FOOTNOTES:

[1] The prefix "Democratic" was not used by Jefferson; it became

established, however, and official.

[2] Under the rubric of "strict construction" fall the greatest

struggles in the party's history: those over the United States Bank,

over tariffs--for protection or for "revenue" only--over "internal

improvements," over issues of administrative economy in providing for

the "general welfare," &c. The course of the party has frequently

been inconsistent, and its doctrines have shown, absolutely

considered, progressive latitudinarianism.

[3] "Nationalistic" is used here and below, not in the sense of a

general nationalistic spirit, such as that of Jackson, but to

indicate the centralizing tendency of a broad construction of

constitutional powers in behalf of commerce and manufactures.

[4] Standing for protective tariffs, internal improvements, &c.

[5] It should be borne in mind, however, that the Democratic party of

Jackson was not strictly _identical_ with the Democratic-Republican

party of Jefferson,--and some writers date back the origin of the

present Democratic party only to 1828-1829.

[6] The Democratic national convention of 1832 was preceded by an

Anti-Masonic convention of 1830 and by the National-Republican

convention of 1831; but the Democratic platform of 1840 was the first

of its kind.

[7] The attitude of the Republican party was no less inconsistent and

evasive.

[8] It controlled the House of Representatives from 1874 to 1894

except in 1880-1882 and 1888-1890; but except for a time in

Cleveland's second term, there were never simultaneously a Democratic

president and a Democratic majority in Congress.

[9] Professor A. D. Morse in _International Monthly_, October 1900.

He adds, "It has done more to Americanize the foreigner than all

other parties." (It is predominant in the great cities of the

country.)

[10] In connexion with the prevalent popular tendency to regard the

president as a people's tribune, it may be noted that a strong

presidential veto is, historically, peculiarly a Democratic

contribution, owing to the history of Jackson's (compare Cleveland's)

administration.

DEMOCRITUS, probably the greatest of the Greek physical philosophers,

was a native of Abdera in Thrace, or as some say--probably wrongly--of

Miletus (Diog. Laërt. ix. 34). Our knowledge of his life is based almost

entirely on tradition of an untrustworthy kind. He seems to have been

born about 470 or 460 B.C., and was, therefore, an older contemporary of

Socrates. He inherited a considerable property, which enabled him to

travel widely in the East in search of information. In Egypt he settled

for seven years, during which he studied the mathematical and physical

systems of the ancient schools. The extent to which he was influenced by

the Magi and the Eastern astrologists is a matter of pure conjecture. He

returned from his travels impoverished; one tradition says that he

received 500 talents from his fellow-citizens, and that a public funeral

was decreed him. Another tradition states that he was regarded as insane

by the Abderitans, and that Hippocrates was summoned to cure him.

Diodorus Siculus tells us that he died at the age of ninety; others make

him as much as twenty years older. His works, according to Diogenes

Laërtius, numbered seventy-two, and were characterized by a purity of

style which compares favourably with that of Plato. The absurd epithet,

the "laughing philosopher," applied to him by some unknown and very

superficial thinker, may possibly have contributed in some measure to

the fact that his importance was for centuries overlooked. It is

interesting, however, to notice that Bacon (_De Principiis_) assigns to

him his true place in the history of thought, and points out that both

in his own day and later "in the times of Roman learning" he was spoken

of in terms of the highest praise. In the variety of his knowledge, and

in the importance of his influence on both Greek and modern speculation

he was the Aristotle of the 5th century, while the sanity of his

metaphysical theory has led many to regard him as the equal, if not the

superior, of Plato.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Demijohn" to "Destructors" Volume 8, Slice 2 · 第 7 / 35 题