“My dear Julia,--I write you a hurried note to tell you that I have

left behind me, at Number Eleven, my _second beaver hat_. It is in

the hatbox in the white cupboard on the landing outside the nursery

door. Do not send anything else with it, as you were imprudent enough

to do last time I asked you to despatch luggage; the Customs are

very particular, and it is important for me just now, amid all these

political troubles, not to have what the French call ‘histoires.’ I

have really nothing to tell you more as to the condition of affairs,

nor anything to add to the brief remarks in my last letter. Were I not

connected by business ties with the Continent nothing should tempt

me to this kind of journey again. The train service is ridiculously

slow, and there is a feeling of distress and ill-ease wherever one

goes. It is truly amazing to me that any people, however stunted by

centuries of oppression, should tolerate the form of government which

has been recently set up by brute force in this unhappy country!

Meanwhile, though everyone discusses politics, nothing is _done_, and

the practical things of life are wholly neglected. The streets still

remain the narrow, ill-lit thoroughfares which would be a disgrace to

a small English provincial town, and the Army, so far as any civilian

can judge, is worthless. The men slouch about with their hands in

their pockets; the Cavalry sit their horses very badly; and even the

escort of the ‘Emperor’ would look supremely ridiculous in any other

surroundings. I have little doubt that if horse racing were more

thoroughly developed the Equine Race would improve. As it is, the

horses here are deplorable. I hope to persuade M. Behrens, who is one

of the few sensible and clear-sighted men I have met during this visit,

to accept our proposals, and I will write you further on the matter.

“Your affectionate husband,

“JO. BILSTED.

“P.S.--I somewhat regret that you have accepted the invitation to the

Children’s Party. However, I never interfere with you in these matters.

I must, however, positively forbid your taking little Charles, who,

though he is eldest, suffers, I fear, from a weak heart, inherited from

your dear mother. I hope to return this day fortnight.”

“HÔTEL DE FERRAS, _July 15, 1870_.

“My dear Julia,--It was a matter of great regret to me that you should

have been compelled to leave Paris a few days before myself; but I

shall follow to-morrow, and hope to be at Number Eleven by Thursday at

the latest. You will then have learned the terrible truth that war has

been finally declared. Nothing could have more deeply _im_pressed and

_op_pressed me at the same time. The overwhelming military power which

in better hands and under a proper guidance might have been turned to

such noble uses is to be hurled against the insecure combination of

German States which have recently been struggling, perfectly rightly

in my opinion, to become One Great Nation; for I make no doubt that

the lesser States will throw in their lot with Prussia: a menace to

one is a menace to all. I write from the bottom of my heart (my dear

Julia), when I say that I am convinced that after the first triumphs

of this Man of Blood our own Government will speak with no uncertain

voice, and will defend the new German people against the aggressor. It

was sufficiently intolerable that his Italian policy should have been

framed before our eyes, without intervention, and that the unity of

that ancient land should be deferred through his insolence. I have not

borne to visit Rome since the hateful presence of a foreign garrison

was established there. I will even go so far (perhaps against your own

better judgment) as to raise the matter in Parliament, but I greatly

fear that the House will not be sitting when the most drastic action

is needed. However, I repeat what I have said; I am confident in the

ultimate Righteousness of our intervention. I am therefore confident

that we shall not allow the further expansion of this Military Policy.

“As I write the garish, over-lit façades of this luxurious Babylon, its

broad, straight streets, with their monotonous vulgar splendour, and

the swarms of the military all round, fill me with foreboding. It would

be a terrible thing if this very negation of True Civilisation and

Religion were to triumph, and I am certain that unless we speak boldly

we ourselves shall be the next victim. But we _shall_ speak boldly....

My faith is firm.

“Your affectionate husband,

“JO. BILSTED.

“P.S.--I am glad that Charles has got through his examination

successfully. I hope he clearly understands that I have no intention of

letting him be returned for Pensbury until a year has elapsed.”

“HÔTEL DE FERRAS, _April 1, 1886_.

