TO EDWARD MOXON

_Recollections of the Lambs_

Keswick, 2 _Feb._ 1836.

My dear sir,

I have been too closely engaged in clearing off the second volume of

Cowper to reply to your inquiries concerning poor Lamb sooner. His

acquaintance with Coleridge began at Christ's Hospital; Lamb was

some two years, I think, his junior. Whether he was ever one of the

_Grecians_ there, might be ascertained, I suppose, by inquiring. My

own impression is, that he was not. Coleridge introduced me to him

in the winter of 1794-5, and to George Dyer also, from whom, if his

memory has not failed, you might probably learn more of Lamb's early

history than from any other person. Lloyd, Wordsworth, and Hazlitt

became known to him through their connexion with Coleridge.

When I saw the family (one evening only, and at that time), they were

lodging somewhere near Lincoln's Inn, on the western side (I forget

the street), and were evidently in uncomfortable circumstances. The

father and mother were both living; and I have some dim recollection

of the latter's invalid appearance. The father's senses had failed him

before that time. He published some poems in quarto. Lamb showed me

once an imperfect copy: the _Sparrow's Wedding_ was the title of the

longest piece, and this was the author's favourite; he liked, in his

dotage, to hear Charles read it.

His most familiar friend, when I first saw him, was White, who held

some office at Christ's Hospital, and continued intimate with him as

long as he lived. You know what Elia says of him. He and Lamb were

joint authors of the _Original Letters of Falstaff_. Lamb, I believe,

first appeared as an author in the second edition of Coleridge's

_Poems_ (Bristol, 1797), and, secondly, in the little volume of blank

verse with Lloyd (1798). Lamb, Lloyd, and White were inseparable in

1798; the two latter at one time lodged together, though no two men

could be imagined more unlike each other. Lloyd had no drollery in his

nature; White seemed to have nothing else. You will easily understand

how Lamb could sympathize with both.

Lloyd, who used to form sudden friendships, was all but a stranger

to me, when unexpectedly he brought Lamb down to visit me at a little

village (Burton) near Christchurch, in Hampshire, where I was lodging

in a very humble cottage. This was in the summer of 1797, and then, or

in the following year, my correspondence with Lamb began. I saw more

of him in 1802 than at any other time, for I was then six months

resident in London. His visit to this county was before I came to it;

it must have been either in that or in the following year: it was to

Lloyd and to Coleridge.

I had forgotten one of his schoolfellows, who is still living--C.V.

Le Grice, a clergyman at or near Penzance. From him you might learn

something of his boyhood.

Cottle has a good likeness of Lamb, in chalk, taken by an artist named

Robert Hancock, about the year 1798. It looks older than Lamb was at

that time; but he was old-looking.

Coleridge introduced him to Godwin, shortly after the first number

of the _Anti-Jacobin Magazine and Review_ was published, with a

caricature of Gillray's, in which Coleridge and I were introduced with

asses' heads, and Lloyd and Lamb as toad and frog. Lamb got warmed

with whatever was on the table, became disputatious, and said things

to Godwin which made him quietly say, 'Pray, Mr. Lamb, are you toad

or frog?' Mrs. Coleridge will remember the scene, which was to her

sufficiently uncomfortable. But the next morning S.T.C. called on

Lamb, and found Godwin breakfasting with him, from which time their

intimacy began.

His angry letter to me in the _Magazine_ arose out of a notion that

an expression of mine in the _Quarterly Review_ would hurt the sale of

_Elia_; some one, no doubt, had said that it would. I meant to serve

the book, and very well remember how the offence happened. I had

written that it wanted nothing to render it altogether delightful but

a _saner_ religious feeling. _This_ would have been the proper word if

any other person had written the book. Feeling its extreme unfitness

as soon as it was written, I altered it immediately for the first word

which came into my head, intending to remodel the sentence when it

should come to me in the proof; and that proof never came. There can

be no objection to your printing all that passed upon the occasion,

beginning with the passage in the _Quarterly Review_, and giving his

letter.

I have heard Coleridge say that, in a fit of derangement, Lamb fancied

himself to be young Norval. He told me this in relation to one of his

poems.

If you will print my lines to him upon his _Album Verses_, I will

send you a corrected copy. You received his letters, I trust, which

Cuthbert took with him to town in October. I wish they had been more,

and wish, also, that I had more to tell you concerning him, and what

I have told were of more value. But it is from such fragments of

recollection, and such imperfect notices, that the materials for

biography must, for the most part, be collected.

=CHARLES LAMB=

1775-1834

Selected English Letters (XV-XIX Centuries) · 第 294 / 402 题