III

POSSIBILITIES OPEN TO THE SPANISH NAVY AT THE BEGINNING OF

THE WAR.--THE REASONS FOR BLOCKADING CUBA.--FIRST

MOVEMENTS OF THE SQUADRONS UNDER ADMIRALS SAMPSON AND

CERVERA.

For the reasons just stated, it was upon Cervera's squadron that the

attention of instructed military students was chiefly turned at the

outset of the war. Grave suspicions as to its efficiency, indeed, were

felt in many quarters, based partly upon actual knowledge of the

neglect of the navy practised by the Spanish Government, and partly

upon the inference that the general incapacity evident for years past

in all the actions of the Spanish authorities, and notably in Cuba,

could not but extend to the navy,--one of the most sensitive and

delicate parts of any political organization; one of the first to go

to pieces when the social and political foundations of a State are

shaken, as was notably shown in the French Revolution. But, though

suspected, the ineffectiveness of that squadron could not be assumed

before proved. Until then--to use the words of an Italian writer who

has treated the whole subject of this war with comprehensive and

instructive perspicacity--Spain had "the possibility of contesting the

command of the sea, and even of securing a definite preponderance, by

means of a squadron possessed of truly exceptional characteristics,

both tactical and strategic,"--in short, by means of a "fleet in

being."

It is true that in this estimate the writer quoted included the

_Carlos V._, a new and high-powered armored cruiser, and also a number

of protected cruisers and of torpedo vessels, of various kinds, all

possessing a rate of speed much superior to the more distinctly

fighting ships in which consisted the strength of the United States

squadrons. Such a fleet, homogeneous in respect to the particular

function which constitutes the power of a "fleet in being," whose

effectiveness lies in its legs and in its moral effect, in its power

to evade pursuit and to play upon the fears of an enemy, should be

capable of rapid continuous movement; and such a fleet Spain actually

possessed when the war broke out--only it was not ready. "This

splendid fleet," resumed our Italian critic, giving rein, perhaps, to

a Southern imagination, but not wholly without just reason, "would be

in a condition to impose upon the enemy the character which the

conflict should assume, alike in strategy and in tactics, and thereby

could draw the best and greatest advantage from the actual situation,

with a strong probability of partial results calculated to restore the

equilibrium between the two belligerent fleets, or even of successes

so decisive, if obtained immediately after the declaration of war, as

to include a possibility of a Spanish preponderance." The present

writer guards himself from being understood to accept fully this

extensive programme for a fleet distinctly inferior in actual

combative force; but the general assumption of the author quoted

indicates the direction of effort which alone held out a hope of

success, and which for that reason should have been vigorously

followed by the Spanish authorities.

As the Spanish Navy--whatever its defects in organization and

practice--is not lacking in thoughtful and instructed officers, it is

probable that the despatch of Cervera with only four ships, instead of

at least the five armored cruisers well qualified to act together,

which he might have had, not to speak of the important auxiliaries

also disposable, was due to uninstructed popular and political

pressure, of the same kind that in our country sought to force the

division of our fleet among our ports. That the Spanish Government was

thus goaded and taunted, at the critical period when Cervera was lying

in Santiago, is certain. To that, most probably, judging from the

words used in the Cortes, we owe the desperate sortie which delivered

him into our hands and reduced Spain to inevitable submission. "The

continuance of Cervera's division in Santiago, and its apparent

inactivity," stated a leading naval periodical in Madrid, issued two

days before the destruction of the squadron, "is causing marked

currents of pessimism, and of disaffection towards the navy,

especially since the Yankees have succeeded in effecting their

proposed landing. This state of public feeling, which has been

expressed with unrestricted openness in some journals, has been

sanctioned in Congress by one of the Opposition members uttering very

unguarded opinions, and reflecting injuriously upon the navy itself,

as though upon it depended having more or fewer ships." The Minister

of Marine, replying in the Cortes, paraphrased as follows, without

contradiction, the words of this critic, which voiced, as it would

appear, a popular clamor: "You ask, 'Why, after reaching Santiago, has

the squadron not gone out, and why does it not now go out?' Why do

four ships not go out to fight twenty? You ask again: 'If it does not

go out, if it does not hasten to seek death, what is the use of

squadrons? For what are fleets built, if not to be lost?' We are bound

to believe, Señor Romero Robledo, that your words in this case express

neither what you intended to say nor your real opinion." Nevertheless,

they seem not to have received correction, nor to have been retracted;

and to the sting of them, and of others of like character, is

doubtless due the express order of the Ministry under which Cervera

quitted his anchorage.

Like ourselves, our enemy at the outset of the war had his fleet in

two principal divisions: one still somewhat formless and as yet

unready, but of very considerable power, was in the ports of the

Peninsula; the other--Cervera's--at the Cape Verde Islands, a

possession of Portugal. The latter was really exceptional in its

qualities, as our Italian author has said. It was exceptional in a

general sense, because homogeneous and composed of vessels of very

high qualities, offensive and defensive; it was exceptional also, as

towards us in particular, because we had of the same class but two

ships,--one-half its own force,--the _New York_ and the _Brooklyn_;

and, moreover, we had no torpedo cruisers to oppose to the three which

accompanied it. These small vessels, while undoubtedly an encumbrance

to a fleet in extended strategic movements in boisterous seas, because

they cannot always keep up, are a formidable adjunct--tactical in

character--in the day of battle, especially if the enemy has none of

them; and in the mild Caribbean it was possible that they might not

greatly delay their heavy consorts in passages which would usually be

short.

