OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_BY MR. PUNCH'S STAFF OF LEARNED CLERKS_.)

When I first read the title of _Secret Bread_ (HEINEMANN) my idea

was--well, what would anyone naturally think but that here was a

romance of food-hoarding, a tale of running the potato blockade and

the final discovery of a hidden cellar full of fresh rolls? But of

course I was quite wrong. The name has nothing to do with food, other

than mental; it stands for the sustaining idea (whatever it is)

that each one of us keeps locked in his heart as the motive of his

existence. With _Ishmael Ruan_, the hero of Miss F. TENNYSON JESSE'S

novel, this hidden motive was love of the old farm-house hall of

Cloom, and a wish to hand it on, richer, to his son. _Ishmael_

inherited Cloom himself because, though the youngest of a large

family, he was the only one born in wedlock. Hence the second theme of

the story, the jealousy between _Ishmael_ and _Archelaus_, the elder

illegitimate brother. How, through the long lives of both, this

enmity is kept up, and the frightful vengeance that ends it, make an

absorbing and powerful story. The pictures of Cornish farm-life also

are admirably done--though I feel bound to repeat my conviction that

the time is at hand when, for their own interest, our novelists will

have to proclaim what one might call a close time for pilchards.

Still, Miss JESSE has written an unusually clever book, full of

vigour and passion, of which the interest never flags throughout the

five-hundred-odd closely-printed pages that carry its protagonists

from the early sixties almost to the present day. No small

achievement.

* * * * *

Mrs. SKRINE has collected some charming fragrant papers from various

distinguished sources concerning the ever-recurring phenomenon of

_The Devout Lady_ (CONSTABLE), in order to inspire one JOAN, a V.A.D.

heroine of the new order. I guess JOAN, of whom only a faint glimpse

is vouchsafed, must be a nice person--the author's affectionate

interest in her is sufficient proof of that. I suppose we all know

our Little Gidding out of SHORTHOUSE'S _John Inglesant_. Mrs. SKRINE

deprecates the Inglesantian view and offers us a stricter portrait of

MARY COLLET. "Madam" THORNTON, Yorkshire Royalist dame in the stormy

days of the Irish Rebellion and the Second JAMES'S flight to St.

Germain, is another portrait in the gallery; then there's PATTY MORE,

HANNAH'S less famous practical sister, of Barleywood and the Cheddar

Cliff collieries; and a modern great lady of a lowly cottage, in

receipt of an old-age pension and still alive in some dear corner of

England--the best sketch of the series, because drawn from life and

not from documents. If the author has a fault it is her detached

allusiveness, her flattering but mystifying assumption that one can

follow all her references, and her rather mannered idiom: "He proved a

kind husband, but sadly a tiresome." These, however, be trifles. Read

this pleasant book, I beg you, and send it on to your own Joan.

* * * * *

I have read with deep interest and appreciation and with a mournful

pleasure the _Letters of Arthur George Heath_ (BLACKWELL, Oxford). It

is the record, in a series of letters mostly written to his parents,

of the short fighting life of a singularly brave and devoted man.

There is in addition a beautiful memoir by Professor GILBERT MURRAY,

whose privilege it was to be ARTHUR HEATH'S friend. HEATH was not

vowed to fighting from his boyhood onward. He was a brilliant scholar

and afterwards a fellow of New College, Oxford. The photograph of him

shows a very delicate and refined face, and his letters bear out

the warrant of his face and prove that it was a true index to his

character. Until the great summons came one might have set him down

as destined to lead a quiet life amid the congenial surroundings of

Oxford, but we know now that the real stuff of him was strong and

stern. He joined the army a day or two after the outbreak of war,

being assured that our cause was just and one that deserved to be

fought for. He had no illusions as to the risk he ran, but that didn't

weigh with him for a moment. On July 11th, 1915, he writes to his

mother from the Western Front: "Will you at least try, if I am killed,

not to let the things I have loved cause you pain, but rather to get

increased enjoyment from the Sussex Downs or from Janie (his youngest

sister) singing Folk Songs, because I have found such joy in them,

and in that way the joy I have found can continue to live?" Beautiful

words these, and typical of the man who gave utterance to them.

The end came to him on October 8th, his twenty-eighth birthday. His

battalion of the Royal West Kent Regiment was engaged in making a

series of bombing attacks. In one of these ARTHUR HEATH was shot

through the neck and fell. "He spoke once," Professor MURRAY tells us,

"to say, 'Don't trouble about me,' and died almost immediately." His

Platoon Sergeant wrote to his parents, "A braver man never existed,"

and with that epitaph we may leave him.

