CHAPTER XVII.

THE NINETEENTH CENTURY.

Felicie de Fauveau.--Parentage.--Her Mother a Legitimist.--The

Daughter’s Inheritance of Loyalty.--Removals.--Felicie’s

Studies.--Learns to Model.--Resolves to be a Sculptor.--Labor becoming

to a Gentlewoman.--Her first Works.--Early Triumphs.--Social Circle in

Paris.--Evening Employments.--Revival of a peculiar Taste.--Mediæval

Fashions.--The bronze Lamp.--Equestrian Sketch.--Effect of the

Revolution of 1830.--The two Felicies leave Paris.--A rural

Conspiracy.--A domiciliary Visit.--Escape of the Ladies.--Discovery

and Capture.--The Stratagem at the Inn.--Escape of Madame in

Disguise.--Imprisonment of Mademoiselle.--Works in Prison.--Return

to Paris.--Politics again.--Felicie banished.--Breaks up her

Studio.--Poverty and Privation.--Residence in Florence.--Brighter

Days.--Character of Felicie.--Personal Appearance.--Her Dwelling and

Studio.--Her Works.--The casting of a bronze Statue.--Industry and

Retirement.--“A good Woman and a great Artist.”--ROSA BONHEUR.--Her

Birth in Bordeaux.--Her Father.--Rosa a Dunce in Childhood.--Her

Parrot.--Rambles.--The Spanish Poet.--Removal to Paris.--Revolution

and Misfortune.--Death of Madame Bonheur.--The Children at

School.--Rosa detests Books and loves Roaming.--Remarriage of

Bonheur.--Rosa a Seamstress.--Hates the Occupation.--Prefers turning

the Lathe.--Her Unhappiness.--Placed at a Boarding-school.--Her

Pranks and Caricatures.--Abhorrence of Study.--Mortification at her

Want of fine Clothes.--Resolves to achieve a Name and a Place in the

World.--Discontent and Gloom.--Return home.--Left to herself.--Works

in the Studio.--Her Vocation apparent.--Studies at the Louvre.--Her

Ardor and Application.--The Englishman’s Prophecy.--Rosa vowed to

Art.--Devoted to the Study of Animals.--Excursions in the Country

in search of Models.--Visits the _Abattoirs_.--Study of various

Types.--Visits the Museums and Stables.--Resorts to the horse and

cattle Fairs in male Attire.--Curious Adventures.--Anatomical

Studies.--Advantages of her Excursions.--Her Father her only

Teacher.--The Family of Artists.--Rosa’s pet Birds and

Sheep.--Her first Appearance.--Rising Reputation.--Takes the gold

Medal.--Proclaimed the new Laureat.--Death of her Father.--Rosa

Directress of the School of Design.--Her Sister a Professor.--“The

Horse-market.”--Rosa’s Paintings.--Bestows her Fortune on

others.--Her Farm.--Drawings presented to Charities.--Demand for

her Paintings.--Her Right to the Cross of the Legion of Honor.--The

Emperor’s Refusal to grant it to a Woman.--Description of her

Residence and her Studio.--Rosa found asleep.--Her personal

Appearance.--Dress.--Her Character.--Her Industry.--Mademoiselle

Micas.--Mountain Rambles.--Rosa’s Visit to Scotland.--Her Life in the

Mountains.--At the Spanish Posada.--Threatened Starvation.--Cooking

Frogs.--The Muleteers.--Rosa’s Scotch Terrier.--Her Resolution never

to marry.

FELICIE DE FAUVEAU.

Felicie was born in Tuscany, but was taken, when an infant, to Paris,

where her education commenced. Her parents were persons of much

intelligence and culture. Her mother had great taste for music and

painting, and it was from her that her daughter’s talents received

their first direction and encouragement. The family favored the

aristocrats and Legitimists, and endured much in the cause of the

Bourbons. Madame de Fauveau’s eyes had opened on the terrors of

the guillotine, and she was as proud of those memories of exile,

proscription, and the scaffold as most persons are of honor and titles.

Her chivalrous loyalty looked on them as dignities, and the privilege

of suffering for the family to which she was devoted was cheaply earned

in her eyes by the ruin and exile of her own.

The daughter shared in the mother’s chivalrous sentiments, and her

cherished ideas of monarchy and Romanism became perceptible in her

conversation and works, while her self-sacrificing spirit of loyalty

remained the same amid many vicissitudes. Owing to pecuniary losses,

her parents were compelled, while she was yet very young, to remove

successively to Limoux, Bayonne, and Besançon. While at Bayonne,

in 1823, she met with many partisans in the war then raging on the

frontiers of Spain--men whose loyalty amounted to fanaticism, and

whose piety belonged to the ancient time of the Crusades; from these

her youthful imagination must have received powerful and indelible

impressions.

Her studies were varied and profound; ancient history, classic and

modern languages, heraldry, and archæology received her devoted

attention. The feudal and chivalric traditions of the Middle Ages were

explored with eagerness by her, and she reproduced and utilized the

knowledge thus acquired. During her residence in Besançon, she executed

some oil-paintings which were much praised; but she seemed to feel that

canvas was not the material which would most fully express her ideas.

She had then received no instruction in modeling. One day, in her walk,

she paused before the shop of one of the workmen who carve images of

virgins and saints for village churches. Impelled irresistibly, she

entered and made inquiries as to the method of work, learning thus

the secrets of modeling in clay or wax, and of carving wood or gold.

It then appeared that her vocation was decidedly for the plastic art.

She had the faculty of coloring with skill, and might have been a

great painter, had she not resolved to be a sculptor. Her taste led

her to adopt the mediæval manner, and she took Benevenuto Cellini for

her prototype, occupying herself with art in both its monumental and,

decorative character.

At the death of her father, the family--consisting of the widow, two

sons and three daughters--was in some distress. Felicie determined to

devote her talents to their support. Some of her friends objected that

such employment was unbecoming one who belonged to a noble family.

“Unbecoming!” said she, drawing herself up with a noble pride; “_Sachez

qu’un artiste tel que moi est gentilhomme._”

The first work she exhibited was a group from Scott’s novel,

“The Abbot.” Encouraged by its brilliant success, she produced a

basso-relievo, consisting of six figures--Christina of Sweden and

Monaldeschi in the fatal gallery of Fontainebleau. This work was in

the Exposition des Beaux Arts, and it received from Charles X. in

person the gold medal awarded by the jury. The dramatic energy of the

group, the expression of the figures, and the beauty of the minor

details won universal admiration, and it was hailed as offering the

brightest promise of future excellence. The triumphant artist was then

a girl in the bloom of early youth; and, flattered and delighted at

the appreciation she met with, it is not to be wondered at that her

resolution to adhere to the career she had chosen was steadfast and

immovable.

Felicie remained in Paris with her family till 1830. Her mother’s

house was the centre of a charming circle of persons of high rank,

of cultivated women, and of accomplished artists, such as Scheffer,

Steuben, Gassier, Paul Delaroche, Triqueti, Gros, Giraud, etc. So

distinguished and agreeable was the mother, so sensible and so witty

was the conversation of the daughter, that their society was coveted

and prized. The friends assembled of an evening in their drawing-room

would gather round a large centre-table, and improvise drawings in

pencil, chalk, and pen and ink; or would model, in clay or wax,

brooches and ornaments, sword handles and scabbards, dagger-hilts, etc.