The two main divisions of the Spanish fleet were thus about fifteen

hundred miles apart when war began on the 25th of April. The

neutrality of Portugal made it impossible for Cervera to remain long

in his then anchorage, and an immediate decision was forced upon his

Government. It is incredible that among the advisers of the Minister

of Marine--himself a naval officer--there was no one to point out that

to send Cervera at once to the Antilles, no matter to what port, was

to make it possible for the United States to prevent any future

junction between himself and the remaining vessels of their navy. The

squadron of either Sampson or Schley was able to fight him on terms of

reasonable equality, to say the least. Either of our divisions,

therefore, was capable of blockading him, if caught in port; and it

was no more than just to us to infer that, when once thus cornered, we

should, as we actually did at Santiago, assemble both divisions, so as

to render escape most improbable and the junction of a reinforcement

practically impossible. Such, in fact, was the intention from the very

first: for, this done, all our other undertakings, Cuban blockade and

what not, would be carried on safely, under cover of our watching

fleet, were the latter distant ten miles or a thousand from such other

operations. The writer, personally, attaches but little importance to

the actual consequences of strictly offensive operations attempted by

a "fleet in being," when of so inferior force. As suggested by Spanish

and foreign officers, in various publications, they have appeared to

him fantastic pranks of the imagination, such as he himself indulged

in as a boy, rather than a sober judgment formed after considering

both sides of the case. "I cannot but admire Captain Owen's zeal,"

wrote Nelson on one occasion, "in his anxious desire to get at the

enemy, but I am afraid it has made him overleap sandbanks and tides,

and laid him aboard the enemy. I am as little used to find out the

impossible as most folks, and I think I can discriminate between the

impracticable and the fair prospect of success." The potentialities of

Cervera's squadron, after reaching the Spanish Antilles, must be

considered under the limitations of his sandbanks and tides; of

telegraph cables betraying his secrets, of difficulties and delays in

coaling, of the chances of sudden occasional accidents to which all

machinery is liable, multiplied in a fleet by the number of vessels

composing it; and to these troubles, inevitable accompaniments of

such operations, must in fairness be added the assumption of

reasonable watchfulness and intelligence on the part of the United

States, in the distribution of its lookouts and of its ships.

The obvious palliative to the disadvantage thus incurred by Spain

would have been to add to Cervera ships sufficient to force us at

least to unite our two divisions, and to keep them joined. This,

however, could not be done at once, because the contingent in Spain

was not yet ready; and fear of political consequences and public

criticism at home, such as that already quoted, probably deterred the

enemy from the correct military measure of drawing Cervera's squadron

back to the Canaries, some eight hundred or nine hundred miles; or

even to Spain, if necessary. This squadron itself had recently been

formed in just this way; two ships being drawn back from the Antilles

and two sent forward from the Peninsula. If Spain decided to carry on

the naval war in the Caribbean,--and to decide otherwise was to

abandon Cuba in accordance with our demand,--she should have sent all

the armored ships she could get together, and have thrown herself

frankly, and at whatever cost, upon a mere defensive policy for her

home waters, relying upon coast defences--or upon mere luck, if need

were--for the safety of the ports. War cannot be made without running

risks. When you have chosen your field for fighting, you must

concentrate upon it, letting your other interests take their chance.

To do this, however, men must have convictions, and conviction must

rest upon knowledge, or else ignorant clamor and contagious panic will

sweep away every reasonable teaching of military experience. And so

Cervera went forth with his four gallant ships, foredoomed to his fate

by folly, or by national false pride, exhibited in the form of

political pressure disregarding sound professional judgment and

military experience. We were not without manifestations here of the

same uninstructed and ignoble outcry; but fortunately our home

conditions permitted it to be disregarded without difficulty.

Nevertheless, although under circumstances thus favorable we escaped

the worst effects of such lack of understanding, the indications were

sufficient to show how hard, in a moment of real emergency, it will be

for the Government to adhere to sound military principles, if there

be not some appreciation of these in the mass of the people; or, at

the very least, among the leaders to whom the various parts of the

country are accustomed to look for guidance.

It may be profitable at this point to recall a few dates; after which

the narrative, avoiding superfluous details, can be continued in such

outline as is required for profitable comment, and for eliciting the

more influential factors in the course of events, with the consequent

military lessons from them to be deduced.

