CHAPTER X

Meanwhile our campaign upon the Rhine proceeded, and the enemy, having

had all their grand projects of victory defeated by the firmness and the

capacity of the Marechal de Choiseul, retired into winter-quarters, and

we prepared to do the same. The month of October was almost over when

Madame de Saint-Simon lost M. Fremont, father of the Marechal de Lorges.

She had happily given birth to a daughter on the 8th of September. I was

desirous accordingly to go to Paris, and having obtained permission from

the Marechal de Choiseul, who had treated me throughout the campaign with

much politeness and attention, I set out. Upon arriving at Paris I found

the Court at Fontainebleau. I had arrived from the army a little before

the rest, and did not wish that the King should know it without seeing

me, lest he might think I had returned in secret. I hastened at once

therefore to Fontainebleau, where the King received me with his usual

goodness,-saying, nevertheless, that I had returned a little too early,

but that it was of no consequence.

I had not long left his presence when I learned a report that made my

face burn again. It was affirmed that when the King remarked upon my

arriving a little early, I had replied that I preferred arriving at once

to see him, as my sole mistress, than to remain some days in Paris, as

did the other young men with their mistresses. I went at once to the

King, who had a numerous company around him; and I openly denied what had

been reported, offering a reward for the discovery of the knave who had

thus calumniated me, in order that I might give him a sound thrashing.

All day I sought to discover the scoundrel. My speech to the King and my

choler were the topic of the day, and I was blamed for having spoken so

loudly and in such terms. But of two evils I had chosen the least,--a

reprimand from the King, or a few days in the Bastille; and I had avoided

the greatest, which was to allow myself to be believed an infamous

libeller of our young men, in order to basely and miserably curry favour

at the Court. The course I took succeeded. The King said nothing of the

matter, and I went upon a little journey I wished particularly to take,

for reasons I will now relate.

I had, as I have already mentioned, conceived a strong attachment and

admiration for M. de La Trappe. I wished to secure a portrait of him,

but such was his modesty and humility that I feared to ask him to allow

himself to be painted. I went therefore to Rigault, then the first

portrait-painter in Europe. In consideration of a sum of a thousand

crowns, and all his expenses paid, he agreed to accompany me to La

Trappe, and to make a portrait of him from memory. The whole affair was

to be kept a profound secret, and only one copy of the picture was to be

made, and that for the artist himself.

My plan being fully arranged, I and Rigault set out. As soon as we

arrived at our journey's end, I sought M. de La Trappe, and begged to be

allowed to introduce to him a friend of mine, an officer, who much wished

to see him: I added, that my friend was a stammerer, and that therefore

he would be importuned merely with looks and not words. M. de La Trappe

smiled with goodness, thought the officer curious about little, and

consented to see him. The interview took place. Rigault excusing

himself on the ground of his infirmity, did little during three-quarters

of an hour but keep his eyes upon M. de La Trappe, and at the end went

into a room where materials were already provided for him, and covered

his canvas with the images and the ideas he had filled himself with.

On the morrow the same thing was repeated, although M. de La Trappe,

thinking that a man whom he knew not, and who could take no part in

conversation, had sufficiently seen him, agreed to the interview only out

of complaisance to me. Another sitting was needed in order to finish the

work; but it was with great difficulty M. de La Trappe could be persuaded

to consent to it. When the third and last interview was at an end, M. de

La Trappe testified to me his surprise at having been so much and so long

looked at by a species of mute. I made the best excuses I could, and

hastened to turn the conversation.

The portrait was at length finished, and was a most perfect likeness of

my venerable friend. Rigault admitted to me that he had worked so hard

to produce it from memory, that for several months afterwards he had been

unable to do anything to his other portraits. Notwithstanding the

thousand crowns I had paid him, he broke the engagement he had made by

showing the portrait before giving it up to me. Then, solicited for

copies, he made several, gaining thereby, according to his own admission,

more than twenty-five thousand francs, and thus gave publicity to the

affair.

