49. _Statement by Paul Harrison_

I was in Africa when the news of my father’s death reached me. The work

on which I was engaged was nearly completed, and I at once made

arrangements for handing over the concluding portions of the job and

returning to England. It took a little time to settle all this and to

arrange for my journey to the coast, and it was not till the 6th of

January, 1930, that I arrived in London.

From the moment that I heard the cause of death assigned, I was

positively convinced that there was no accident about it. My father’s

expert knowledge of fungi was very great; and he was a man of almost

exaggerated precision in matters of this kind. It was entirely

incredible to me that he could ever have mistaken a stool of _Amanita

muscaria_ for _Amanita rubescens_, even in the gathering of it; far more

so that he could have peeled and prepared the fungus for eating without

noticing the difference. To the average coroner’s jury, accustomed to

dealing with schoolchildren and trippers, such a mistake would no doubt

seem perfectly natural; but my father was no more likely to take

_Muscaria_ for _Rubescens_ than to take a piece of cast-iron for a piece

of chilled steel. I immediately scouted the whole idea of accident. Two

possibilities remained for me to investigate. Either my father, in his

unselfish devotion to the worthless woman he had married, had destroyed

himself by a painful method which would look like accident and so disarm

suspicion; or else he had been murdered. In either case, I was

determined that the woman should not benefit by the crime which she had

caused.

Feeling as I did towards Margaret Harrison, I could not bring myself to

take up my residence at my father’s house. I therefore took a room at an

hotel in the Bloomsbury district, which has the advantage of being

central, and set myself to examine the problem under all its aspects.

I read and re-read carefully all the newspaper reports of the inquest,

and also all the letters which my father had written to me during the

last two years. The most important of these latter I have included among

the documents submitted to you. There was another, the essentials of

which are covered by Mr. Munting’s statement, which mentioned that Miss

Agatha Milsom had had to be “put away,” and that the character of Mr.

Munting was accordingly considered to have been cleared from suspicion.

I fastened at once upon this incident. I had naturally never believed

that Miss Milsom’s version of this episode was the true one. I believed

my father to have been quite correct in his original suspicions. Miss

Milsom’s illness had, I decided, enabled Munting to pull the wool over

his victim’s eyes very nicely. Margaret Harrison and Munting had been

corresponding all along, until the convenient decease of my father set

them free to come together again after a decent interval.

This suggestion led me directly to the idea of suicide. In some way my

father’s eyes had been opened to what was going on; and the agent must

undoubtedly have been Lathom. He was Munting’s friend and, deliberately

or unconsciously, he must have let fall some words during his stay at

“The Shack” which made the situation plain. I thought it probable that

this young man had played a double-faced part, and forwarded Munting’s

interests under pretence of being friendly with my father. As regards

the idea of murder, Munting appeared to have an alibi. His arrival with

Lathom on the Saturday night had been witnessed, and I did not think it

likely that he could have made any earlier appearance in that

sparsely-populated district without being seen. It seemed possible that

he and Lathom had been confederates, and committed the murder in

collusion; but at the moment I was inclined to think that my father had

been hounded into self-destruction by this precious pair, or rather

trio.

It seemed to me that any first step must be to see Margaret Harrison.

She would learn before long that I was in London, from my father’s

solicitors, with whom I necessarily had business. It was better,

therefore, to call on her at once, both to prevent her from suspecting

my suspicions and to keep up appearances in the eyes of the

neighbourhood.

Accordingly, I went round to Whittington Terrace on the day after my

arrival. I sent up my name by the maid (a new girl since my time), and,

after a short interval, Margaret Harrison came down to me. She was

dressed in deep mourning, very fashionably cut, and came up to me with

the gushing manner which I had always so greatly disliked.

“Oh, Paul!” she said, “isn’t this terrible? How dreadful it has been for

you, poor dear, all that long way away! I am so glad you have managed to

get home!”

“If you are,” I said, “it must be for the first time on record.”

Her face took on the sulky look I knew so well.

“I knew you never liked me, Paul,” she said, “but surely this is hardly

the time to bear a grudge.”

“Perhaps not,” said I, “but it hardly seems worth while to pretend that

you are delighted to see me.”

“As you like,” she replied. “We may as well sit down, anyway.”

She sat down, and I went over and stood by the window.

“You are staying here, of course?” she inquired, after a short silence.

I replied that I preferred to live at an hotel for the present, because

it was more convenient for business.

“Of course,” she said, “you will have a lot of things to see about. I

quite understand. I kept the house on, because I didn’t know what your

plans would be. But perhaps you think it would be better to give it up?”

“Do just as you like,” I answered. “The furniture is yours, I believe?”

“Yes; but this place is really more than I want when I am by myself.

Besides”—here she gave an affected shudder—“it seems, well, haunted,

rather. If you are not coming here, I think I shall give it up and take

a couple of rooms somewhere. I can look after your things till you get

settled.”

The documents in the case · 第 119 / 150 题