Apart from the spoliation of Mexico by the United States, the
independence of the Hispanic nations had not been menaced for more
than thirty years. Now comes a period in which the plight of their big
northern neighbor, rent in twain by civil war and powerless to enforce
the spirit of the Monroe Doctrine, caused two of the countries to become
subject a while to European control. One of these was the Dominican
Republic.
In 1844 the Spanish-speaking population of the eastern part of the
island of Santo Domingo, writhing under the despotic yoke of Haiti, had
seized a favorable occasion to regain their freedom. But the magic word
"independence" could not give stability to the new state any more than
it had done in the case of its western foes. The Haitians had
lapsed long since into a condition resembling that of their African
forefathers. They reveled in the barbarities of Voodoo, a sort of snake
worship, and they groveled before "presidents" and "emperors" who rose
and fell on the tide of decaying civilization. The Dominicans unhappily
were not much more progressive. Revolutions alternated with invasions
and counter-invasions and effectually prevented enduring progress.
On several occasions the Dominicans had sought reannexation to Spain
or had craved the protection of France as a defense against continual
menace from their negro enemies and as a relief from domestic turmoil.
But every move in this direction failed because of a natural reluctance
on the part of Spain and France, which was heightened by a refusal
of the United States to permit what it regarded as a violation of the
Monroe Doctrine. In 1861, however, the outbreak of civil war in the
United States appeared to present a favorable opportunity to obtain
protection from abroad. If the Dominican Republic could not remain
independent anyway, reunion with the old mother country seemed
altogether preferable to reconquest by Haiti. The President, therefore,
entered into negotiations with the Spanish Governor and Captain General
of Cuba, and then issued a proclamation signed by himself and four of
his ministers announcing that by the "free and spontaneous will" of
its citizens, who had conferred upon him the power to do so, the nation
recognized Queen Isabella II as its lawful sovereign! Practically
no protest was made by the Dominicans against this loss of their
independence.
Difficulties which should have been foreseen by Spain were quick to
reveal themselves. It fell to the exPresident, now a colonial
governor and captain general, to appoint a host of officials and, not
unnaturally, he named his own henchmen. By so doing he not only aroused
the animosity of the disappointed but stimulated that of the otherwise
disaffected as well, until both the aggrieved factions began to plot
rebellion. Spain, too, sent over a crowd of officials who could not
adjust themselves to local conditions. The failure of the mother country
to allow the Dominicans representation in the Spanish Cortes and
its readiness to levy taxes stirred up resentment that soon ended
in revolution. Unable to check this new trouble, and awed by the
threatening attitude of the United States, Spain decided to withdraw
in 1865. The Dominicans thus were left with their independence and
a chance--which they promptly seized--to renew their commotions. So
serious did these disturbances become that in 1869 the President of
the reconstituted republic sought annexation to the United States but
without success. American efforts, on the other hand, were equally
futile to restore peace and order in the troubled country until many
years later.
The intervention of Spain in Santo Domingo and its subsequent withdrawal
could not fail to have disastrous consequences in its colony of Cuba,
the "Pearl of the Antilles" as it was proudly called. Here abundant
crops of sugar and tobacco had brought wealth and luxury, but not many
immigrants because of the havoc made by epidemics of yellow fever.
Nearly a third of the insular population was still composed of negro
slaves, who could hardly relish the thought that, while the mother
country had tolerated the suppression of the hateful institution in
Santo Domingo, she still maintained it in Cuba. A bureaucracy, also,
prone to corruption owing to the temptations of loose accounting at the
custom house, governed in routinary, if not in arbitrary, fashion.
Under these circumstances dislike for the suspicious and repressive
administration of Spain grew apace, and secret societies renewed their
agitation for its overthrow. The symptoms of unrest were aggravated by
the forced retirement of Spain from Santo Domingo. If the Dominicans
had succeeded so well, it ought not to be difficult for a prolonged
rebellion to wear Spain out and compel it to abandon Cuba also. At this
critical moment news was brought of a Spanish revolution across the
seas.
