But the point to which I would more especially call attention is that of

the unwearied exertions of Royalty to foster and inflame the passion for

Military glory. I wandered for hours through the spacious and

innumerable halls of Versailles, in which Art and Nature seem to have

been taxed to the utmost to heap up prodigies of splendor. At least one

hundred of these rooms would each of itself be deemed a marvel of

sumptuous display anywhere else; yet here we passed over floors of the

richest Mosaic and through galleries of the finest and most elaborately

wrought Marble as if they had been but the roughest pavement or the

rudest plaster. The eye is fatigued, the mind bewildered, by an almost

endless succession of sumptuous carving, gilding, painting, &c., until

the intervention of a naked ante-room or stair-case becomes a positive

relief to both. And the ideas everywhere predominant are War and its

misnamed Glory. Here are vast, expensive paintings purporting to

represent innumerable Sieges and Battles in which the French arms were

engaged, many of them so insignificant that the world has wisely

forgotten them, yet here preserved to inflame and poison the minds of

hot-blooded, unreflecting youth, impelling them to rush into the

manufacture of cripples and corpses under the horrible delusion that

needless, aimless Slaughter, if perpetrated by wholesale, can really be

honorable and glorious. These paintings, as a whole, are of moderate

value as works of Art, while their tendency is horrible and their

details to me revolting. Carriages shattered and overturned, animals

transfixed by spear-thrusts and writhing in speechless agony, men

riddled by cannon-shot or pierced by musket-balls and ghastly with

coming death, such are the spectacles which the more favored and

fortunate of the Gallic youth have been called for generations to admire

and enjoy. These battle-pieces have scarcely more Historic than Artistic

value, since the names of at least half of them might be transposed and

the change be undetected by ninety-nine out of every hundred who see

them. If _all_ the French battles were thus displayed, it might be urged

with plausibility that these galleries were historical in their

character; but a full half of the story, that which tells of French

disaster and discomfiture--is utterly suppressed. The Battles of

Ptolemais, of Ivry, of Fontenoy, of Rivoli, of Austerlitz, &c., are here

as imposing as paint can make them, but never a whisper of Agincourt,

Crecy, Poictiers, Blenheim, or Ramillies, nor yet of Salamanca, of

Vittoria, of Leipsic, or Waterloo. Even the wretched succession of

forays which the French have for the last twenty years been prosecuting

in Algerine Africa here shines resplendent, for Vernet has painted, by

Louis Philippe's order and at France's cost, a succession of

battle-pieces wherein French numbers and science are seen prevailing

over Arab barbarism and irregular valor in combats whereof the very

names have been wisely forgotten by mankind, though they occurred but

yesterday. One of these is much the largest painting I ever saw, and is

probably the largest in the world, and it seems to have been got up

merely to exhibit one of Louis Philippe's sons in the thickest of the

fray. Last of all, we have the "Capture of Abd-el-Kader," as imposing as

Vernet could make it, but no whisper of the persistent perfidy wherewith

he has been retained for several years in bondage, in violation of the

express agreement of his captors. The whole collection is, in its

general effect, delusive and mischievous, the purpose being to exhibit

War as always glorious and France as uniformly triumphant. It is by

means like these that the business of shattering knee-joints and

multiplying orphans is kept in countenance.

Versailles is a striking monument of the selfish profligacy of

King-craft and the long-suffering patience of Nations. Hundreds of

thousands of laborers' children must have gone hungry to their straw

pallets in order that their needy parents might pay the inexorable taxes

levied to build this Palace. Yet after all it has stood mainly

uninhabited! Its immense extent and unequalled splendor require an

immeasurable profusion in its occupant, and the incomes even of kings

are not absolutely without limit. So Versailles, with six or eight other

Royal Palaces in and around Paris, has generally stood empty, entailing

on the country an enormous annual expense for its simple preservation.