“My dear Charles,--It was a filial thought in you to send a letter

which would reach me upon my sixtieth birthday, and believe me that,

speaking as your father, I am not insensible to it.

“I wish you could come and see your mother and me if only for a few

hours, but I know that your Parliamentary duties are heavier than ever;

indeed, life in the House of Commons is not what it used to be! In my

time it was often called ‘the best club in Europe.’ Alas, no one can

say that now! Meanwhile your mother and I are very happy pottering

about our old haunts in Paris; but you have no idea, my dear Charles,

how changed it all is! You can, of course, remember the Second Empire

as a child, but to your mother and me, who were so intimate with

Paris during its most brilliant period, there is something tragic

in the sight of this great capital since the awful chastisement of

fifteen years ago. We ought not, of course, to judge foreign nations

too harshly, but after no inconsiderable experience of Parliamentary

life I cannot but have the most gloomy forebodings as to the future of

this nation. There seems no settled policy of any kind. Yesterday I

attended a debate in the Chamber, but the various speakers articulated

so rapidly that I was not able to follow them with any precision. It is

surely an error to pour out torrents of words in this fashion, and I

cannot believe there is any mature thought behind it at all. I regret

to say that the practice of duelling, though denounced by all the best

thought in the country, is still rife, and nowhere do occasions for its

exercise arise more frequently than in the undisciplined political

life of this capital. One must not, however, look only on the dark

side; there are certainly some very fine new buildings springing up,

especially in the American quarter towards the Arc de Triomphe. Of

course your mother and I keep to the old Hôtel de Ferras. We are at an

age now when one does not easily change one’s habits, but it seems to

me positively dingy compared with some of these new great palaces. It

is a comfort, however, to deal with people who know what an English

banknote is, and who will take an English cheque, and who can address

one properly on the outside of an envelope. It amused your dear mother

to see how quickly they seized the new honour which her Majesty has so

graciously conferred upon me.

“Your affectionate father,

“JO. BILSTED.”

“HÔTEL DE FERRAS, _October 19, 1906_.

“My dear Charles,--I cannot tell you how warmly I agree with your last

letter upon the state of Europe. I am an old man, I have seen many men

and things, and I have been particularly familiar with foreign policy

ever since I first entered the House of Commons, now nearly fifty years

ago, but rarely have I known a moment more critical than the present.

My one comfort lies in the fact that in spite of the divisions of

Party, the heart of the nation is still sound, and the leaven of common

sense in the electors will save us yet. I feel a shade of regret

sometimes to think that the division no longer retains its old name;

I should like to feel that, father and son, we had held it for three

generations, but though the name has changed, the spirit of the place

is the same.... I beg you to mark my words; I may say without boasting

that I have rarely been wrong in my judgment of foreign affairs. When

one sees things here one sometimes trembles for the future.

“This Hotel is not at all what it was. It is ill-kept and damp, and I

shall not return to it.

“Expect me in London before the end of the week.

“PENSHURST.”

[Lord Penshurst died shortly after his return to London. He was

succeeded by his son Charles, second Baron, but the Division is still

represented by a member of the family in the person of Mr. George

Bilstead, his second son, the husband of Mrs. Bilstead, and author of

_The Coming Struggle in the Balkans_.]

The Duel

In the year 1895 of blessed memory there was living in the town of

Paris at the expense of his parents a young English gentleman of the

name of Bilbury; at least, if that were not his name his name was so

nearly that that it doesn’t matter. He spoke French very well, and had

for his age (which was twenty-four) a very good working acquaintance

with French customs. He was popular among the students with whom he

associated, and it was his especial desire not to seem too much of a

foreigner on the various occasions when French life contrasts somewhat

with that of this island. It was something of a little mania of his,

for though he was patriotic to a degree when English history or English

habits were challenged, yet it made him intolerably nervous to feel

exceptional or eccentric in the town where he lived. It was upon this

account that he fought a duel.

There happened to be resident in the town of Paris at the same time

another gentleman, whose name was Newman; he also was young, he

also was English, but whereas Mr. Bilbury was by genius a painter,

Mr. Newman was by vocation an engineer. And while Mr. Bilbury would

spend hours in the studio of a master whom (in common with the other

students) he despised, Mr. Newman was continually occupied in playing

billiards with his fellow students of engineering in the University.