Just as the plight of Spain in 1808, and again in 1820, had afforded a
favorable opportunity for its colonies on the continents of America to
win their independence, so now in 1868 the tidings that Queen Isabella
had been dethroned by a liberal uprising aroused the Cubans to action
under their devoted leader, Carlos Manuel de Cespedes. The insurrection
had not gained much headway, however, when the provisional government of
the mother country instructed a new Governor and Captain General--whose
name, Dulce (Sweet), had an auspicious sound--to open negotiations with
the insurgents and to hold out the hope of reforms. But the royalists,
now as formerly, would listen to no compromise. Organizing themselves
into bodies of volunteers, they drove Dulce out. He was succeeded by one
Caballero de Rodas (Knight of Rhodes) who lived up to his name by trying
to ride roughshod over the rebellious Cubans. Thus began the Ten Years'
War--a war of skirmishes and brief encounters, rarely involving a
decisive action, which drenched the soil of Cuba with blood and laid
waste its fields in a fury of destruction.
Among the radicals and liberals who tried to retain a fleeting control
over Mexico after the final departure of Santa Anna was the first
genuine statesman it had ever known in its history as a republic--Benito
Pablo Juarez, an Indian. At twelve years of age he could not read
or write or even speak Spanish. His employer, however, noted his
intelligence and had him educated. Becoming a lawyer, Juarez entered
the political arena and rose to prominence by dint of natural talent
for leadership, an indomitable perseverance, and a sturdy patriotism. A
radical by conviction, he felt that the salvation of Mexico could never
be attained until clericalism and militarism had been banished from its
soil forever.
Under his influence a provisional government had already begun a
policy of lessening the privileges of the Church, when the conservative
elements, with a cry that religion was being attacked, rose up in arms
again. This movement repressed, a Congress proceeded in 1857 to issue
a liberal constitution which was destined to last for sixty years. It
established the federal system in a definite fashion, abolished special
privileges, both ecclesiastical and military, and organized the country
on sound bases worthy of a modern nation. Mexico seemed about to enter
upon a rational development. But the newly elected President, yielding
to the importunities of the clergy, abolished the constitution,
dissolved the legislature, and set up a dictatorship, in spite of the
energetic protests of Juarez, who had been chosen Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court, and who, in accordance with the terms of the temporarily
discarded instrument, was authorized to assume the presidency should
that office fall vacant. The rule of the usurper was short-lived,
however. Various improvised "generals" of conservative stripe put
themselves at the head of a movement to "save country, religion, and the
rights of the army," drove the would-be dictator out, and restored the
old regime.
Juarez now proclaimed himself acting President, as he was legally
entitled to do, and set up his government at Vera Cruz while one
"provisional president" followed another. Throughout this trying time
Juarez defended his position vigorously and rejected every offer
of compromise. In 1859 he promulgated his famous Reform Laws which
nationalized ecclesiastical property, secularized cemeteries, suppressed
religious communities, granted freedom of worship, and made marriage
a civil contract. For Mexico, however, as for other Spanish American
countries, measures of the sort were far too much in advance of their
time to insure a ready acceptance. Although Juarez obtained a great
moral victory when his government was recognized by the United States,
he had to struggle two years more before he could gain possession of the
capital. Triumphant in 1861, he carried his anticlerical program to the
point of actually expelling the Papal Nuncio and other ecclesiastics
who refused to obey his decrees. By so doing he leveled the way for
the clericals, conservatives, and the militarists to invite foreign
intervention on behalf of their desperate cause. But, even if they had
not been guilty of behavior so unpatriotic, the anger of the Pope over
the treatment of his Church, the wrath of Spain over the conduct of
Juarez, who had expelled the Spanish minister for siding with the
ecclesiastics, the desire of Great Britain to collect debts due to her
subjects, and above all the imperialistic ambitions of Napoleon III, who
dreamt of converting the intellectual influence of France in Hispanic
America into a political ascendancy, would probably have led to European
occupation in any event, so long at least as the United States was slit
asunder and incapable of action.