And now, though France has outgrown Royalty, it knows not what to do

with its costly, spacious, glittering shells. A single Palace

(Rambouillet) standing furthest from Paris, was converted (under Louis

Philippe) into a gigantic storehouse for Wool, while its spacious Parks

and Gardens were wisely devoted to the breeding and sustenance of the

choicest Merino Sheep. The others mainly stand empty, and how to dispose

of them is a National perplexity. Some of them may be converted into

Hospitals, Insane Retreats, &c., others into Libraries or Galleries of

Art and Science; but Versailles is too far from Paris for aught but a

Retreat as aforesaid, and has cost so immense a sum that any use which

may be made of it will seem wasteful. I presume it could not be sold as

it stands for a tenth of its actual cost. Perhaps it will be best,

therefore, to convert all the others into direct uses and preserve this

for public inspection as a perpetual memorial of the reckless

prodigality and all-devouring pomp of Kings, and as a warning to Nations

never again to entrust their destinies to men who, from their very

education and the influences surrounding them through life, must be led

to consider the Toiling Millions as mainly created to pamper their

appetites, to gratify their pride, and to pave with their corpses their

road to extended dominion.

ST. CLOUD is a much smaller but more pleasantly situated, more tastefully

furnished and decorated Palace, some miles nearer than Versailles to

Paris, and commanding an admirable view of the city. The LUXEMBOURG,

situated in the southern section of the city, is externally a chaste and

well-proportioned edifice, containing some fine pictures by living artists,

and surrounded by spacious and delightful woods, shrubbery, &c., termed

"the Gardens of the Luxembourg." The TUILERIES, in the heart of the city,

near the Seine, I have not seen internally, and the exterior seems low,

straggling, and every way unimposing. Its extent is almost incredible by

those who have not seen it--scarcely less than that of Versailles. The

LOUVRE is the finest structure of all, and most worthily devoted. Its

lower story is filled with Sculptures of no considerable merit, but its

galleries contain more strikingly good Paintings than I shall ever again

see under one roof. I have spent a good part of two days there, and mean

to revisit it on my return.

PASSPORTS, ETC.

If each American could spend three days on this continent, his love of

Country and of Liberty could not fail to be quickened and intensified,

if only by an experience of the enormity of the Passport nuisance. It

has cost me precious hours already, not to speak of dollars, and is

certain to cost many more of each. I have nearly concluded to given up

Germany on account of it, while Italy fairly swarms with petty

sovereignties and with Yankee Consuls, the former afraid of their own

black shadows, the latter intent on their beloved two dollars each from

every American traveler. Such is the report I have of them, and I

presume the reality is equal to the foreshadowing. It is a shame that

Republican France stands far behind Aristocratic Britain in this

respect, but I trust the contrast will not endure many more years.

Two Americans who arrived here last week caused some perplexity to their

landlord. Every man who lodges a stranger here must see forthwith that

he has a Passport in good condition, in default of which said host is

liable to a penalty. Now, these Americans, when applied to, produced

Passports in due form, but the professions set forth therein were not

transparent to the landlord's apprehension. One of them was duly

designated in his Passport as a "_Loafer_" the other as a "_Rowdy_" and

they informed him, on application, that, though these professions were

highly popular in America and extensively followed, they knew no French

synonyms into which they could be translated. The landlord, not content

with the sign manual of Daniel Webster, affirming that all was right,

applied to an American friend for a translation of the inexplicable

professions, but I am not sure that he has even yet been fully

enlightened with regard to them.

I am off to-day (I hope) for Lyons and Italy.

XIX.

FRANCE, CENTRAL AND EASTERN.

LYONS, Tuesday, June 17, 1851.

