"I have been saying too much, perhaps, concerning myself: but my design in

it was not to make a parade of my eloquence and ability, which I have no

temptation to do, but only to specify the pains and labour which I have

taken to improve it. After spending the five succeeding years in pleading

a variety of causes, and with the ablest Advocates of the time, I was

declared an Aedile, and undertook the patronage of the Sicilians against

Hortensius, who was then one of the Consuls elect. But as the subject of

our conversation not only requires an historical detail of Orators, but

such preceptive remarks as may be necessary to elucidate their characters;

it will not be improper to make some observations of this kind upon that

of Hortensius. After his appointment to the consulship (very probably,

because he saw none of consular dignity who were able to rival him, and

despised the competition of others of inferior rank) he began to remit

that intense application which he had hitherto persevered in from his

childhood; and having settled himself in very affluent circumstances, he

chose to live for the future what he thought an _easy_ life, but which, in

truth, was rather an indolent one. In the three succeeding years, the

beauty of his colouring was so much impaired, as to be very perceptible to

a skilful connoisseur, though not to a common observer. After that, he

grew every day more unlike himself than before, not only in other parts of

Eloquence, but by a gradual decay of the former celerity and elegant

texture of his language. I, at the same time, spared no pains to improve

and enlarge my talents, such as they were, by every exercise that was

proper for the purpose, but particularly by that of writing. Not to

mention several other advantages I derived from it, I shall only observe,

that about this time, and but a very few years after my Aedileship, I was

declared the first Praetor, by the unanimous suffrages of my fellow-

citizens. For, by my diligence and assiduity as a Pleader, and my accurate

way of speaking, which was rather superior to the ordinary style of the

Bar, the novelty of my Eloquence had engaged the attention, and secured

the good wishes of the public. But I will say nothing of myself: I will

confine my discourse to our other Speakers, among whom there is not one

who has gained more than a common acquaintance with those parts of

literature, which feed the springs of Eloquence:--not one who has been

thoroughly nurtured at the breast of Philosophy, which is the mother of

every excellence either in deed or speech:--not one who has acquired an

accurate knowledge of the Civil Law, which is so necessary for the

management even of private causes, and to direct the judgment of an

Orator:--not one who is a complete master of the Roman History, which

would enable us, on many occasions, to appeal to the venerable evidence of

the dead:--not one who can entangle his opponent in such a neat and

humourous manner, as to relax the severity of the Judges into a smile or

an open laugh:--not one who knows how to dilate and expand his subject, by

reducing it from the limited considerations of time, and person, to some

general and indefinite topic;--not one who knows how to enliven it by an

agreeable digression: not one who can rouse the indignation of the Judge,

or extort from him the tear of compassion;--or who can influence and bend

his soul (which is confessedly the capital perfection of an Orator) in

such a manner as shall best suit his purpose.

"When Hortensius, therefore, the once eloquent and admired Hortensius, had

almost vanished from the Forum, my appointment to the Consulship, which

happened about six years after his own promotion to that office, revived

his dying emulation; for he was unwilling that after I had equalled him in

rank and dignity, I should become his superior in any other respect. But

in the twelve succeeding years, by a mutual deference to each other's

abilities, we united our efforts at the Bar in the most amicable manner:

and my Consulship, which at first had given a short alarm to his jealousy,

afterward cemented our friendship, by the generous candor with which he

applauded my conduct. But our emulous efforts were exerted in the most

conspicuous manner, just before the commencement of that unhappy period,

when Eloquence herself was confounded and terrified by the din of arms

into a sudden and a total silence: for after Pompey had proposed and

carried a law, which allowed even the party accused but three hours to

make his defence, I appeared, (though comparatively as a mere _noviciate_

by this new regulation) in a number of causes which, in fact, were become

perfectly the same, or very nearly so; most of which, my Brutus, you was

present to hear, as having been my partner and fellow-advocate in many of

them, though you pleaded several by yourself; and Hortensius, though he

died a short time afterwards, bore his share in these limited efforts. He

began to plead about ten years before the time of your birth; and in his

sixty-fourth year, but a very few days before his death, he was engaged

with you in the defence of Appius, your father-in-law. As to our

respective talents, the Orations we have published will enable posterity

to form a proper judgment of them. But if we mean to inquire, why

Hortensius was more admired for his Eloquence in the younger part of his

life, than in his latter years, we shall find it owing to the following

causes. The first was, that an _Asiatic_ style is more allowable in a

young man than in an old one. Of this there are two different kinds.