The young lady wished to revive those famous days when sculpture lent

its aid to the gold and silver smith, the jeweler, the clock-maker,

and the armorer. To her may be chiefly attributed the impulse given

to this taste in Paris--a taste that infected England also, reviving

mediæval fashions for ornaments, and also mediæval feelings and

aspirations, which at last found expression in Puseyism in religion,

and pre-Raphaelism in art.

She executed, for Count Portalès, a bronze lamp of singular beauty,

representing a bivouac of archangels armed as knights. They are resting

round a watch-fire, while one, St. Michael, is standing sentinel. It

is in the old Anglo-Saxon style. Round the lamp, in golden letters, is

the device, “_Vaillant, veillant_.” Beneath is a stork’s foot holding a

pebble, a symbol of vigilance, surrounded by beautiful aquatic plants.

The work was poetically conceived, and executed with great spirit and

finish. She also commenced a work which she called “a monument to

Dante,” and sketched an equestrian statue of Charles VIII. On returning

from the expedition to Naples, it was said, the monarch paused on the

ascent of the Alps, and turned to take a last farewell of the beautiful

country--“wooed, not wed”--which he so unwillingly abandoned. The

sculptress was most successful in rendering this expression of sadness

and yearning. The pose of the horse was natural, yet commanding; and

the work would doubtless have been a master-piece; but, unfortunately,

the model had to be destroyed, on the breaking up of her studio.

Mademoiselle de Fauveau had now acquired an eminence and gained

a celebrity which must have satisfied the most ambitious. She was

incessantly occupied with commissions for most of the private galleries

in France; and a place was promised her among those great artists who

are employed to adorn public monuments, and whose works enrich public

collections. She was to have modeled two doors for the gallery in the

Louvre, after the manner of Ghiberti’s Gates of Paradise; a baptistery

and pulpit in one of the metropolitan churches had been already spoken

of, when the revolution of 1830 broke up this calm and noble existence,

and ended her career in Paris.

To Mademoiselle de Fauveau, with her extreme opinions, this revolution

was a personal calamity. She had identified the glory and greatness of

France with the elder branch of the Bourbons. The times for her were

evil and out of joint; she abhorred the Paris which had overthrown

what she considered a legitimate, to set up a pseudo royalty, and

she longed, with all the concentration and single-mindedness of her

character, for an opportunity of leaving the city. This soon presented

itself. Among other noble and distinguished persons who were proud of

their acquaintance with this gifted woman, were members of the Duras

family. The married daughter, who bore the beloved but fatal name of La

Roche Jacquelein, sympathized entirely with the opinions and feelings

of her namesake, Felicie. She invited the artist to leave Paris, and

accompany her on a visit to her estates in La Vendée. During this

visit, which was at first considered a mere relaxation from severe

labor and study, riding, shooting, and hunting took the place of

designing, modeling, and casting. But, after a while, a more serious

purpose was contemplated, and a loftier end proposed. Mademoiselle

de Fauveau found herself in the thick of a political conspiracy.

A regular _chouannerie_ was organized, and our poetical artist

distinguished herself by her spirit, energy, and determination. To this

day the peasantry in that part of France always speak of her as “_la

demoiselle_.”

The authorities at last took umbrage, and a domiciliary visit was made

to the chateau. The two ladies, warned in time, escaped, and took

refuge in a neighboring farm-house. But arms and ammunitions were found

in the chateau, with compromising letters and treasonable symbols.

Orders were given to pursue and arrest the fugitives. The farm-house

was searched in vain; the peasants were questioned, but their fidelity

was unimpeachable. Unfortunately, however, some faint sounds were heard

behind an oven; the grated door was removed, and the two rebels, who

had so nearly defeated the search of their pursuers, were discovered,

arrested, and sent under a strong guard to Angers.

At the first stage they stopped at an inn. The captives were conducted

to a room up stairs; the door was locked, and their guards descended to

the kitchen to refresh themselves. Presently a maid-servant was sent

up to receive their orders for supper. In an instant, Madame de la

Roche Jacquelein made herself understood by this woman. As soon as the

supper was brought up, and the door closed, she effected an exchange

of clothes, and, thus disguised, descended boldly, plates in hand,

to the kitchen. She quickly deposited her burden on the dresser, and

then, taking up the milk-pail, announced in the pretty _patois_ of the

country her intention to fetch the milk from the dairy. It is said the

lady looked so captivating in her new costume that a gallant sergeant

made advances to her, which she was obliged to repress vigorously, so

as to proceed unattended. She reached the dairy, went out at a back

door, crossed some fields, and was soon out of reach. Mademoiselle

de Fauveau remained quietly in her room, allowing the servant to

sleep with her, so as to lull all suspicion, and give as much time as

possible for the escape. The next morning the evasion of Madame was

discovered, and caused great consternation. It was thought necessary

to take the most rigid precautions, such as obliging Mademoiselle de

Fauveau to have a guard in her sleeping-room, who was authorized to

disturb her whenever he wished to make sure of her presence, to prevent

her following her friend’s example. She was thus transferred to Angers,

and remained seven months in prison.

Her bold spirit and elastic temperament were not weakened or cast down

by this destruction of her hopes. She took advantage of the forced

seclusion to resume her occupations. In prison she modeled several

small groups; one of them, composed of twelve figures, representing the

duel of the Sire de Jarnee and the Count de la Chataignevaie in the

presence of Henry II. and his court. She also designed a monument for

Louis de Bonnechose, who had lately perished in an affray with some

soldiers sent to arrest him. The background of this composition is

architectural, in the Gothic style, adorned with the blazoned shields,

achievements, and banners which belong peculiarly to the Vendean

party. On the summit of the edifice is an angel, whose face is veiled,

supporting the armorial shield of the deceased; in the foreground

the Archangel Michael, terrible and victorious, has just killed the

dragon. This dragon has a head like a cock--a type of the French

republic. Michael bears in his right hand the avenging sword, and in

his left holds a pair of crystal scales; in one of these are figures

of judges, advocates, and magistrates; in the other, which weighs down

these, is a single drop of blood, with this inscription:

“Quam gravis est sanguis justi inultus.”

In this sketch, as, indeed, in all Felicie’s works, the symbolical

beauty inspires the whole; the ideal gives spirit to the material form,

while the form receives its noblest distinction as the fitting vehicle

of the idea.

After seven months’ imprisonment, Mademoiselle de Fauveau was set at

liberty, and returned to Paris and her studio. Very soon afterward, the

appearance of the Duchesse de Berri in Vendée set on fire all Royalist

imaginations. Madame de la Roche Jacquelein and our fair artist again

left Paris, and worked day and night for the cause so dear to their

hearts, to reap again disappointment, failure, and misfortune. This

episode in Felicie’s life may show how strong was the political bias

which gave tone and character to both her private and artistic life.

“My opinions are dearer to me than my art,” she said, and her actions

proved this. She was one of the forlorn hope that stood up in the

breach to save a falling dynasty; and with its ruins were ingulfed her

own fortune, her prospects, and such part of her success as depended on

the public recognition and acceptance of art in her own country.

