H. D. GROVE.

(_a_) Immediately upon the receipt of this letter of Mr. Grove's we

wrote on to Washington to ascertain the facts in the case, but were

answered that the census bureau was abolished, and they could not tell.

We know that when the person for taking the census in the district in

which we were then residing, called upon us, he required the number of

colts, calves, lambs, and pigs, although some of them were only three

days old at the time; and to our objection of rendering an account of

such young stock, he remarked, "never mind, they will be grown when

the census appears, and it is the law." Most of those to whom we have

put the question about rendering an account of the lambs in their

flocks, say they did so; others do not recollect. If there has been

irregularity with sheep-owners in giving an account of their lambs, of

course we are incorrect; and we think, upon reflection, we may have

estimated the number of lambs too high; though, on the other hand, we

are quite certain Mr. Grove has set them down as entirely too few; for

we know flocks that produce within a fraction as many lambs annually as

there are breeding ewes.

(_b_) Perhaps when Mr. Grove has travelled south and west more

extensively, and seen in the months of March and April, as many

half-bare sheep as we have, which shed their wool from disease, want of

care, &c., he may come to a different conclusion. We have often seen

flocks in the same condition at the north too, leaving many of our

farmers little to boast of in this respect.

(_c_) We have turned to the article to which Mr. Grove alludes, but

really, we do not find that we used the expressions attributed to

us. We said "Spanish Merino," also, "unadulterated Merino;" meaning

thereby, the Rambouillets more particularly. We also spoke in general

terms, in recommending the use of these. Such a flock of Saxons as Mr.

Grove's we would _especially except_; and if the accounts which we hear

of them be correct, and we have no doubt they are, we would not cross

them with anything less fine than themselves. They are unquestionably

superior animals, as is proved by their superior weights of fleece, and

the high price the wool commands; and we wish, since the name of Saxon

has been so basely misused in this country by miserable counterfeits,

that Mr. Grove would give his flock the name of Electoral; for they

and their descendants are probably the only ones entitled to it in

the United States. With this name, they would then fairly stand aloof

from the common herd, as they deserve, and not be associated in idea

hereafter, with the miserable riff-raff of the country, passing under

the general name of Saxons. It is our intention next season to call and

see Mr. Grove's flock.

(_d_) We meant to be understood as alluding to a cross on the coarser

and more restiff sheep of the country, when we spoke of obtaining an

increase of weight of wool on the same food, and we know that this can

be done.

(_e_) True enough, but we did not say these valuable flocks were

Paulars; nor did we go so far as to assert that they were pure Merinos

of any distinct name. We wish it understood, that we do not endorse all

the opinions of Examiner any more than we do other correspondents--he

speaks for himself, and we for ourselves.

* * * * *

_For the American Agriculturist._

The American Agriculturist. Vol. II. No. XI, December 1843 Designed to Improve the Planter, the Farmer, the Stock-breeder, and the Horticulturist · 第 21 / 59 题