"The former is sententious and sprightly, and abounds in those turns of

sentiment which are not so much distinguished by their weight and solidity

as by their neatness and elegance; of this cast was Timaeus the Historian,

and the two Orators so much talked of in our younger days, Hierocles the

Alabandean, and his brother Menecles, but particularly the latter; both

whose Orations may be reckoned master-pieces of the kind. The other sort

is not so remarkable for the plenty and richness of its sentiments, as for

its rapid volubility of expression, which at present is the ruling taste

in Asia; but, besides it's uncommon fluency, it is recommended by a choice

of words which are peculiarly delicate and ornamental:--of this kind were

Aeschylus the Cnidian, and my cotemporary Aeschines the Milesian; for they

had an admirable command of language, with very little elegance of

sentiment. These showy kinds of eloquence are agreeable enough in young

people; but they are entirely destitute of that gravity and composure

which befits a riper age. As Hortensius therefore excelled in both, he was

heard with applause in the earlier part of his life. For he had all that

fertility and graceful variety of sentiment which distinguished the

character of Menecles: but, as in Menecles, so in him, there were many

turns of sentiment which were more delicate and entertaining than really

useful, or indeed sometimes convenient. His language also was brilliant

and rapid, and yet perfectly neat and accurate; but by no means agreeable

to men of riper years. I have often seen it received by Philippus with the

utmost derision, and, upon some occasions, with a contemptuous

indignation: but the younger part of the audience admired it, and the

populace were highly pleased with it. In his youth, therefore, he met the

warmest approbation of the public, and maintained his post with ease as

the first Orator in the Forum. For the style he chose to speak in, though

it has little weight, or authority, appeared very suitable to his age: and

as it discovered in him the most visible marks of genius and application,

and was recommended by the numerous cadence of his periods, he was heard

with universal applause. But when the honours he afterwards rose to, and

the dignity of his years required something more serious and composed, he

still continued to appear in the same character, though it no longer

became him: and as he had, for some considerable time, intermitted those

exercises, and relaxed that laborious attention which had once

distinguished him, though his former neatness of expression, and

luxuriancy of sentiment still remained, they were stripped of those

brilliant ornaments they had been used to wear. For this reason, perhaps,

my Brutus, he appeared less pleasing to you than he would have done, if

you had been old enough to hear him, when he was fired with emulation and

flourished in the full bloom of his Eloquence.

"I am perfectly sensible," said Brutus, "of the justice of your remarks;

and yet I have always looked upon Hortensius as a great Orator, but

especially when he pleaded for Messala, in the time of your absence."--"I

have often heard of it," replied I, "and his Oration, which was afterwards

published, they say, in the very same words in which he delivered it, is

no way inferior to the character you give it. Upon the whole, then, his

reputation flourished from the time of Crassus and Scaevola (reckoning

from the Consulship of the former) to the Consulship of Paullus and

Marcellus: and I held out in the same career of glory from the

Dictatorship of Sylla, to the period I have last, mentioned. Thus the

Eloquence of Hortensius was extinguished by his _own_ death, and mine by

that of the Commonwealth."--"Ominate more favourably, I beg of you,"

