ANECDOTES AND APHORISMS FROM THE "GULISTÁN," WITH ANALOGUES--CONCLUSION.

Besides the maxims comprised in the concluding chapter of the

_Gulistán_, under the heading of "Rules for the Conduct of Life," many

others, of great pith and moment, are interspersed with the tales and

anecdotes which Saádí recounts in the preceding chapters, a selection of

which can hardly fail to prove both instructive and interesting.

It is related that at the court of Núshírván, king of Persia, a number

of wise men were discussing a difficult question; and Buzurjmihr (his

famous prime minister), being silent, was asked why he did not take part

in the debate. He answered: "Ministers are like physicians, and the

physician gives medicine to the sick only. Therefore, when I see your

opinions are judicious, it would not be consistent with wisdom for me to

obtrude my sentiments. When a matter can be managed without my

interference it is not proper for me to speak on the subject. But if I

see a blind man in the way of a well, should I keep silence it were a

crime." On another occasion, when some Indian sages were discoursing on

his virtue, they could discover in him only this fault, that he

hesitated in his speech, so that his hearers were kept a long time in

suspense before he delivered his sentiments. Buzurjmihr overheard their

conversation and observed: "It is better to deliberate before I speak

than to repent of what I have said."[11]

[11] The sayings of Buzurjmihr, the sagacious prime minister

of King Núshírván, are often cited by Persian writers,

and a curious story of his precocity when a mere youth

is told in the _Latá'yif at-Taw'áyif_, a Persian

collection, made by Al-Káshifí, of which a translation

will be found in my "Analogues and Variants" of the

Tales in vol. iii of Sir R. F. Burton's _Supplemental

Arabian Nights_, pp. 567-9--too long for reproduction

here.

A parallel to this last saying of the Persian vazír is found in a

"notable sentence" of a wise Greek, in this passage from the _Dictes, or

Sayings of Philosophers_, printed by Caxton (I have modernised the

spelling):

"There came before a certain king three wise men, a Greek, a Jew, and a

Saracen, of whom the said king desired that each of them would utter

some good and notable sentence. Then the Greek said: 'I may well correct

and amend my thoughts, but not my words.' The Jew said: 'I marvel of

them that say things prejudicial, when silence were more profitable.'

The Saracen said: 'I am master of my words ere they are pronounced; but

when they are spoken I am servant thereto.' And it was asked one of

them: 'Who might be called a king?' And he answered: 'He that is not

subject to his own will.'"

The _Dictes, or Sayings of Philosophers_, of which, I believe, but one

perfect copy is extant, was translated from the French by Earl Rivers,

and printed by Caxton, at Westminister, in the year 1477, as we learn

from the colophon. I am not aware that any one has taken the trouble to

trace to their sources all the sayings comprised in this collection, but

I think the original of the above is to be found in the following, from

the preface to the Arabian version (from the Pahlaví, the ancient

language of Persia) of the celebrated Fables of Bidpaï, entitled _Kalíla

wa Dimna_, made in the year 754:

"The four kings of China, India, Persia, and Greece, being together,

agreed each of them to deliver a saying which might be recorded to their

honour in after ages. The king of China said: 'I have more power over

that which I have not spoken than I have to recall what has once passed

my lips.' The king of India: 'I have been often struck with the risk of

speaking; for if a man be heard in his own praise it is unprofitable

boasting, and what he says to his own discredit is injurious in its

consequences.' The king of Persia: 'I am the slave of what I have

spoken, but the master of what I conceal.' The king of Greece: 'I have

never regretted the silence which I had imposed upon myself; though I

have often repented of the words I have uttered;[12] for silence is

attended with advantage, whereas loquacity is often followed by

incurable evils.'"

[12] Simonides used to say that he never regretted having

held his tongue, but very often had he felt sorry for

having spoken.--_Stobæus_: Flor. xxxiii, 12.

The Persian poet Jámí--the last of the brilliant galaxy of genius who

enriched the literature of their country, and who flourished two

centuries after Saádí had passed to his rest--reproduces these sayings

of the four kings in his work entitled _Baháristán_, or Abode of Spring,

which is similar in design to the _Gulistán_.

