CHAPTER XIV

DIARY CONTINUED, 1801-1803

Public affairs and prophecy—The divining rod—The appropriation of

waste lands—The word ‘meanness’ defined—South’s

sermons—Projected theological

compendia—Correspondence—Journalising to ‘my friend’—Anecdote of

Dean Milner and Pitt—Death of the Duke of Bedford—Napoleon and

Protestantism.

_March 20._—It is in vain to complain of gaps; if I had but

attention enough to write only two lines every day I should have

hope of going on. I have been thinking more seriously of the

Journal, and of converting it to use as a memento of the progress I

make in the only business worth real attention—my salvation through

the merits of the Blessed Saviour. For this purpose I must fix on

some hour of the day to be regular at it, and, if I hold my

resolution, it shall be immediately after my prayers in the morning,

being always up at 4 A.M. and sometimes at 3 A.M. I am then sure to

be uninterrupted; positively I will begin to-morrow morning.

_21st._—Dined yesterday with Lord Somerville. I did not like the

day. Duke of Montrose, Duke of Athol, and Lord Rossmore sent

excuses, but the Marquis of Abercorn, Lord Dalkeith, Lord Villiers,

Lord Barrington, Mr. McDougal, Mr. Baird, and two Scotch members

were there, the last but one a hard-headed, sensible man.

Much conversation, particularly farming. This morning Sir A. St.

John Mildmay called to have my opinion of a Bill he is now bringing

into Parliament to enable the clergy to give leases of their tithes

beyond the term of their lives. The Archbishop has not negatived it,

but such a Bill can no more pass than the abolition of tithes; it is

open to such frauds that perhaps it ought not to pass.

My chief misfortune in having little society with well-disposed

minds: I know few except Wilberforce and Cecil; the latter I rarely

see, and W. is so full of business that I might nearly as well be

unknown to him. I will urge him to form a Society to meet once a

week for conversation merely on religion.

_22nd, Sunday._—To be eager and alert in rising at 4 A.M. for all my

secular employments and sluggish on the Lord’s Day, when, if I rise,

it must be to His worship, seemed long ago a snare of Satan, which,

blessed be God, I have resisted. I was yesterday at the Society for

Bettering the Condition of the Poor, the Bishop of Durham in the

chair; it is an excellent institution, and may call down the

blessing of God—may that Being grant them his grace to do good from

right motives! With the Duke of Bedford on the Smithfield Society,

and the whole day full of business, which, on the Sabbath, I banish

as much as I can from my mind. In the evening my son and daughter

only at home, and therefore I got an hour’s religious conversation

with them on the times and the Prophecies.

I have been too negligent of improving such opportunities, but the

tremendous moment in which we live, so lately having seen the

country without King, without minister, with a famine, and seven

wars! If it be not a moment to call people to a serious

recollection, nothing can ever do it.

So near the expiration of the 1,260 years of Daniel and St. John;

the Turkish Empire on the point of destruction; a strange and

unthought-of establishment in Egypt, a country that is to have much

to do in the return of the Jews—ourselves in India, they may have

some unknown relation to that phial to be poured out on the

Euphrates to make way for the Kings of the East—altogether combine

strangely to give suspicion that we are on the eve of some great

events which are to usher in the final consummation of all things,

and consequently the fall of the ten Kings of Europe. The times are

truly awful, and demand such piety and resignation as no other

period of modern history even approached to.

_23rd._—At the Lock yesterday. Scott is now my favourite preacher,

and I have heard him ever since I came to Town with great pleasure

and attention in spite of a very bad manner. His matter is most

excellent. Received the Sacrament.

_24th._—Called yesterday on Mr. and Mrs. Montagu in their great

house. It is said he has just lost a coal pit that was worth

6,000_l._ or 7,000_l._ a year; I had a card for her Monday parties,

and not having been, I apologised. I must now and then go after

Easter. But all company of the sort is flat to me. I have just made

up the annual account for 1800, and the loss upon the year is

22_l._; this meeting a tax on paper which will cost 48_l._ a year is

alarming. I had entertained many vain hopes that the work after so

many years’ continuance would have stood its ground, but I know not

what to think. Now I must print only six instead of seven sheets,

and try so for another year. If I lose then, I must give up the

work, much as it will hurt me. The ‘Agricultural and Commercial

Magazine’ and the ‘Farmers’ Magazine,’ which approach more to the

nature of newspapers, and which have contained hardly one paper of

real importance, have been selling well; such is the world, its

judgment and discernment!

_28th._—Yesterday the Board proceeded to Hyde Park in a body to see

the experiments of Captain Hoar on the _Virgula divina_. He, many

years ago, saw Lady Milbank’s surprising faculty of discovering

springs, and trying, found that he had it himself. He is recommended

to the Board by Mr. Lascelles, member for Yorkshire.

I found from the conductor of the waterworks at the reservoir then

at work, that the twig in Mr. Hoar’s hand when he crossed them

turned up in a surprising manner. He seemed, in the opinion of Sir

Joseph Banks, to fail once, but in the four trials I watched, and in

which I know he could not be acquainted with the direction of the

pipes, he succeeded completely. Next Tuesday another trial.

To-morrow will be published in the ‘Annals’ the first parts of my

essay on applying waste lands to the better support of the poor. I

prepared it some time ago for the Board, as it was collected in my

last summer’s journey; I read it to a committee—Lord Carrington, Sir

C. Willoughby and Mr. Millington—who condemned it, and, after

waiting a month, Lord C. told me I might do what I pleased with it

for myself, but not print it as a work for the Board; so I altered

the expressions which referred to the body, and sent it to the

‘Annals.’ I prayed earnestly to God on and since the journey for His

blessing on my endeavours to serve the poor, and to influence the

minds of people to accept it; but for the wisest reasons certainly

He has thought proper not to do this, and for the same reasons

probably it will be printed without effect. I think it, however, my

duty to Him to do all I possibly can. Such events and circumstances

I am well persuaded are entirely in His Divine management, and that

we are mere instruments in His hands. Whether I print or not is a

matter wholly unimportant, but the use made of it is in the hands of

the Almighty alone. I am well persuaded that this is the only

possible means of saving the nation from the ruin fast coming on by

the misery of the poor and the alarming ruin of rates. God’s will be

done!

_29th._—Yesterday at the Farmers’ Club. I have little relish of

these meetings, unless given to farming conversation, and this was

nothing but wrangling about the disposition of money. Sunday before

Easter.—Company and talk, eating and wine; sitting up late are ill

preparations for the Sabbath.

_31st._—The Duke of Bedford and Lord Winchilsea at the Club; filled

up vacancies and settled the premiums. The Board greatly attended

yesterday, and adjourned for the holidays.

Captain Hoar is turned over to Lord Egremont, of whom the Bishop of

Durham said that he possessed of all the men almost that he ever

knew the clearest head and most penetrating understanding. I asked

Lord Carrington to employ Arthur while I am absent; he said it was

mean to make him a clerk—but everything is wrong that is proposed to

this man, even the things which, let alone, he would propose

himself.

Honest industry in a lawful employment cannot be mean, especially in

an employment that he likes. This is one of the world’s prejudices,

and rotten like all the rest.

_April 4._—At Bradfield. The pleasure of coming into the country

from such a place as London is great and pure. The freshness and

sweetness of the air, the quiet and stillness, the sunshine

unclouded by smoke, the singing of the birds, the verdure of the

fields, the budding out of vegetation, altogether is charming.

I have only an old woman who keeps the house in our absence, and

never was so attended before; but no matter—I am quiet, peaceful,

and living economically, and shall, I hope, be very well contented.

