APOCRYPHAL LIFE OF ESOP, THE FABULIST.

The origin of the Beast-Fable is still a vexed question among scholars,

some of whom ascribe it to the doctrine of metempsychosis, or the

transmigration of human souls into different animal forms; others,

again, are of the opinion that beasts and birds were first adopted as

characters of fictitious narratives, in order to safely convey reproof

or impart wholesome counsel to the minds of absolute princes, who would

signally resent "plain speaking."[127] Several nations of

antiquity--notably the Greeks, the Hindús, the Egyptians--have been

credited with the invention of the beast-fable, and there is no reason

to believe that it may not have been independently devised in different

countries. It is very certain, however, that Esop was not the inventor

of this kind of narrative in Greece, while those fables ascribed to him,

which have been familiar to us from our nursery days, are mostly

spurious, and have been traced to ancient Oriental sources. The

so-called Esopic apologue of the Lion and the House is found in an

Egyptian papyrus preserved at Leyden.[128] Many of them are quite modern

_rechauffés_ of Hindú apologues, such as the Milkmaid and her Pot of

Milk, which gave rise to our popular saying, "Don't count your chickens

until they be hatched." Nevertheless, genuine fables of Esop were

current in Athens at the best period of its literary history, though it

does not appear that they existed in writing during his lifetime.

Aristophanes represents a character in one of his plays as learning

Esop's fables from oral recitation. When first reduced to writing they

were in prose, and Socrates is said to have turned some of them into

verse, his example being followed by Babrius, amongst others, of whose

version but few fables remain entire. The most celebrated of his Latin

translators is Phædrus, who takes care to inform us that

If any thoughts in these Iambics shine,

The invention's Esop's, and the verse is mine.[129]

[127] The reader may with advantage consult the article

'Beast-Fable,' by Mr. Thos. Davidson, in _Chambers's

Encylopædia_, new edition.

[128] But this papyrus might be of as late a period as the

second century of our era.

[129] For the most complete history of the Esopic Fable, see

vol. i of Mr. Joseph Jacobs' edition of _The Fables of

Aesop, as first printed by Caxton in 1484, with those of

Avian, Alfonso, and Poggio_, recently published by Mr.

David Nutt; where a vast amount of erudite information

will be found on the subject in all its ramifications.

Mr. Jacobs, indeed, seems to have left little for future

gleaners: he has done his work in a thorough,

Benfey-like manner, and students of comparative

folk-lore are under great obligations to him for the

indefatigable industry he has devoted to the valuable

outcome of his wide-reaching learning.

Little is authentically known regarding the career of the renowned

fabulist, who is supposed to have been born about B.C. 620, and, as in

the case of Homer, various places are assigned as that of his

nativity--Samos, Sardis, Mesembria in Thrace, and Cotiæium in Phrygia.

He is said to have been brought as a slave to Athens when very young,

and after serving several masters was enfranchised by Iadmon, the

Samian. His death is thus related by Plutarch: Having gone to Delphos,

by the order of Croesus, with a large quantity of gold and silver, to

offer a costly sacrifice to Apollo and to distribute a considerable sum

among the inhabitants, a quarrel arose between him and the Delphians,

which induced him to return the money, and inform the king that the

people were unworthy of the liberal benefaction he had intended for

them. The Delphians, incensed, charged him with sacrilege, and, having

procured his condemnation, precipitated him from a rock and caused his

death.--The popular notion that Esop was a monster of ugliness and

deformity is derived from a "Life" of the fabulist, prefixed to a Greek

collection of fables purporting to be his, said to have been written by

Maximus Planudes, a monk of the 14th century, which, however apocryphal,

is both curious and entertaining, from whatever sources the anecdotes

may have been drawn.

