Introduction

This book contains my original theory, called MDT (Modeling Devices

Theory) on the basic hardware function of the brain (human or animal).

As any scientific theory, it is a symbolic model. Any symbolic model is

based on a limited number of basic terms and a limited number of basic

relations between the basic terms. For the basic terms and only for

them, there are accepted descriptive definitions. All the others terms

are generated by the model, together with their normal definitions.

These definitions are generated by the model by logical and

mathematical procedures.

These are the basic characteristics of any scientific theory and so, I

follow the procedures described above, to make a theory on the basic

hardware functions of the brain.

This theory is in a total opposition with all the actual sciences

associated with the functions of the brain. The present sciences,

associated with the functions of the brain, are not based on a single

fundamental model. In this way, as my theory will be accepted, all what

it was already written in the actual sciences associated with the

functions of the brain, have to be re-written or forgotten.

This attempt of total revolution is necessary because the actual

sciences on the brain don't use normal definitions of the terms. There

are only descriptions associated with them.

In psychology, for instance, about any scientist has his/her own list of

descriptive definition associated with the terms used by him/her. In

this way, it is not possible to make a logical structure to integrate

all the terms used in that field. So, the psychology, for instance, is

not a positive science.

Example:

Let's consider a classical positive science, as Newton's Mechanics is.

In this symbolic model, all terms have exactly the same definition for

all the scientists. These definition are not changed since 340 years ago

when they were generated by the symbolic model of Mechanics. For

instance, the term "speed" is defined as v=s/t. That is, "speed" means

that the "space" is divided by "time". This definition is a normal

definition generated by the symbolic model of Mechanics and so, that

term is not introduced by description.

Let's suppose now that a symbolic model associated with the basic

hardware function of the brain is already created or it will be created.

The first consequence is that all the terms used in association with the

functions of the brain will be generated by the model by logical and

mathematical procedures, together with their normal definitions. There

is no reason to suppose that any descriptive definition which is already

used in the present sciences of the brain will be compatible with the

definitions generated by that symbolic model.

So, all what is already created in the present sciences associated with

the brain has to be re-written or forgotten.

Regardless of the fact that MDT theory will be accepted or not, a

symbolic model which covers the basic hardware function of the brain

will produce this total revolution in all the sciences associated with

the brain, including psychology, psychiatry, gnoseology, epistemology,

many parts of social sciences.

Let's consider that a symbolic model to cover the basic functions of the

brain is created and is accepted. The persons who already work in these

fields have to re-start everything about from zero. Their opposition

will be enormous and I have no illusion in this direction.

This theory was created about 10 years ago. Based on my personal

experience, the theory is easily understood by persons with special

orientation on positive sciences, including children's over 12 years

old. Also, the persons who already work with symbolic models

(mathematicians, physicists, engineers and so on) have a high capacity

to understand it.

Let's see what MDT offers.

First of all, MDT treats the brain as a device which processes the

information. In this way, MDT has no direct connection with the

medicine. MDT is concerning only with the basic functions associated

with information processing and it is not interested by problems as

"what part of the brain is doing something" or "how a function is

implemented". MDT is a theory associated with the processing of the

information and so it has no direct interference with the physical

brain.

As a symbolic model associated with the basic function of the brain, it

generates precise definition, based on logic, of all the terms used in

association with the functions of the brain. In this way, all the terms

are logical correlated between them.

Examples: MDT generates normal definitions for: knowledge,

consciousness, to imagine, to think, intelligence, emotion, to be

irritate, love, happiness and many others. E.g. the "consciousness" is

the facility of a brain to make and operate a model which contains the

being itself as an element. MDT defines, than, 6 different types of

consciousness which are, of course, defined in the same precise way.

Even more, based on MDT, it is possible to design a logical structure to

implement the function called "consciousness".

MDT explains the basic functions of the brain up to the level to make a

logical design to synthesize all the brain's functions (human or

animal). Of course, a technological implementation of that functions is

not possible now because the computers, for example, have yet a very low

power to process the information and this situation will last, I think,

at least in the next 25 years.

In fact, the brain is treated by MDT as a technological product. So,

there are defined the main design goals and also, the main deficiencies

(by design or given by technological implementation).

There is analyzed the problem if, by evolution, it is possible or not to

evolve from animal brain to human brain.

There are analyzed the design and technological problems, including the

functional illnesses of the brains.

The theory treats also the paranormal phenomenon and suggest some

methods to develop such activities.

The Application section contains also many items as a history of the

evolution of the brain, the evaluation of the problems of psychological

tests and performance tests for a brain, some problems associated with

the present and future levels of evolution of the brain, some long range

problems associated with the development of the human society (including

the terrorism) and many others.

The basic elements of MDT occurs in 1993 and the first written form (on

WEB) in 1997. The process of developing is continuing.

Dorin T. MOISA

moisa@zappmobile.ro

EXPLICATIE

Aceasta' versiune a ca'rtzii este scrisa' i'n i'ntregime cu caractere ASCII.

Totushi, eliminarea diacriticelor poate sa' creeze ambiguita'tzi. Asha cum deja

atzi observat, diacriticele se i'nlocuiesc cu nishte caractere speciale. Astfel,

"s" cu coditza' se i'nlocuieshte cu "sh" iar "t" cu coditza se i'nlocuieshte cu

"tz". Pentru "i" cu ca'ciula' se foloseshte "i'" iar pentru "a" cu ca'ciula' se

foloseshte "a'", asha cum deja atzi observat.

Totusi, sunt putine cazuri cind eliminarea diacriticelor poate sa creeze

ambiguitati. Din cauza aceasta, acest text va folosi notatia speciala de mai sus

numai si numai in situatiile in care ar putea sa apara ambiguitati.

Astfel, nu vom scrie "i'nva'tza'mi'nt" deoarece scrierea "invatamint" nu creaza

ambiguitati dar vom scrie "casa" sau "casa'" in functie de articolul

hotarit/nehotarit cerut de sensul frazei.

Aceasta carte se adreseaza numai celor care percep realitatea externa pe baza de

logica. Acesti cititori vor avea tendinta naturala sa accepte eliminarea

diacriticelor din scriere. In Germania exista' deja o forma oficiala de scriere a

limbii numai cu caractere ASCII si care a fost impusa de guvern cu toate

protestele populatiei. Poate ar trebui ca aceasta problema sa fie pusa, in mod

serios, si la noi. Aici este deci o propunere. Pentru cei care nu agreeaza aceasta

scriere, exista si o versiune W'97 a cartii, cu diacritice.

Dorin Teodor MOISA

Creierul, O Enigma Descifrata · 第 3 / 65 题