CHAPTER X

"HITHERTO UNPUBLISHED"

(_Being the report which was not sent to the Record._)

_Marlstone, June 16th._

My Dear Molloy: This is in case I don't find you at your office. I

have found out who killed Manderson, as this despatch will show.

That was my problem; yours is to decide what use to make of it. It

definitely charges an unsuspected person with having a hand in the

crime, and practically accuses him of being the murderer, so I

don't suppose you will publish it before his arrest, and I believe

it is illegal to do so afterwards until he has been tried and found

guilty. You may decide to publish it then; and you may find it

possible to make some use or other before then of the facts I have

given. That is your affair. Meanwhile, will you communicate with

Scotland Yard, and let them see what I have written? I have done

with the Manderson mystery, and I wish to God I had never touched

it. Here follows my despatch.

P. T.

I begin this, my third and probably my final despatch to the _Record_

upon the Manderson murder, with conflicting feelings. I have a strong

sense of relief, because in my two previous despatches I was obliged, in

the interests of justice, to withhold facts ascertained by me which

would, if published then, have put a certain person upon his guard and

possibly have led to his escape; for he is a man of no common boldness

and resource. Those facts I shall now set forth. But I have, I confess,

no liking for the story of treachery and perverted cleverness which I

have to tell. It leaves an evil taste in the mouth, a savor of something

revolting in the deeper puzzle of motive underlying the puzzle of the

crime itself, which I believe I have solved.

It will be remembered that in my first despatch I described the

situation as I found it on reaching this place early on Tuesday morning.

I told how the body was found, and in what state; dwelt upon the

complete mystery surrounding the crime and mentioned one or two local

theories about it; gave some account of the dead man's domestic

surroundings; and furnished a somewhat detailed description of his

movements on the evening before his death. I gave, too, a little fact

which may or may not have seemed irrelevant: that a quantity of whisky

much larger than Manderson habitually drank at night had disappeared

from his private decanter since the last time he was seen alive. On the

following day, the day of the inquest, I wired little more than an

abstract of the proceedings in the coroner's court, of which a verbatim

report was made at my request by other representatives of the _Record_;

and it will be remembered that the police evidence showed that two

revolvers, with either of which the crime might have been committed, had

been found--one in Manderson's bureau and the other in the room of the

secretary, Marlowe; but that no importance could be attached to this, as

the weapons were of an extremely popular make. I write these lines in

the last hours of the same day; and I have now completed an

investigation which has led me directly to the man who must be called

upon to clear himself of the guilt of the death of Manderson.

Apart from the central mystery of Manderson's having arisen long before

his usual hour to go out and meet his death, there were two minor points

of oddity about this affair which, I suppose, must have occurred to

thousands of those who have read the accounts in the newspapers; points

apparent from the very beginning. The first of these was that, whereas

the body was found at a spot not thirty yards from the house, all the

people of the house declared that they had heard no cry or other noise

in the night. Manderson had not been gagged; the marks on his wrists

pointed to a struggle with his assailant; and there had been at least

one pistol-shot. (I say at least one, because it is the fact that in

murders with firearms, especially if there has been a struggle, the

criminal commonly misses his victim at least once.) This odd fact seemed

all the more odd to me when I learned that Martin, the butler, was a bad

sleeper, very keen of hearing, and that his bedroom, with the window

open, faced almost directly toward the shed by which the body was found.

The second odd little fact that was apparent from the outset was

Manderson's leaving his dental plate by the bedside. It appeared that he

had risen and dressed himself fully, down to his necktie and watch and

chain, and had gone out-of-doors without remembering to put in this

plate, which he had carried in his mouth every day for years, and which

contained all the visible teeth of the upper jaw. It had evidently not

been a case of frantic hurry; and even if it had been, he would have

been more likely to forget almost anything than this denture. Any one

who wears such a removable plate will agree that the putting it in on

rising is a matter of second nature. Speaking as well as eating, to say

nothing of appearances, depend upon it.

Neither of these queer details, however, seemed to lead to anything at

the moment. They only awakened in me a suspicion of something lurking in

the shadows, something that lent more mystery to the already mysterious

question how and why and through whom Manderson met his end.

With this much of preamble I come at once to the discovery which, in the

first few hours of my investigation, set me upon the path which so much

ingenuity had been directed to concealing.