Divine service was worse done than anything; Sharpe, who is past

everything, preaches and reads worse than any human being; this is

lamentable. That point is the glory of London; one can find churches

where our attention is commanded by instruction.

I never saw the wheat look better, thanks to God! My farm is the

source of disquiet as well as pleasure—such bailiffs as I must keep

execute everything badly, except just what they have always been

used to; and with great expenses there are always many things sadly

neglected. With such absences as I am forced to, this must be the

case.

I have read Barrow’s sermons chiefly since I came down. That on Good

Friday excellent, on Whit Sunday capital, and on the prophecies of

the Messiah such as would convince an infidel, were not infidelity

true hardness of heart.

_5th._—At the Sacrament, none but Green and his wife, and the clerk

and his wife. How much have the clergy to answer for! Reading Barrow

and South’s sermons, ‘The Image of God in the Creation,’ which is

full of wit. Barrow is a most powerful writer, he pours out a

torrent of matter, a stream of mind, as Johnson said of Burke; an

amazing flow of conception and of expression, forcible and varied; a

rich command of language, and such fertility that one of his sermons

would make ten modern ones.

The life I am getting into here of walking and reading is such a

contrast to that at London as to be a most pleasant change and

recreation to my soul and body.

From January 20th I had been so loaded with business of the

requisitions from the Committees of Lords and Commons, and reading

360 essays, that I was employed every day from morn to dinner. I

rose at 4 A.M. regularly, sometimes sooner, even at 3 A.M., and

neglected my ‘Elements’[200] entirely on this account. All was for

the Board, and not free from anxiety. Here I shall have a

fortnight’s refreshment and relaxation, thanks to the Almighty for

it, and that He blesses me with health to enjoy it.

_7th._—Yesterday at 2 o’clock I walked to Bury, for I have neither

horse nor chaise to go in or on. Dined with my friend[201] alone. I

had much talk, and tried hard to impress her with good religious

notions, but I fear in vain; she will not be converted but by

misfortune and misery, her easy prosperous situation will prevent

it. I can only pray for her.

I have made an experiment in living here not unimportant. I drink no

wine or beer, only a pint or one-third of a bottle of cider at

dinner. I care not what I eat, I have only one maid and no helps,

and could thus live for a trifle in a cottage. In such times such

trials may have their use beyond the Christian propriety of

self-denial; but my collection of good books are a great comfort,

which, if deprived of, I should miss terribly. I rise at 4 A.M.,

walk up to my neck in the garden pond, pray, and then read till

breakfast; read, walk, and farm till dinner, and so on till it is

dark, and no moment hangs heavily on my hands. I reproach myself

with indolence for not going among the cottagers, but they come to

me numerously, and having descriptive lists I know enough to do more

than I am able, but I ought to go to their houses and examine their

state well.

I have been reading Watson’s Collection,[202] and am forming a table

of striking passages, and think to have them copied for arranging

with the many I have already written, and may print it some time or

other under some such title as this: _A course of reading on the

origin, truth, and doctrines of the Christian Religion_. I know of

no book of evidences that includes all; by taking the most

impressive passages on each subject from many books, and disposing

them in a lucid form, I think I could produce a very useful work

without presuming to compose any part of it myself. May the Lord

afford me His Spirit should I go on with the design, but with my

employment it would be a business requiring much time!

_9th._—Dined with Mr. and Mrs. Balgrave. Balgrave is a good-tempered

Suffolk parson, neglects the duty of his church, idle, indolent,

drinks his bottle of port and reads his newspaper, but what is

called a respectable character, no vices, nor any imprudent follies.

_10th._—Symonds dined with me and took a bed. The Duke of Brunswick

marching into Hanover will, he says, be a keen revenge.

When he married our King’s sister, Lord Bute (who told the whole to

S. while travelling with him in Italy) promised him the government

of Hanover as soon as it should be vacant, with the King’s

knowledge. The Marquis of Granby conveyed the assurance. When the

vacancy happened the Prince of Mecklenburg was talked of. Lord

Granby wrote to Lord Bute to remonstrate, who went to the King and

Queen, and urged the real necessity of adhering to the promise. All

in vain, the Queen prevailed, and her brother, not two degrees

better than ——, was appointed. The Duke of Brunswick never forgave

it, and when invited to England rejected the idea with anger.

Symonds saw him at Venice and noted the asperity of some of his

expressions.

_11th._—Reading Sherlock’s sermons. In those on the truth of

Christianity, and a defence of the mysteries of it, I know none

equal; excellent indeed and clear, persuasive, and convincing; but I

have some doubts on the vitality of his faith. In the third

discourse of the second volume he says: ‘Here is a plain proof of

what the work of the Spirit is. It brings proofs to the reason of

man, but does not bring the reason of man to the proofs.’ I conceive

just the contrary, the proofs themselves are clear, full, and

abounding with what ought to produce universal conviction, but men,

for want of the Spirit, turn their back, neglect, or despise them.

It is the business of the Spirit to take away the heart of stone,

and then the proofs are manifest: the heart and reason of man are

really brought to the proofs.

_12th, Sunday._—The ground white with snow, and the wind cutting. I

am up every morn at 4 A.M., and walk to the garden pond; habits will

do anything. I do not mind it at all, and sometimes stand in the

wind till dry; it is, however, sharp work.

A nonsensical letter from Lord Carrington requiring me to go to the

Treasury for the 800_l._ for the Essays, which is entirely the

treasurer’s business. He is as unfeeling as a log; this is a return

for my being at work from 4 A.M. in the morning for ten weeks. I

should once have been full of indignation and abhorrence; thank God,

I am more calm. I shall go on Friday instead of the Monday

following. But I wish he had let me alone. I am vexed, but the world

is full of nothing but great miseries or teasing vexations, the more

the better; they wean us from it effectually.

I have been here ten days and have not visited one poor family. My

heart reproaches me. I have given as much as I apprehended I could

afford, but that is laziness. The cold winds and sleet have kept me

too much in the house. It is easier to give than to be active in

doing good. I have four days more. Oh, let me be stirring in doing

good! Indolence is inexcusable. If I thought I had but a little time

to live, with what energy would all this be done! And how soon may I

be trembling on a death bed! Have mercy on me, O God, and give me

grace to serve Thee with activity and vigour. Read the whole book of

Job. I can read, think, speculate, write, and meditate, but in doing

good am negligent and slothful. I have had a passing fit of

melancholy from looking at my ever dear daughter’s picture, which I

carry with me everywhere, and never think of her but to bless God

for having in some measure (how imperfectly!) brought me to Himself.

Age coming on apace; the world fading faster still; horrible

threatenings in the aspect of public affairs; small hope of any

comfort underived from religion. How black and dreary would all my

prospects be were it not for the consolation I draw from a most

lively and never varying faith in the truth of Christianity, in the

_full assurance_ of immortality! What would be my situation without

this only balm of my existence? Domestic comfort a blank; my friends

dropping into the grave, and the infirmities of age in near

prospect.

Gratitude and thanksgiving to my blessed Saviour for affording me

grace to believe; and with it all the comfort that remains for me in

this world. My child! My child! Oh, may we meet in heaven!

_13th._—The poor people of the neighbouring villages crowd here to

my great distress. I give all something, and wish I could give more;

but I dread falling into the dark impropriety of giving too much, of

making what would seem and be a parade of charity or generosity with

other people’s money, which is somewhat the case with a man who

gives while he has debts unprovided for. I truly know not what

rightly to do in this case. The evil just described is great, and

ought to be avoided, but at the same time what ought I to think of

myself who have been always ready to spend and run in debt for forty

years together; and then should take up so strictly as to do nothing

for miserably poor people in such times as these? Surely on such an

occasion we should be exerting every power to relieve them!