And while Mr. Bilbury was spending quite twelve hours a day in finding

out how to make a picture look like a thing if you stood a long way

off from it (which is the end and object of his school in Paris), Mr.

Newman had already acquired the art of making a billiard ball come

right back again towards the cue after it had struck its neighbour. Mr.

Bilbury had learned how to sing in chorus with the other students songs

relating in no way to pictorial excellence; Mr. Newman had learned to

sing those songs peculiar to students of engineering, but relating in

no way to applied physics. In a word, these two young gentlemen had

never met.

But one day Mr. Bilbury, going arm-in-arm with three friends towards

the river, met upon the pavement of the Rue Bonaparte Mr. Newman in

much the same posture, but accompanied by a rather larger bodyguard. It

would have been astonishing to anyone little acquainted with the temper

of students in the University, and indeed it _was_ astonishing both to

Mr. Newman and to Mr. Bilbury, though they had now for some months been

acquainted with the inhabitants of that strange corner of the universe,

to see how this trifling incident provoked an altercation which in its

turn degenerated into a vulgar quarrel. Each party refused to give way

to the other, and the members of each began comparing the members of

the other to animals of every kind such as the pig, the cow, and even

certain denizens of the deep. In the midst of the hubbub Mr. Bilbury,

not to be outdone in the racy vigour of youth, shouted at Mr. Newman

(who for all he knew might have been a Russian revolutionary or a man

from St. Cyr) an epithet which he had come across in the contemporary

literature of the capital, and which he imagined to be of common

exchange among the merry souls of the University. To his surprise--nay,

to his alarm--a dead silence followed the use of this very humble and

ordinary word. Mr. Newman, to whom it was addressed, was not indeed

ignorant of its meaning (for it meant nothing in particular and was

offensive), but was astonished at the gravity of those round him when

the little epithet had been uttered. With a sense of surprise now far

exceeding that of Mr. Bilbury he saw his companions draw themselves

up stiffly, take off their eccentric felt hats with large sweeping

gestures, and march him off as stiff as pokers, leaving the Bilbury

group solemn with the solemnity of men who have a duty to perform.

That duty was very quickly accomplished. The eldest and most

responsible of the three friends told Bilbury very gently but very

firmly that there could be no issue but one to the scene which had just

passed.

“I am not blaming you, my dear John,” he said kindly (Mr. Bilbury’s

name was John), “but you know there can be only one issue.”

Meanwhile Mr. Newman’s friends, after maintaining their strict and

haughty parade almost the whole length of the Rue Bonaparte, broke

silence together, and said: “It is shameful, and you will not tolerate

it!” To which Mr. Newman replied by an assurance that he would in no

way fall beneath the dignity of the situation.

More than this neither Mr. Bilbury nor Mr. Newman knew, but they both

went to bed that night much later than either intended, and each felt

in himself a something of what Ruth felt when she stood among the alien

corn, or words to that effect.

And next morning each of them woke with the knowledge that he had some

terrible business on hand with some ass of a foreigner who had got

excited, or, to be more accurate, had suddenly stopped being excited

for wholly incomprehensible reasons at a particular moment in a lively

conversation. Both Mr. Newman and Mr. Bilbury were, I say, in this mood

when there entered to Mr. Newman in his room in the Rue des Ecoles

(which he could ill afford) two of his friends of the night before, who

said to him very simply and rapidly that it would be better for them

to act as his seconds as the others had chosen them as most fitted. To

this Mr. Newman murmured his adhesion, and was about to ask anxiously

whether he would soon see them again, when, with a solemnity quite out

of keeping with their usual good-fellowship, they bowed in a ritual

manner and disappeared.

Meanwhile a similar scene was taking place in the little fourth-floor

room which Mr. Bilbury occupied, and Mr. Bilbury, somewhat better

acquainted with the customs of the University, dismissed his two

friends with a little speech and awaited developments.