I came out of Paris through the spacious _Boulevards_,[B] which, under

various second appellations, stretch eastward from the Madeleine Church

nearly to the barrier, and then bend southward, near the beautiful

column which marks the site and commemorates the fall of the Bastile, so

long the chief dungeon wherein Despotism stifled Remonstrance and tamed

the spirit of Freedom. Liberty in France is doomed yet to undergo many

trials--nay, is now enduring some of them--but it is not within the

compass of probability that another Bastile should ever rear its head

there, nor that the absolute power and abject servitude which it fitly

symbolized should ever be known there hereafter. Very near it on the

south lies the famous Faubourg St. Antoine, inhabited mainly by bold,

free-souled working-men, who have repeatedly evinced their choice to die

free rather than live slaves, and in whom the same spirit lives and

rules to-day. I trust that dire alternative will never again be forced

upon them, but if it should be there is no Bastile so impregnable, no

despotism so fortified by prescription, and glorious recollections, and

the blind devotion of loyalty, as those they have already leveled to the

earth.

The Paris Station of the Lyons Railway is at the eastern barrier of the

City. I received here another lesson in French Railroad management. I

first bought at the office my ticket for Chalons on the Saone, which is

the point to which the road is now completed. The distance is 243 miles;

the fare (first-class) $7.50. But the display of my ticket did not

entitle me to enter the passengers' sitting-room, much less to approach

the cars. Though I had cut down my baggage, by two radical

retrenchments, to two light carpet-bags, I could not take these with me,

nor would they pass without weighing. When weighed, I was required to

pay three or four sous (cents) for extra baggage, though there is no

stage-route in America on which those bags would not have passed

unchallenged and been accounted a very moderate allowance. Now I was

permitted to enter the sacred precincts, but my friend, who had spent

the morning with me and come to see me off, was inexorably shut out, and

I had no choice but to bid him a hasty adieu. Passing the entrance, I

was shown into the apartment for first-class passengers, while the

second-class were driven into a separate fold and the third-class into

another. Thus we waited fifteen minutes, during which I satisfied myself

that no other American was going by this train, and but three or four

English, and of these the two with whom I scraped an acquaintance were

going only to Fontainbleau, a few miles from Paris. They were required

to take their places in a portion of the train which was to stop at

Fontainbleau, and so we moved off.

The European Railway carriages, so far as I have yet seen them, are more

expensive and less convenient than ours. Each is absolutely divided into

apartments about the size of a mail-coach, and calculated to hold eight

persons. The result is thirty-two seats where an American car of equal

length and weight would hold at least fifty, and of the thirty-two

passengers, one-half must inevitably ride backward. I believe the

second-class cars are more sociable, and mean to make their

acquaintance. I should have done it this time, but for my desire to meet

some one with whom I could converse, and Americans and Englishmen are

apt to cling to the first-class places. My aim was disappointed. My

companions were all Frenchmen, and, what was worse, all inveterate

smokers. They kept puff-puffing, through the day; first all of them,

then three, two, and at all events one, till they all got out at Dijon

near nightfall; when, before I had time to congratulate myself on the

atmospheric improvement, another Frenchman got in, lit his cigar, and

went at it. All this was in direct and flagrant violation of the rules

posted up in the car; but when did a smoker ever care for law or

decency? I will endeavor next time to find a seat in a car where women

are fellow-passengers, and see whether their presence is respected by

the devotees of the noxious weed. I have but a faint hope of it.

