2. _Illustrations from the Moral Law_ (vv. 21-48).

The selection of illustrative instances is made with consummate skill.

Our Lord, avoiding that which is specially Jewish in its interest,

treats of matters that are of world-wide importance. He deals with the

broadest principles of righteousness as adapted to the universal

conscience of mankind, starting at the lowest point of mere earthly

morality and rising to the very highest development of Christian

character, thus leading up to the magnificent conclusion: "Be ye

therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect."

He begins with the crime which the natural conscience most strongly

and instinctively condemns, the crime of murder; and shows that the

scribes and Pharisees, and those who had been like them in bygone

days, really destroyed the sixth commandment by limiting its range to

the muscles, so that, if there were no actual killing, the commandment

was not broken; whereas its true sphere was the heart, the essence of

the forbidden crime being found in unjustifiable anger, even though no

word is uttered or muscle moved,--a view of the case which ought to

have been suggested to the intelligent student of the law by such

words as these: "Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart" (Lev.

xix. 17); or again: "Whoso killeth his neighbour ignorantly, whom he

hated not in time past, ... is not worthy of death, inasmuch as he

hated him not in time past" (Deut. xix. 4). Hatred in the heart, then,

is murder. How searching! And how terribly severe the sentence! Even

in its least aggravated form it is the same as that decreed against

the actual shedding of blood. All the three sentences are

death-penalties, only there are aggravations in the penalty where

there are aggravations in the offence. Such is the Saviour's teaching

on the great subject of sin. Yet there are those who imagine that the

Sermon on the Mount is all the gospel they need!

The two practical applications which follow press the searching

subject home. The one has reference to the Throne of Grace, and

teaches that all offences against a brother must be put away before

approaching it. The other has reference to the Throne of Judgment, and

teaches by a familiar illustration drawn from common experience in the

courts of Palestine that it is an awful thing to think of standing

there with the memory of a single angry feeling that had not been

forgiven and utterly removed (v. 26).

The crime of adultery furnishes the next illustration; and He deals

with it on the same lofty principles and with the same terrible

severity. He shows that this crime, too, is of the heart--that even a

wanton look is a commission of it; and again follows up His searching

exposition by a twofold practical application, first showing that

personal purity must be maintained at any cost (vv. 29, 30), and then

guarding the sacredness of home, by that exaltation of the marriage

bond which has secured the emancipation of woman and her elevation to

her proper sphere, and kept in check those frightful evils which are

ever threatening to defile the pure and sacred spring from which

society derives its life and sustenance (vv. 31, 32).

Next comes the crime of perjury--a compound sin, which breaks at the

same time two commandments of the Decalogue, the third and the ninth.

Here, again, our Lord shows that, if only due homage is paid in the

heart to reverence and to truth, all swearing is superseded. Let a man

habitually live in the fear of the Lord all the day long, and "his

word is as good as his oath"--he will always speak the truth, and will

be incapable of taking the name of the Lord in vain. It is of course

to be remembered that these are the laws of the kingdom of Christ; not

laws meant for the kingdoms of this world, which have to do with men

of all sorts, but for a kingdom made up of those who hunger and thirst

after righteousness, who seek and find purity of heart. This passage

accordingly has no bearing on the procedure of secular courts of

justice. But, though the use of oaths may still be a necessity in the

world, in the kingdom of heaven they have no place. The simple "Yea,

yea," "Nay, nay," is quite enough where there is truth in the inward

parts and the fear of God before the eyes; and the feeling of

reverence, not only for God Himself but for all the works of His

hands, will effectually prevent the most distant approach to

profanity.

The sin of revenge furnishes the next illustration. The Pharisaic

perversion of the old law actually sanctioned private revenge, on the

ground of a statute intended for the guidance of the courts of

justice, and given for the sake of curbing the revengeful spirit which

without it would lead a prosecutor to demand that his enemy should

suffer more than he had inflicted. In this way they really destroyed

that part of the Mosaic legislation, whereas He fulfilled it by

developing still further,--bringing, in fact, to perfection,--that

spirit of humanity which had dictated the law at the first. The true

spirit of the Mosaic legislation was to discourage private revenge by

assigning such cases to the courts, and curbing it still further by

the limitation of the penalty imposed. Was not this spirit most nobly

fulfilled, carried to its highest development, when the Saviour laid

it down as the law of His kingdom that our revenge is to be the

returning of good for evil?

The four practical illustrations (vv. 39-42) have been a source of

difficulty, but only to those who forget that our Saviour is all the

while warning against "the letter that killeth," and showing the need

of catching "the spirit" of a commandment which "giveth life" to it.

To deal with these illustrations according to the letter, as telling

us exactly what to do in particular cases, is not to fulfil but to

destroy the Saviour's words. The great thing, therefore, is to catch

their spirit; then they will be found of use, not for so many

specified cases, but for all cases whatever. As an illustration of

the difficulties to which we refer, mention may be made of the

prejudice against the passage which suggests the turning of the other

cheek, on the ground that it encourages a craven spirit. Take it as a

definite command, and this would be in many cases the result. It would

be the result wherever fear or pusillanimity was the motive. But where

is there in all this passage the least trace of fear or pusillanimity?

It is all love and magnanimity. It is the very antipodes of the craven

spirit. It is the heroism of self-denying love!

The last illustration cuts at the root of all sin and crime, the

tap-root of selfishness. The scribes and Pharisees had made use of

those regulations, most needful at the time, which separated Israel

from other nations, as an excuse for restricting the range of love to

those prepared to render an equivalent. Thus that wonderful statute of

the old legislation, "Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself," was

actually made a minister to selfishness; so that, instead of leading

them to a life above the world, it left them not a whit better than

the lowest and most selfish of the people. "If ye love them which love

you, what reward have ye? Do not even the publicans the same?" Thus

was the noble "royal law according to the Scripture" destroyed by the

petty quibbling use of the word "neighbour." Our Lord fulfilled it by

giving to the word neighbour its proper meaning, its widest extent,

including even those who have wronged us in thought or word or deed,

"I say unto you, Love your _enemies_, bless them that curse you,

do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully

use you, and persecute you."

How lofty, how far beyond the reach of the natural man!--but not

impossible, or it would not have been demanded. It is one of the

things of the kingdom concerning which the assurance is given later

on: "Ask, and ye shall receive; seek, and ye shall find." Still, the

Master knows full well that it is no small demand He is making of poor

human nature. So at this point He leads our thoughts upward to our

Father in heaven, suggesting in that relationship the possibility of

its attainment (for why should not a child be like its father?) and

the only example possible, for this was a range of righteousness

beyond the reach of all that had gone before--He Himself as the Son of

the Father would later set it forth before the eyes of men in all its

lustre. But that time is yet to come, and meantime He can only point

upward to the Highest, and urge them to this loftiest height of

righteousness by the tender plea, "That ye may be the children of your

Father which is in heaven: for He maketh His sun to rise on the evil

and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust."

How beautiful and expressive are these symbols from nature, and how

encouraging the interpretation of nature His use of them suggests! And

what shall we say of their suggestiveness in the higher sphere of the

spirit? Already the Sun of Righteousness is rising with healing in His

wings; and in due time the rain of the Spirit will fall in fulness of

blessing; so shall His disciples receive all that is needful to raise

them to the very highest in character and conduct, in beatitude and

righteousness; and accordingly their Master may well finish His whole

exposition of the morals of the kingdom with the stirring, stimulating

call, "Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven

is perfect."

Expositor's Bible: The Gospel of Matthew · 第 19 / 56 题