I have already described Manderson's bedroom, the rigorous simplicity of

its furnishings, contrasted so strangely with the multitude of clothes

and shoes, and the manner of its communication with Mrs. Manderson's

room. On the upper of the two long shelves on which the shoes were

ranged I found, where I had been told I should find them, the pair of

patent leather shoes which Manderson had worn on the evening before his

death. I had glanced over the row, not with any idea of their giving me

a clue, but merely because it happens that I am a judge of shoes, and

all these shoes were of the very best workmanship.

But my attention was at once caught by a little peculiarity in this

particular pair. They were the lightest kind of lace-up dress shoes,

very thin in the sole, without toe-caps, and beautifully made, like all

the rest. These shoes were old and well-worn; but being carefully

polished and fitted, as all the shoes were, upon their trees, they

looked neat enough. What caught my eye was a slight splitting of the

leather in that part of the upper known as the vamp, a splitting at the

point where the two laced parts of the shoe rise from the upper. It is

at this point that the strain comes when a tight shoe of this sort is

forced upon the foot, and it is usually guarded with a strong stitching

across the bottom of the opening. In both the shoes I was examining this

stitching had parted, and the leather below had given way. The splitting

was a tiny affair in each case, not an eighth of an inch long, and the

torn edges having come together again on the removal of the strain,

there was nothing that a person who was not something of a connoisseur

of shoe-leather would have noticed. Even less noticeable, and indeed not

to be seen at all unless one were looking for it, was a slight straining

of the stitches uniting the upper to the sole. At the toe and on the

outer side of each shoe this stitching had been dragged until it was

visible on a close inspection of the joining.

These indications, of course, could mean only one thing. The shoes had

been worn by someone for whom they were too small.

Now it was clear at a glance that Manderson was always thoroughly well

shod and careful, perhaps a little vain, of his small and narrow feet.

Not one of the other shoes in the collection, as I soon ascertained,

bore similar marks; they had not belonged to a man who squeezed himself

into tight shoe-leather. Someone who was not Manderson had worn these

shoes, and worn them recently; the edges of the tears were quite fresh.

The possibility of someone having worn them since Manderson's death was

not worth considering; the body had only been found about twenty-six

hours when I was examining the shoes; besides, why should any one wear

them? The possibility of someone having borrowed Manderson's shoes and

spoiled them for him, while he was alive, seemed about as negligible.

With others to choose from he would not have worn these. Besides, the

only men in the place were the butler and the two secretaries. But I do

not say that I gave those possibilities even as much consideration as

they deserved; for my thoughts were running away with me; and I have

always found it good policy, in cases of this sort, to let them have

their heads. Ever since I had got out of the train at Marlstone early

that morning I had been steeped in details of the Manderson affair; the

thing had not once been out of my head. Suddenly the moment had come

when the dæmon wakes and begins to range.

Let me put it less fancifully. After all, it is a detail of psychology

familiar enough to all whose business or inclination brings them in

contact with difficult affairs of any sort. Swiftly and spontaneously,

when chance or effort puts one in possession of the key-fact in any

system of baffling circumstances, one's ideas seem to rush to group

themselves anew in relation to that fact, so that they are suddenly

rearranged almost before one has consciously grasped the significance of

the key-fact itself. In the present instance, my brain had scarcely

formulated within itself the thought, 'Somebody who was not Manderson

has been wearing those shoes,' when there flew into my mind a flock of

ideas, all of the same character and all bearing upon this new notion.

It was unheard-of for Manderson to drink much whisky at night. It was

very unlike him to be untidily dressed, as the body was when found--the

cuffs dragged up inside the sleeves, the shoes unevenly laced; very

unlike him not to wash, when he rose, and to put on last night's evening

shirt and collar and underclothing; very unlike him to have his watch in

the waistcoat pocket that was not lined with leather for its reception.

(In my first despatch I mentioned all these points, but neither I nor

any one else saw anything significant in them, when examining the body.)

It was very strange, in the existing domestic situation, that Manderson

should be communicative to his wife about his doings, especially at the

time of his going to bed, when he seldom spoke to her at all. It was

extraordinary that Manderson should leave his bedroom without his false

teeth.