Among the sayings of other wise men (whose names, however, Saádí does

not mention) are the following: A devotee, who had quitted his monastery

and become a member of a college, being asked what difference there is

between a learned man and a religious man to induce him thus to change

his associates, answered: "The devotee saves his own blanket out of the

waves, and the learned man endeavours to save others from drowning."--A

young man complained to his spiritual guide of his studies being

frequently interrupted by idle and impudent visitors, and desired to

know by what means he might rid himself of the annoyance. The sage

replied: "To such as are poor lend money, and of such as are rich ask

money, and, depend upon it, you will never see one of them again."

Saádí's own aphorisms are not less striking and instructive. They are

indeed calculated to stimulate the faltering to manly exertion, and to

counsel the inexperienced. It is to youthful minds, however, that the

"words of the wise" are more especially addressed; for it is during the

spring-time of life that the seeds of good and evil take root; and so we

find the sage Hebrew king frequently addressing his maxims to the young:

"My son," is his formula, "my son, attend to my words, and bow thine ear

to my understanding; that thou mayest regard discretion, and that thy

lips may keep knowledge." And the "good and notable sentences" of Saádí

are well worthy of being treasured by the young man on the threshold of

life. For example:

"Life is snow, and the summer advanceth; only a small portion remaineth:

art thou still slothful?"

This warning has been reiterated by moralists in all ages and

countries;--the Great Teacher says: "Work while it is day, for the night

cometh when no man can work." And Saádí, in one of his sermons (which is

found in another of his books), recounts this beautiful fable, in

illustration of the fortunes of the slothful and the industrious:

It is related that in a certain garden a Nightingale had built his nest

on the bough of a rose-bush. It so happened that a poor little Ant had

fixed her dwelling at the root of this same bush, and managed as best

she could to store her wretched hut of care with winter provision. Day

and night was the Nightingale fluttering round the rose-bower, and

tuning the barbut[13] of his soul-deluding melody; indeed, whilst the

Ant was night and day industriously occupied, the thousand-songed bird

seemed fascinated with his own sweet voice, echoing amidst the trees.

The Nightingale was whispering his secret to the Rose,[14] and that,

full-blown by the zephyr of the dawn, would ogle him in return. The poor

Ant could not help admiring the coquettish airs of the Rose, and the gay

blandishments of the Nightingale, and incontinently remarking: "Time

alone can disclose what may be the end of this frivolity and talk!"

After the flowery season of summer was gone, and the black time of

winter was come, thorns took the station of the Rose, and the raven the

perch of the Nightingale. The storms of autumn raged in fury, and the

foliage of the grove was shed upon the ground. The cheek of the leaf was

turned yellow, and the breath of the wind was chill and blasting. The

gathering cloud poured down hailstones, like pearls, and flakes of snow

floated like camphor on the bosom of the air. Suddenly the Nightingale

returned into the garden, but he met neither the bloom of the Rose nor

fragrance of the spikenard; notwithstanding his thousand-songed tongue,

he stood stupified and mute, for he could discover no flower whose form

he might admire, nor any verdure whose freshness he might enjoy. The

Thorn turned round to him and said: "How long, silly bird, wouldst thou

be courting the society of the Rose? Now is the season that in the

absence of thy charmer thou must put up with the heart-rending bramble

of separation." The Nightingale cast his eye upon the scene around him,

but saw nothing fit to eat. Destitute of food, his strength and

fortitude failed him, and in his abject helplessness he was unable to

earn himself a little livelihood. He called to his mind and said:

"Surely the Ant had in former days his dwelling underneath this tree,

and was busy in hoarding a store of provision: now I will lay my wants

before her, and, in the name of good neighbourship, and with an appeal

to her generosity, beg some small relief. Peradventure she may pity my

distress and bestow her charity upon me." Like a poor suppliant, the

half-famished Nightingale presented himself at the Ant's door, and said:

"Generosity is the harbinger of prosperity, and the capital stock of

good luck. I was wasting my precious life in idleness whilst thou wast

toiling hard and laying up a hoard. How considerate and good it were of

thee wouldst thou spare me a portion of it." The Ant replied:

"Thou wast day and night occupied in idle talk, and I in attending to

the needful: one moment thou wast taken up with the fresh blandishment

of the Rose, and the next busy in admiring the blossoming spring. Wast

thou not aware that every summer has its fall and every road an

end?"[15]

[13] The name of a musical instrument.