After the failure of this second attempt of the Legitimists,

Mademoiselle de Fauveau was among the persons exiled. She first took

refuge in Switzerland; then returned to Paris, in the very teeth of

the authorities, broke up her studio and establishment there, and went

to Florence, where she fixed her permanent abode with her mother and

brother.

Considerable expense and outlay are necessary to carry on the art

of sculpture, and a removal from a studio in which were accumulated

sketches, models, and marbles--most of them not portable--was almost

total ruin. The forced sale of furniture; the transfer, at a heavy

discount, of funds which had to be reinvested, added serious items

to the amount of loss. From the fragments thus thrown aside fortunes

were made. At the very time when the little family was enduring bitter

privation in Florence, a man realized an almost fabulous sum by selling

walking-sticks manufactured from designs made by Mademoiselle de

Fauveau in those happy Paris evenings before mentioned.

The expense attendant on establishing a new studio in Florence had

to be met by the labor of many years. Madame de Fauveau, at this

period, was the guardian angel of the family, and thought no sacrifice

too great for the encouragement of her daughter’s genius, and the

advancement of her views. Her own poetical and imaginative mind aroused

and fostered the ideas of the sculptress, while her unflinching

resignation and humble faith soothed and solaced her heart.

With unparalleled nobleness, in spite of extreme poverty, the family

refused to receive a sous from the princes or the party they had so

served. No fleck of the world’s dust can be thrown on that spotless

fidelity. It was at this period, when each day’s labor scarcely

sufficed to provide for daily necessities, that Mademoiselle de Fauveau

wrote to one of her friends, “We artists are like the Hebrews of old;

manna is sent to us, but on condition we save none for the morrow.”

Brighter days dawned. Labor is not only its own reward, in the

happiness it confers, but those who sow unweariedly and judiciously

shall reap fairly. Our sculptress achieved a modest independence. It

was probably at this time of her life that her friend the Baroness de

Krafft sketched her character, dwelling on the contrasts presented

by her history, in which her mind was developed, and the bent of her

nature determined. “Fire, air, and water,” she says, “are in that

organization;” and it is true that ardor, purity, and impulse are

the characteristics of her genius. On the one hand we see the lady

of the Faubourg St. Germaine, with all the habits, associations, and

prejudices which belong to her order; on the other, the artist, earning

her daily bread, and obliged to face in their reality the sternest

necessities and most imperative obligations; the single woman treading

victoriously the narrow and thorny path which all women tread who

seek to achieve independence by their own exertions; and the genius

which, to attain breadth and vigor, must freely sweep out of its path

limitations and obstacles. These contrasts appear in her person and

manner. Her glance, usually soft, can kindle and grow stern. Madame de

Krafft notices that the movements of her arms are somewhat abrupt and

angular, but her hands “are white, soft, and fine, royal as the hands

of Cæsar, or of Leonardo da Vinci.”

Mademoiselle de Fauveau is described by a visitor as being fair, with

low and broad forehead; soft, brown, penetrating eyes, aquiline nose,

and mouth finely chiseled, well closed, and slightly sarcastic. Of the

medium height, her figure is flexible and well formed. Her ordinary

studio dress is velvet, of that “_feuille morte_” color Madame Cottin

has made famous; with a jacket of the same fastened by a small leathern

belt, a _foulard_ round the neck, and a velvet cap. Her hair is blonde,

cut square on the forehead and short on the neck, and left rather

longer at the sides, in the Vandyke manner. The face, and figure,

and presence, give the impress of a firm but not aggressive nature,

revealing the energy of resistance, not of defiance. Opinions strongly

held and enunciated, defended to the death, if necessary, give such

an aspect. Combined with this peculiarity is a look of thoughtful

melancholy, such as Retzch has represented in his sketches of Faust. In

fact, the head, in a statuette of herself, might serve as an ideal of

the world-famous student. There are two admirable likenesses of her:

one by Ary Scheffer and one by Giraud.

Her dwelling is in the Via delle Fornace, where are also the studios of

Powers and Fedi. A dark green door opens into a paved covered court,

formerly the entrance to a convent, which is now adapted to form a

modern habitation. On one side a flight of stairs leads to the upper

rooms, another door leads to the studio; a third opens on a cool,

quiet garden, shaded by trees. There are dovecotes, pigeon-houses,

and bird-cages; and the walks are hedged with laurels and cypresses,

while there are gay flowers mingled with Etruscan vases and jars.

The artist’s drawing-room looks like the parlor of an abbess,

furnished with antique hangings, carved chairs, silver crucifixes,

and gold-grounded, pre-Raphaelite pictures, some of great beauty and

value. From this drawing-room, half oratory and half boudoir, the

visitor descends to the studio, which is composed of two or three large

white-washed rooms on the ground floor.

The first thing that strikes one here is the evidence of the artist’s

indefatigable industry. Here are casts and bassi-relievi from the

antique, but no goddesses, nymphs, or cupids; it is Christian art of

the mediæval period. Saints and angels cover the walls; in the centre

is a large crucifix of carved wood, beautifully executed, and full

of vigor and expression; near it is a Santa Reparata, designed in

terra-cotta. Mademoiselle de Fauveau has been peculiarly successful

in her adaptation of terra-cotta to artistic purposes. A large

alto-relievo represents two freed spirits flying heavenward, dropping

their earthly chains. A lovely St. Dorothea looks upward, and holds up

her hands for a basket of flowers and fruit which a descending angel

is bringing from Paradise. Bold and rapid movement is expressed in

the flying figure. In the background is an architectural design of a

church, and an inscription describing how it sprang, as it were, from

the martyr’s blood. There is a Judith addressing the Israelites from

an open gallery, with the head of Holofernes on a spear beside her. In

the aspect of the resolute woman of Bethulia there is an undefinable

resemblance to the artist. The expression, indeed, is congenial to her

character, in which there is the concentration of purpose which gives

force, and the ardor that gives decision to the will.

There are also works of a lighter character; the carved frame-work

of a mirror, with an exquisite allegorical design--a fop and a

coquette, in elaborate costume, are bending inward toward the glass,

so intent on self-admiration as to be unconscious that a demon below

has caught their feet in a line or snare from which they will not be

able to extricate themselves without falling. Most of Mademoiselle

de Fauveau’s works have superabundant richness of ornament and

allegorical device. Her designs for gold and silver ornaments are

unrivaled for elegance and imaginative picturesqueness.

She made for Count Zichy a Hungarian costume, the collar, belt, sword,

and spurs being of the most finished workmanship. A silver bell,

ornamented with twenty figures, for the Empress of Russia, represents a

mediæval household, in the costumes of the period, and their peculiar

avocations, assembling at the call of three stewards, whose figures

form the handle. Round the ball is blazoned, in Gothic characters, “_De

bon vouloir servir le maître_.”

It would be tedious to enumerate the works of this indefatigable

artist. The finished specimens of twenty-five years of labor are shut

up in private galleries, the models remaining in her studio. Her last

and most imposing work is the monument in Santa Croce, erected to the

memory of Louise Favreau by her parents. Madame de Krafft published a

description of this in the _Revue Britannique_ for March, 1857. Three

monuments, in different styles, may be seen in the Lindsay chapel. In

her studio are several busts of great beauty, strongly relieved by her

method of placing an architectural back-ground. One is the bust of the

Marquis de Bretignières, the founder of the reformatory school colony

of Mettray.