All these thoughts, as I say, came flocking into my mind together, drawn

from various parts of my memory of the morning's inquiries and

observations. They had all presented themselves, in far less time than

it takes to read them as set down here, as I was turning over the shoes,

confirming my own certainty on the main point. And yet when I confronted

the definite idea that had sprung up suddenly and unsupported before

me,--_It was not Manderson who was in the house that night_--it seemed a

stark absurdity at the first formulating. It was certainly Manderson who

had dined at the house and gone out with Marlowe in the car. People had

seen him at close quarters. But was it he who returned at ten? That

question too seemed absurd enough. But I could not set it aside. It

seemed to me as if a faint light was beginning to creep over the whole

expanse of my mind, as it does over land at dawn, and that presently the

sun would be rising. I set myself to think over, one by one, the points

that had just occurred to me, so as to make out, if possible, why any

man masquerading as Manderson should have done these things that

Manderson would not have done.

I had not to cast about very long for the motive a man might have in

forcing his feet into Manderson's narrow shoes. The examination of

footmarks is very well understood by the police. But not only was the

man concerned to leave no footmarks of his own. He was concerned to

leave Manderson's, if any; his whole plan, if my guess was right, must

have been directed to producing the belief that Manderson was in the

place that night. Moreover, his plan did not turn upon leaving

footmarks. He meant to leave the shoes themselves, and he did so. The

maidservant had found them outside the bedroom door, as Manderson always

left his shoes, and had polished them, replacing them on the

shoe-shelves later in the morning, after the body had been found.

When I came to consider in this new light the leaving of the false

teeth, an explanation of what had seemed the maddest part of the affair

broke upon me at once. A dental plate is not inseparable from its owner.

If my guess was right, the unknown had brought the denture to the house

with him, and left it in the bedroom, with the same object as he had in

leaving the shoes; to make it impossible that any one should doubt that

Manderson had been in the house and had gone to bed there. This, of

course, led me to the inference that _Manderson was dead before the

false Manderson came to the house_; and other things confirmed this.

For instance, the clothing, to which I now turned in my review of the

position: if my guess was right, the unknown in Manderson's shoes had

certainly had possession of Manderson's trousers, waistcoat and shooting

jacket. They were there before my eyes in the bedroom; and Martin had

seen the jacket--which nobody could have mistaken--upon the man who sat

at the telephone in the library. It was now quite plain (if my guess was

right) that this unmistakable garment was a cardinal feature of the

unknown's plan. He knew that Martin would take him for Manderson at the

first glance.

And there my thinking was interrupted by the realization of a thing that

had escaped me before. So strong had been the influence of the

unquestioned assumption that it was Manderson who was present that

night, that neither I nor, so far as I know, any one else had noted the

point. _Martin had not seen the man's face; nor had Mrs. Manderson._

Mrs. Manderson (judging by her evidence at the inquest, of which, as I

have said, I had a full report made by the _Record_ stenographers in

court) had not seen the man at all. She hardly could have done, as I

shall show presently. She had merely spoken with him as she lay half

asleep, resuming a conversation which she had had with her living

husband about an hour before. Martin, I perceived, could only have seen

the man's back, as he sat crouching over the telephone; no doubt a

characteristic pose was imitated there. And the man had worn his hat,

Manderson's broad-brimmed hat! There is too much character in the back

of a head and neck. The unknown, in fact, supposing him to have been of

about Manderson's build, had had no need for any disguise, apart from

the jacket and the hat and his powers of mimicry.

I paused there to contemplate the coolness and ingenuity of the man. The

thing, I now began to see, was so safe and easy, provided that his

mimicry was good enough, and that his nerve held. Those two points

assured, only some wholly unlikely accident could unmask him.

To come back to my puzzling out of the matter as I sat in the dead man's

bedroom with the tell-tale shoes before me:--the reason for the entrance

by the window instead of by the front-door will already have occurred to

any one reading this. Entering by the door, the man would almost

certainly have been heard by the sharp-eared Martin in his pantry just

across the hall; he might have met him face to face.

Then there was the problem of the whisky. I had not attached much

importance to it; whisky will sometimes vanish in very queer ways in a

household of eight or nine persons; but it had seemed strange that it

should go in that way on that evening. Martin had been plainly quite

dumfounded by the fact. It seemed to me now that many a man--fresh, as

this man in all likelihood was, from a bloody business, from the

unclothing of a corpse, and with a desperate part still to play--would

turn to that decanter as to a friend. No doubt he had a drink before

sending for Martin; after making that trick with ease and success, he

probably drank more.