[14] The fancied love of the nightingale for the rose is a

favourite theme of Persian poets.

[15] Cf. the fable of Anianus: After laughing all summer at

her toil, the Grasshopper came in winter to borrow part

of the Ant's store of food. "Tell me," said the Ant,

"what you did in the summer?" "I sang," replied the

Grasshopper. "Indeed," rejoined the Ant. "Then you may

dance and keep yourself warm during the winter."

These are a few more of Saádí's aphorisms:

Riches are for the comfort of life, and not life for the accumulation of

riches.[16]

[16] Auvaiyár, the celebrated Indian poetess, in her

_Nalvali_, says:

Hark! ye who vainly toil and wealth

Amass--O sinful men, the soul

Will leave its nest; where then will be

The buried treasure that you lose?

The eye of the avaricious man cannot be satisfied with wealth, any more

than a well can be filled with dew.

A wicked rich man is a clod of earth gilded.

The liberal man who eats and bestows is better than the religious man

who fasts and hoards.

Publish not men's secret faults, for by disgracing them you make

yourself of no repute.

He who gives advice to a self-conceited man stands himself in need of

counsel from another.

The vicious cannot endure the sight of the virtuous, in the same manner

as the curs of the market howl at a hunting-dog, but dare not approach

him.

When a mean wretch cannot vie with any man in virtue, out of his

wickedness he begins to slander him. The abject, envious wretch will

slander the virtuous man when absent, but when brought face to face his

loquacious tongue becomes dumb.

O thou, who hast satisfied thy hunger, to thee a barley loaf is beneath

notice;--that seems loveliness to me which in thy sight appears

deformity.

The ringlets of fair maids are chains for the feet of reason, and snares

for the bird of wisdom.

When you have anything to communicate that will distress the heart of

the person whom it concerns, be silent, in order that he may hear it

from some one else. O nightingale, bring thou the glad tidings of the

spring, and leave bad news to the owl!

It often happens that the imprudent is honoured and the wise despised.

The alchemist died of poverty and distress, while the blockhead found a

treasure under a ruin.

Covetousness sews up the eyes of cunning, and brings both bird and fish

into the net.

Although, in the estimation of the wise, silence is commendable, yet at

a proper season speech is preferable.[17]

[17] "Comprehensive talkers are apt to be tiresome when we

are not athirst for information; but, to be quite fair,

we must admit that superior reticence is a good deal due

to the lack of matter. Speech is often barren, but

silence does not necessarily brood over a full nest.

Your still fowl, blinking at you without remark, may all

the while be sitting on one addled nest-egg; and when it

takes to cackling will have nothing to announce but that

addled delusion."--George Eliot's _Felix Holt_.

Two things indicate an obscure understanding: to be silent when we

should converse, and to speak when we should be silent.

Put not yourself so much in the power of your friend that, if he should

become your enemy, he may be able to injure you.

* * * * *

Our English poet Young has this observation in his _Night Thoughts_:

Thought, in the mine, may come forth gold or dross;

When coined in word, we know its real worth.

He had been thus anticipated by Saádí: "To what shall be likened the

tongue in a man's mouth? It is the key of the treasury of wisdom. When

the door is shut, who can discover whether he deals in jewels or

small-wares?"

The poet Thomson, in his _Seasons_, has these lines, which have long

been hackneyed:

Loveliness

Needs not the aid of foreign ornament,

But is when unadorned adorned the most.

Saádí had anticipated him also: "The face of the beloved," he says,

"requireth not the art of the tire-woman. The finger of a beautiful

woman and the tip of her ear are handsome without an ear-jewel or a

turquoise ring." But Saádí, in his turn, was forestalled by the Arabian

poet-hero Antar, in his famous _Mu'allaka_, or prize-poem, which is at

least thirteen hundred years old, where he says: "Many a consort of a

fair one, whose beauty required no ornaments, have I laid prostrate on

the field."