Besides devoting herself to the actual expression of her ideas, Madame

de Fauveau has, all her life, studied to improve the mere mechanical

portion of her art. She endeavored to revive certain secrets known

to the ancients, which have been abandoned and forgotten, to the

detriment of modern sculpture. To cast a statue entire, instead of in

portions, and with so much precision as to require no farther touch

of the chisel--to preserve inviolate, as it were, the idea, while it

is subject to the difficult process of clothing it with form, has been

her life-long endeavor. In bronze, by means of wax, she succeeded,

after repeated failures, with incredible perseverance. A figure of

St. Michael in one of her works was thus cast seven times. The least

obstacle, were it only the breadth of a pin’s point in one of the

air-vents which are necessary to draw the seething metal into every

part of the mould, is enough to destroy the work. At last her head

workman brought her St. Michael complete; all the energy and delicacy

of the original design being preserved, and none of the pristine

freshness lost in the translation from wax to bronze.

Mademoiselle de Fauveau works almost incessantly, scarcely allowing

herself any relaxation. Her principal associates are a few of the

higher church dignitaries, and two or three distinguished Italian or

foreign families. Retirement is agreeable to her, and her political

opinions have drawn around her a line of demarkation. She has paid two

visits to Rome: one when the Duc de Bordeaux was there. He paid her

much attention, as did the two great princes of art, Cornelius and

Tenerani, at that time in Rome. Thus situated, beloved by many, admired

and appreciated by all, this clever artist and noble woman leads an

honored life, which seems a realized dream of work, progress, and

success.

From every point of view, a life so spent is a curious and interesting

study. There is the independence belonging to an existence devoted

to art, with almost cloistral simplicity and formality. She had been

hardly ever separated from her proud and devoted mother till her

death, in 1858. The loss left her inconsolable. Her brother, an artist

of merit, resides with her, assists in most of her works, and is the

support and comfort of her life. Her happy home and domestic relations

have helped to expand and refine her genius. A woman’s art, as well as

her heart, suffers when the home in which she works is uncongenial. Our

artist’s name--Felicie--has proved a good omen for one who is at once

“a good woman and a great artist.”

ROSA BONHEUR.[3]

[3] This sketch was prepared under the supervision of Mademoiselle

Bonheur.

Rosalie Bonheur--as she is called in her _acte de naissance_--was born

in Bordeaux on the 16th of March, 1822. Her father, Oscar Raymond

Bonheur, was a painter of merit, who had in youth taken the highest

honors at the exhibitions of his native town. He devoted part of his

time to giving drawing-lessons in families for the support of his

aged parents. An attachment sprung up between him and one of his

pupils--Sophie Marqués--a lovely and accomplished girl. Her family

opposed their union on account of the artist’s poverty; and after the

marriage the young people were thrown entirely on their own resources.

Rosalie was the eldest of their four children. Her father was compelled

to give up his dreams of fame and the higher labors of his art, and for

eight years maintained his family by teaching drawing.

Rosalie--or Rosa, as she has always called herself--was a wild, active,

impetuous child, impatient of restraint, and having a detestation of

study. She was a long time in acquiring even the elements of reading

and writing. When not in the fields, she was in the garden. She

remembers a gray parrot, a pet of her grandfather’s, that often called

out “Rosa! Rosa!” in a voice like her mother’s, and would bring her

in, when her mother would seize the opportunity to make her repeat her

catechism. When the lesson was over, the little girl would scold the

bird angrily for the trick it had played her. But if Rosa hated her

books, she dearly loved all objects in nature, and was happiest when

rambling in wood or meadow, gathering posies as large as herself. Her

complexion was fair, with rosy cheeks; her light auburn hair curled in

natural ringlets; and she was so plump that the Spanish poet Moratia,

who then lived in Bordeaux, and spent his evenings at Bonheur’s, used

to call her his “round ball.” He would romp with the merry child for

hours together, and laugh over the rude figures she was fond of cutting

out of paper. Rosa was fond of amusing herself in her father’s studio,

drawing rough outlines on the walls, or burying her little fat hands

in the clay, and making grotesque attempts at modeling, though these

childish efforts were not noticed by her family as showing any genius.

The exiled poet, however, saw the boldness, vigor, and originality of

her nature, and often prophesied that his favorite would turn out, in

some way, “a remarkable woman.”

In 1829 Raymond Bonheur quitted Bordeaux, and established himself

with his family in Paris. Interested in the ideas then fermenting in

the public mind, he entered into the excitement that preceded the

Revolution of July. Periods of national effervescence are not favorable

to art; the painter could not sell his pictures, and had to betake

himself once more to giving drawing-lessons. His wife gave lessons

on the piano; but the growing agitation of the social and political

world made their united exertions profitless. Madame Bonheur sustained

her husband’s courage throughout this trying period, while she was

often compelled, after the day’s labors, to sit up half the night to

earn with her needle a precarious support for the morrow. When public

tranquillity returned, Bonheur resumed his teaching, and had some of

his works noticed in the Paris Exhibition.

Madame Bonheur died in 1833. The father then placed the three elder

children with an honest woman--La Mère Cathérine--who lived in the

Champs Elysées; Juliette, the youngest, being sent to friends in

Bordeaux. La Mère sent her little charges to the Mutual School of

Chaillot. Rosa, now in her eleventh year, and detesting books and

confinement as heartily as ever, generally contrived to avoid the

school-room, and spent most of her time in the grassy and wooded

spots afforded in the Bois de Boulogne, and other environs of Paris.

Two years passed thus; the children being plainly clad and living on

the humblest fare. Rosa meanwhile, with her passion for independence

and outdoor life, incurred almost daily the angry reprimands of La

Mère Cathérine, who was distressed at her neglect of school for her

rambles. “I never spent an hour of fine weather indoors during the

whole of the time,” she often said. But this sort of gipsy life could

not last. Raymond Bonheur married again, took a house in the Faubourg

du Roule, brought the three children home, and endeavored to put them

in a way to make a position for themselves. The two boys--Auguste and

Isidore--were placed in a respectable school, in which their father

gave three lessons a week by way of payment; and Rosa, who could not be

got to learn any thing out of a book, and seemed to have neither taste

nor talent for any thing but rambling about in the sunshine, was placed

with a seamstress, in order that she might learn to make a living by

her needle.

Nothing could have been more disagreeable to the poor girl than the

monotonous employment to which she was thus condemned. The mere act of

sitting still on a chair was torture to her active temperament; she ran

the needle into her fingers at every stitch, and bending over her hated

task made her head ache, and filled her with inexpressible weariness

and disgust. The husband of the seamstress was a turner, and had his

lathe in an adjoining room. Rosa’s sole consolation was to slip into

this room, and obtain the turner’s permission to help him work the

lathe. If he were absent, she would do her utmost to set the lathe in

motion by herself, more than once doing some damage to the turner’s

tools. But these stolen pleasures were insufficient to compensate her

for the repulsiveness of her new avocation; and whenever her father,

with his pockets full of bonbons, came to see her and learn how she

was getting on, she would throw herself into his arms in a passion

of tears, and beseech him to take her away. Every week her distress

became more and more evident; she lost her appetite and color, and was

apparently falling ill. Her father was much disappointed at the ill

success of his attempt to make of his wild daughter an orderly and

industrious needle-woman; but he was too fond of her to persevere in

an experiment so repugnant to her feelings. He therefore broke off the

arrangement with the seamstress, and took her home.