According to Planudes,[130] Esop was born at Amorium, in the Greater

Phrygia, a slave, ugly exceedingly: he was sharp-chinned, snub-nosed,

bull-necked, blubber-lipped, and extremely swarthy (whence his name,

_Ais-ôpos_, or _Aith-ôpos_: burnt-face, blackamoor); pot-bellied,

crook-legged, and crook-backed; perhaps uglier even than the Thersites

of Homer; worst of all, tongue-tied, obscure and inarticulate in his

speech; in short, everything but his mind seemed to mark him out for a

slave. His first master sent him out to dig one day. A husbandman having

presented the master with some fine fresh figs, they were given to a

slave to be set before him after his bath. Esop had occasion to go into

the house; meanwhile the other slaves ate the figs, and when the master

missed them they accused Esop, who begged a moment's respite: he then

drank some warm water and caused himself to vomit, and as he had not

broken his fast his innocence was thus manifest. The same test

discovered the thieves, who by their punishment illustrated the proverb:

Whoso against another worketh guile

Thereby himself doth injure unaware.[131]

[130] _Fabulae Romanenses Graece conscriptae ex recensione et

cum adnotationibus_, Alfredi Eberhard (Leipzig, 1872),

vol. i, p. 226 ff.

[131] It would have been well had the sultan Bayazíd compelled

his soldier to adopt this plan when accused by an old

woman of having drunk up all her supply of goat's milk.

The soldier declared his innocence, upon which Bayazíd

ordered his stomach to be cut open, and finding the milk

not yet digested, quoth he to the woman: "Thou didst not

complain without reason." And, having caused her to be

recompensed for her loss, "Now go thy way," he added,

"for thou hast had justice for the wrong done thee."

Next day the master goes to town. Esop works in the field, and

entertains with his own food some travellers who had lost their way, and

sets them on the right road again. They are really priests of Artemis,

and having received their blessing he falls asleep, and dreams that

Tychê (i.e. Fortune) looses his tongue, and gives him eloquence. Waking,

he finds he can say _bous_, _onos_, _dikella_, (ox, ass, mattock). This

is the reward of piety, for "well-doing is full of good hopes." Zenas,

the overseer, is rebuked by Esop for beating a slave. This is the first

time he has been heard to speak distinctly. Zenas goes to his master and

accuses Esop of having blasphemed him and the gods, and is given Esop to

sell or give away as he pleases. He sells him to a trader for three

obols (4-1/2d.), Esop pleading that, if useless for aught else, he will

do for a bugbear to keep his children quiet. When they arrive home the

little ones begin to cry. "Was I not right?" quoth Esop, and the other

slaves think he has been bought to avert the Evil Eye.

The merchant sets out for Asia with all his house-hold. Esop is offered

the lightest load, as being a raw recruit. From among the bags, beds,

and baskets he chooses a basket full of bread--"a load for two men."

They laugh at his folly, but let him have his will, and he staggers

under the burden to the wonder of his master. But at the first halt for

_ariston_, or breakfast, the basket is half-emptied, and by the evening

wholly so, and then Esop marches triumphantly ahead, all commending his

wit. At Ephesus the merchant sells all his slaves, excepting a musician,

a scribe, and Esop. Thence he goes to Samos, where he puts new garments

on the two former (he had none left for Esop), and sets them out for

sale, Esop between them. Xanthus, the philospher, lived at Samos. He

goes to the slave market, and, seeing the three, praises the dealer's

cunning in making the two look handsomer than they were by contrast with

the ugly one. Asking the scribe and the musician what they know, their

answer is, "Everything," upon which Esop laughs. The price of the

musician (1000 obols, or six guineas) and of the scribe (three times

that sum) prevents the philosopher from buying them, and he turns to

Esop to see what he is made of. He gives him the customary salutation,

"Khaire!" (Rejoice). "I wasn't grieving," retorts Esop. "I greet thee,"

says Xanthus. "And I thee," replies Esop. "What are thou?" "Black." "I

don't mean that, but in what sort of place wast thou born?" "My mother

didn't tell me whether in the second floor or the cellar." "What can you

do?" "Nothing." "How?" "Why, these fellows here say they know how to do

everything, and they haven't left me a single thing." "By Jove," cries

Xanthus, "he has answered right well; for there is no man who knows

everything. That was why he laughed, it is clear." In the end, Xanthus

buys Esop for sixty obols (about 7s. 6d.) and takes him home, where his

wife (who is "very cleanly") receives him only on sufferance.