Yet one Persian poet, at least, namely, Nakhshabí, held a different

opinion: "Beauty," he says, "adorned with ornaments, portends disastrous

events to our hearts. An amiable form, ornamented with diamonds and

gold, is like a melodious voice accompanied by the rabáb." Again, he

says: "Ornaments are the universal ravishers of hearts, and an upper

garment for the shoulder is like a cluster of gems. If dress, however,"

he concedes, "may have been at any time the assistant of beauty, beauty

is always the animator of dress." It is remarkable that homely-featured

women dress more gaudily than their handsome sisters generally, thus

unconsciously bringing their lack of beauty (not to put too fine a point

on it) into greater prominence.

In common with other moralists, Saádí reiterates the maxim that learning

and virtue, precept and practice, should ever go hand in hand. "Two

persons," says he, "took trouble in vain: he who acquired wealth without

using it, and he who taught wisdom without practising it." Again: "He

who has acquired knowledge and does not practise it, is like unto him

that ploughed but did not sow." And again: "How much soever you may

study science, when you do not act wisely, you are ignorant. The beast

that they load with books is not profoundly wise and learned: what

knoweth his empty skull whether he carrieth fire-wood or books?" And yet

again: "A learned man without temperance is like a blind man carrying a

lamp: he showeth the way to others, but does not guide himself."

Ingratitude is denounced by all moralists as the lowest of vices. Thus

Saádí says: "Man is beyond dispute the most excellent of created beings,

and the vilest animal is the dog; but the sages agree that a grateful

dog is better than an ungrateful man. A dog never forgets a morsel,

though you pelt him a hundred times with stones. But if you cherish a

mean wretch for an age, he will fight with you for a mere trifle." In

language still more forcible does a Hindú poet denounce this basest of

vices: "To cut off the teats of a cow;[18] to occasion a pregnant woman

to miscarry; to injure a Bráhman--are sins of the most aggravated

nature; but more atrocious than these is ingratitude."

[18] The cow is sacred among the Hindús.

The sentiment so tersely expressed in the Chinese proverb, "He who never

reveals a secret keeps it best," is thus finely amplified by Saádí: "The

matter which you wish to preserve as a secret impart not to every one,

although he may be worthy of confidence; for no one will be so true to

your secret as yourself. It is safer to be silent than to reveal a

secret to any one, and tell him not to mention it. O wise man! stop the

water at the spring-head, for when it is in full stream you cannot

arrest it."[19]

[19] Thus also Jámí, in his _Baháristán_ (Second "Garden"):

"With regard to a secret divulged and one kept

concealed, there is in use an excellent proverb, that

the one is an arrow still in our possession, and the

other is an arrow sent from the bow." And another

Persian poet, whose name I have not ascertained,

eloquently exclaims: "O my heart! if thou desirest ease

in this life, keep thy secrets undisclosed, like the

modest rose-bud. Take warning from that lovely flower,

which, by expanding its hitherto hidden beauties when in

full bloom, gives its leaves and its happiness to the

winds."

The imperative duty of active benevolence is thus inculcated: "Bestow

thy gold and thy wealth while they are thine; for when thou art gone

they will be no longer in thy power. Distribute thy treasure readily

to-day, for to-morrow the key may be no longer in thy hand. Exert

thyself to cast a covering over the poor, that God's own veil may be a

covering to thee."