cried Brutus.--"As favourably as you please," said I, "and that not so

much upon my own account, as your's. But _his_ death was truly fortunate,

who did not live to behold the miseries, which he had long foreseen. For

we often lamented, between ourselves, the misfortunes which hung over the

State, when we discovered the seeds of a civil war in the insatiable

ambition of a few private Citizens, and saw every hope of an accommodation

excluded by the rashness and precipitancy of our public counsels. But the

felicity which always marked his life, seems to have exempted him, by a

seasonable death, from the calamities that followed. But, as after the

decease of Hortensius, we seem to have been left, my Brutus, as the sole

guardians of an _orphan_ Eloquence, let us cherish her, within our own

walls at least, with a generous fidelity: let us discourage the addresses

of her worthless, and impertinent suitors; let us preserve her pure and

unblemished in all her virgin charms, and secure her, to the utmost of our

ability, from the lawless violence of every armed ruffian. I must own,

however, though I am heartily grieved that I entered so late upon the road

of life, as to be overtaken by a gloomy night of public distress, before I

had finished my journey; that I am not a little relieved by the tender

consolation which you administered to me in your very agreeable letters;--

in which you tell me I ought to recollect my courage, since my past

transactions are such as will speak for me when I am silent, and survive

my death,--and such as, if the Gods permit, will bear an ample testimony

to the prudence and integrity of my public counsels, by the final

restoration of the Republic:--or, if otherwise, by burying me in the

ruins of my country. But when I look upon _you_, my Brutus, it fills me

with anguish to reflect that, in the vigour of your youth, and when you

was making the most rapid progress in the road to fame, your career was

suddenly stopped by the fatal overthrow of the Commonwealth. This unhappy

circumstance has stung me to the heart; and not _me_ only; but my worthy

friend here, who has the same affection for you, and the same esteem for

your merit which I have. We have the warmest wishes for your happiness,

and heartily pray that you may reap the rewards of your excellent virtues,

and live to find a Republic in which you will be able, not only to revive,

but even to add to the fame of your illustrious ancestors. For the Forum

was your birth-right, your native theatre of action; and you was the only

person that entered it, who had not only formed his Elocution by a

rigorous course of private practice, but enriched his Oratory with the

furniture of philosophical Science, and thus united the highest virtue to

the most consummate Eloquence. Your situation, therefore, wounds us with

the double anxiety, that _you_ are deprived of the _Republic_, and the

Republic of _you_. But still continue, my Brutus, (notwithstanding the

career of your genius has been checked by the rude shock of our public

distresses) continue to pursue your favourite studies, and endeavour (what

you have almost, or rather intirely effected already) to distinguish

yourself from the promiscuous crowd of Pleaders with which I have loaded

the little history I have been giving you. For it would ill befit you,

(richly furnished as you are with those liberal Arts, which, unable to

acquire at home, you imported from that celebrated city which has always

been revered as the seat of learning) to pass after all as an ordinary

Pleader. For to what purposes have you studied under Pammenes, the most

eloquent man in Greece; or what advantage have you derived from the

discipline of _the old_ Academy, and it's hereditary master Aristus (my

guest, and very intimate acquaintance) if you still rank yourself in the

common class of Orators? Have we not seen that a whole age could scarcely

furnish two Speakers who really excelled in their profession? Among a

crowd of cotemporaries, Galba, for instance, was the only Orator of

distinction: for old Cato (we are informed) was obliged to yield to his

superior merit, as were likewise his two juniors Lepidus, and Carbo. But,

in a public Harangue, the style of his successors the Gracchi was far more

easy and lively: and yet, even in their time, the Roman Eloquence had not

reached its perfection. Afterwards came Antonius, and Crassus; and then

Cotta, Sulpicius, Hortensius, and--but I say no more: I can only add, that

if I had been so fortunate, &c, &c,"--[_Caetera defunt._]

THE ORATOR,

BY MARCUS TULLIUS CICERO;

ADDRESSED TO MARCUS BRUTUS;

And now first translated from the Original Latin.

"Song charms the Sense, but Eloquence the Soul."

MILTON.

THE ORATOR.

Which, my Brutus, would be the most difficult talk,--to decline answering

a request which you have so often repeated, or to gratify it to your

satisfaction,--I have long been at a loss to determine. I should be

extremely sorry to deny any thing to a friend for whom I have the warmest

esteem, and who, I am sensible, has an equal affection for me;--

especially, as he has only desired me to undertake a subject which may

justly claim my attention. But to delineate a character, which it would be

very difficult, I will not say to _acquire_, but even to _comprehend_ in

its full extent, I thought was too bold an undertaking for him who reveres

the censure of the wife and learned. For considering the great diversity

of manner among the ablest Speakers, how exceedingly difficult must it be

to determine which is best, and give a finished model of Eloquence? This,

however, in compliance with your repeated solicitations, I shall now

attempt;--not so much from any hopes of succeeding, as from a strong

inclination to make the trial. For I had rather, by yielding to your

wishes, give you room to complain of my insufficiency; than, by a

peremptory denial, tempt you to question my friendship.