Some years before, the Mexican Government under the clerical and
militarist regime had made a contract with a Swiss banker who for a
payment of $500,000 had received bonds worth more than fifteen times the
value of the loan. When, therefore, the Mexican Congress undertook to
defer payments on a foreign debt that included the proceeds of this
outrageous contract, the Governments of France, Great Britain, and Spain
decided to intervene. According to their agreement the three powers were
simply to hold the seaports of Mexico and collect the customs duties
until their pecuniary demands had been satisfied. Learning, however,
that Napoleon III had ulterior designs, Great Britain and Spain withdrew
their forces and left him to proceed with his scheme of conquest. After
capturing Puebla in May, 1863, a French army numbering some thirty
thousand men entered the capital and installed an assemblage of notables
belonging to the clerical and conservative groups. This body thereupon
proclaimed the establishment of a constitutional monarchy under an
emperor. The title was to be offered to Maximilian, Archduke of Austria.
In case he should not accept, the matter was to be referred to the
"benevolence of his majesty, the Emperor of the French," who might then
select some other Catholic prince.
On his arrival, a year later, the amiable and well-meaning Maximilian
soon discovered that, instead of being an "Emperor," he was actually
little more than a precarious chief of a faction sustained by the
bayonets of a foreign army. In the northern part of Mexico, Juarez,
Porfirio Diaz,--later to become the most renowned of presidential
autocrats,--and other patriot leaders, though hunted from place to
place, held firmly to their resolve never to bow to the yoke of the
pretender. Nor could Maximilian be sure of the loyalty of even his
supposed adherents. Little by little the unpleasant conviction intruded
itself upon him that he must either abdicate or crush all resistance in
the hope that eventually time and good will might win over the Mexicans.
But do what they would, his foreign legions could not catch the wary
and stubborn Juarez and his guerrilla lieutenants, who persistently wore
down the forces of their enemies. Then the financial situation became
grave. Still more menacing was the attitude of the United States now
that its civil war was at an end. On May 31, 1866, Maximilian received
word that Napoleon III had decided to withdraw the French troops.
He then determined to abdicate, but he was restrained by the unhappy
Empress Carlotta, who hastened to Europe to plead his cause with
Napoleon. Meantime, as the French troops were withdrawn, Juarez occupied
the territory.
Feebly the "Emperor" strove to enlist the favor of his adversaries by a
number of liberal decrees; but their sole result was his abandonment
by many a lukewarm conservative. Inexorably the patriot armies closed
around him until in May, 1867, he was captured at Queretaro, where he
had sought refuge. Denied the privilege of leaving the country on a
promise never to return, he asked Escobedo, his captor, to treat him
as a prisoner of war. "That's my business," was the grim reply. On the
pretext that Maximilian had refused to recognize the competence of the
military court chosen to try him, Juarez gave the order to shoot him.
On the 19th of June the Austrian archduke paid for a fleeting glory
with his life. Thus failed the second attempt at erecting an empire in
Mexico. For thirty-four years diplomatic relations between that country
and Austria-Hungary were severed. The clerical-military combination had
been overthrown, and the Mexican people had rearmed their independence.
As Juarez declared: "Peace means respect for the rights of others."
Even if foreign dreams of empire in Mexico had vanished so abruptly, it
could hardly be expected that a land torn for many years by convulsions
could become suddenly tranquil. With Diaz and other aspirants to
presidential power, or with chieftains who aimed at setting up little
republics of their own in the several states, Juarez had to contend for
some time before he could establish a fair amount of order. Under his
successor, who also was a civilian, an era of effective reform began. In
1873 amendments to the constitution declared Church and State absolutely
separate and provided for the abolition of peonage--a provision which
was more honored in, the breach than in the observance.