I was very much annoyed at this, and with the noise it made in the world;

and I wrote to M. de La Trappe, relating the deception I had practised

upon him, and sued for pardon. He was pained to excess, hurt, and

afflicted; nevertheless he showed no anger. He wrote in return to me,

and said, I was not ignorant that a Roman Emperor had said, "I love

treason but not traitors;" but that, as for himself, he felt on the

contrary that he loved the traitor but could only hate his treason.

I made presents of three copies of the picture to the monastery of La

Trappe. On the back of the original I described the circumstance under

which the portrait had been taken, in order to show that M. de La Trappe

had not consented to it, and I pointed out that for some years he had

been unable to use his right hand, to acknowledge thus the error which

had been made in representing him as writing.

The King, about this time, set on foot negotiations for peace in Holland,

sending there two plenipotentiaries, Courtin and Harlay, and

acknowledging one of his agents, Caillieres, who had been for some little

time secretly in that country.

The year finished with the disgrace of Madame de Saint Geran. She was on

the best of terms with the Princesses, and as much a lover of good cheer

as Madame de Chartres and Madame la Duchesse. This latter had in the

park of Versailles a little house that she called the "Desert." There

she had received very doubtful company, giving such gay repasts that the

King, informed of her doings, was angry, and forbade her to continue

these parties or to receive certain guests. Madame de Saint Geran was

then in the first year of her mourning, so that the King did not think it

necessary to include her among the interdicted; but he intimated that he

did not approve of her. In spite of this, Madame la Duchesse invited her

to an early supper at the Desert a short time after, and the meal was

prolonged so far into the night, and with so much gaiety, that it came to

the ears of the King. He was in great anger, and learning that Madame de

Saint Geran had been of the party, sentenced her to be banished twenty

leagues from the Court. Like a clever woman, she retired into a convent

at Rouen, saying that as she had been unfortunate enough to displease the

King, a convent was the only place for her; and this was much approved.

At the commencement of the next year (1697) the eldest son of the Comte

d'Auvergne completed his dishonour by a duel he fought with the Chevalier

de Caylus, on account of a tavern broil, and a dispute about some

wenches. Caylus, who had fought well, fled from the kingdom; the other,

who had used his sword like a poltroon, and had run away dismayed into

the streets, was disinherited by his father, sent out of the country, and

returned no more. He was in every respect a wretch, who, on account of

his disgraceful adventures, was forced to allow himself to be

disinherited and to take the cross of Malta; he was hanged in effigy at

the Greve, to the great regret of his family, not on account of the

sentence, but because, in spite of every entreaty, he had been proceeded

against like the most obscure gentleman. The exile of Caylus afterwards

made his fortune.

We had another instance, about this time, of the perfidy of Harlay. He

had been entrusted with a valuable deposit by Ruvigny, a Huguenot

officer, who, quitting France, had entered the service of the Prince of

Orange, and who was, with the exception of Marshal Schomberg, the only

Huguenot to whom the King offered the permission of remaining at Court

with full liberty to practise his religion in secret. This, Ruvigny,

like Marshal Schomberg, refused. He was, nevertheless, allowed to retain

the property he possessed in France; but after his death his son, not

showing himself at all grateful for this favour, the King at last

confiscated the property, and publicly testified his anger. This was the

moment that Harlay seized to tell the King of the deposit he had. As a

recompense the King gave it to him as confiscated, and this hypocrite of

justice, of virtue, of disinterestedness, and of rigorism was not ashamed

to appropriate it to himself, and to close his ears and his eyes to the

noise this perfidy excited.