_20th._—Friday to London. Saturday, Farmers’ Club. An argument with

Lord Egremont, &c., on land for the poor; everybody is against it.

What infatuation!

_21st._—Last night at Mrs. Montagu’s conversazione. I had some

[talk] with the Bishop of Durham, who agrees with me on the poor;

with Lady Harcourt, who wants restrictions on farmers; with Lord

Somers, who told stories of supernatural movements of furniture in

Norfolk.[203] I left it very early though invited for all March and

April. This is the first of my going.

London very disagreeable to me, and has made me compare in my mind

my present situation with a large income, and that of living in a

cottage in the country upon 100_l._ a year, without trouble or

anxiety or business, except to make my peace with God. I liked my

time alone with my old woman [servant] at Bradfield much better than

here. I had nobody to wrangle and quarrel with me.

_May 4._—Yesterday I was at church in the morning with Mrs. O. Oakes

at the Lock, and heard Scott, and in the evening at the Surrey

Chapel to hear Rowland Hill. Neither of them pleased, though she

admits Scott’s matter was excellent. She was most struck with the

extreme fervency of Mr. Wilberforce’s devotion, who, sitting in the

reading desk for the convenience of hearing better, she saw him

clearly. Bought Rowland Hill’s sermon on the Sunday Schools against

the attack of Bishop Horsley,[204] who is, from all I hear of him,

such a bishop as Suffolk parsons are clergymen. Scott thinks that

evil spirits do work on our souls, and to me it is remarkable that

he says the imagination is their great field. I have reason enough

to believe him in the right. These are enquiries in which we have no

other clue to guide us but Scripture, and surely there we find

proofs without end of the agency of evil spirits; for my own part I

have no doubt of it.

_Bradfield._—As there was no church this morning, I had eleven poor

women from the village to talk to upon their neglect of church. I

read many passages on public worship and prayer out of Dodd’s

Commentary on the Bible, and explained, preached, and reasoned with

them. One made a defence, and was inclined to prate. I took it

coolly, and presently brought her to better reason. I doubt they

liked a sixpence apiece better than my sermon, yet three of them

cried. How much more docile and teachable are the poor than the

rich! One might gradually do much with the poor, but very little

indeed with their betters. God opens the hearts of the one, and

hardens those of the others as a punishment for their pride and

ingratitude.

The Duke of Bedford has asked Lord Carrington to the sheep shearing.

Lord Egremont called, he remarks that the Chancellor, Lord Rosslyn,

and Lord Grenville, &c. &c., all have in the late debates gone out

of the way to abuse the Board of Agriculture, and remarks that

keeping a Board only to treat it in this manner is preposterous.

_7th._—My publications are very well adapted to take off the edge of

all worldly infatuated admiration or dependence on the things of

time in comparison of those of eternity. Washington’s Letters have

been advertised to the expense of 5_l._ or 6_l._, and I do not

believe that 100 are sold, and my enquiry into the cottage system

for poor people will have no more effect on Government or the

Legislature than if I had whistled ‘Alley Croker.’ So much the

better perhaps for the good of my soul.

_25th._—Mr. Hoole called and was let in. He has heard at a great

table (he did not say where) a very so-so account of Lord

Carrington—fidgeting, restless, dissatisfied, ambitious, avaricious,

with a mere show of parts and knowledge. He has made immensely by

the loan; and the richer he grows, so much the worse. The eldest

girl said to Mr. H. when he called: ‘My papa used to have prayers in

his family; but none since he has been a peer.’ What a motive for

neglecting God! Also he is a dissenter and a democrat. A Unitarian

he may be, but certainly no democrat. The Lord show mercy to him,

and by interrupting his prosperity or lowering his health, bring him

to repentance!

_26th._—Yesterday I dined with the Duke of Grafton, and he asked me

when the election of president and secretary of the Board was, for

he heard there was an intention of turning Lord Carrington and me

out. He said his answer was, as to Lord C., there were reasons which

might account for that, but what can Mr. Y. have done? ‘Oh, he is

careless, and does nothing,’ and so I dare say there are people to

report and perhaps so think. Lord Somerville in revenge, I doubt

not, hates everything belonging to the Board, and wishes to come in

and sweep everyone clear away, in order to introduce creatures of

his own, and this, uniting with Gifford’s scandals and slander about

the Board intending to pull down the club in the ‘Porcupine’ and

‘Anti-Jacobin Review,’[205] gains the attention of fools, and

mingled by the depravity of the world, is circulated and believed.

But of all farces, that of my doing nothing is the most precious.

What I have done through the whole session of the Board surpasses

credibility, almost to myself, and nothing but rising at 4 A.M. in

the morning could have enabled me to go through it. The first spare

half day I have I will make a list of all I have done, and see if

they will not acquit me to my own heart. Oh, did I serve my God as

well as I have served the Board! Could I review my services to my

Redeemer as satisfactorily, happy should I be!

_27th._—Symonds and Hoole dined with us, and, as the former will see

the Duke of Grafton to-day, I gave him a message card, on one side

of which is ‘_Some use in rising at 4_ A.M.,’ and on the other as

follows: ‘From January 20 to May 23 are 90 days, Sundays and

vacation excluded, 50 Boards and Committees; 340 essays read, and

every one commented on. Report to the House of Commons on Potatoes.

Report to the Lords on Grass Lands. Enquiry into cottagers’ land

published, but drawn up for the Board. Memoir on Salt, from more

than fifty authors. Ten new premises framed. Memoir on wastes,

paring, burning, and arable land.’

If for such employment I am stigmatised for doing nothing, it shows

that in order to please, it matters not what we do, caprice will be

the only judgment. What conclusion is to be drawn from such cases?

Serve God truly, and as to man trouble not thyself about him; let

this be the golden rule, and it will bring peace at the last.

_28th._—Lord Carrington fretting and worrying, and upon the full

fidget about the newspapers’ abuse, and the criticisms in the House

of Lords upon the publication of the Board; swearing that he will

allow no nonsense to be published, and this will be more absurd and

pragmatical than ever. Oh! Mr. Pitt, Mr. Pitt, that thou shouldest

have formed such a Board as this, and then permit it to frame such a

constitution as should render it absolutely dependent on the folly

and caprice of a president! What might it not have done had its laws

been what they ought to have been!

Dalton, of Yorkshire, gave me a long account of his taking Hyder Ali

when only the colonel of 500 horse—a soldier of fortune.[206] Lord

Egremont came up from Petworth, where, he tells me, not a loaf for

three days and a half, and a mutiny among the volunteers.

_29th._—Dined yesterday at Lord Winchilsea’s. There were the Duke of

Bedford, Lord Egremont, Lord Romney, Lord Somerville, Mr. Calhoun,

Mr. Northey, Mr. Conyers, and myself: much farming. Lord Romney gave

Lord Egremont a guinea, to receive fifty when he produced a tench

that weighed seven pounds.

Yesterday the Committee voted 50_l._ to my son for his labour in

arranging &c., during thirteen weeks, the Reports from inclosed

parishes to the House of Commons. I thanked them very awkwardly, and

talked of gratitude, for it came on unexpectedly; that readiness

which is never at a loss I have not an atom of. My heart always

speaks at a sudden; whereas in many cases the head is most wanted.

But the fault was on the right side, it was more than I expected.