The Railroad from Paris to Chalons passes through a generally level

region, watered by tributaries of the Seine and of the Saone, with a

range of gentle hills skirting the valleys, generally on the right and

sometimes on either hand. As in England, the track is never allowed to

cross a carriage-road on its own level, but is carried either under or

over each. The soil is usually fertile and well cultivated, though not

so skillfully and thoroughly as that of England. There are places,

however, in which the cultivation could not easily be surpassed, but I

should say that the average product would not be more than two-thirds

that of England, acre for acre. There are very few fences of any kind,

save a slight one inclosing the Railway, beyond which the country

stretches away as far as the eye can reach without a visible landmark,

the crops of different cultivators fairly touching each other and

growing square up to the narrow roads that traverse them. You will see,

for instance, first a strip of Grass, perhaps ten rods wide, and

running back sixty or eighty rods from the Railroad; then a narrower

strip of Wheat; then one of Grape-Vines; then one of Beans; then one of

Clover; then Wheat again, then Grass or Oats, and so on. I saw very

little Rye; and if there were Potatoes or Indian Corn, they were not up

sufficiently high to be distinguished as we sped by them. The work going

forward was the later Weeding with the earlier Hay-making, and I saw

nearly as many women as men working in the fields. The growing crops

were generally kept pretty clear of weeds, and the grass was most

faithfully but very slowly cut. I think one Yankee would mow over more

ground in a day than two Frenchmen, but he would cut less hay to the

acre. Of course, in a country devoid of fences and half covered with

small patches of grain, there could not be many cattle: I saw no oxen,

very few cows, and not many horses. The hay-carts were generally drawn

by asses, or by horses so small as not to be easily distinguished from

asses as we whirled rapidly by. The wagons on the roads were generally

drawn by small horses. I judge that the people are generally industrious

but not remarkably efficient, and that the women do the larger half of

the work, house-work included. The hay-carts were wretchedly small, and

the implements used looked generally rude and primitive. The dwellings

are low, small, steep-roofed cottages, for which a hundred dollars each

would be a liberal offer. Of course, I speak of the rural habitations;

those in the villages are better, though still mainly small,

steep-roofed, poor, and huddled together in the most chaotic confusion.

The stalls and pastures for cattle were in the main only visible to the

eye of faith; though cattle there must be and are to do the ploughing

and hauling. I suspect they are seldom turned loose in summer, and that

there is not a cow to every third cottage. I think I did not see a yoke

of oxen throughout the day's ride of 243 miles.

I was again agreeably disappointed in the abundance of Trees. Wood

seems to be the peasants' sole reliance for fuel, and trees are planted

beside the roads, the streams, the ditches, and often in rows or patches

on some arable portion of the peasants' narrow domain. This planting is

mainly confined to two varieties--the Lombardy Poplar and what I took to

be the Pollard, a species of Willow which displays very little foliage,

and is usually trimmed up so as to have but a mere armful of leaves and

branches at the top of a trunk thirty to fifty feet high, and six to

twelve inches through. The Lombardy Poplar is in like manner preferred,

as giving a large amount of trunk to little shade, the limbs rarely

extending three feet from the trunk, while the growth is rapid. Such are

the means employed to procure fuel and timber with the least possible

abstraction of soil from the uses of cultivation. There are some

side-hills so rocky and sterile as to defy human industry, and these are

given up to brush-wood, which I presume is cut occasionally and bound

into faggots for fuel. Some of it may straggle up, if permitted, into

trees, but I saw little that would fairly justify the designation of

Forest. Of Fruit-trees, save in the villages, there is a deplorable

scarcity throughout.

We passed through few villages and no town of note but DIJON, the capital

of ancient Burgundy, where its Parliament was held and where its Dukes

reigned and were buried. Their palace still stands, though they have

passed away. Dijon is 200 miles from Paris, and has 25,000 inhabitants,

with manufactures of Cotton, Woolen and Silk. Here and henceforth the

Vine is more extensively cultivated than further Northward.

We reached CHALONS on the Saone (there is another Chalons on the Marne)

before 9 P. M. or in about ten hours from Paris. Here a steamboat was

ready to take us forthwith to Lyons, but French management was too much

for us. Our baggage was all taken from the car outside and carried piece

by piece into the depot, where it was very carefully arranged in order

according to the numbers affixed to the several trunks, &c., in Paris.