But he had known when to stop. The worst part of the enterprise was

before him, the business--clearly of such vital importance to him, for

whatever reason--of shutting himself in Manderson's room and preparing a

mass of convincing evidence of its having been occupied by Manderson;

and this with the risk--very slight, as no doubt he understood, but how

unnerving!--of the woman on the other side of the half-open door awaking

and somehow discovering him. True, if he kept out of her limited field

of vision from the bed, she could only see him by getting up and going

to the door. I found that to a person lying in her bed, which stood with

its head to the wall a little beyond the door, nothing was visible

through the doorway but one of the cupboards by Manderson's bed-head.

Moreover, since this man knew the ways of the household, he would think

it most likely that Mrs. Manderson was asleep. Another point with him, I

guessed, might have been the estrangement between the husband and wife,

which they had tried to cloak by keeping up, among other things, their

usual practice of sleeping in connected rooms, but which was well known

to all who had anything to do with them. He would hope from this that if

Mrs. Manderson heard him, she would take no notice of the supposed

presence of her husband.

So, pursuing my hypothesis, I followed the unknown up to the bedroom,

and saw him setting about his work. And it was with a catch in my own

breath that I thought of the hideous shock with which he must have heard

the sound of all others he was dreading most: the drowsy voice from the

adjoining room.

What Mrs. Manderson actually said, she was unable to recollect at the

inquest. She thinks she asked her supposed husband whether he had had a

good run in the car. And now what does the unknown do? Here, I think, we

come to a supremely significant point. Not only does he--standing rigid

there, as I picture him, before the dressing-table, listening to the

sound of his own leaping heart--not only does he answer the lady in the

voice of Manderson; he volunteers an explanatory statement. He tells her

that he has, on a sudden inspiration, sent Marlowe in the car to

Southampton; that he has sent him to bring back some important

information from a man leaving for Paris by the steamboat that morning.

Why these details from a man who had long been uncommunicative to his

wife, and that upon a point scarcely likely to interest her? Why these

details _about Marlowe_?

Having taken my story so far, I now put forward the following definite

propositions: that between a time somewhere about ten, when the car

started, and a time somewhere about eleven, Manderson was shot--probably

at a considerable distance from the house, as no shot was heard; that

the body was brought back, left by the shed, and stripped of its outer

clothing, while the car was left in hiding somewhere at hand; that at

some time round about eleven o'clock a man who was not Manderson,

wearing Manderson's shoes, hat and jacket, entered the library by the

garden-window; that he had with him Manderson's black trousers,

waistcoat and motor-coat, the denture taken from Manderson's mouth, and

the weapon with which he had been murdered; that he concealed these,

rang the bell for the butler, and sat down at the telephone with his hat

on and his back to the door; that he was occupied with the telephone all

the time Martin was in the room; that on going up to the bedroom-floor

he quietly entered Marlowe's room and placed the revolver with which the

crime had been committed--Marlowe's revolver--in the case on the

mantel-piece from which it had been taken; and that he then went to

Manderson's room, placed Manderson's shoes outside the door, threw

Manderson's garments on a chair, placed the denture in the bowl by the

bedside, and selected a suit of clothes, a pair of shoes and a tie from

those in the bedroom.

Here I will pause in my statement of this man's proceedings to go into a

question for which the way is now sufficiently prepared.

_Who was the false Manderson?_

Reviewing what was known to me, or might almost with certainty be

surmised, about that person, I set down the following five conclusions:

(1) He had been in close relations with the dead man. In his acting

before Martin and his speaking to Mrs. Manderson he had made no mistake.

(2) He was of a build not unlike Manderson's, especially as to height

and breadth of shoulder, which mainly determine the character of the

back of a seated figure when the head is concealed and the body loosely

clothed. But his feet were larger, though not greatly larger, than

Manderson's.

(3) He had considerable aptitude for mimicry and acting--probably some

experience too.

(4) He had a minute acquaintance with the ways of the Manderson

household.

(5) He was under a vital necessity of creating the belief that Manderson

was alive and in that house until some time after midnight on the Sunday

night.

So much I took as either certain or next door to it. It was as far as I

could see. And it was far enough.

I proceed to give, in an order corresponding with the numbered

paragraphs above, such relevant facts as I was able to obtain about Mr.

John Marlowe, from himself and other sources.

(1) He had been Manderson's private secretary, upon a footing of great

intimacy, for nearly three years.