You desire to know, then, (and you have often repeated your request) what

kind of Eloquence I most approve, and can look upon to be so highly

finished, as to require no farther improvement. But should I be able to

answer your expectations, and display, in his full perfection, the Orator

you enquire after; I am afraid I shall retard the industry of many, who,

enfeebled by despair, will no longer attempt what they think themselves

incapable of attaining. It is but reasonable, however, that all those who

covet what is excellent, and which cannot be acquired without the greatest

application, should exert their utmost. But if any one is deficient in

capacity, and destitute of that admirable force of genius which Nature

bestows upon her favourites, or has been denied the advantages of a

liberal education, _let him make the progress he is able_. For while we

are driving to overtake the foremost, it is no disgrace to be found among

the _second_ class, or even the _third_. Thus, for instance, among the

poets, we respect the merit not only of a _Homer_ (that I may confine

myself to the Greeks) or of _Archilochus, Sophocles_, or _Pindar_, but of

many others who occupied the second, or even a lower place. In Philosophy

also the diffusive majesty of Plato has not deterred _Aristotle_ from

entering the list; nor has _Aristotle_ himself, with all his wonderful

knowledge and fertility of thought, disheartened the endeavours of others.

Nay, men of an elevated genius have not only disdained to be intimidated

from the pursuit of literary fame;--but the very artists and mechanics

have never relinquished their profession, because they were unable to

equal the beauty of that _Iasylus_ which we have seen at Rhodes, or of the

celebrated _Venus_ in the island of _Coos_:--nor has the noble image of

Olympian _Jove_, or the famous statue of the Man at Arms, deterred others

from making trial of their abilities, and exerting their skill to the

utmost. Accordingly, such a large number of them has appeared, and each

has performed so well in his own way, that we cannot help being pleased

with their productions, notwithstanding our admiration at the nobler

efforts of the great masters of the chissel.

But among the Orators, I mean those of Greece, it is astonishing how much

one of them has surpassed the rest:--and yet, though there was a

_Demosthenes_, there were even _then_ many other Orators of considerable

merit;--and such there were before he made his appearance, nor have they

been wanting since. There is, therefore, no reason why those who have

devoted themselves to the study of Eloquence, should suffer their hopes to

languish, or their industry to flag. For, in the first place, even that

which is most excellent is not to be despaired of;--and, in all worthy

attempts, that which is next to what is best is great and noble.

But in sketching out the character of a compleat Orator, it is possible I

may exhibit such a one as hath never _yet_ existed. For I am not to point

out the _Speaker_, but to delineate the _Eloquence_ than which nothing can

be more perfect of the kind:--an Eloquence which hath blazed forth through

a whole Harangue but seldom, and, it may be, never; but only here and

there like a transient gleam, though in some Orators more frequently, and

in others, perhaps, more sparingly.

My opinion, then, is,--that there is no human production of any kind, so

compleatly beautiful, than which there is not a _something_ still more

beautiful, from which the other is copied like a portrait from real life,

and which can be discerned neither by our eyes nor ears, nor any of our

bodily senses, but is visible only to thought and imagination. Though the

statues, therefore, of Phidias, and the other images above-mentioned, are

all so wonderfully charming, that nothing can be found which is more

excellent of the kind; we may still, however, _suppose_ a something which

is more exquisite, and more compleat. For it must not be thought that the

ingenious artist, when he was sketching out the form of a Jupiter, or a

Minerva, borrowed the likeness from any particular object;--but a certain

admirable semblance of beauty was present to his mind, which he viewed and

dwelt upon, and by which his skill and his hand were guided. As,

therefore, in mere bodily shape and figure there is a kind of perfection,

to whose ideal appearance every production which falls under the notice of

the eye is referred by imitation; so the semblance of what is perfect in

Oratory may become visible to the mind, and the ear may labour to catch a

likeness. These primary forms of thing are by Plato (the father of science

and good language) called _Ideas_; and he tells us they have neither

beginning nor end, but are co-eval with reason and intelligence; while

every thing besides has a derived, and a transitory existence, and passes

away and decays, so as to cease in a short time to be the thing it was.