This consumed the better part of half an hour, though half as many

Yankees as were fussing over it would have had it all distributed to the

owners inside of ten minutes. Then the holders of the first three or four

numbers were let into the baggage-room, and when they were disposed of as

many more were let in, and so on. Each, as soon as he had secured his

baggage, was hustled into an omnibus destined for the boat. I was among

the first to get seated, but ours was the last omnibus to start, and when

the attempt was made, the carriage was overloaded and wouldn't start! At

last it was set in motion, but stopped twice or thrice to let off

passengers and baggage at hotels, then to collect fare, and at last, when

we had got within a few rods of the landing, we were cheered with the

information that "_Le bateau est parti!_" The French may have been better

than this, but its purport was unmistakable--the boat was gone, and we

were done. I had of course seen this trick played before, but never so

clumsily. There was no help for us, however, and the amount of useless

execration emitted was rather moderate than otherwise. Our charioteers

had taken good care to obtain their pay for carrying us some time before,

and we suffered ourselves to be taken to our predestined hotel in a frame

of mind approaching Christian resignation. In fact, when I had been shown

up to a nice bed-room, with clean sheets and (for France) a fair supply

of water, and had taken time to reflect that there is no accommodation

for sleeping on any of these European river-boats, I was rather glad we

had been swindled than otherwise. So I am still. But you may travel the

same route in a hurry; so look out!

We rose at 4 and made for the boat, determined not to be caught twice in

the same town. At five we bade good-bye to Chalons-sur-Saone (a pleasant

town of 13,000 people), under a lowering sky which soon blessed the

earth with rain--a dubious blessing to a hundred people on a steamboat

with no deck above the guards and scarcely room enough below for the

female passengers. However, the rain soon ceased and the sky gradually

cleared, so that since 9 o'clock the day has been sunny and delightful.

The distance from Chalons to Lyons by the Saone is some 90 miles. The

river is about the size of the Connecticut from Greenfield to Hartford,

but is sluggish throughout, with very low banks until the last ten or

fifteen miles. After an intervale of half a mile to two miles, the land

rises gently on the right to an altitude of some two to five hundred

feet, the slope covered and checkered the whole distance with vineyards,

meadows, woods, &c. The Poplar and the Pollard are still planted, but

the scale of cultivation is larger and the houses much better than

between Paris and Dijon. The intervale (mainly in meadow) is much wider

on the left bank, the swell beyond it being in some places scarcely

visible. The scenery is greatly admired here, and as a whole may be

termed pretty, but cannot compare with that of the Hudson or Connecticut

in boldness or grandeur. There are some craggy hill-sides in the

distance, but I have not yet seen an indisputable mountain in France,

though I have passed nearly through it in a mainly southerly course for

over five hundred miles.

As we approach Lyons, the hills on either side come nearer and finally

shut in the river between two steep acclivities, from which much

building-stone has been quarried. Elsewhere, these hill-sides are

covered with tasteful country residences of the retired or wealthy

Lyonnais, surrounded by gardens, arbors, shrubbery, &c. The general

effect is good. At last, houses and quays begin to line and bridges to

span the river, and we halt beside one of the quays and are in Lyons.

FOOTNOTES:

[B] _Boulevard_ means, I presume, rampart or fortified works (hence our

English _bulwark_). The rampart was long ago removed, as the city

outgrew it, but the name is retained by the ample street which took its

place. Our _Battery_ at New-York illustrates this origin of a name.

XX.

LYONS TO TURIN.

TURIN (Italy), June 20, 1851.

LYONS, though a French city, and the second in the Republic, wears a sad,

disheartened aspect. In '91 a stronghold of decaying Loyalty, it is

to-day the very focus of Democratic Socialism, being decidedly more "Red"

than Paris.--Here is concentrated the Sixth Military Division of the

French Army, under chiefs not chary of using the sabre and bayonet, and

with instructions to apply efficient poultices of grape and canister on

the first palpable appearance of local inflammation. Should Louis Napoleon

be enabled to override the Constitution and prolong his sway, it is

possible that, by the aid of the act of May 31st, 1850, whereby more than

half the Artisans of France are disfranchised, the spirit of Lyons may in

time be subdued, and partisans of "Order" substituted for her present

Socialist Representatives in the Assembly; but, should the popular cause

triumph in the ensuing Elections, I shall be agreeably disappointed if

that triumph is as temperately and forbearingly enjoyed here as was that

of February, 1848.

Glances at Europe In a Series of Letters from Great Britain, France, Italy, Switzerland, &c. During the Summer of 1851. · 第 11 / 26 段