After thinking over many plans for her, he at length succeeded in

making an arrangement for her reception in a boarding-school in the

Rue de Reuilly, Faubourg St. Antoine, on the same terms as those he

had obtained for her brothers. A vast deal of good advice was expended

on her, with many earnest exhortations to make the best use of the

advantages of the school, by diligent application to her studies.

For a short time after her entrance into this establishment, Rosa was

delighted with her new life, for she speedily became a favorite with

her young companions, the leader in all their games, and the inventor

of innumerable pranks. But the teachers were far from being equally

satisfied with the new pupil, who could not be got to learn a lesson,

and who threw the household into confusion with her doings. One of

her favorite amusements was to draw caricatures of the governesses

and professors; which caricatures, after coloring, she cut out very

carefully, and contrived to fasten to the ceiling of the school-room,

by means of bread patiently chewed to the consistence of putty,

and applied to the heads of the figures. The sensation created by

this novel exhibition of portraiture, and the ludicrous bowings and

courtesyings of the paper figures, as they swayed over the heads of

their originals, may be easily imagined. The pupils would go beside

themselves with suppressed laughter; the teachers were naturally more

displeased than diverted. The mistress of the establishment, struck

with the vigor and originality of these drawings, caused them to be

detached from the ceiling, and placed them privately in an album,

where, it is said, they have been treasured to this day. But Rosa was

none the less pronounced a very naughty girl; and she generally found

herself condemned to bread and water about five days in the week.

Rosa Bonheur is by no means deficient in the faculty of acquiring

knowledge, and has since made up, in her own way, for her early

disinclination to study; but it was absolutely impossible for her,

at that time, to constrain her mercurial temperament to the measured

regularity of a class; and the only branch of study in which she made

any progress was drawing, which she practiced assiduously, sharing the

lessons given twice a week by her father in return for her schooling.

Rosa, however, was far from happy. Besides the constant trouble in

which her love of frolic and mischief involved her, there was another

annoyance that poisoned her peace, and gradually rendered her stay in

the school intolerably painful.

All the other pupils being daughters of rich tradesmen, they were

elegantly dressed, and had their silver forks and cups at table, and

plenty of pocket-money for the gratification of their school-girl

fancies. Rosa, with her calico frocks and coarse shoes, her iron

spoon, tin mug, and empty pockets, felt keenly the inferiority of

her position. Her father was as good and as clever as the fathers

of her companions; why, then, was he not rich? Why must she wear

calico and drink out of tin, while the other girls had silver mugs

and beautiful silk dresses? Too generous to be envious, and treated

as a favorite by the other pupils, the proud and sensitive child yet

recoiled instinctively from a contact which awakened in her mind an

unreasoning sense of injustice, and humiliated her, as she felt, for

no fault of her own. She had no wish to deprive her little companions

of the superior advantages of their lot, but she longed to possess

the same, tormenting herself day and night with pondering on her

difficulties, and seeking to devise some plan by which they might be

overcome. To this period, with its secret mental experiences, is to be

traced that firm resolve to achieve a name and a place for herself in

the world--to a perception of whose social facts she was now beginning

to awaken--which sustained her through the subsequent phases of her

artistic development. Yet this resolve, though prompted by a galling

sense of the humble character of her wardrobe and “belongings,”

pointed less to the acquisition of greater elegance of dress and

personal conditions--to which she has subsequently shown herself almost

indifferent--than to the attainment of a superior and independent

social position. She was determined to be something, though she could

not see what, and felt no doubt of the accomplishment of her purpose,

though as yet she had no idea of the mode in which it was to be carried

out. Meanwhile, her secret discontent preyed on her spirits and

affected her health. She became reserved and gloomy, and while seeking,

with feverish anxiety, to devise the sort of work that should enable

her to gain for herself the superior position she so ardently coveted,

she became more and more neglectful of her studies, until, her teachers

and her father being alike discouraged by her seeming idleness, the

latter withdrew her from the school, and once more took her home.

More than ever perplexed what to do with her, her father now left her

for a time entirely to herself. Thus abandoned to her own spontaneous

actions, Rosa, who felt that the idle and aimless life she had hitherto

led was little calculated to help her to the realization of her secret

ambition, and who was full of unacknowledged regret and remorse for her

incapacity and uselessness, sought refuge from her own uncomfortable

thoughts in her father’s studio, where she amused herself with

imitating every thing she saw him do; drawing and modeling, day after

day, with the utmost diligence and delight, happy as long as she had

in her hands a pencil, a piece of charcoal, or a lump of clay. In the

quiet and congenial activity of the studio, her excited feelings became

calm, and her ideas grew clearer; she began to understand herself, and

to devise the path nature had marked out for her. As this change took

place in her mind, the desultory and purposeless child became rapidly

transformed into the earnest, self-conscious, determined woman. She

drew and modeled from morning till night with enthusiastic ardor; and

her father, amazed at her progress, and perceiving at last the real

bent of her nature, devoted himself seriously to her instruction,

superintending her efforts with the greatest interest and care. He took

her through a serious course of preparatory study, and then sent her to

the Louvre to copy the works of the old masters, as a discipline for

her eye, her hand, and her judgment.

Surrounded and stimulated by the glorious creations of the great

painters--the first to enter the gallery and the last to leave it--too

much absorbed in her model to be conscious of any thing that went on

around her, Rosa pursued her labors with unwavering zeal.

“I have never seen an example of such application, and such ardor for

work,” remarked M. Jousselin, director of the Louvre, in describing the

deportment of the young student.

The splendid coloring and form of the Italian schools, the lofty

idealism of the German, and the broad naturalism of the Dutch, alike

excited her enthusiasm; she studied them all with equal delight,

and copied them with equal felicity. To aid her father in his arduous

struggle for the support of his family, now increased by the birth of

two younger children, was the immediate object of Rosa’s ambition;

and, the admirable fidelity of her copies insuring them a speedy sale,

this filial desire was soon gratified. She gained but a small sum for

each, but so great was her industry that those earnings soon became an

important item in the family resources.

One day, when she had just put the finishing touch to a copy of _Les

Bergers d’Arcadie_, at the Louvre, an elderly English gentleman stopped

beside her easel, and, having examined her work with much attention,

exclaimed, “Your copy, _mon enfant_, is superb, faultless! Persevere as

you have begun, and I prophesy that you will be a great artist!” The

stranger’s prediction gave the young painter much pleasure, and she

went home that evening with her head full of joyous visions of future

success.

Rosa was now in her seventeenth year, vowed to art as the aim and

occupation of her life, cultivating landscape, historical, and genre

painting with equal assiduity, but without any decided preference for

either; when, happening to make a study of a goat, she was so much

enchanted with this new attempt that she thenceforth devoted herself

to the cultivation of the peculiar province in which she has commanded

such brilliant success. Too poor to procure models, she went out daily

into the country on foot, in search of picturesque views and animals

for sketching. With a bit of bread in her pocket, and laden with canvas

and colors, or a mass of clay--for she was attracted equally toward

painting and sculpture, and has shown that she would have succeeded

equally in either--she used to set out very early in the morning, and,

having found a site or a subject to her mind, seat herself on a bank or

under a tree, and work on till dusk; coming home at nightfall, after

a tramp of ten or a dozen miles, browned by sun and wind, soaked with

rain, or covered with mud; exhausted with fatigue, but rejoicing in the

lessons the day had furnished.