_June 6._—Charming weather for the country, now in its full beauty,

and I am stoved up in this horrid place. Lord C. talked of

adjourning the Board on Tuesday, which I hope much he will do. The

15th is the Sheep Show at Woburn; it will be the 20th before it is

possible for me to see Bradfield, and hardly then; the longest day

before a man gets into the country!!! Let them turn me out of my

secretaryship and I shall not regret it, but down all discontent; it

is God’s will, and my duty is to be thankful for all.

It is a comfort which exceeds all others, that as age advances the

end of life is viewed as a mere change of residence, and the mental

eye fixed on heaven, with full confidence in the promises of God. I

would not give this conviction for the wealth of the Indies, for the

empire of the world. And what does one lose by religion? I enjoy all

such pleasures of life as are unattended by remorse, just as much,

or more indeed, far more, than I did while I was a dissipated

character. Reading, composition, serious conversation on any topic

worth discussing, the rural beauties of Nature, and the pleasures of

agriculture, friendship, affection, not love, as it is called, the

whole of which I fear is founded in lust, and proves nineteen times

in twenty the tyrant of the breast, and the fertile source of ten

thousand miseries! Happy those in whom it terminates in a settled,

quiet, tranquil friendship, sufficient to satisfy without the

wanderings of the heart that lead to so much misery.

I was here (at Bradfield) three weeks at Easter after a severe

confinement to incessant business; I am now again in the same deep

retirement, the life of a hermit, after eight weeks of business and

bustle. I feel how vast the benefit is to have these periodical

retirements from the world in silence and solitude. Had I gone

directly from London on my tour, plunging from one busy scene to

another, my mind would have had no time to cool, none to settle into

any calm and tranquil state for reflection, which is unfavourable to

the growth of religion, of morals, nay, of talents to perform

anything of consequence. A round of business or dissipation thus

unbroken is mischievous to the heart, ties it to the world, and

unfits it for every effort of regeneration and repentance, or of

meditation and philosophy.

Lord Euston is going the tour of Suffolk, ordering returns to be

made of all carts, waggons, horses, mills, and ovens; a step

preparatory in the expectation of an invasion. But it is in

everyone’s mouth that with such a price of corn half the country

would join an enemy. I must freely confess I dread the result. We

have no hope but in the protection of the Almighty, who has hitherto

so wonderfully protected us; and what has been the gratitude shown

to Him?

Most melancholy is the reflection. Our rulers are truly infatuated,

to have done nothing for the assistance of the poor, but leave them

to such trying times without even showing a disposition to take any

steps that could be effective. To do nothing to give relief, when

land for the poor does relieve them so beneficially wherever they

have it, is a cruel infatuation. To see poor rates at their present

enormous height and the poor in misery—yet where they have land, to

find rates 3_d._ or 4_d._ or 9_d._ in the £, and the poor in a state

of ease and comfort—one would think should speak feelingly and

powerfully—but no such thing. Men are governed by their stupid

prejudices, and have too much pride to permit their eyes to be

opened. Had an Act passed last session that had the effect of thus

assisting the poor, instead of the pernicious system by rates, and

some progress were now making in every county to carry it into

execution, we should not hear such opinions advanced, because they

would be groundless; the poor labourers, seeing such steps taken for

their comfort and to free them from the ineffective thraldom of

parish rates, would be patient and quiet. At present they see

nothing done or doing for them, and have their hearts almost broken

by penury—without resource—without hope.

In such a situation who would wonder to see men join an enemy in

crowds? Heaven forbid that this infatuation of Government be not

providential, and the means by which the Deity may mean to punish

the nation for and by its sins!

The trumpeter of the Corps of Yeomanry came to me with a written

engagement to forfeit 5_s._ the first absence and 10_s._ 6_d._ every

successive one if we do not meet the first Friday of every month. I

was always exempted on account of my necessary absence; however, as

they expect to be called into actual service, I would not now retire

when an invasion is expected, so I signed; but when the alarm is

quite blown over—should that please the Almighty—I shall withdraw,

for I am too old and too weak, and my pursuits too far off and too

numerous to permit attendance.

_September 7_ [on tour, at Dunstable].—Breakfasted with Mr. Parkyn,

and then went to meet a person who instructs people in plaiting

straw, and I bargained with him at 30_s._ a week for a girl to be

instructed—a month will do; that is 6_l._, and the journey there and

back, about 4_l._, so for 10_l._ I shall be able to introduce this

most excellent fabric among our poor. The children begin at four

years old, and by six earn 2_s._ or 3_s._ a week; by seven 1_s._ a

day; and at eight and nine, &c., 10_s._ or 12_s._ a week. This will

be of immense use to them.

Got to Woburn by 2 P.M., sat down and wrote for two hours and a

half, then dressed, but did not dine till nearly 8 P.M. The Duke of

Manchester there with Lord Preston, Mr. Cartwright, and Edwards, the

bookseller, who is putting the library to rights and showing how to

make the catalogue. I was surprised to learn from him that a man

could not lay out in one year more than 5,000_l._ judiciously in

books; that Lord Spencer has been fourteen years expending

25,000_l._, and has the best library in England, perhaps better than

the King’s. He tells me the nation [France] bought L’Héritier’s[207]

library, and gave it to the Botanical Garden. Miss Knight,[208]

authoress of the continuation of ‘Rasselas,’ whom I met at

Kedington’s, lent Dolmien’s[209] ‘Life at Naples,’ through Lady

Hamilton’s interest with the Queen. He wrote to her from prison.

Did not get to bed till past 11 P.M. Such hours and fasting from 9

A.M. in morn to 8 P.M. at night did not agree with me. I waked at 4

A.M., and having a lamp, rose, washed, prayed, and sat down by

candlelight to my notes and finished them.

Lord Preston swears; it hurts me to hear him. I certainly ought to

convert such people and reproach myself, and confess the sin every

day in my catalogue to God; but I go on and do it not. If I had wit

I could laugh at it, but I have no more wit than a pig.

The following are selected from this year’s correspondence:

_From T. Symonds, Esq., describing Trinity College Establishment,

Revenue, &c._

‘Cambridge: March 20, 1801.

‘You desire me, good friend, to send you a long letter from this

place, but I could more easily find materials to write one to our

friend Charles Cole, from his being perfectly conversant with

every one here, and with almost everything. You observe very

right, that landlords cannot come into a share of the wealth of

their tenants but by a corn rent. This I have insisted upon of

late frequently at Bury. The present state of the University is an

indisputable proof of it. The pressure of the times is hardly felt

by its members. Will you not think so, when you hear that the

revenue of this College amounted to nearly 16,000_l._ last year,

and that the eight senior fellows received more than 300_l._ each,

and the junior half of that sum? They have been obliged to raise,

however, the price of the commons (as they are called) from

fifteen to eighteen pence. But I sit down here every day for this

sum to a dinner, which gentlemen of a thousand a year cannot give

often with prudence.

‘The papers, I presume, have informed you of the trial of our

plate stealers last week.

‘The whole business was ill conducted. The man who sold to the Jew

the medals of King’s College for 70_l._, the plate of this for

300_l._, and the plate of Caius for 500_l._, pleaded guilty, and

in consequence of a free pardon to appear against the Jew, who,

though acquitted at these Assizes, will probably be hanged at the

next. Grimshaw, the chimney sweeper, is the only victim at

present. Your friend Simeon was not wanting in his visits to him.