One day Xanthus, meeting friends at the bath, sends Esop home to boil

pease (idiomatically using the word in the singular), for his friends

are coming to eat with him. Esop boils _one_ pea and sets it before

Xanthus, who tastes it and bids him serve up. The water is then placed

on the table, and Esop justifies himself to his distracted master, who

then sends him for four pig's feet. While they boil, Xanthus slyly

abstracts one, and when Esop discovers this he takes it for a plot

against him of the other slaves. He runs into the yard, cuts a foot from

the pig feeding there, and tosses it into the pot. Presently the other

foot is put back, and Esop is confounded to see _five_ trotters on the

boil. He serves them up, however, and when Xanthus asks him what the

five mean he replies: "How many feet have two pigs?" Xanthus saying,

"Eight," quoth Esop: "Then here are five, and the porker feeding below

goes on three." On being reproached he urges: "But, master, there is no

harm in doing a sum in addition and subtraction, is there?" For very

shame Xanthus forbears whipping him.

One morning Xanthus gives a breakfast, for which Esop is sent to buy

"the best and most useful." He buys tongues, and the guests

(philosophers all) have nothing else. "What could be better for man than

tongue?" quoth Esop. Another time he is ordered to get "the worst and

most worthless"; again he brings tongues, and again is ready with a

similar defence.[132] A guest reviles him, and Esop retorts that he is

"malicious and a busybody." On hearing this Xanthus commands him to find

some one who is not a busybody. In the road Esop finds a simple soul and

brings him home to his master, who persuades his wife to bear with him

in anything he should pretend to do to her; if the guest is a busybody

(or one who meddles) Esop will get a beating. The plan fails; for the

good man continues eating and takes no notice of the wife-cuffing going

on, and when his host seems about to burn her, he only asks leave to

bring his own wife to be also placed on the pile.

[132] This story is also found in the _Liber de Donis_ of

Etienne de Bourbon (No. 246), a Dominican monk of the

14th century; in the _Summa Praedicantium_ of John

Bromyard, and several other medieval monkish collections

of _exempla_, or stories designed for the use of

preachers: in these the explanation is that nothing can

be better and nothing worse than _tongue_.

At a symposium Xanthus takes too much wine, and in bravado wagers his

house and all that it contains that he will drink up the waters of the

sea. Out of this scrape Esop rescues him by suggesting that he should

demand that all the rivers be stopped from flowing into the sea, for he

did not undertake to drink them too, and the other party is

satisfied.[133]

[133] This occurs in the several Asiatic versions of the Book

of Sindibád (Story of the Sandalwood Merchant); in the

_Gesta Romanorum_; in the old English metrical _Tale of

Beryn_; in one of the Italian _Novelle_ of Sacchetti;

and in the exploits of Tyl Eulenspiegel, the German

Rogue.

A party of scientific guests are coming to dinner one day, and Esop is

set just within the door to keep out "all but the wise." When there is a

knock at the door Esop shouts: "What does the dog shake?" and all save

one go away in high dudgeon, thinking he means them; but this last

answers: "His tail," and is admitted.

At a public festival an eagle carries off the municipal ring, and Esop

obtains his freedom by order of the state for his interpretation of this

omen--that some king purposes to annex Samos. This, it turns out, is

Croesus, who sends to claim tribute. Hereupon Esop relates his first

fable, that of the Wolf, the Dog, and the Sheep, and, going on an

embassy to Croesus, that of the Grasshopper who was caught by the

Locust-gatherer. He brings home "peace with honour." After this Esop

travels over the world, showing his wisdom and wit. At Babylon he is

made much of by the king. He then visits Egypt and confounds the sages

in his monarch's behalf. Once more he returns to Greece, and at Delphi

is accused of stealing a sacred golden bowl and condemned to be hurled

from a rock. He pleads the fables of the Matron of Ephesus,[134] the

Frog and the Mouse, the Beetle and the Eagle, the Old Farmer and his

Ass-waggon, and others, but all is of no avail, and the villains break

his neck.

[134] Taken from Petronius Arbiter. The story is widely

spread. It is found in the _Seven Wise Masters_,

and--_mutatis mutandis_--is well known to the Chinese.

Planudes takes some liberties with his original,

substituting for the soldier guarding the suspended

corpse of a criminal, who "comforts" the sorrowing

widow, a herdsman with his beasts, which he loses in

prosecuting his amour.