M. de Monaco, who had obtained for himself the title of foreign prince by

the marriage of his son with the Duchesse de Valentinois, daughter of M.

le Grand, and who enjoyed, as it were, the sovereignty of a rock--beyond

whose narrow limits anybody might spit, so to speak, whilst standing in

the middle--soon found, and his son still more so, that they had bought

the title very dearly. The Duchess was charming, gallant, and was

spoiled by the homage of the Court, in a house open night and day, and to

which her beauty attracted all that was young and brilliant. Her

husband, with much intelligence, was diffident; his face and figure had

acquired for him the name of Goliath; he suffered for a long time the

haughtiness and the disdain of his wife and her family. At last he and

his father grew tired and took away Madame de Valentinois to Monaco. She

grieved, and her parents also, as though she had been carried off to the

Indies. After two years of absence and repentance, she promised marvels,

and was allowed to return to Paris. I know not who counselled her, but,

without changing her conduct, she thought only how to prevent a return to

Monaco; and to insure herself against this, she accused her father-in-law

of having made vile proposals to her, and of attempting to take her by

force. This charge made a most scandalous uproar, but was believed by

nobody. M. de Monaco was no longer young; he was a very honest man, and

had always passed for such; besides, he was almost blind in both eyes,

and had a huge pointed belly, which absolutely excited fear, it jutted

out so far!

After some time, as Madame de Valentinois still continued to swim in the

pleasures of the Court under the shelter of her family, her husband

redemanded her; and though he was laughed at at first, she was at last

given up to him.

A marriage took place at this time between the son of Pontchartrain and

the daughter of the Comte de Roye. The Comte de Roye was a Huguenot,

and, at the revocation of the edict of Nantes, had taken refuge, with his

wife, in Denmark, where he had been made grand marshal and commander of

all the troops. One day, as the Comte de Roye was dining with his wife

and daughter at the King's table, the Comtesse de Roye asked her daughter

if she did not think the Queen of Denmark and Madame Panache resembled

each other like two drops of water? Although she spoke in French and in

a low tone, the Queen both heard and understood her, and inquired at once

who was Madame Panache. The Countess in her surprise replied, that she

was a very amiable woman at the French Court. The Queen, who had noticed

the surprise of the Countess, was not satisfied with this reply. She

wrote to the Danish minister at Paris, desiring to be informed of every

particular respecting Madame Panache, her face, her age, her condition,

and upon what footing she was at the French Court. The minister, all

astonished that the Queen should have heard of Madame Panache, wrote word

that she was a little and very old creature, with lips and eyes so

disfigured that they were painful to look upon; a species of beggar who

had obtained a footing at Court from being half-witted, who was now at

the supper of the King, now at the dinner of Monseigneur, or at other

places, where everybody amused themselves by tormenting her: She in turn

abused the company at these parties, in order to cause diversion, but

sometimes rated them very seriously and with strong words, which

delighted still more those princes and princesses, who emptied into her

pockets meat and ragouts, the sauces of which ran all down her

petticoats: at these parties some gave her a pistole or a crown, and

others a filip or a smack in the face, which put her in a fury, because

with her bleared eyes not being able to see the end of her nose, she

could not tell who had struck her;--she was, in a word, the pastime of

the Court!

Upon learning this, the Queen of Denmark was so piqued, that she could no

longer suffer the Comtesse de Roye near her; she complained to the King:

he was much offended that foreigners, whom he had loaded with favour,

should so repay him. The Comte de Roye was unable to stand up against

the storm, and withdrew to England, where he died a few years after.

The King at this time drove away the company of Italian actors, and would

not permit another in its place. So long as the Italians had simply

allowed their stage to overflow with filth or impiety they only caused

laughter; but they set about playing a piece called "The False Prude," in

which Madame de Maintenon was easily recognised. Everybody ran to see

the piece; but after three or four representations, given consecutively

on account of the gain it brought, the Italians received orders to close

their theatre and to quit the realm in a month. This affair made a great

noise; and if the comedians lost an establishment by their boldness and

folly, they who drove them away gained nothing--such was the licence with

which this ridiculous event was spoken of!

Memoirs of Louis XIV and His Court and of the Regency — Volume 02 · 第 2 / 9 章