Before lunch the thing was arranged, and Mr. Newman, who was waiting in

a rather hopeless way for his friends’ return, was informed at about

twelve o’clock that all was settled; it was to be at the end of the

week, up in Meudon, in a field which belonged to one of his friends’

uncles. “We are less likely to be disturbed there,” said the friend,

“and we can carry the affair to a satisfactory finish.” Then he added:

“It has a high wall all round it.”

“But,” said the other second, interrupting him, “since we have chosen

pistols that will not be much good, for the report will be heard.”

“No,” said the first second in a nonchalant manner, “my uncle keeps

a shooting gallery and the neighbours will think it a very ordinary

sound. You had,” he explained courteously to Mr. Newman, “the choice of

weapons as the insulted party, and we chose pistols of course.”

“Of course,” said Mr. Newman, who was not going to give himself away

upon details of this kind.

“The other man’s seconds,” went on Mr. Newman’s friend genially,

“wanted swords, but we told them that you couldn’t fence; besides

which, with amateurs nothing ever happens with swords. And then,” he

continued, musing, “if the other man is really good you’re done for,

whereas with pistols there is always a chance.”

To Mr. Bilbury, equally waiting for the luncheon hour in some

gloominess of soul, the same tale was told, _mutatis mutandis_, as they

say in what is left of the classical school of the University. His

adversary had chosen pistols. “And you know,” said one of his seconds

to Bilbury sympathetically, “he had the right of choice; technically

he was the insulted party. Besides which, pistols are always better if

people don’t know each other.”

The other second agreed, and was firmly of the opinion that swords were

only for intimate friends or politicians. They also mentioned the field

at Meudon, but with this difference that it became in their mouths the

ancient feudal property of one of their set, and they were careful to

point out that the neighbours were all Royalists, devotedly attached to

the family, and the safest and most silent witnesses in the world.

For the remaining days Mr. Bilbury and Mr. Newman were conducted by

their separate groups of friends, the first to a shooting gallery near

Vincennes, the second to a shooting gallery near St. Denis. Their

experiments were thus conducted many miles apart: and it was just as

well. It was remarkable what an affluence of students came as the

days proceeded to see the exercise in martial sport of Mr. Newman. At

first from fifty to sixty of the students with one or two of the pure

mathematicians and three or four chemists comprised the audience, but

before the week was over one might say that nearly all the Applied

Physics and Positive Sciences of the University were crowding round

Vincennes and urging Mr. Newman to accurate and yet more accurate

efforts at the target. At St. Denis the number of artists increased in

a similar proportion, and to these, before the week was ended, were

added great crowds of poets, rhetoricians, and even mere symbolists,

who wore purple ties and wigs. These also urged Mr. Bilbury to add to

his proficiency; and sometimes that principal himself would shudder

to see a long-haired and apparently inept person with a greenish face

pick up a pistol with dreadful carelessness and put out the flame of a

candle at a prodigious distance with unerring aim.

When the great day arrived two processions of such magnitude as gave

proof of the latent wealth of the Republic crawled up the hill to

Meudon. The occasion was far too solemn for a trot, and two men at

least of those present thought several times uncomfortably about

funerals. I must add in connection with funerals that a large coffin

was placed upon trestles in a very conspicuous part of the field, into

which each party entered by opposite wooden gates which, with the high

square wall all round, quite shut out the surrounding neighbourhood.

The two groups of friends (each over a hundred in number), all dressed

in black and most of them in top-hats, retired to opposite corners of

the field, nor was there any sign of levity in either body in spite

of their youth; the four seconds, who were in frock-coats and full

of an unnatural importance, deposited upon the ground between them a

very valuable leather case which, when it was opened, discovered two

perfectly new pistols of a length of barrel inordinate even for the use

of Arabs, let alone for civilised men. These two were loaded in private

and handed to either combatant, and Mr. Bilbury and Mr. Newman, having

been directed each to hold the pistol pointed to the ground, were set

apart by either wall while the seconds proceeded to pace the terrain.

