THEORIES OF RECONSTRUCTION.

There are three prominent theories of reconstruction now before the

people. The first, as being in the natural and constitutional order of

things, has shaped the policy of the Administration in its whole conduct

of affairs. It supposes the rebellion to be an armed insurrection

against the authority of the United States, usurping the functions and

powers of various State Governments, and seeking to overthrow the

Nation. So considering it, the whole power of the Nation has been

brought to bear to subdue it, in accordance with the just authority

conferred by the Constitution, which is the organic law of the Nation.

The steadfast prosecution of this policy, upheld and supported by the

people with a unanimity and patient faith that have strengthened the

cause of democratic government all over the earth, has rescued from the

rebellion and restored to their undisputed position in the Union, the

States of Kentucky, Missouri, and now, at last, Tennessee, with a

portion of Virginia. Such are the results to the Union of the natural

and constitutional policy that aims at reconstruction through

restoration.

The two other theories spoken of may be best considered together, as

they originated in a common purpose, namely, the abolition of slavery,

which it is supposed cannot be attained by the ordinary processes of war

under the Constitution. Their advocates, however, contend that they are

strictly constitutional.

The first of these theories supposes that the States included in the

rebellion have, by the fact of rebellion, forfeited all rights as

States. It is argued that States, like individuals, forfeit their rights

by rebellion.

The other theory supposes that the States having rebelled, may be dealt

with as foreign States; so that, according to the laws of war, the

nation may treat them altogether as alien enemies, and in the event of

the Nation's triumph, the States will be in all respects like conquered

provinces.

It will be observed that each of these theories ignores the principle of

the indivisibility of the Union, and presupposes a dismemberment of it

on the part of every rebellious State.

The Continental Monthly, Vol. 4, No. 6, December 1863 Devoted to Literature and National Policy · 第 30 / 80 题