Her inability to procure models at home also suggested to her

another expedient, the adoption of which shows how earnest was her

determination to overcome the obstacles poverty had placed in the way

of her studies. The slaughtering and preparing of animals for the

Paris market is confined to a few _abattoirs_, great establishments

on the outskirts of the city, placed under the supervision of the

municipal authorities. Each of these establishments contains extensive

inclosures, in which are penned thousands of lowing and bleating

victims, waiting their turn to be led to the shambles. To one of

these--the _abattoir du Roule_--had Rosa the courage to go daily for

many months, surmounting alike the repugnance which such a locality

naturally inspired, and her equally natural hesitation to place herself

in contact with the crowd of butchers and drovers who filled it. Seated

on a bundle of hay, with her colors beside her, she painted on from

morning till dusk, not unfrequently forgetting the bit of bread in

her pocket, so absorbed would she become in the study of the varied

types that rendered the courts and stables of this establishment

so invaluable a field of observation for her. Not content with

drawing the occupants of the _abattoir_ in their pens, far from the

sickening horror of the shambles, she felt the necessity of studying

their attitudes under the terror and agony of the death-stroke, and

compelled herself to make repeated visits to the slaughter-house;

looking on scenes whose repulsiveness was rendered doubly painful

to her by her affectionate sympathy with the brute creation. In the

evening, on her return home, her hands, face, and clothes were usually

spotted all over by the flies, so numerous wherever animals are

congregated. Such was the respect with which she inspired the rude

companions by whom she was surrounded, and who would often beg to see

her sketches, which they regarded with the most naïve admiration, that

nothing ever occurred to annoy her in the slightest degree during her

long sojourns in the crowded precincts of the _abattoir_.

After she had ceased to visit this establishment, she frequented in

a similar manner the stables of the Veterinary School of Alfort, and

the animals and museums of the Garden of Plants. She also resumed her

sketching rambles in the country, and resorted diligently to all the

horse and cattle fairs held in the neighborhood of Paris. On the latter

occasions she invariably wore male attire; a precaution she found it

necessary to adopt, as a convenience, and still more, as a protection

against the annoyances that would have rendered it impossible for her

to mingle in such gatherings in feminine costume. In her masculine

habit Rosa had so completely the look of a good-hearted, ingenuous

boy, that the graziers and horse-dealers, whose animals she drew,

would frequently insist on “standing treat” in a _chopine_ of wine, or

a _petit verre_ of something stronger, to the “clever little fellow”

whose skillful portrayal of their beasts had so much delighted them;

and it sometimes required all her address and ingenuity to escape

from their well-meant persecutions. Her good looks, too, in the

assumed character of a youth of the sterner sex, would sometimes make

sad havoc in the susceptible hearts of village dairy-maids. Some

laughable incidents might be related under this head. In her subsequent

explorations of the romantic regions at either foot of the Pyrenees,

the passion with which she has unwittingly inspired the black-eyed

Phœbes of the south has more than once proved a source of serious

though comical embarrassment to the artist, desirous above all things

to maintain impenetrably the secret of her disguise.

The young artist’s studies were not confined to the exterior forms of

her models. She procured the best anatomical treatises and plates,

with casts and models of the different parts of the human frame, and

studied them thoroughly; she then procured legs, shoulders, and heads

of animals from the butchers, carefully dissecting them, and thus

obtaining an intimate knowledge of the forms and dependencies of the

muscles whose play she had to delineate.

Now that Rosa has arrived at the fame her swelling child-heart

prophesied to itself before she had ascertained the path that should

lead to the fulfillment of her aspirations, the richest and noblest of

her countrymen are proud to place at her disposal the finest products

of their farms and studs; while mules, donkeys, sheep, goats, pigs,

dogs, and rare poultry are offered to her from one end of Europe to

the other. But it is certain that the poverty and obscurity which,

during her first years of effort, compelled her to frequent _abattoirs_

and cattle-markets in search of subjects for her pencil were really

of unspeakable service in forcing her to make acquaintance with a

multitude of types under a variety of action and condition, such as

she could never have seen in any other way, and in giving her a

breadth of conception, variety of detail, and truthfulness to nature,

which a more limited range of experience could not have supplied.

Through all her varied studies, Raymond Bonheur was his daughter’s

constant and only teacher. M. Léon Cogniet, whose pupil she is

erroneously said to have been, merely took a friendly interest in her

progress, and warmly encouraged her to persevere. She never took a

lesson of any other teacher than her father and nature.

Bonheur, with his family, now occupied small six-story rooms in the

Rue Rumfort. His two sons had also devoted themselves to art under his

auspices, Auguste being a painter, and Isidore a sculptor. The loving

family, merry and hopeful in spite of poverty, labored diligently

together in the same little studio. From daylight till dusk Rosa was

always at her easel, singing like a linnet, the busiest and merriest

of them all. In the evening, the frugal dinner dispatched and the lamp

lighted, she would spend several hours in drawing illustrations for

books, and animals for prints and for albums; or in moulding little

groups of oxen, sheep, etc., for the figure-dealers--thus earning an

additional contribution to the family purse.

Rosa delighted in birds, of which she had many in the studio; but it

grieved her to see them confined. To her great joy, one of her brothers

contrived a net, which he fastened to the outer side of the window,

so that they could be safely let out of their cages. She had also a

beautiful sheep, with long silky wool, the most docile and intelligent

of quadrupeds, which she kept on the leads outside their windows, the

leads forming a terrace, converted by her into a garden, gay with

honeysuckles, cobeas, convolvulus, nasturtiums, and sweet-peas. As the

sheep could not descend six flights of stairs, yet needed occasional

exercise and change of diet, Isidore used to place it gravely on his

shoulders, and carry it down to a neighboring croft, where it browsed

on the fresh grass to its heart’s content, after which he would carry

it back to its aerial residence. Thus carefully tended, the animal

passed two years contentedly on the terrace, affording to Rosa and her

brothers an admirable model.

It was in the Fine Arts Exhibition of 1841 that Rosa Bonheur made her

first appearance before the critical Areopagus of Paris, attracting

the favorable notice both of connoisseurs and public, by two charming

little groups of a goat, sheep, and rabbits. The following year she

exhibited three paintings: “Animals in a Pasture,” “A Cow lying in a

Meadow,” and “A Horse for Sale,” which attracted still more notice, the

first being specially remarkable for its exquisite rendering of the

atmospheric effects of evening, and its blending of poetic sentiment

with bold fidelity to fact.

From this period she appeared in all the Paris exhibitions, and in

many of those of the provincial towns, her reputation rising every

year, and several bronze and silver medals being awarded to her

productions. In 1844 she exhibited, with her paintings, “A Bull” in

clay, one of the many proofs she has given of powers that would have

raised her to a high rank as a sculptor, had she not, at length, been

definitively drawn, by the combined attractions of form and color,

into the ranks of the painters. In the following year she exhibited

twelve paintings--a splendid collection--flanked by the works of her

father and her brother Auguste, then admitted for the first time. In

1846 her productions were accompanied by those of her father and both

her brothers, the younger of whom then first appeared as a sculptor.