In the following passage the man of learning and virtue is contrasted

with the stupid and ignorant blockhead:

"If a wise man, falling into company with mean people, does not get

credit for his discourse, be not surprised, for the sound of the harp

cannot overpower the noise of the drum, and the fragrance of ambergris

is overcome by fetid garlic. The ignorant fellow was proud of his loud

voice, because he had impudently confounded the man of understanding. If

a jewel falls in the mud it is still the same precious stone,[20] and if

dust flies up to the sky it retains its original baseness. A capacity

without education is deplorable, and education without capacity is

thrown away. Sugar obtains not its value from the cane, but from its

innate quality. Musk has fragrance of itself, and not from being called

a perfume by the druggist. The wise man is like the druggist's chest,

silent, but full of virtues; while the blockhead resembles the warrior's

drum, noisy, but an empty prattler. A wise man in the company of those

who are ignorant has been compared by the sages to a beautiful girl in

the company of blind men, and to the Kurán in the house of an

infidel."--The old proverb that "an evil bird has an evil egg" finds

expression by Saádí thus: "No one whose origin is bad ever catches the

reflection of the good." Again, he says: "How can we make a good sword

out of bad iron? A worthless person cannot by education become a person

of any worth." And yet again: "Evil habits which have taken root in

one's nature will only be got rid of at the hour of death."

[20] Is such a thing as an emerald made worse than it was if

it is not praised?--_Marcus Aurelius_.

If glass be used to decorate a crown,

While gems are taken to bedeck a foot,

'Tis not that any fault lies in the gem,

But in the want of knowledge of the setter.

--_Panchatantra_, a famous Indian book of Fables.

Firdausí, the Homer of Persia (eleventh century), has the following

remarks in his scathing satire on the sultan Mahmúd, of Ghazní

(Atkinson's rendering):

Alas! from vice can goodness ever spring?

Is mercy hoped for in a tyrant king?

Can water wash the Ethiopian white?

Can we remove the darkness from the night?

The tree to which a bitter fruit is given

Would still be bitter in the bowers of heaven;

And a bad heart keeps on its vicious course,

Or, if it changes, changes for the worse;

Whilst streams of milk where Eden's flow'rets blow

Acquire more honied sweetness as they flow.

The striking words of the Great Teacher, "How hardly shall they that

have riches enter into the kingdom of God!" find an interesting analogue

in this passage by Saádí: "There is a saying of the Prophet, 'To the

poor death is a state of rest.' The ass that carries the lightest burden

travels easiest. In like manner, the good man who bears the burden of

poverty will enter the gate of death lightly loaded, while he who lives

in affluence, with ease and comfort, will, doubtless, on that very

account find death very terrible. And in any view, the captive who is

released from confinement is happier than the noble who is taken

prisoner."

A singular anecdote is told of another celebrated Persian poet, which

may serve as a kind of commentary on this last-cited passage: Faridú

'd-Dín 'Attár, who died in the year 1229, when over a hundred years old,

was considered the most perfect Súfí[21] philosopher of the time in

which he lived. His father was an eminent druggist in Nishapúr, and for

a time Faridú 'd-Dín followed the same profession, and his shop was the

delight of all who passed by it, from the neatness of its arrangements

and the fragrant odours of drugs and essences. 'Attár, which means

druggist, or perfumer, Faridú 'd-Dín adopted for his poetical title. One

day, while sitting at his door with a friend, an aged dervish drew near,

and, after looking anxiously and closely into the well-furnished shop,

he sighed heavily and shed tears, as he reflected on the transitory

nature of all earthly things. 'Attár, mistaking the sentiment uppermost

in the mind of the venerable devotee, ordered him to be gone, to which

he meekly rejoined: "Yes, I have nothing to prevent me from leaving thy

door, or, indeed, from quitting this world at once, as my sole

possession is this threadbare garment. But O 'Attár, I grieve for thee:

for how canst thou ever bring thyself to think of death--to leave all

these goods behind thee?" 'Attár replied that he hoped and believed that

he should die as contentedly as any dervish; upon which the aged

devotee, saying, "We shall see," placed his wooden bowl upon the ground,

laid his head upon it, and, calling on the name of God, immediately

resigned his soul. Deeply impressed with this incident, 'Attár at once

gave up his shop, and devoted himself to the study of Súfí

philosophy.[22]

[21] The Súfís are the mystics of Islám, and their poetry,

while often externally anacreontic--bacchanalian and

erotic--possesses an esoteric, spiritual signification:

the sensual world is employed to symbolise that which is

to be apprehended only by the _inward_ sense. Most of

the great poets of Persia, Afghanistán, and Turkey are

generally understood to have been Súfís.