Whatever, therefore, may be discussed by reason and method, should be

constantly reduced to the primary form or semblance of it's respective

genus.

I am sensible that this introduction, as being derived not from the

principles of Eloquence, but from the deepest recesses of Philosophy, will

excite the censure, or at least the wonder of many, who will think it both

unfashionable and intricate. For they will either be at a loss to discover

it's connection with my subject, (though they will soon be convinced by

what follows, that, if it appears to be far-fetched, it is not so without

reason;)--or they will blame me, perhaps, for deserting the beaten track,

and striking out into a new one. But I am satisfied that I often appear to

advance novelties, when I offer sentiments which are, indeed, of a much

earlier date, but happen to be generally unknown: and I frankly

acknowledge that I came forth an Orator, (if indeed I am one, or whatever

else I may be deemed) not from the school of the Rhetoricians, but from

the spacious walks of the Academy. For these are the theatres of

diversified and extensive arguments which were first impressed with the

foot-steps of Plato; and his Dissertations, with those of other

Philosophers, will be found of the greatest utility to an Orator, both for

his exercise and improvement; because all the fertility, and, as it were,

the materials of Eloquence, are to be derived from thence;--but not,

however, sufficiently prepared for the business of the Forum, which, as

themselves have frequently boasted, they abandoned to the _rustic Muses_

of the vulgar! Thus the Eloquence of the Forum, despised and rejected by

the Philosophers, was bereaved of her greatest advantages:--but,

nevertheless, being arrayed in all the brilliance of language and

sentiment, she made a figure among the populace, nor feared the censure of

the judicious few. By this means, the learned became destitute of a

popular Eloquence, and the Orators of polite learning.

We may, therefore, consider it as a capital maxim, (the truth of which

will be more easily understood in the sequel) that the eloquent Speaker we

are enquiring after, cannot be formed without the assistance of

Philosophy. I do not mean that this alone is sufficient; but only (for it

is sometimes necessary to compare great things to small) that it will

contribute to improve him in the same manner as the _Palaestra_ [Footnote:

The _Palaestra_ was a place set apart for public exercises, such as

wrestling, running, fencing, &c. the frequent performance of which

contributed much to a graceful carriage of the body, which is a necessary

accomplishment in a good Actor.] does an Actor; because without

Philosophy, no man can speak fully and copiously upon a variety of

important subjects which come under the notice of an Orator. Accordingly,

in the _Phaedrus_ of Plato, it is observed by Socrates that the great

_Pericles_ excelled all the Speakers of his time, because he had been a

hearer of _Anaxagoras_ the Naturalist, from whom he supposes that he not

only borrowed many excellent and sublime ideas, but a certain richness and

fertility of language, and (what in Eloquence is of the utmost

consequence) the various arts either of soothing or alarming each

particular passion. The same might be said of _Demosthenes_, whose letters

will satisfy us, how assiduously he attended the Lectures of Plato. For

without the instruction of Philosophy, we can neither discover what is the

_Genus_ or the _Species_ to which any thing belongs, nor explain the

nature of it by a just definition, or an accurate analysis of its parts;--

nor can we distinguish between what is true and false, or foresee the

consequences, point out the inconsistencies, and dissolve the ambiguities

which may lie in the case before us. But as to Natural Philosophy (the

knowledge of which will supply us with the richest treasures of

Elocution;)--and as to life, and it's various duties, and the great

principles of morality,--what is it possible either to express or

understand aright, without a large acquaintance with these? To such

various and important accomplishments we must add the innumerable

ornaments of language, which, at the time above mentioned, were the only

weapons which the Masters of Rhetoric could furnish. This is the reason

why that genuine, and perfect Eloquence we are speaking of, has been yet

attained by no one; because the Art of _Reasoning_ has been supposed to be

one thing, and that of _Speaking_ another; and we have had recourse to

different Instructors for the knowledge of things and words.

Cicero's Brutus or History of Famous Orators; also His Orator, or Accomplished Speaker. · 第 10 / 19 段