S. J. TILDEN TO THE EDITORS OF THE "EVENING POST"

"2 UNION PLACE. TUESDAY EVENG.

"_Oct. 9th, 1860_.

_"To the Editors of the 'Evening Post':_

"GENTLEMEN,--You politely offer to publish in your columns a speech

of mine which you seem to think was not adequately developed at the

Cooper Institute last evening, and you add that my friends among your

readers 'would be glad to know how' I 'have reasoned' myself into the

associations in which I stand on the Presidential question.

"If I had a speech already written I would at once avail myself of

the opportunity of submitting my views on public affairs to a mass of

readers, among which are many cultivated intellects and some friends

of my earlier years who, I respectfully say I think, are widely and

dangerously wrong in their present political action. I have but the

intervals of exhausting daily engagements in which to prepare a speech;

but if after this explanation your offer shall continue open, I will

endeavor within the next few days to write out in a condensed form

what I think ought to be said, not to my friends only, but to all our

citizens touching the present state of the country. If, indeed, it can

be justly said that I have helped to lead the _Evening Post_ into any

'heresies,' I acknowledge the sacred duty of showing it a 'decent way

out' of them.

"With much consideration, I remain,

"S. J. TILDEN."

"Though we invited Mr. Tilden to give us the speech which he proposed

to address to his spectators--they would not permit him to call them

his audience--at the Cooper Institute, we are quite willing to extend

the courtesy to anything he may choose to offer us in which he thinks

the public has an interest. The readers of the _Evening Post_ know much

better than the crowd he tried to address at the Cooper Institute that

Mr. Tilden never writes or speaks without having something to say worth

hearing, though they have not lately been unfortunate enough to agree

with him on Federal politics."

The foregoing letter, with the editorial comment which follows it,

appeared in the _Evening Post_ October 10, 1860.

The occasion which provoked it was the following account, which

appeared a day or two previous in the _Evening Post_, of a meeting

at the Cooper Union of malcontents, having little in common to unite

them but their hostility to the party which had nominated Abraham

Lincoln for President. They were mostly the unaccounted-for _débris_

of the old Whig party, who tried to disguise themselves by taking the

name of "Merchants of New York." Mr. Tilden was invited to speak, but

this motley audience did not care to listen long to so prominent a

political partisan of Jackson and Van Buren, who had also been the most

formidable critic of all Whig measures during all their successive

administrations:

"THE TREMENDOUS DEMONSTRATION

"The 'Dry-Goods party,' as by general consent the fusionists have come

to be designated, held what they called a 'Union meeting' last night at

the Cooper Institute. They did not meet at Tammany Hall, for obvious

reasons, though it must have made some of the gentlemen who contributed

towards the expense of the entertainment feel a little queer when they

found themselves associating politically with a class of men who could

not be persuaded to put a foot inside of the old Wigwam. It has been

observed that political parties, as they decline in strength, lengthen

the list of officers supposed to officiate at their public gatherings,

just as the shadows of mountains lengthen as the sun goes down. The

Dry-Goods party did not attempt to be an exception; on the contrary,

they seem to have made all of their party vice-presidents that they

did not make president and secretaries. In looking over the list of

gentlemen who figure on this occasion, we could not but be struck with

what Clay called the 'mutability of all human opinion.' It seemed as if

the milky portion of the old barn-burning party of '48 which had soured

from the effects of Republican thunder, had been specially served up

for the public entertainment. There was Dix, who ran for Governor

with Van Buren in 1848 against Cass, nominated for chairman by Wilson

G. Hunt, largely in the dry-goods line, who supported Van Buren and

free soil as zealously and liberally as he now supports Breckinridge,

Douglas, Bell, Sam & Co.

"Our old friend Tilden, who stood at the wheel during all those

troublous times; who was one of the counsel for the Barnburners in the

Baltimore convention of 1848, and who helped to lead the _Evening Post_

into all its free-soil heresies without ever showing it any decent way

out of them, offered the resolutions and made a short speech. It would

have been longer, but the audience wished to hear Wood. Either Wood or

a song they must have, and so Mr. Tilden retired with his speech just

as good as new, and, as it appeared, too good for his audience, that

they might hear a song from a Mr. Cosgrove, Wood being returned by the

officer 'not found.' The preference for Wood is explained, perhaps,

by the fact that the first vice-president, W. B. Astor, was one of

the ten or dozen gentlemen who certified to Mayor Wood's character

when a candidate a second time for the '_mayorality_'--as Mr. Wood is

in the habit of spelling the dignity he at present enjoys--and who

recommended him warmly to the suffrages of the people. All the rest of

the gentlemen who signed that 'character,' Moses Taylor, M. Aspinwall,

the Browns, etc., figure also among the vice-presidents, and it is

not strange, therefore, that a meeting thus officered should prefer a

speech from Fernando Wood to a speech from Samuel J. Tilden.

"Then there was Henry Grinnell, who paid liberally towards raising

the standard of rebellion at the park meeting, held shortly after

the nomination of Cass, in 1848, and whose name was freely used by

the Barnburners until about the time that the Union-saving steamship

companies began to be incorporated and subsidized by Congress. Since

then he has had little or no interest in anything North, this side of

the Arctic circle.

"John Cochrane, Dan Norris, Henry Eveson, William F. Havemeyer,

Stephen Cambreleng, Charles A. Secor, Myndert Van Schaick, whom, to

his great disappointment, the Barnburners failed to elect Mayor of the

city before the days of fusion, T. B. Tappen, John Van Buren, A. B.

Conger, Addison Gardiner, etc., etc., make up the list of distinguished

Barnburners of the milky sort who have 'turned,' and now form the

cheesy pillars and architrave of the Dry-Goods party.

"The speakers for the evening were James W. Gerard and Charles O'Conor,

two of our ablest lawyers, skilled to make the worse appear the better

reason, and, from long professional training, about as much at home on

one side of a question as another. As neither of these gentlemen were

in good standing with the old Democratic party, the first being an old

Whig and the other a fractious and crockery-breaking independent, they

were listened to with patience by an assembly conspicuously impatient

of anything savoring of old-fashioned Democracy.

"What effect the bringing together such a crowd of officers for

such a thin display of speakers will have upon the dry-goods market

will doubtless appear in the column where such reports are usually

chronicled; what effect it will have on the Pennsylvania election will

appear by the returns in to-morrow's _Evening Post_; what effect it

will have upon the vote of this State is of no sort of consequence, for

we were sure of a large majority before it was held, and of course we

may reasonably expect a larger majority now.

"We are sorry about Mr. Tilden's speech. We have no doubt it was a

good one, and as we are the friends of free speech we will publish it

cheerfully in the _Evening Post_ if he will give us the opportunity. It

will reach a great many more of his friends through our columns than

stood within the reach of his voice, and they will all be glad to know

by what process so clever a man has reasoned himself into such bad

company."

Letters and Literary Memorials of Samuel J. Tilden, v. 1 · 第 96 / 348 题