[22] Sir Gore Ouseley's _Biographical Notices of Persian Poets_.

The death of Cardinal Mazarin furnishes another remarkable illustration

of Saádí's sentiment. A day or two before he died, the cardinal caused

his servant to carry him into his magnificent art gallery, where, gazing

upon his collection of pictures and sculpture, he cried in anguish, "And

must I leave all these?" Dr. Johnson may have had Mazarin's words in

mind when he said to Garrick, while being shown over the famous actor's

splendid mansion: "Ah, Davie, Davie, these are the things that make a

death-bed terrible!"

Few passages of Shakspeare are more admired than these lines:

And this our life, exempt from public haunts,

Finds _tongues in trees_, books in the running brooks,

Sermons in stones, and good in everything.[23]

[23] Cf. these lines, from Herrick's "Hesperides":

But you are _lovely leaves_, where we

May read, how soon things have

Their end, tho' ne'er so brave;

And after they have shown their pride,

Like you, a while, they glide

Into the grave.

Saádí had thus expressed the same sentiment before him: "The foliage of

a newly-clothed tree, to the eye of a discerning man, displays a whole

volume of the wondrous works of the Creator." Another Persian poet,

Jámí, in his beautiful mystical poem of _Yúsuf wa Zulaykhá_, says:

"Every leaf is a tongue uttering praises, like one who keepeth crying,

'In the name of God.'"[24] And the Afghan poet Abdu 'r-Rahman says:

"Every tree, every shrub, stands ready to bend before him; every herb

and blade of grass is a tongue to mutter his praises." And Horace Smith,

that most pleasing but unpretentious writer, both of verse and prose,

has thus finely amplified the idea of "tongues in trees":

Your voiceless lips, O Flowers, are living preachers,

Each cup a pulpit, every leaf a book,

Supplying to my fancy numerous teachers,

From loneliest nook.

'Neath cloistered boughs, each floral bell that swingeth,

And tolls its perfume on the passing air,

Makes Sabbath in the fields, and ever ringeth

A call to prayer;--

Not to the domes where crumbling arch and column

Attest the feebleness of mortal hand,

But to that fane, most catholic and solemn,

Which God hath planned:

To that cathedral, boundless as our wonder,

Whose quenchless lamps the sun and moon supply;

Its choir, the winds and waves, its organ, thunder,

Its dome, the sky.

There, amid solitude and shade, I wander

Through the green aisles, and, stretched upon the sod,

Awed by the silence, reverently ponder

The ways of God.

[24] "In the name of God" is part of the formula employed by

pious Muslims in their acts of worship, and on entering

upon any enterprise of danger or

uncertainty--_bi'smi'llahi ar-rahman ar-rahimi_, "In the

name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate!" These

words are usually placed at the beginning of Muhammedan

books, secular as well as religions; and they form part

of the Muslim Confession of Faith, used in the last

extremity: "In the name of God, the Merciful, the

Compassionate! There is no strength nor any power save

in God, the High, the Mighty. To God we belong, and

verily to him we return!"

* * * * *

When Saádí composed his _Gulistán_, in 1278, he was between eighty and

ninety years of age, with his great mind still vigorous as ever; and he

lived many years after, beloved and revered by the poor, whose

necessities he relieved, and honoured and esteemed by the noble and the

learned, who frequently visited the venerable solitary, to gather and

treasure up the pearls of wisdom which dropped from his eloquent tongue.

Like other poets of lofty genius, he possessed a firm assurance of the

immortality of his fame. "A rose," says he, "may continue to bloom for

five or six days, but this Rose-Garden will flourish for ever"; and

again: "These verses and recitals of mine will endure after every

particle of my dust has been dispersed." Six centuries have passed away

since the gifted sage penned his _Gulistán_, and his fame has not only

continued in his own land and throughout the East generally, but has

spread into all European countries, and across the Atlantic, where long

after the days of Saádí "still stood the forests primeval."

Flowers from a Persian Garden and Other Papers · 第 27 / 78 题