He told an acquaintance of mine "that he found Grimshaw’s

conversation delightful; that he had grace to die; and that the

sooner he was executed the better, for fear this grace should

evaporate." Should it ever be my lot to be condemned for

execution, I will immediately apply to you for consolation. Simeon

could work no conviction in the Jew; this will not surprise you.

‘I saw in the papers a list of the dancers at Lady Carrington’s

ball; but, to my astonishment, did not discover your name. The

papers have raised Lord C. to the degree of Viscount;[210] it

would be too insulting for a man recently in business to step

above the heads of our ancient Barons. I should have told you that

we have here a young nobleman of unblemished character. I mean

Lord Henry Petty, whose knowledge and abilities are such, both in

writing and speaking in public, as to lead me to imagine that he

cannot fail to make a distinguished figure in Parliament. By the

bye, there seem to be some members of the House of Commons who are

jealous of your Board.

‘Yours sincerely,

‘J. SYMONDS.’

_January 24, 1802._—A great gap; but from coming to London in

November to quitting it the following month I wrote journal letters

paged to my friend.[211] Through the Christmas holidays a blank. I

have subscribed to the Lock Hospital 5_l._ 5_s._, and go every

Sunday. Wilberforce always there taking notes of Scott’s sermons.

In the great business of my salvation I go on slowly, struggling

hard, however, to advance, by freeing my imagination from sensuality

and my heart from coldness. God give me grace to persist. I lay

great stress on trying by every means to impress in my mind a

constant sense of God’s presence.

_March 8._—At Wilberforce’s last night till 10 o’clock, and was not

in bed till quarter past 11 P.M. Though I was up before 4 A.M., and

had no sleep in the day, or very little, the consequence was that in

the night just past I slept very soundly indeed, and till 6 A.M.

Dean Milner[212] there, and I had much conversation with him about

W. while he and Mr. W. were out of the room. He first made an

impression on Wilberforce’s mind at Scarborough; he hinted on some

person named being an enthusiast, but Milner (though not religious

then himself) checked it with a firmness that made W. think. They

afterwards travelled to Nice, and were there three months about the

year 1783 or 1784. The Duke of Gloucester was then an infidel; the

conversation M. had with him upon the journey had no other effect

(indeed that was the capital one) but of making him serious in

reading and considering the Bible, which he did with great industry

and deep attention, bringing to it a _heart_ open to conviction; his

health was injured by application, but his eternal soul was saved.

He afterwards broke off his intimacies with a social fashionable

set, and particularly from dinners which hurt his progress in Divine

impersonation. He fairly and openly told his friends the reason.

Pitt never joked or laughed at him—some did, but he never; all were

sorry to lose him. But he was in earnest, and carried his

determination into effect to give himself wholly to the care of his

soul in the first place, and next to perform his temporal duties by

assiduity in business. The Dean remarked the great good his book is

likely to do from this time to the end of the world. Many, many may

be saved by it. He dictated an answer to some quotations from David

which the Duke of Grafton gave me the other day in argument against

original sin, the righteousness named 1,000 years before Christ. He

replied as I had done on the spot to the Duke, that these men had

the _spirit_, and then were righteous before God in _Jesus Christ_

who saved from the creation.

The Duke of Bedford’s death! How much I could write on that topic. I

met Halifax at the Duke of Grafton’s. He died with what is called

perfect courage, collectedness, and resolution that is perfectly

hardened in insensibility. A most tremendous, awful, horrible case!

But very difficult to separate affection for the amiable temper and

useful life from a just condemnation of his utter want of religion

and piety.

_From the Duke of Bedford[213]

in carrying out the plans of his late Brother_

‘Woburn Abbey: March 28, 1802.

‘Sir,—The sudden and fatal event which deprived me of one of the

kindest of friends and most affectionate of brothers, Agriculture

of one of its firmest props, and Society of one of its best and

most useful members, coming upon me too so soon after a former

severe domestic calamity, left my mind in such a state of sad

dejection as to render me wholly incapable of writing to you on a

subject deeply interesting to me, because it occupied the last

thoughts of my much lamented brother. His zeal for that first and

most interesting of pursuits, Agriculture, did not forsake him

even in the last moments of his life, and on his death-bed, with

an earnestness of mind expressive of his character, and with that

anxious consideration for the interests of his country which

occupied so many years of his well-spent life, he strongly urged

me to follow up those plans of national improvement which he had

begun, and from which he had formed the most sanguine hopes of

success. He referred me to Mr. Cartwright and to you for

explanations and details; with Mr. C. I have already had some

conversation, and hope soon to have the pleasure of seeing you. I

shall be in London in a day or two, and if you will favour me with

a line in Arlington Street, to name the day and hour most

convenient to you to call upon me, you will much oblige me. Should

you be absent from Town I trust it will not be long before I have

the satisfaction of seeing you at Woburn.

‘Desirous as I am in every point of view to fulfil the last wishes

of my departed brother, I feel that my humble efforts must be at

such a vast distance from the exertions of his well-regulated and

superior mind, that without the aid and advice of those most

capable of assisting me, I should utterly despair of attaining the

objects now so near to my heart.

‘I am, Sir,

‘Your faithful and obedient servant,

‘BEDFORD.’

_My Reply_

‘32 Sackville Street: March 1802.

‘My Lord,—The melancholy event which has deprived your Grace of a

brother so beloved was a stroke that affected every feeling of my

heart; others more habituated to his merit on great occasions

better knew than it was possible for me to do the powers of a mind

that could fathom the most important subjects; but to me, sinking

his great consequence in the country, he was a kind, most amiable,

and indulgent friend, nor shall I ever cease to lament the loss of

the best temper I ever met with; good humour seemed to spring from

a perennial source in his bosom. Pleasing and happy it is for his

lamented memory that all ranks and classes of the people have vied

in the expressions of grief for the loss of so able, sincere, and

unquestionable a patriot. It pleased him on several late occasions

to converse with me on his plans of those establishments he

meditated to connect with the employment of Mr. Cartwright.

Probably that gentleman has explained all or most of them to your

Grace. I shall be most happy to repeat them, and I am sure I need

not add that veneration for the memory of one who commanded the

regrets of a great nation, as well as the respect I owe to your

Grace’s character, will induce me most willingly to give you the

little assistance that is in my power to lessen the loss we have

all suffered.

‘I rejoice in hearing of your Grace’s determination to tread in

those steps which proved so direct a path to a well-earned and

most useful fame.

‘From eleven o’clock to-day till four, and from twelve till three

on Thursday, I am engaged with the Board, but will wait on your

Grace at any other time you are pleased to appoint.

‘I am, my Lord,

‘Most respectfully your Grace’s

‘Much obliged and most humble servant,

‘ARTHUR YOUNG.’

The Board has been busy in voting testimonies to the memory of the

Duke of Bedford, a race who should express most strongly their

veneration. The Bishop of Llandaff brought a dedication for the

volume now ready—a medal ordered and a bust. These people are carnal

and worldly, except, however, Mr. Wilberforce, who much promoted it,

and spoke often in favour of it. His example is authority, or I

should have considered the whole as a worldly-minded business, and

bad. This Duke, with vast powers and immense influence, set an

example to a town and populous neighbourhood in the country, and to

a great circle of friends and dependents, of an utter neglect, if

not contempt, of religion: all was worldly in his views; all his

motives tending that way, and his example mischievous to religion

and the souls of men. All this praise and veneration is therefore

very questionable, and, I think, unlawful; it is looking at objects

and judging of things with the herd, and therefore wrong; we cannot

go with them but to do mischief. Of what consequence is religion to

the world if farming and beneficence and good temper, and a life

highly useful in a worldly view, is to outweigh the evils of

irreligion, and so very bad an example in morals and want of piety?

