THE RELIGION OF THE UNIVERSE

Among proposed substitutes for Christianity, none occupies a more

prominent place than Pantheism, the identity of God and the universe.

'Pantheism,' says Haeckel, 'is the world system of the modern

scientist.'[1] Pantheism, or the Religion of the Universe, is, in one

aspect, a protest against Anthropomorphism, the making of God in the

image of man. It is in supposing God to be altogether such as we are,

to be swayed by the same motives, to be actuated by the same passions

as we are, that the most deadly errors have arisen. Robert Browning,

in _Caliban upon Setebos_, represents a half-brutal {66} being who

lives in a cave speculating upon the government of the world, wondering

why it came to be made, and what could be the purpose of the Creator in

making it. Every motive that could sway the savage mind is in turn

discussed: pleasure, restlessness, jealousy, cruelty, sport. 'Because

I, Caliban,' such is the process of his reasoning, 'delight in

tormenting defenceless animals, or would crush any one that interfered

with my comfort, or do things because my taskmaster obliges me to do

them, so must it be with Him Who made the world.' With great

grotesqueness, but with marvellous power, the degraded monster argues

as to the reasons which could have prompted the Unseen Ruler to frame

the earth and its inhabitants. Everything that he attributes to God is

in keeping with his own base nature. What is the explanation of the

horrors which have been perpetrated in the Name of God? The sacrifice

of human {67} beings, of vanquished enemies, or of the nearest and the

dearest, the agonies of self-torture, did not these originate in the

transference to the Invisible God of the emotions and principles by

which men were guiding their own lives? They had no notion of

forbearance and forgiveness and patience, therefore they did not think

that there could be forgiveness with God. They were to be turned aside

from their fierce, revengeful purposes by bribes and by the protracted

sufferings of their foes, therefore they thought that God might be

bribed by gifts or propitiated by pains. What they were on earth,

delighting in bloodshed and conquest and revelry, that, they supposed,

must be the Being or the Beings who ruled in the world unseen.

I

God is not as man is, this was a lesson which ancient prophets

struggled to teach. He is not a man that He should lie, or a son {68}

of man that He should repent. He is not to be conceived as influenced

by the petty hopes and fears and jealousies which influence the mass of

mortals. 'My thoughts are not as your thoughts, neither are your ways

my ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth,

so are My ways higher than your ways and My thoughts than your

thoughts.' He is infinitely exalted above the best and wisest of His

children and to see in Him only their likeness is not to see Him

aright. It is not to be denied that the writers of the Old Testament

employ anthropomorphic language to vivify the justice and goodness of

the Eternal. They speak of His Eyes and of His Face, of His Hands and

of His Arm and of His Voice. They speak of Him walking in the Garden

and smelling a sweet savour. They speak of Him repenting and being

jealous and coming down to see what is done on earth. Such figures,

however, as a rule, have a force {69} and an appropriateness which

never can become obsolete or out of date. They even heighten the

Majesty and Spotless Holiness of God. They are felt to be, at most,

words struggling to express what no words can ever convey: they are the

readiest means of impressing on the dull understanding of men their

practical duty, of letting them know with what purity and righteousness

they have to do. It is not in such figures that any harm can ever lie.

The error of taking literally such phrases as 'Hands' or 'Arm' or

'Voice' is not very prevalent, but the error of framing God after our

moral image is not distant or imaginary. There is a mode of speaking

about Divine Purposes and Divine Motives which must jar on those who

have begun to discern the Divine Majesty, to whom the thought of the

All-Embracing Presence has become a reality.

{70}

Modern Substitutes for Christianity · 第 46 / 107 题