Mr. Newman remembered the cricket pitches of his dear home which

perhaps he would never see again; Mr. Bilbury could think of nothing

but a tune which ran in his head and caused him grave discomfort.

When the ceremony of the pacing was over the two unfortunate gentlemen

were put facing each other, but twisted, with the right side of the one

turning to the corresponding side of the other, so as to afford the

smallest target for the deadly missiles; and then one of the seconds

who held the handkerchief retired to some little distance to give the

signal.

It was at this juncture, as Mr. Newman and Mr. Bilbury stood with their

pistols elevated towards heaven, and waiting for the handkerchief

to drop, each concentrated with a violent concentration upon the

emotions of the moment, that a prodigious noise of hammering and

shouting was heard at one of the doors of the enclosure, and that three

gentlemen--the one wearing a large three-coloured sash, the like of

which neither Mr. Bilbury nor Mr. Newman had ever seen--entered, and

ordered the whole party to desist in the name of the law. So summoned,

the audience with the utmost precipitation climbed over the wall,

forced itself through the gates, and in every manner at its disposal

vanished. And the gentleman with the tri-coloured sash, sitting down

in the calmest manner upon one of the trestles and turning the coffin

over by way of making a table, declared himself a public officer, and

took notes of all that had occurred. It was interesting to see the

businesslike way in which the seconds gave evidence, and the courtesy

with which the two principals were treated as distinguished foreigners

by the gentleman with the three-coloured sash. He was young, like all

the rest, amazingly young for a public official of such importance, but

collected and evidently most efficient. When he had done taking his

notes he stood up in a half-military fashion, ranged Mr. Newman and

Mr. Bilbury before him, and very rapidly read out a series of legal

sentences, at the conclusion of which was a fine of one hundred francs

apiece, and no more said about the matter. Mr. Bilbury and Mr. Newman

were astonished that attempted homicide should cost so little in this

singular country. They were still more astonished to discover that

etiquette demanded a genial reconciliation of the two combatants under

such circumstances, and they were positively amazed to find after that

reconciliation that they were compatriots.

It was their seconds who insisted upon standing the dinner that

evening. The whole incident was very happily over save for one passing

qualm which Mr. Bilbury felt (and Mr. Newman also) when he saw the

gentleman, whom he had last met as the tri-coloured official of the

Republic, passing through the restaurant singing at the top of his

voice and waving his hand genially to the group as he went out upon the

boulevard.

But they remembered that in democracies the office is distinguished

from the man. Luckily for democracies.

On a Battle, or “Journalism,” or “Points of View”

“_The art of historical writing is rendered the less facile in

expression from I know not what personal differences which the most

honest will admit into their record of events, and the most observant

wilt permit to colour the picture proceeding from their pens._”

(Extract from the Judicious Essay of a Gentleman in Holy Orders,

author of _A History of Religious Differences_.)

I

FROM HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF TO THE MINISTER OF WAR

OF HIS BROTHER THE EMPEROR OF PATAGONIA.

(Begins)

I have the honour to report: Upon the morning of Sunday, the 31st,

the enemy attacked the left of my position in great force, a little

before dawn. I withdrew the XIth, XIIIth, and IInd Brigades, which were

here somewhat advanced, covering their retirement with detachments

from the First, the Thirty-seventh, and the Forty-second of the Line.

The retirement was executed in good order and with small loss, the

total extent of which I cannot yet determine, but of which by far the

greater part consists of men but slightly wounded. Several pieces which

had been irretrievably damaged were destroyed and abandoned. Upon

reaching a position I had determined in my general plan before leaving

the capital (see annexed sketch map A) the forces entrenched, defending

a line which the enemy did not care to attack. I have reinforced the

Brigade with two groups drawn from the Corps Artillery, and have

despatched all aids, medicaments, etc., required.

A simultaneous attack delivered upon the centre of my position was

repulsed, the enemy flying in the utmost disorder, and leaving behind

them two pieces of artillery and a colour, which last I have sent under

the care of Major the Duke of Tierra del Fuego to be deposited among

the glorious trophies that adorn the Military Temple.

On Everything · 第 7 / 15 段