I cannot approve of it, much as I liked the man in all worldly

respects.

Dr. Pearson talking of experiments observed that contrary

experiments to good ones are nothing. ‘I can get evidence for or

against anything: for the existence of angels and devils,’ &c. He is

a great infidel, one of the gang of philosophers of the Royal

Society, whose head, Sir J. B., is of the same mould, and whose

influence is all on the same side, and does much mischief. The

great, the wise, and the learned in this town, I fear, are nineteen

in twenty infidels. Shocking! dreadful to think of!!

Dined at the Duke of Grafton’s, Menil the Nimrod and Dr. Halifax

there. I never fail to combat his Unitarianism, but do no good; yet

his arguments are weak as water.

_20th._—At the Farmers’ Club. Carried with some difficulty a premium

of fifty guineas for the best plough; several voted against it,

because impossible to decide which of several should be the best!

These folks can hardly know the right end of a plough.

_25th._—Dined at the Bishop of Durham’s; Price, the

Vice-Chamberlain, there, and Mr. and Mrs. Bernard. I would have some

serious talk, and therefore asked the Bishop if he had read

Overton’s[214] book? He had, and highly approved it. He met with it

at York, and asked the Archbishop if he knew anything of the author,

and, to his surprise, found that he did not even know there was such

a man, and knew nothing of him. The Bishop promised to send me his

two charges and letters to the Deists. He was lately in company with

Otto,[215] and made enquiries what that minister conceived would be

the result of the present order of things in France relative to

religion. Otto thought that it would end in the establishment of

Protestantism;[216] this is remarkable and not improbable. The

Concordat will not be executed. I questioned the Bishop about Paley:

‘Mr. Y., I gave Dr. P. a living of 1,100_l._ a year for two great

works, the “Horæ Paulinæ” and “The Evidences,” and so I told him:

“But, Dr. P., as to your Moral Philosophy I disapprove of it, and

therefore do not mistake my motive”’!! He is engaged in a work now

at press on natural religion by the Bishop’s recommendation.

_27th._—Our third volume Part I. of the ‘Communications’ is out, but

I have yet heard nothing of the public opinion. The mere printing

this thin quarto has been the whole business of the Board, that is,

of the President, from last November; nothing else done of any sort

or kind. This is pitiable. He corrected the proofs and made them

dance up and down to Wycombe, and wait as if time was of no

consequence, and a whole Session will pass with this for its only

employment. My ‘Hertford’ is ready for printing, Pitt’s ‘Leicester,’

Howlett’s ‘Essex,’ and Plymley’s ‘Salop,’ and all at a stand; not

one proof of the second part of the ‘Essays’ at press in a

fortnight, and nothing else thought of. He is as fit to be President

of the Board as Grand Llama of Thibet; such is the way that all

public business is conducted. If I saw as much of the Treasury, have

no doubt but similar though not equal neglect would appear. But what

a table of cyphers to meet week after week and urge nothing to

satisfy the public. The whole of this flows from the most fastidious

coxcombical pretension to purity of language: the time is spent in

making phrases, as the French express it, which ought to be employed

in devising and executing plans of improvement and pushing on the

county surveys. Lamentable! A fine folly, however, has taken place;

the President and two other members went to see Salisbury’s

botanical garden—there he agreed to hire six acres at rent and taxes

14_l._ an acre for Board experiments 1½ miles from Hyde Park Corner.

I was not consulted, and 60_l._ paid for a lease before I knew a

word of the matter; then I was ordered to view it, which I did, but

no opinion asked. Next I was directed to draw up a plan of

experiments, which I did, without corn, for myriads of sparrows from

nurseries would eat all up. These were partly accepted and partly

rejected, and potatoes scouted because _people are sick of the name

of potatoes_. ‘Suppose another famine, my Lord, what will those

persons then think who are now sick of potatoes?’

It stands over for the Board. The whole idea is stark, staring

folly; it will cost 250_l._ a year, and the harvest well deserved

ridicule.

_April 11._—Last Wednesday, Lord Carrington took me into his room

and told me that his brother having the loan, he had spoken to him

to write me down for 500_l._; and that the rise having been 4 per

cent. he had directed it to be sold, and it would produce me 200_l._

clear of charges. I thanked him much. Such a thing never entered my

thoughts, and consequently surprised me much. It was very kind and

considerate, and I am certainly much obliged to him for it. Next

evening he sent for me, and gave me a draft on Smith and Payne,

221_l._ 17_s._ 6_d._, for the rise was 4½ per cent. I was thankful

to God for this, and meditated much on it. If God had not been

willing it would not have entered his head, and I find it

comfortable to attribute everything to God, as, indeed, everything

ought certainly to be attributed, and the more we trust entirely to

Him the better I am persuaded it is for us. This is the first

lottery for many years that I have been out of, but meeting with a

passage in some of Scott’s things against lotteries I would not put

in, or have anything to do with it. If God pleases to give me money

He has a thousand ways of doing it, and in these reflections I have

had hard work to guard my mind against the temptation to consider it

in the light of a reward which would be vile where there is no

merit, no desert. I offend too daily and hourly to deserve anything

but wrath at His hands, and this I cannot dwell on too much or too

deeply. But for two years past of His infinite goodness He has made

all money matters very favourable to me, and I thank Him for an

uninterrupted stream of His bounty without let or hindrance, and

this notwithstanding my sensual mind and many offences. I cannot be

too grateful for so much goodness, and I pray Him to give me grace

to be kind and charitable to others while He is so good to me. I

think of these things with fear and trembling, lest they should

throw my mind and conduct into an improper train.

Of late I have been ruminating on a short publication against the

Deists, to consist merely of an attack on them to show the

difficulties and absurdities of their system; it will consist

chiefly of extracts. I have read Bogue,[217] and Fuller and

Berkeley’s[218] ‘Minute Philosopher,’ and Leslie,[219] but none of

them come up to my idea. It should be unmixed with a defence of

Christianity, which should come in by way of appendix. I cannot get

it out of my head, and shall certainly attempt it; the worst is I

must read their works (_i.e._ of the Deists, &c.), which is bad, but

I shall not do it without prayer to God to fortify me against their

sophistries and delusions.

Yesterday morning I hoped and expected to leave London, but Lord

Pelham, Secretary of State, has sent us the returns of acres cropped

last year from the clergy of the Kingdom, and so a Committee to-day,

and to-morrow Good Friday; for Saturday I have taken places. Thus,

after twelve weeks in London, I lose four days. Very unlucky, and

very disagreeable, and for such nonsense as disgraces common sense.

He wrote a circular letter to all the clergy of the Kingdom last

June for this purpose, and from 10,000 parishes received accounts

from about a half. Precious ones, to be sure! A very probable matter

that the farmers would give the number of acres sown with every sort

of grain to the parsons; such attempts degrade Government in the

eyes of the people. What opinion can they have of men’s abilities

who expect thus to gain such facts?

I was in danger of returning to London without one entry in this

Journal, but going up to wipe my dear Bobbin’s book has thrown my

mind into a fit of melancholy that I know not how easily to get rid

of; yet will it go too soon? I have been whitewashing the house,

cleaning about it, and keeping all things in pretty good order to do

justice to the place as well as I am able; but my dear child’s

recollection brings forcibly to my heart the impression that it is

the will of God I should have hardly any chance of this prosperity

being kept in my family. My son has no children, nor likely to have

any. Mary, no chance of marrying, so that my posterity ends with the

next generation. The will of God be done, but human vanity and

feelings will rise in the bosom, and they cannot rise without these

unpleasant ideas forcing themselves into my mind. Bradfield has been

ours 200 years, and I should have liked that my name and family

might here have continued. But God has punished me for my sins; I

can have nothing at His hands that I do not deserve. Blessed be His

holy Name, be it my endeavour to submit to His will with resignation

and cheerfulness.