* * * * *

Such are some of the apocryphal sayings and doings of Esop the

fabulist--the manner of his death being the only circumstance for which

there is any authority. The idea of his bodily deformity is utterly

without foundation, and may have been adopted as a foil to his

extraordinary shrewdness and wit, as exhibited in the anecdotes related

of him by Planudes. That there was nothing uncouth in the person of Esop

is evident from the fact that the Athenians erected a fine statue of

him, by the famed sculptor Lysippus.--The Latin collection of the fables

ascribed to Esop was first printed at Rome in 1473 and soon afterwards

translated into most of the languages of Europe. About the year 1480 the

Greek text was printed at Milan. From a French version Caxton printed

them in English at Westminster in 1484, with woodcuts: "Here begynneth

the Book of the subtyl History and Fables of Esope. Translated out of

Frenssche into Englissche, by William Caxton," etc. In this version

Planudes' description of Esop's personal appearance is reproduced:[135]

He was "deformed and evil shapen, for he had a great head, large visage,

long jaws, sharp eyes, a short neck, curb backed, great belly, great

legs, and large feet; and yet that which was worse, he was dumb and

could not speak; but, notwithstanding all this, he had a great wit and

was greatly ingenious, subtle in cavillection and joyous in words"--an

inconsistency which is done away in a later edition by the statement

that afterwards he found his tongue.--It is curious to find the Scottish

poet Robert Henryson (15th century), in one of the prologues to his

metrical versions of some of the Fables, draw a very different portrait

of Esop.[136] He tells us that one day in the midst of June, "that joly

sweit seasoun," he went alone to a wood, where he was charmed with the

"noyis of birdis richt delitious," and "sweit was the smell of flowris

quhyte and reid," and, sheltering himself under a green hawthorn from

the heat of the sun, he fell asleep:

And, in my dreme, methocht come throw the schaw[137]

The fairest man that ever befoir I saw.

His gowne wes of ane claith als quhyte as milk,

His chymeris[138] wes of chambelote purpour broun;

His hude[139] of scarlet, bordourit[140] weill with silk,

On hekellit-wyis,[141] untill his girdill doun;

His bonat round, and of the auld fassoun,[142]

His beird was quhyte, his ene was greit and gray,

With lokker[143] hair, quilk ouer his schulderis lay.

Ane roll of paper in his hand he bair,

Ane swannis pen stikkand[144] under his eir,

Ane inkhorne, with ane prettie gilt pennair,[145]

Ane bag of silk, all at his belt can beir:

Thus was he gudelie graithit[146] in his geir.

Of stature large, and with ane feirfull[147] face;

Evin quhair I lay, he came ane sturdie pace.

[135] Mr. Jacobs was obliged to omit the Life of Esop in his

reprint of Caxton's text of the Fables, as it would have

unduly increased the bulk of his second volume. But

those interested in the genealogy of popular tales and

fables will be glad to have Mr. Jacobs' all but

exhaustive account of the so-called Esopic fables,

together with his excellent synopsis of parallels, in

preference to the monkish collection of spurious

anecdotes of the fabulist, of which the most noteworthy

are given in the present paper.

[136] Robert Henryson was a schoolmaster in Dunfermline in the

latter part of the 15th century. His _Moral Fables_,

edited by Dr. David Irving, were printed for the

Maitland Club in 1832, and his complete works (Poems and

Fables) were edited by Dr. David Laing, and published in

1865. His _Testament of Cresseid_, usually considered as

his best performance, is a continuation of Chaucer's

_Troilus and Cresseide_, which was derived from the

Latin of an unknown author named Lollius. Henryson was

the author of the first pastoral poem composed in the

English (or Scottish) language--that of _Robin and

Makyn_. "To his power of poetical conception," Dr. Laing

justly remarks, "he unites no inconsiderable skill in

versification: his lines, if divested of their uncouth

orthography, might be mistaken for those of a more

modern poet."

[137] _Schaw_, a wood, a covert.

[138] _Chymeris_, a short, light gown.

[139] _Hude_, hood.

[140] _Bordourit_, embroidered.

[141] _Hekellit-wise_, like the feathers in the neck of a cock.

[142] _Fassoun_, fashion.

[143] _Lokker_, (?) gray.