* * * * *

The scenes of _A Sheaf of Bluebells_ (HUTCHINSON) are laid in

Normandy, where they speak the French language. But the Baroness ORCZY

does not take advantage of this local habit, and is careful not to put

too heavy a strain upon the intelligence of those who do not enjoy the

gift of tongues. "_Ma tante_," "_Mon cousin_," "_Enfin"_--these are

well within the range of all of us. Indeed, though I shrink from

boasting, I could easily have borne it if she had tried me a little

higher. "_Ma tante_," for instance, got rather upon my nerves before

the heroine had finished with it. The plot (early nineteenth century)

is concerned with one _Ronnay de Maurel_, a soldier and admirer of

NAPOLEON, and in consequence anathema to most of his own family.

The heroine was betrothed to _Ronnay's_ half-brother, as elegant and

royalist as _Ronnay_ was uncouth and Napoleonic. It is a tale of love

and intrigue for idle hours, the kind of thing that the Baroness does

well; and, though she has done better before in this vein, you

will not lack for excitement here; and possibly, as I did, you will

sometimes smile when strictly speaking you ought to have been serious.

* * * * *

"Economy, I hate the word!" said a much-harassed housekeeper recently:

echoing, I fear, the sentiments of the great majority of the British

people. Nevertheless, let no one be deterred by a somewhat forbidding

title from reading Mr. HENRY HIGGS'S _National Economy: An Outline

of Public Administration_ (MACMILLAN). Although written by a Treasury

official--a being who in popular conception is compounded of red-tape

and sealing-wax and spends his life in spoiling the Ship of State by

saving halfpennyworths of tar--it is not a dry-as-dust treatise on the

art of scientific parsimony, but a lively plea for wise expenditure.

Mr. HIGGS is no believer in the dictum that the best thing to do with

national resources is to leave them to fructify in the pockets of

the taxpayers--"doubtful soil," in his opinion; nor is he afraid that

heavy taxation will kill the goose with the golden eggs. It may be

"one of those depraved birds which eat their own eggs, in which case,

if its eggs cannot be trapped, killing is all it is fit for." The

author is full of well-thought-out suggestions for saving waste and

increasing efficiency in our national administration. The introduction

of labour-saving machinery, the elimination of superfluous officials,

the reduction of the necessary drudgery which too often blights the

initiative and breaks the hearts of our young civil servants--all

these and many other reforms are advocated in Mr. HIGGS'S most

entertaining pages. I cordially commend them to the attention of

everyone who takes an intelligent interest in public affairs, not

excluding Cabinet Ministers, Members of Parliament, and political

journalists.

* * * * *

Though already we have so portentous an array of books jostling each

other upon the warshelf, there must be many people who will gladly

find the little space into which they may slip a slender volume

called _A General's Letters to His Son on Obtaining His Commission_

(CASSELL). So slender indeed is the book that by the time you have

read the disproportionate title you seem to be about halfway through

it. But here is certainly a case of infinite riches in a little room.

The anonymous writer is deserving of every praise for the mingled

restraint and force of his method; you feel that, were the name

less outworn, he might well have signed himself "One Who Knows," for

practical experience sounds in every line. Greatest merit of all, the

letters contrive to handle even the most delicate matters without a

hint of preaching. But no words of mine could, in this association,

add anything to the tribute paid in a brief preface by so qualified a

critic as General Sir H.L. SMITH-DORRIEN: "If young officers will only

study these letters carefully, and shape their conduct accordingly,

they need have no fear of proving unworthy of His Majesty's

Commission." This is high praise, but well deserved. Personally, my

chief regret is that so valuable a collection of advice should have

delayed its appearance so long: there would have been use and to spare

for it these three years past.

* * * * *

[Illustration: THE ARTS IN WAR-TIME.

_First Tommy_ (_watching artist engaged in protective colouring_).

"MARVELLOUS, AIN'T IT, BERT, 'OW TALENT WILL OUT, EVEN IN THE MOST

ADWERSE CIRCUMSTANCES?"

_Second Tommy_. "YUS. WOT _I_ LIKES BEST IS THE EXPRESSION ON THE

DAWG."]

* * * * *

"The Admiralty announce that several raids were carried out by

naval aircraft from Dunkirk in the course of the night of May

21-June 1, the objectives being Ostend, Zeebrugge and

Bruges. Many bombs were dropped on the objectives with good

results."--_Cork Constitution_.

The Huns must have found it a very long night.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 152, June 13, 1917 · 第 34 / 34 题