(2) The two men were nearly of the same height, about five feet, eleven

inches; both were powerfully built and heavy in the shoulder; Marlowe,

who was the younger by some twenty years, was slighter about the body,

though Manderson was a man in good physical condition. Marlowe's shoes

(of which I examined several pairs) were roughly about one shoemaker's

size longer and broader than Manderson's.

(3) In the afternoon of the first day of my investigation, after

arriving at the results already detailed, I sent a telegram to a

personal friend, a fellow of a college at Oxford, whom I knew to be

interested in theatrical matters, in these terms:

Please wire John Marlowe's record in connection with acting at

Oxford some time past decade very urgent and confidential.

My friend replied in the following telegram, which reached me next

morning (the morning of the inquest):

Marlowe was member O.U.D.S. for three years and president 19--

played Bardolph Cleon and Mercutio excelled in character acting and

imitations in great demand at smokers was hero of some historic

hoaxes.

I had been led to send the telegram which brought this very helpful

answer by seeing on the mantel-shelf in Marlowe's bedroom a photograph

of himself and two others in the costume of Falstaff's three followers,

with an inscription from _The Merry Wives_, and by noting that it bore

the imprint of an Oxford firm of photographers.

(4) During his connection with Manderson, Marlowe had lived as one of

the family. No other person, apart from the servants, had his

opportunities for knowing the domestic life of the Mandersons in detail.

(5) I ascertained beyond doubt that Marlowe arrived at a hotel in

Southampton on the Monday morning at six-thirty, and there proceeded to

carry out the commission which, according to his story, and to the

statement made to Mrs. Manderson in the bedroom by the false Manderson,

had been entrusted to him by his employer. He had then returned in the

car to Marlstone, where he had shown great amazement and horror at the

news of the murder.

* * * * *

These, I say, are the relevant facts about Marlowe. We must now examine

fact number _five_ (as set out above) in connection with conclusion

number _five_ about the false Manderson.

I would first draw attention to one important fact. _The only person who

professed to have heard Manderson mention Southampton at all before he

started in the car was Marlowe._ His story--confirmed to some extent by

what the butler overheard--was that the journey was all arranged in a

private talk before they set out, and he could not say, when I put the

question to him, why Manderson should have concealed his intentions by

giving out that he was going with Marlowe for a moonlight drive. This

point, however, attracted no attention. Marlowe had an absolutely

air-tight alibi in his presence at Southampton by six-thirty; nobody

thought of him in connection with a murder which must have been

committed after twelve-thirty--the hour at which Martin, the butler, had

gone to bed. But it was the Manderson who came back from the drive who

went out of his way to mention Southampton openly to two persons. _He

even went so far as to ring up a hotel at Southampton and ask questions

which bore out Marlowe's story of his errand._ This was the call he was

busy with when Martin was in the library.

Now let us consider the alibi. If Manderson was in the house that night,

and if he did not leave it until some time after twelve-thirty, Marlowe

could not by any possibility have had a direct hand in the murder. It is

a question of the distance between Marlstone and Southampton. If he had

left Marlstone in the car at the hour when he is supposed to have done

so--between ten and ten-thirty--with a message from Manderson, the run

would be quite an easy one to do in the time. But it would be physically

impossible for the car--a fifteen horse-power four-cylinder

Northumberland, an average medium-power car--to get to Southampton by

half-past six unless it left Marlstone by midnight at latest. Motorists

who will examine the road-map and make the calculations required, as I

did in Manderson's library that day, will agree that on the facts as

they appeared there was absolutely no case against Marlowe.

But even if they were not as they appeared; if Manderson was dead by

eleven o'clock, and if at about that time Marlowe impersonated him at

White Gables; if Marlowe retired to Manderson's bedroom--how can all

this be reconciled with his appearance next morning at Southampton? _He

had to get out of the house, unseen and unheard, and away in the car by

midnight._ And Martin, the sharp-eared Martin, was sitting up until

twelve-thirty in his pantry, with the door open, listening for the

telephone bell. Practically he was standing sentry over the foot of the

staircase, the only staircase leading down from the bedroom floor.