The family group was completed in a subsequent exhibition by the

admission of her younger sister, Julietta, who had returned to Paris,

and had also become an artist. In 1849 her magnificent “Cantal Oxen”

took the gold medal. Horace Vernet, president of the committee of

awards, proclaimed the new laureat in presence of a brilliant crowd of

amateurs, presenting her with a superb Sèvres vase in the name of the

government; the value of a triumph which placed her ostensibly in the

highest rank of her profession being immeasurably enhanced in her eyes

by the unbounded delight it afforded to her father.

Raymond Bonheur, released from pecuniary difficulty, and rejuvenated

by the joy of his daughter’s success, had accepted the directorship of

the government school of design for girls, and resumed his palette with

all the ardor of his younger days. But his health had been undermined

by the fatigues and anxieties he had borne so long, and he died of

heart disease in 1849, deeply regretted by his family. Rosa, who had

aided him in the school of design, was now made its directress. She

still holds the post, her sister, Madame Peyrol, being the resident

professor, and Rosa superintending the classes in a weekly lesson.

Her already brilliant reputation was still farther enhanced by the

appearance, in 1849, of her noble “Plowing Scene in the Nivernais,”

ordered by the government, and now in the Luxembourg Gallery; of the

“Horse-market,” in 1853, the preparatory studies for which occupied her

during eighteen months; and the “Hay-making,” in 1855. The last two

works created great enthusiasm in the public mind.

More fortunate than many other great artists, whose merits have been

slowly acknowledged, Rosa Bonheur has been a favorite with the public

from her first appearance. Her vigorous originality, her perfect

mastery of the technicalities and mechanical details of her art, and

the charm of a style at once fresh and simple, and profoundly and

poetically true, ensured for her productions a sympathetic appreciation

and a rapid sale. She had produced, up to June, 1858, thirty-five

paintings; and many more, not exhibited, have been purchased by private

amateurs. In these the peculiar aspect of crag, mountain, valley, and

plain--of trees and herbage; the effects of cloud, mist, and sunshine,

and of different hours of the day--are as profoundly and skillfully

rendered as are the outer forms and inner life of the animals around

which the artist, like nature, spreads the charm and glory of her

landscapes. She has already made a fortune, but has bestowed it

entirely on others, with the exception of a little farm a few miles

from Paris, where she spends a great deal of her time. Such is her

habitual generosity, and so scrupulous is her delicacy in all matters

connected with her art, that it may be doubted whether she will ever

amass any great wealth for herself. Her port-folios contain nearly a

thousand sketches, eagerly coveted by amateurs; but she regards these

as a part of her artistic life, and refuses to part with them on any

terms. A little drawing that accidentally found its way into the hands

of a dealer, a short time since, brought eighty pounds in London.

Rosa had presented it to a charity, as she now and then does with her

drawings. Demands for paintings reach her from every part of the

world; but she refuses all orders not congenial to her talent, valuing

her own probity and dignity above all price.

The award of the jury in 1853--in virtue of which the authoress of

“The Horse-market” was enrolled among the recognized masters of the

brush, and as such exempted from the necessity of submitting her works

to the examining committee previous to their admission to future

exhibitions--entitled her, according to French usage, to the cross of

the Legion of Honor. This decoration was refused to the artist by the

emperor _because she was a woman_!

The refusal, repeated after her brilliant success of 1855, naturally

excited the indignation of her admirers, who could not understand why

an honor that would be accorded to a certain talent in a man should be

refused to the same in a woman. But, though Rosa was included in the

invitation to the state dinner at the Tuileries, always given to the

artists to whom the Academy of Fine Arts has awarded its highest honor,

the refusal of the decoration was maintained, notwithstanding numerous

efforts made to obtain a reversal of the imperial decree.

A visitor describes the studio of this world-renowned artist. At the

southern end of the Rue d’Assas--a retired street, half made up of

extensive gardens, the tops of trees alone visible above the high stone

walls--just where, meeting the Rue de Vaugirard, it widens into an

irregular little square, surrounded by sleepy-looking, old-fashioned

houses, and looked down upon by the shining gray roofs and belfry of

an ancient Carmelite convent--is a green garden-door, surmounted by

the number “32.” A ring will be answered by the barkings of one or two

dogs; and when the door is opened by the sober-suited serving-man, the

visitor finds himself in a garden full of embowering trees. The house,

a long, cozy, irregular building, standing at right angles with the

street, is covered with vines, honeysuckles, and clematis. A part of

the garden is laid out in flower-beds; but the larger portion--fenced

off with a green paling, graveled, and containing several sheds--is

given up to the animals kept by the artist as her models. There may be

seen a horse, a donkey, four or five goats, sheep of different breeds,

ducks, cochinchinas, and other denizens of the barn-yard, all living

together in perfect amity and good-will.

On fine days the artist may be found seated on a rustic chair inside

the paling, busily sketching one of these animals, a wide-awake or

sun-bonnet on her head. If the visitor comes on a Friday afternoon, the

time set apart for Rosa’s receptions, he is ushered through glass doors

into a hall, where the walls are covered with paintings, orange-trees

and oleanders standing in green tubs in the corners, and the floor

(since the artist crossed the Channel!) covered with English oil-cloth.

From this hall a few stairs, covered with thick gray drugget, lead to

the atelier, on Fridays turned into the reception-room.

This beautiful studio, one of the largest and most finely proportioned

in Paris, with its greenish-gray walls, and plain green curtains to

lofty windows that never let in daylight--the room being lighted

entirely from the ceiling--has all its wood-work of dark oak, as are

the book-case, tables, chairs, and other articles of furniture--richly

carved, but otherwise of severe simplicity--distributed about the room.

The walls are covered with paintings, sketches, casts, old armor,

fishing-nets, rude baskets and pouches, poles, gnarled and twisted

vine-branches, picturesque hats, cloaks, and sandals, collected by

the artist in her wanderings among the peasants of various regions;

nondescript draperies, bones and skins of animals, antlers and

horns. The fine old book-case contains as many casts, skeletons, and

curiosities as books, and is surrounded with as many busts, groups in

plaster, shields, and other artistic booty, as its top can accommodate;

and the great Gothic-looking stove at the upper end of the room is

covered in the same way with little casts and bronzes. Paintings of all

sizes, and in every stage of progress, are seen on easels at the lower

end of the room, the artist always working at several at a time. Stands

of port-folios and stacks of canvas line the sides of the studio; birds

are chirping in cages of various dimensions, and a magnificent parrot

eyes you suspiciously from the top of a lofty perch. Scattered over

a floor as bright as waxing can make it, are skins of tigers, oxen,

leopards, and foxes--the only species of floor-covering admitted by

the artist into her workroom. “They give me ideas,” she says of these

favorite appurtenances; “whereas the most costly and luxurious carpet

is suggestive of nothing.”