Betsy and O. dined with me on Tuesday, but the day so bad I could

not show her the round garden, which was got in very neat order. I

have had a letter from the Duke of Liancourt in which he speaks of

coming to England. I wrote to advise him against it, for he would, I

fear, be very ill received. The Duke of Grafton read me a letter

expressed in most indignant terms on the passage relative to him and

his family in Mons. de Liancourt’s travels.[220] The new Duke of

Bedford writes to desire me, in very kind terms, to go to the Woburn

sheep-shearing; asks it as a sort of favour. I had some very fine

days on coming down, but of late the weather has been cold, damp,

and melancholy, but I never come without wishing to live here

constantly. I cannot help wishing it, but I hope without

discontent—that would be black ingratitude to God. He fixes me where

I am; all, all things I am well persuaded come from His Almighty

hand, and therefore a cheerful submission is one great article of a

religious life. I brought down linen for the poor, but the number

that want, and I cannot relieve, is melancholy: I think I have fixed

straw work here, for above twenty-five have learned, and my

splitting machines are all distributed. Some days since I sent off

to Dunstable the first product of their work, and hope I shall have

a good sale for the poor children.

_June 1: London._—I keep this Journal as I do everything else, lest

good purposes be turned aside by trifles and want of resolution.

This is the thanksgiving-day; and last night was the Union

masquerade, and the coaches are now (5 A.M. in the morning)

rattling, and one fool in some monkey dress has walked by my

windows.

A letter from the Duke of Bedford asking me to go to Woburn, which I

shall do, and then I hope to Holkham, where Mr. Coke will take me in

his coach——and there I am on my ground for the survey of Norfolk;

but it is not yet decided whether I am to do it. It is a duty I owe

to God to use the vacation in the best manner I can, but I can ill

afford to travel at my own expense, determined as I am, if possible,

to pay 700_l._ of debts.

I should like to make a long journey in enquiries concerning the

poor; I know not what would be best, and have prayed to God to guide

me, but I am utterly displeased with myself in my religious

pursuits. My mind is sensual, and my progress slow; may the mercy of

the Almighty be shed on me in grace to mend. I have planned a new

work, ‘Deism Delineated,’ and made some progress, but do not please

myself. It must be done gradually as I read, and my time is fully

occupied with many pursuits.

Post to Chesterford, and having received a letter from the present

Duke of Bedford requesting me to meet Lord Somerville and Mr. Coke

at Woburn in order to consult upon the best means of carrying the

late Duke’s intentions into execution, especially in relation to the

sheep-shearing, I set off accordingly, and got to Woburn at night,

where I found Lord Somerville and Mr. Coke, and we considered the

matter as well as the late Duke’s proposals to breeders. At the

meeting the Duke’s attention was very pleasing, for he had great

solicitude to arrange everything down to the minutest trifles in

exactly the same manner as his brother had done on former occasions.

Before dinner, the first day, he came up to me and said, ‘Mr. Y., I

beg you will take your old seat, and preside at one end of the

table, for which purpose I have ordered a servant to keep your

chair.’ Everyone remarked the extreme attention of the duke that all

the business of the meeting should be well conducted.

_12th._—Heartily tired of London, and the scenes I have endured at

home. I left town, and took Betsy’s new chaise, which I had bought

for her (170 guineas) for Chesterfield, where her whole family were.

It was a hurrying day.

Next morning, Sunday, to church, and in the afternoon, contrary to

many feelings, to Baldock. No post-chaise to be had, so went on in

my whisky to Shefford, then post to Woburn by particular desire of

the Duke of Bedford, to concert matters with Lord Somerville and Mr.

Coke for the shearing business. It was 11 P.M. at night before I

arrived; nobody there except they and Cartwright.

On the Thursday, with Mr. Coke and Mr. Talbot, in Coke’s chaise to

Brandon, and on Friday morning to Holkham.

Farmed on Saturday and too much on Sunday, so here have been two

Lord’s days profaned. How difficult it is to be in the world and

preserve oneself uncontaminated by common practices! At church,

however, in the morning.

The sheep-shearing the four following days, at which I had never

been before. He does it handsomely; 200 dined on plate.

The dinner better than at Woburn, I think from vicinity to the sea,

which gives plenty of fish.

At the Holkham meeting, had I entertained my former feelings of

pride and discontent, I should not have been too well pleased, for

Mr. C. was personally civil and attentive; and yet he took not the

smallest public opportunity of mentioning me, the Board, my report,

or anything about it, though the occasion certainly called in reason

for it. Once this would have mortified me, but now I value such

matters not a straw. May God permit me to do my duty to Him, and as

to what men think of me, I regard it less than the idle wind. I went

to bed every night directly after coffee, between 9 and 10 P.M., and

was up between 3 and 4 A.M.

[In London] at Mrs. Montagu’s.—Sir Sidney not there; Ryder, the

Privy Councillor, and his brother and Montagu, had been at Paris,

and we had little conversation except on Bonaparte, &c. They

contended that every scrap of land is cultivated and much that was

waste. Sir F. combated the idea, and urged reports of prefects,

speeches, &c., as proving rents sunk, price of land fallen, produce

as four to six, population lessened, and the price of labour risen,

&c. &c. The last no proof of decline.

Ryder, on corn, observed that the same fact of wheat being dearer in

peace than in war is found in the French prices annexed to

Arnold.[221]

They would not be introduced to Bonaparte. Fox had much conversation

with him, and he plainly urged the fact that Wyndham was concerned

in the infernal machine, asserting that he had the proof. Sir F.

says that this proof was one George, being much with W., and

afterwards going on the expedition to Quiberon. A party was taken

amongst whose papers (on the arrests for the infernal machine) were

letters on that conspiracy to or from George, which combination was

Bonaparte’s _proof_. The Government, [he says, is] the completest

military despotism that ever was in the world.

At the theatre some Frenchmen finding Montagu was English, spoke

much of me; and said they wanted of all things that I should come

and examine France a second time under the new _régime_.

Dined with Swirenove, the Russian chaplain of the embassy, greatly

employed by the nobility of that Empire in agricultural commissions.

Patterson, bailiff to Lord Hardwicke, is going to Russia, and left

me to make a bargain for him, which I did. He is to have 100 guineas

first year, and increasing 20 yearly till 200 guineas; 60 for his

son-in-law, and 20 for his daughter, and 25 for a ploughman. Count

Rostopchin, at Woronowo, near Moscow, who has an immense estate, is

the man. A Russian count there, Benwakin, I think, [he named] whose

peasants pay him 30 roubles a year; but paper money so multiplied

and at 50 per cent. discount, that all prices are greatly risen

nominally. The Emperor’s going to farm so largely has already had a

great effect in turning the attention of the nobility to it. My

annuity yesterday remitted from Ireland, 72_l._[222] Thank God for

that uninterrupted stream of His bounty which I have enjoyed of late

years without let or hindrance, and which my vile ingratitude

returns so badly.

Lord Winchilsea called yesterday, and sat an hour with me. He is, I

believe, one of the very best of the nobility, and a really

respectable moral character, and benevolent to the poor.