With this difficulty we arrive at the last and crucial phase of my

investigation. Having the foregoing points clearly in mind, I spent the

rest of the day before the inquest in talking to various persons and in

going over my story, testing it link by link. I could only find the one

weakness which seemed to be involved in Martin's sitting up until

twelve-thirty; and since his having been instructed to do so was

certainly a part of the plan, meant to clinch the alibi for Marlowe, I

knew there must be an explanation somewhere. If I could not find that

explanation my theory was valueless. I must be able to show that at the

time Martin went up to bed, the man who had shut himself in Manderson's

bedroom might have been many miles away on the road to Southampton.

I had, however, a pretty good idea already--as perhaps the reader of

these lines has by this time, if I have made myself clear--of how the

escape of the false Manderson before midnight had been contrived. But I

did not want what I was now about to do to be known. If I had chanced to

be discovered at work, there would have been no concealing the direction

of my suspicions. I resolved not to test them on this point until the

next day, during the opening proceedings at the inquest. This was to be

held, I knew, at the hotel, and I reckoned upon having White Gables to

myself so far as the principal inmates were concerned.

So in fact it happened. By the time the proceedings at the hotel had

begun, I was hard at work at White Gables. I had a camera with me. I

made search, on principles well known to and commonly practised by the

police, and often enough by myself, for certain indications. Without

describing my search, I may say at once that I found and was able to

photograph two fresh finger-prints, very large and distinct, on the

polished front of the right-hand top drawer of the chest of drawers in

Manderson's bedroom; five more (among a number of smaller and less

recent impressions made by other hands) on the glasses of the French

window in Mrs. Manderson's room, a window which always stood open at

night with a curtain before it; and three more upon the glass bowl in

which Manderson's dental plate had been found lying.

I took the bowl with me from White Gables. I took also a few articles

which I selected from Marlowe's bedroom, as bearing the most distinct of

the innumerable finger-prints which are always to be found upon

toilet-articles in daily use. I already had in my possession, made upon

leaves cut from my pocket diary, some excellent finger-prints of

Marlowe's, which he had made in my presence without knowing it. I had

shown him the leaves, asking if he recognized them; and the few seconds

during which he had held them in his fingers had sufficed to leave

impressions which I was afterward able to bring out.

By six o'clock in the evening, two hours after the jury had brought in

their verdict against a person or persons unknown, I had completed my

work, and was in a position to state that two of the five large prints

made on the window-glasses, and the three on the bowl, were made by the

left hand of Marlowe; that the remaining three on the window and the two

on the drawer were made by his right hand.

By eight o'clock I had made at the establishment of Mr. H. T. Copper,

photographer, of Bishopsbridge, and with his assistance, a dozen

enlarged prints of the finger-marks of Marlowe, clearly showing the

identity of those which he unknowingly made in my presence and those

left upon articles in his bedroom, with those found by me as I have

described, and thus establishing the facts that Marlowe was recently in

Manderson's bedroom, where he had in the ordinary way no business, and

in Mrs. Manderson's room, where he had still less. I hope it may be

possible to reproduce these prints for publication with this despatch.

At nine o'clock I was back in my room at the hotel and sitting down to

begin this manuscript. I had my story complete.

I bring it to a close by advancing these further propositions: that on

the night of the murder the impersonator of Manderson, being in

Manderson's bedroom, told Mrs. Manderson, as he had already told Martin,

that Marlowe was at that moment on his way to Southampton; that having

made his dispositions in the room, he switched off the light, and lay in

the bed in his clothes; that he waited until he was assured that Mrs.

Manderson was asleep; that he then arose and stealthily crossed Mrs.

Manderson's bedroom in his stocking feet, having under his arm the

bundle of clothing and shoes for the body; that he stepped behind the

curtain, pushing the doors of the window a little further open with his

hands, strode over the iron railing of the balcony, and let himself down

until only a drop of a few feet separated him from the soft turf of the

lawn.

All this might very well have been accomplished within half an hour of

his entering Manderson's bedroom, which according to Martin he did at

about half-past eleven.

What followed your readers and the authorities may conjecture for

themselves. The corpse was found next morning clothed--rather untidily.

Marlowe in the car appeared at Southampton by half-past six.

* * * * *

I bring this manuscript to an end in my sitting-room at the hotel at

Marlstone. It is four o'clock in the morning. I leave for London by the

noon train from Bishopsbridge. By this evening these pages will be in

your hands, and I ask you to communicate the substance of them to the

Criminal Investigation Department.

PHILIP TRENT.

The Woman in Black · 第 10 / 15 章