But the suggestion of picturesque associations is not the only service

rendered by these spoils of the animal kingdom. One sultry Friday

afternoon, one of her admirers, going earlier than her usual reception

hour, found her lying fast asleep under the long table at the upper end

of the studio, on her favorite skin, that of a magnificent ox, with

stuffed head and spreading horns; her head resting lovingly on that of

the animal. She had come in very tired from her weekly review of the

classes at the School of Design, and had thrown herself down on the

skin, under the shade of the table, to rest a few moments. There was so

much natural grace and simplicity in her attitude, such innocence and

peacefulness in her whole aspect, and so much of the startled child in

her expression, as, roused by the opening and shutting of the door, she

awoke and started to her feet, that the picture seemed as beautiful as

any created by the pencil.

Here Rosa Bonheur receives her guests with the frankness, kindness,

and unaffected simplicity for which she is so eminently distinguished.

In person she is small, and rather under the middle height, with

a finely-formed head, and broad rather than high forehead; small,

well-defined, regular features, and good teeth; hazel eyes, very clear

and bright; dark-brown hair, slightly wavy, parted on one side and cut

short in the neck; a compact, shapely figure; hands small and delicate,

and extremely pretty little feet. She dresses very plainly, the only

colors worn by her being black, brown, and gray; and her costume

consists invariably of a close-fitting jacket and skirt of simple

materials. On the rare occasions when she goes into company--for she

accepts very few of the invitations with which she is assailed--she

appears in the same simple costume, of richer materials, with the

addition merely of a lace collar. She wears none of the usual articles

of feminine adornment; they are not in accordance with her thoughts and

occupations. At work she wears a round pinafore or blouse of gray linen

that envelops her from the neck to the feet. She impresses one at first

sight with the idea of a clear, honest, vigorous, independent nature;

abrupt, yet kindly; original, self-centred, and decided, without the

least pretension or conceit; but it is only when you have seen her

conversing earnestly and heartily, her enthusiasm roused by some topic

connected with her art, or with the great humanitary questions of the

day; when you have watched her kindling eyes, her smile at once so

sweet, so beaming, and so keen, her expressive features irradiated,

as it were, with an inner light, that you perceive how very beautiful

she really is. To know how upright and how truthful she is, how

single-minded in her devotion to her art, how simple and unassuming,

fully conscious of the dignity of her artistic power, but respecting it

rather as a talent committed to her keeping than as a quality personal

to herself, you must have been admitted to something more than the

ordinary courtesy of a reception-day. While, if you would know how

noble and how self-sacrificing she has been, not only to every member

of her own family, but to others possessing no claim on her kindness

but such as that kindness gave them, you must learn it from those who

have shared her bounty, for you will never know a word of it from

herself.

Her dislike to being written about will prevent many interesting

particulars in regard to her from becoming known; but, if they ever

come to light, they will show her life replete with noble teachings,

and that the great painter whose fame will go down to coming ages was

as admirable a woman as she was gifted as an artist; that her moral

worth was no less transcendent than her genius.

Rosa Bonheur is an indefatigable worker. She rises at six, and paints

until dusk, when she lays aside her blouse, puts on a bonnet and

shawl of most unfashionable appearance, and takes a turn through the

neighboring streets alone, or accompanied only by a favorite dog.

Absorbed in her own thoughts, and unconscious of every thing around

her, the first conception of a picture is often struck out by her in

these rapid, solitary walks in the twilight.

Living solely for her art, she has gladly resigned the cares of her

outward existence to an old and devoted friend, Madame Micas, a widow

lady, who, with her daughter, resides with her. Mademoiselle Micas

is an artist, and her beautiful groups of birds are well known in

England. She has been for many years Rosa’s most intimate companion.

Every summer the two artists repair to some mountain district to

sketch. Arrived at the regions inhabited only by the chamois, they

exchange their feminine habiliments for masculine attire, and spend

a couple of months in exploring the wildest recesses of the hills,

courting the acquaintance of their shy and swift-footed tenants, and

harvesting “effects” of storm, rain, and vapor as assiduously as those

of sunshine. Though Rosa is alive to the beauties of wood and meadow,

mountain scenery is her especial delight. Having explored the French

chains and the Pyrenees, in the autumn of 1856 she visited Scotland,

and made numerous sketches in the neighborhood of Glenfallock, Glencoe,

and Ballaculish. Struck by the beauty of the Highland cattle, she

selected some choice specimens of these, which she had sent down to

Wexham Rectory, near Windsor, where she resided, and spent two months

in making numerous studies, from which she produced two pictures:

“The Denizens of the Mountains” and “Morning in the Highlands.” Her

preference for the stern, the abrupt, and the majestic over the soft,

the smiling, and the fair, makes Italy, with all its glories, less

attractive to her than the ruder magnificence of the Pyrenees and the

north.

Among mountains the great artist is completely in her element; out of

doors from morning till night, lodging in the humblest and remotest of

road-side hotels, or in the huts of wood-cutters, charcoal-burners,

and chamois-hunters, and living contentedly on whatever fare can be

obtained. In 1856, being furnished by families of distinction in the

Béarnais and the Basque provinces with introductions, her party pushed

their adventurous wanderings to the little station of Peyronère, the

last inhabited point within the French frontier, and thence up the

romantic defiles of the Vallée d’Urdos, across the summit of the

Pyrenees. Their letters procured them a hospitable reception at each

halting-place, with a trusty guide for the next march. In this way they

crossed the mountains, and gained the lonely _posada_ of Canfan, the

first on the Spanish side of the ridge, where, for six weeks, they saw

no one but the muleteers with their strings of mules, who would halt

for the night at the little inn, setting out at the earliest dawn for

their descent of the mountains.

The people of the _posada_ lived entirely on curdled sheep’s milk,

the sole article of food the party could obtain on their arrival.

At one time, by an early fall of snow, they were shut out from all

communication with the valley. Their threatened starvation was averted

by the exertions of Mademoiselle Micas, who managed to procure a

quantity of frogs, the hind legs of which she enveloped in leaves,

and toasted on sticks over a fire on the hearth. On these frogs they

lived for two days, when the hostess was induced to attempt the

making of butter from the milk of her sheep, and even to allow the

conversion of one of these animals into mutton for their benefit. Their

larder thus supplied, and black bread being brought for them by the

muleteers from a village a long way off, they gave themselves up to

the pleasures of their wild life and the business of sketching. The

arrival of the muleteers, in their embroidered shirts, pointed hats,

velvet jackets, leathern breeches, and sandals, was always a welcome

event. Rosa paid for wine for them, and they, in return, performed

their national dances for her, after which they would throw themselves

down for the night upon sheepskins before the fire, furnishing subjects

for many picturesque _croquis_. As the _posada_ was a police-station,

established there as a terror to smugglers, the little party felt

perfectly safe, notwithstanding its loneliness.

Rosa was much pleased with her Scotch tour. She brought away a

wonderful little Skye terrier, named “Wasp,” of the purest breed,

and remarkably intelligent, which she holds in great affection. She

has learned for its benefit several English phrases, to which “Wasp”

responds with appreciative waggings of the tail.

Rosa Bonheur has avowed her determination never to marry. Determined

to devote her life to her favorite art, she may be expected to produce

a long line of noble works that will worthily maintain her present

reputation; while the virtues and excellences of her private character

will win for her an ever-widening circle of admiration and respect.

Women artists in all ages and countries · 第 17 / 20 章