6. The other characteristics of the qualities are separate facts.

7. But the same quality appears in many times and spaces. Generic

sameness of the quality wherever found becomes thus a further means by

which the jolts are reduced.

8. What between different qualities jolts remain. {294} Each, as far

as the other is concerned, is an absolutely separate and contingent

being.

9. The moral judgment may lead us to postulate as irreducible the

contingencies of the world.

10. Elements mutually contingent are not in conflict so long as they

partake of the continua of time, space, etc.,--partaking being the

exact opposite of strife. They conflict only when, as mutually

exclusive possibilities, they strive to possess themselves of the same

parts of time, space, and ego.

11. That there are such real conflicts, irreducible to any

intelligence, and giving rise to an excess of possibility over

actuality, is an hypothesis, but a credible one. No philosophy should

pretend to be anything more.

NOTE.--Since the preceding article was written, some observations on

the effects of nitrous-oxide-gas-intoxication which I was prompted to

make by reading the pamphlet called The Anaesthetic Revelation and the

Gist of Philosophy, by Benjamin Paul Blood, Amsterdam, N. Y., 1874,

have made me understand better than ever before both the strength and

the weakness of Hegel's philosophy. I strongly urge others to repeat

the experiment, which with pure gas is short and harmless enough. The

effects will of course vary with the individual. Just as they vary in

the same individual from time to time; but it is probable that in the

former case, as in the latter, a generic resemblance will obtain. With

me, as with every other person of whom I have heard, the keynote of the

experience is the tremendously exciting sense of an intense

metaphysical illumination. Truth lies open to the view in depth

beneath depth of almost blinding evidence. The mind sees all the

logical relations of being with an apparent subtlety and instantaneity

to which its normal consciousness offers no parallel; only as sobriety

returns, the feeling of insight fades, and one is left staring vacantly

at a few disjointed words and phrases, as one stares at a

cadaverous-looking snow-peak from which the sunset glow has just fled,

or at the black cinder left by an extinguished brand.

{295}

The immense emotional sense of _reconciliation_ which characterizes the

'maudlin' stage of alcoholic drunkenness,--a stage which seems silly to

lookers-on, but the subjective rapture of which probably constitutes a

chief part of the temptation to the vice,--is well known. The centre

and periphery of things seem to come together. The ego and its

objects, the _meum_ and the _tuum_, are one. Now this, only a

thousandfold enhanced, was the effect upon me of the gas: and its first

result was to make peal through me with unutterable power the

conviction that Hegelism was true after all, and that the deepest

convictions of my intellect hitherto were wrong. Whatever idea or

representation occurred to the mind was seized by the same logical

forceps, and served to illustrate the same truth; and that truth was

that every opposition, among whatsoever things, vanishes in a higher

unity in which it is based; that all contradictions, so-called, are but

differences; that all differences are of degree; that all degrees are

of a common kind; that unbroken continuity is of the essence of being;

and that we are literally in the midst of _an infinite_, to perceive

the existence of which is the utmost we can attain. Without the _same_

as a basis, how could strife occur? Strife presupposes something to be

striven about; and in this common topic, the same for both parties, the

differences merge. From the hardest contradiction to the tenderest

diversity of verbiage differences evaporate; _yes_ and _no_ agree at

least in being assertions; a denial of a statement is but another mode

of stating the same, contradiction can only occur of the same

thing,--all opinions are thus synonyms, are synonymous, are the same.

But the same phrase by difference of emphasis is two; and here again

difference and no-difference merge in one.

It is impossible to convey an idea of the torrential character of the

identification of opposites as it streams through the mind in this

experience. I have sheet after sheet of phrases dictated or written

during the intoxication, which to the sober reader seem meaningless

drivel, but which at the moment of transcribing were fused in the fire

of infinite rationality. God and devil, good and evil, life and death,

I and thou, sober and drunk, matter and form, black and white, quantity

and quality, shiver of ecstasy and shudder of horror, vomiting and

swallowing, inspiration and expiration, fate and reason, great and

small, extent and intent, joke and earnest, tragic and comic, and fifty

other {296} contrasts figure in these pages in the same monotonous way.

The mind saw how each term _belonged_ to its contrast through a

knife-edge moment of transition which _it_ effected, and which,

perennial and eternal, was the _nunc stans_ of life. The thought of

mutual implication of the parts in the bare form of a judgment of

opposition, as 'nothing--but,' 'no more--than,' 'only--if,' etc.,

produced a perfect delirium of theoretic rapture. And at last, when

definite ideas to work on came slowly, the mind went through the mere

_form_ of recognizing sameness in identity by contrasting the same word

with itself, differently emphasized, or shorn of its initial letter.

Let me transcribe a few sentences:

What's mistake but a kind of take?

What's nausea but a kind of -ausea?

Sober, drunk, -_unk_, astonishment.

Everything can become the subject of criticism--how

criticise without something _to_ criticise?

Agreement--disagreement!!

Emotion--motion!!!

Die away from, _from_, die away (without the _from_).

Reconciliation of opposites; sober, drunk, all the same!

Good and evil reconciled in a laugh!

It escapes, it escapes!

But----

What escapes, WHAT escapes?

Emphasis, EMphasis; there must be some emphasis in order

for there to be a phasis.

No verbiage can give it, because the verbiage is _other_.

_In_coherent, coherent--same.

And it fades! And it's infinite! AND it's infinite!

If it was n't _going_, why should you hold on to it?

Don't you see the difference, don't you see the identity?

Constantly opposites united!

The same me telling you to write and not to write!

Extreme--extreme, extreme! Within the _ex_tensity that

'extreme' contains is contained the '_extreme_' of intensity.

Something, and _other_ than that thing!

Intoxication, and _otherness_ than intoxication.

Every attempt at betterment,--every attempt at otherment,--is a----.

It fades forever and forever as we move.

{297}

There _is_ a reconciliation!

Reconciliation--_e_conciliation!

By God, how that hurts! By God, how it _does n't_ hurt!

Reconciliation of two extremes.

By George, nothing but _o_thing!

That sounds like nonsense, but it is pure _on_sense!

Thought deeper than speech----!

Medical school; divinity school, _school_! SCHOOL! Oh my

God, oh God, oh God!

The Will to Believe, and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy · 第 62 / 66 题