R.B.

Dear friend, I will say; for I feel it must be something as good as

friendship that can forgive and understand this silence, so much like

the veriest human kind of ingratitude. When I look back and think--all

this time after that letter, and not a sign made--I wonder. Yet,

if you knew! First of all, we were silent because we waited for

information which you seemed to desire.... Then there were sadder

reasons. Poor _Aurora_, that you were so more than kind to (oh, how

can I think of it?), has been steeped in tears, and some of them of a

very bitter sort. Your letter was addressed to my husband, you knowing

by your delicate true instinct where your praise would give most

pleasure; but I believe Robert had not the heart to write when I felt

that I should not have the spirits to add a word in the proper key.

When we came here from Florence a few months ago to get repose and

cheerfulness from the sight of the mountains, we said to ourselves

that we would speak to you at ease--instead of which the word was

taken from our own mouth, and we have done little but sit by sick beds

and meditate on gastric fevers. So disturbed we have been--so sad! our

darling precious child the last victim. To see him lying still on his

golden curls, with cheeks too scarlet to suit the poor patient eyes,

looking so frightfully like an angel! It was very hard. But this is

over, I do thank God, and we are on the point of carrying back our

treasure with us to Florence to-morrow, quite recovered, if a little

thinner and weaker, and the young voice as merry as ever. You are

aware that that child I am more proud of than twenty _Auroras_, even

after Leigh Hunt has praised them. He is eight years old, has never

been '_crammed_', but reads English, Italian, French, German, and

plays the piano--then, is the sweetest child! sweeter than he looks.

When he was ill, he said to me, 'You pet! don't be unhappy about

_me_. Think it's a boy in the street, and be a little sorry, but not

unhappy.' Who could not be unhappy, I wonder?

I never saw your book called the _Religion of the Heart._ It's the

only book of yours I never saw, and I mean to wipe out that reproach

on the soonest day possible. I receive more dogmas, perhaps (my

'perhaps' being in the dark rather), than you do. I believe in the

divinity of Jesus Christ in the intensest sense--that he was God

absolutely. But for the rest, I am very unorthodox--about the spirit,

the flesh, and the devil, and if you would not let me sit by you, a

great many churchmen wouldn't; in fact, churches do all of them, as at

present constituted, seem too narrow and low to hold true Christianity

in its proximate developments. I, at least, cannot help believing them

so.

My dear friend, can we dare, after our sins against you--can we dare

_wish_ for a letter from you sometimes? Ask, we dare not. May God

bless you. Even if you had not praised me and made me so grateful,

I should be grateful to you for three things--for your poetry (that

first), then for Milton's hair, and then for the memory I have of

our visit to you, when you sat in that chair and spoke so mildly and

deeply at once.

Let me be ever affectionately yours,

Selected English Letters (XV-XIX Centuries) · 第 383 / 402 题