[144] _Stikkand_, sticking.

[145] _Pennair_, pen-case.

[146] _Graithit_, apparelled, arrayed.

[147] _Feirfull_, awe-inspiring, dignified.

The Arabian sage Lokinan is represented by tradition to have been a

black slave, and of hideous appearance, from which, and from the

identity of the apologues in the Arabian collection that bears his name

as the author with the so-called Esopic fables, some writers have

supposed that Esop and Lokman are simply different names of one and the

same individual. But the fables ascribed to Lokman have been for the

most part (if not indeed entirely) derived from the Greek; and there is

no authority whatever that Lokman composed any apologues. Various

traditions exist regarding Lokman's origin and history. It is said that

he was an Ethiopian, and was sold as a slave to the Israelites during

the reign of David. According to one version, he was a carpenter;

another describes him as having been originally a tailor; while a third

account states that he was a shepherd. If the Arabs may be credited, he

was nearly related to the patriarch Job. Among the anecdotes which are

recounted of his amiable disposition is the following: His master once

gave him a bitter lemon to eat. Lokman ate it all, upon which his

master, greatly astonished, asked him: "How was it possible for you to

eat so unpalatable a fruit?" Lokman replied: "I have received so many

favours from you, that it is no wonder I should once in my life eat a

bitter melon from your hand." Struck with this generous answer, the

master, it is said, immediately gave him his freedom.--A man of eminence

among the Jews, observing a great crowd around Lokman, eagerly listening

to his discourse, asked him whether he was not the black slave who

lately tended the sheep of such a person, to which Lokman replying in

the affirmative, "How was it possible," continued his questioner, "for

thee to attain so exalted a degree of wisdom and piety?" Lokman

answered: "By always speaking the truth; keeping my word; and never

intermeddling in affairs that did not concern me."--Being asked from

whom he had learned urbanity, he replied: "From men of rude manners, for

whatever I saw in them that was disagreeable I avoided doing myself."

And when asked from whom he had acquired his philosophy, he said: "From

the blind, who never advance a step until they have tried the ground."

Lokman is also credited with this apothegm: "Be a learned man, a

disciple of the learned, or an auditor of the learned; at least, be a

lover of knowledge and desirous of improvement."--In Persian and Turkish

tales Lokman sometimes figures as a highly skilled physician, and "wise

as Lokman" is proverbial throughout the Muhammedan world.

_ADDITIONAL NOTE._

DRINKING THE SEA DRY, p. 306.

The same jest is also found in _Aino Folk-Tales_, translated by Prof.

Basil Hall Chamberlain, and published in the _Folk-Lore Journal_, 1888,

as follows:

There was the Chief of the Mouth of the River and the Chief of the Upper

Current of the River. The former was very vain-glorious, and therefore

wished to put the latter to shame or to kill him by engaging him in an

attempt to perform something impossible. So he sent for him and said:

"The sea is a useful thing, in so far as it is the original home of the

fish which come up the river. But it is very destructive in stormy

weather, when it beats wildly upon the beach. Do you now drink it dry,

so that there may be rivers and dry land only. If you cannot do so, then

forfeit all your possessions." The other said, greatly to the

vain-glorious man's surprise: "I accept the challenge." So, on their

going down to the beach, the Chief of the Upper Current of the River

took a cup and scooped up a little of the sea-water with it, drank a few

drops, and said: "In the sea-water itself there is no harm. It is some

of the rivers flowing into it that are poisonous. Do you, therefore,

first close the mouths of all the rivers both in Aino-land and in Japan,

and prevent them from flowing into the sea, and then I will undertake to

drink the sea dry." Hereupon the Chief of the Mouth of the River felt

ashamed, acknowledged his error, and gave all his treasures to his

rival.

* * * * *

Such an idea as this of first "stopping the rivers" might well have been

conceived independently by different peoples, but surely not by such a

race so low in the scale of humanity as the Ainos, who must have got the

story from the Japanese, who in their turn probably derived it from some

Indian-Buddhist source--perhaps a version of the Book of Sindibád. Of

course, the several European versions and variants have been copied out

of one book into another, and independent invention is out of the

question.

Flowers from a Persian Garden and Other Papers · 第 75 / 78 题