HOME OFFICE EXPERT AND “DEADLY FUNGUS”

Sir James Lubbock, the Home Office Analyst, was the first witness to be

called at the resumed inquest. He stated that he had made an analysis of

the contents of the stomach and other organs of the deceased, together

with vomited matter obtained from the bedclothes and elsewhere. He had

also analysed the remains of a dish of mushrooms and other articles of

diet found on the table.

“From the stomach, the vomited matter, and from the unconsumed portion

of the dish of fungus,” said Sir James, “I obtained by analysis a

considerable quantity of a substance known as _muscarine_, which is the

poisonous principle of a fungus, _Amanita muscaria_, or the Fly Agaric.”

Sir James added that, estimating the amount of the poison which had been

rejected from the body in the course of the sickness, he came to the

conclusion that deceased must have consumed a very large quantity of the

poison.

Sufficient to cause death?—Certainly. Muscarine is an exceedingly

deadly poison.

What would be the symptoms of poisoning by muscarine?—They vary in

different cases. Generally speaking, a sensation of acute sickness would

be experienced almost immediately after the meal, followed by violent

vomiting and diarrhœa. There might also be a feeling of suffocation and

dizziness, sometimes accompanied by blindness. The victim would suffer

acute distress and intense depression and fear of death. Unconsciousness

might supervene, or there might be violent convulsions and prolonged

delirium. Death would probably ensue as a result of respiratory

paralysis.

Will you explain that more simply to the jury?—The poison would

paralyse the muscles of the throat and chest, and the victim would be

unable to breathe and would die of suffocation.

You have seen that Dr. Hughes mentioned in his evidence that the pupils

of the eyes were slightly contracted when he first saw the body. What

conclusion do you draw from that?—I cannot definitely say. Myosis (that

is, contraction of the pupils) is characteristic of the effects of

certain poisons, including muscarine, but the contraction usually

disappears at death, though, curiously enough, in the case of eserine, a

pronounced myosis has been found five hours after death. I should regard

a slight degree of contraction as consistent with muscarine poisoning,

but not, in itself, conclusive evidence one way or another.

Have you ever seen a case of muscarine poisoning?—I have seen perhaps

half a dozen cases in my own experience, mostly among children who had

eaten the Fly Agaric in mistake for an edible mushroom. One case, I

remember, was brought to the hospital too late for anything to be done,

and the patient expired in convulsions after a period of

unconsciousness. Three or four were treated by the injection of atropin

and recovered completely. Another case was not brought to my notice till

after the symptoms had cleared up of their own accord; in this case the

amount eaten was very small.

Such cases are not always fatal?—By no means. If the proper treatment

can be given immediately, the prognosis is favourable. Without such

treatment, however, and where a large quantity of the poison is

consumed, recovery would be less likely.

_The Coroner_: In your opinion, what was the cause of death in the case

of Mr. Harrison?

_Sir James Lubbock_: I have not the slightest doubt that he died of

poisoning by muscarine, taken in the dish of fungus submitted to me for

analysis.

Sir James further added that the Fly Agaric, _Amanita muscaria_, was

frequently found in woods and sheltered places, and was liable to be

eaten in mistake for another member of the same family, _Amanita

rubescens_, or Warty Caps, an edible fungus which it very closely

resembled.

Reference was made to the Government publication, _Edible and Poisonous

Fungi_, and to the book _Neglected Edible Treasures_, written by the

deceased, and pictures of the fungi in question were passed round among

the jury.

Questioned with regard to the eggs, bread, coffee, whiskey and other

articles of diet found in “The Shack,” Sir James said he had subjected

them all to careful analysis, without discovering anything of a

deleterious character.

The documents in the case · 第 117 / 150 题