_August 22: Bradfield._—Here is a blank of many weeks, which shows

once more how difficult it is to keep journal resolutions. After a

long tour in Norfolk, which would have afforded much pleasure had

not business occupied all my time, I met Betsy and O. at Harleston,

on the 9th.

War much talked of. The militia calling out. These things, whatever

the event, are certainly God’s providences. His will be done. But

when I consider the almost universal vice and iniquity of the

kingdom, the amazing protection and blessings which have been

showered down on us, and the vile ingratitude to God which pervades

all ranks in an utter forgetfulness of Him, or contempt of His

judgments, I must own I tremble at the thought.

I have lived some time without making a will, which has been very

wrong. I am under such complex settlements that I do not understand

what power I have; and Gotobed’s draft was so full of law jargon,

that I understand nothing of it. I wait no longer, but have made one

plain and simple, and such as I hope, with the blessing of God, will

not nor can be misunderstood. I have disposed of what I have to the

best of my conscience, that is, if I was to die at Christmas. Here

is only 300_l._ to be made up by sale of timber, ‘Annals,’ &c. &c.,

but a farm auction would produce more than 900_l._, and rents are

always behind, some over due. I pray to God for better economy, and

much hope, by a fresh and careful attention to my farm and ‘Annals,’

to bring things speedily to a better account.

I forgot 100_l._ due to me from the Board for Norfolk Report, so

that I evidently leave enough for all demands, probably without

cutting any timber.

I have never lived so well with Mrs. Young as for five weeks past.

War! To look into futurity is idle. The event is in the Lord’s hand,

and will depend on the number and piety of true Christians amongst

us, and not be governed by fleets and armies. France is so

unprepared at sea, that no war ever opened in that respect with

better prospects. But this is the arm of flesh, and may mark the

vanity of all trust in such circumstances.

The following letter to A. Y. may fitly close the chronicle of this

year:

‘Drinkstone: Dec. 8, 1803.

‘Sir,—A letter from Lord Euston to Sir Charles Davers recommends

that in case of invasion all horses and draft cattle that cannot

be driven out of the reach of the enemy be shot; and that all the

axle-trees or wheels of all carriages likely to fall into the

enemy’s hands be broken, the fullest assurance being given of

complete indemnification, provided no horses, draft cattle, or

carriages of any description fall into their hands through

negligence or want of proper exertion on the part of the owners.

‘All other stock is to be left for the use of the troops, unless

there be evident danger it may fall into the invader’s hands, in

which case the measures formerly determined upon must be resorted

to.

‘I am, Sir,

‘Your obedient humble servant,

‘JOSHUA GRIGBY.’

-----

Footnote 200:

_The Elements of Agriculture._

Footnote 201:

Mrs. Oakes, _née_ Betsy Plampin.

Footnote 202:

_A Collection of Theological Tracts_, by the Bishop of Llandaff, 6

vols.

Footnote 203:

This seems to have been an anticipation of table-turning.

Footnote 204:

Samuel Horsley, born 1733, died 1806, Bishop of St. Asaph’s, St.

David’s, and Rochester; celebrated for his controversy with Dr.

Priestley.

Footnote 205:

The _Anti-Jacobin_, or _Weekly Examiner_, was started by Canning,

J. H. Frere, and others; the editor was W. Gifford. It ran from

November 20, 1797, to July 9, 1798.

Footnote 206:

I print this as written, but can find no allusion in works of

reference to the circumstance mentioned.

Footnote 207:

C. de l’Héritier, born 1746, died 1800; botanist, and member of

the Académie des Sciences.

Footnote 208:

Cornelia Knight, author of _Dinarbas_, a continuation of

_Rasselas_, 1790, and other works.

Footnote 209:

Celebrated French geologist. Accompanied Napoleon to Egypt; on his

return was taken prisoner and confined at Messina by the King of

Sicily; on peace being made with Naples was liberated.

Footnote 210:

Robert Smith, son of a banker at Nottingham; M.P. for that town

from 1770 to 1796; supporter and friend of Pitt; raised to the

Irish peerage in 1796, to the English peerage in 1797.

Footnote 211:

Mrs. Orbell Oakes, the beautiful Betty Plampin of former

flirtations, is ‘the friend’ henceforth constantly alluded to.

Footnote 212:

Isaac Milner, 1751-1820, son of a poor weaver (brother of the no

less remarkable Joseph Milner), Dean of Carlisle, and Professor of

Mathematics at Cambridge.

Footnote 213:

John Russell, sixth Duke, ‘the great Duke of Bedford,’ who did

so much for agriculture, and in 1830 rebuilt Covent Garden

Market at a cost of 40,000_l._ Died 1839.

Footnote 214:

J. Overton, officer in the Excise; made telescopes, and had a

private press, where he printed books, mostly theological. Died

1838. See _Annual Register_ for that year.

Footnote 215:

L. W. Otto, Count of Morlay, was a German diplomatist in the

French service, and lived 1752-1817. See Didot, _Biographie

Universelle_.

Footnote 216:

This was not, perhaps, impossible. See the following note from the

_Daily News_ Paris correspondent three or four years ago:

‘An account of Napoleon I.’s visit to Breda in 1810 is now

appearing, for the first time, in the _Débats_, and is deeply

interesting. It will be seen that Napoleon I. at the zenith of his

power was on the point of becoming a Protestant.

‘The Emperor, after receiving several Deputies, went up to the

Catholic Vicar, who had written a speech, and proceeded to read

it. The Emperor, without replying, asked where were the Protestant

ministers. Then M. Ten Oever, in his robes, followed by the entire

Protestant clergy, was presented by the Prince de Wagram, and read

an address. The Emperor remarked with satisfaction that the

Protestant ministers wore their robes. Then, turning to the Roman

Catholic clergy, he asked, “How is it that you are not wearing

your frocks? What! I come to a Department [Holland had been

annexed to France] where the majority are Catholics, who were

formerly oppressed, and who have received more liberty from the

King, my brother, and myself, and your first act is to show me

disrespect! I have always found my Protestants faithful subjects.

I have six thousand at Paris and eight hundred thousand in my

empire, and I have no cause for complaint against a single one.

Fools that you are! _If the Concordat had not been accepted by the

Pope, I should have turned Protestant, and thirty million

Frenchmen would have followed my example._ [The italics are my

own.] You have calumniated Protestants, representing them as men

teaching principles contrary to the rights of sovereigns. I have

no better subjects. They serve in my palace in Paris. It was not

Luther, nor Calvin, but the German princes who declined to submit

to your fanatical yoke. The English were quite right to part

company with you. You would like to set up scaffolds and stakes,

but I will prevent you. All authority comes from God.”’

Footnote 217:

D. Bogue, D.D., _On the Divine Authority of the New Testament_,

1801.

Footnote 218:

Bishop of Cloyne, _Alciphron; or, the Minute Philosopher_, 1732.

Footnote 219:

C. Leslie, died 1722, author of _The Rehearsals: Tracts against

the Deists and Socinians_, 4 vols.

Footnote 220:

_Voyage en Amérique_, 2 vols. 1800. It seems that the French

_émigrés_, after being most hospitably treated in England, showed

little return in the way of graciousness. See _Letters of Maria

Josepha Holroyd_; also the _Jerningham Letters_.

Footnote 221:

Ambrose Marie Arnault, French economist, 1750-1812. See Vapereau.

Footnote 222:

See Chap. IV. ‘Ireland,’ for this curious bargain, by which A. Y.,

instead of a sum total of 700_l._, in 1776 was to receive 72_l._

per annum!

-----

The autobiography of Arthur Young · 第 14 / 16 章