On April 20th the President of the United States approved the joint

resolution passed by the two Houses of Congress, declaring the

independence of Cuba, and demanding that Spain should relinquish her

authority there and withdraw her forces. A blockade, dated April 22nd,

was declared of the north coast of Cuba, from Cardenas on the east to

Bahia Honda, west of Havana, and of the port of Cienfuegos on the

south side of the island. On April 25th a bill declaring that war

between the United States and Spain existed, and had existed since the

21st of the month, was passed by Congress and approved the same

evening by the President, thus adding another instance to the now

commonplace observation that hostilities more frequently precede than

follow a formal declaration. On April 29th, Admiral Cervera's

division--four armored cruisers and three torpedo destroyers--quitted

the Cape de Verde Islands for an unknown destination, and disappeared

during near a fortnight from the knowledge of the United States

authorities. On May 1, Commodore Dewey by a dash, the rapidity and

audacity of which reflected the highest credit upon his professional

qualities, destroyed the Spanish squadron at Manila, thereby

paralyzing also all Spanish operations in the East. The Government of

the United States was thus, during an appreciable time, and as it

turned out finally, released from all military anxiety about the

course of events in that quarter.

Meantime the blockade of the Cuban coasts, as indicated above, had

been established effectively, to the extent demanded by international

law, which requires the presence upon the coast, or before the port,

declared blockaded, of such a force as shall constitute a manifest

danger of capture to vessels seeking to enter or to depart. In the

reserved, not to say unfriendly, attitude assumed by many of the

European States, the precise character of which is not fully known,

and perhaps never will be, it was not only right, but practically

necessary, to limit the extent of coast barred to merchant ships to

that which could be thus effectually guarded, leaving to neutral

governments no sound ground for complaint. Blockade is one of the

rights conceded to belligerent States, by universal agreement, which

directly, as well as indirectly, injures neutrals, imposing pecuniary

losses by restraints upon trade previously in their hands. The ravages

of the insurrection and the narrow policy of Spain in seeking to

monopolize intercourse with her colonies had, indeed, already

grievously reduced the commerce of the island; but with our war there

was sure to spring up a vigorous effort, both legal and contraband, to

introduce stores of all kinds, especially the essentials of life, the

supply of which was deficient. Such cargoes, not being clearly

contraband, could be certainly excluded only by blockade; and the

latter, in order fully to serve our military objects, needed at the

least to cover every port In railway communication with Havana, where

the bulk of the Spanish army was assembled. This it was impossible to

effect at the first, because we had not ships enough; and therefore,

as always in such cases, a brisk neutral trade, starting from Jamaica

and from Mexico, as well as from Europe and the North American

Continent, was directed upon the harbors just outside the limits of

the blockade,--towards Sagua la Grande and adjacent waters in the

north, and to Batabano and other ports in the south. Such trade would

be strictly lawful, from an international standpoint, unless declared

by us to be contraband, because aiding to support the army of the

enemy; and such declarations, by which provisions are included in the

elastic, but ill-defined category of contraband, tend always to

provoke the recriminations and unfriendliness of neutral states.

Blockade avoids the necessity for definitions, for by it all goods

become contraband; the extension of it therefore was to us imperative.

As things were, although this neutral trade frustrated our purposes to

a considerable degree, it afforded us no ground for complaint. On the

contrary, we were at times hard driven by want of vessels to avoid

laying ourselves open to reclamation, on the score of the blockade

being invalid, even within its limited range, because ineffective.

This was especially the case at the moment when the army was being

convoyed from Tampa, as well as immediately before, and for some days

after that occasion: before, because it was necessary then to detach

from the blockade and to assemble elsewhere the numerous small vessels

needed to check the possible harmful activity of the Spanish gunboats

along the northern coast, and afterwards, because the preliminary

operations about Santiago, concurring with dark nights favorable to

Cervera's escape, made it expedient to retain there many of the

lighter cruisers, which, moreover, needed recoaling,--a slow business

when so many ships were involved. Our operations throughout

labored--sometimes more, sometimes less--under this embarrassment,

which should be borne in mind as a constant, necessary, yet perplexing

element in the naval and military plans. The blockade, in fact, while

the army was still unready, and until the Spanish Navy came within

reach, was the one decisive measure, sure though slow in its working,

which could be taken; the necessary effect of which was to bring the

enemy's ships to this side of the ocean, unless Spain was prepared to

abandon the contest. The Italian writer already quoted, a fair critic,

though Spanish in his leanings, enumerates among the circumstances

most creditable to the direction of the war by the Navy Department the

perception that "blockade must inevitably cause collapse, given the

conditions of insurrection and of exhaustion already existing in the

island."

From this specific instance, the same author, whose military judgments

show much breadth of view, later on draws a general conclusion which is

well worth the attention of American readers, because much of our

public thought is committed to the belief that at sea private property,

so called,--that is, merchant ships and their cargoes,--should not be

liable to capture in war; which, duly interpreted, means that the

commerce of one belligerent is not to be attacked or interrupted by the

other. "Blockade," says our Italian, "is the fundamental basis of the

conflict for the dominion of the seas, when the contest cannot be

brought to an immediate issue;" that is, to immediate battle. Blockade,

however, is but one form of the unbloody pressure brought to bear upon

an enemy by interruption of his commerce. The stoppage of commerce, in

whole or in part, exhausts without fighting. It compels peace without

sacrificing life. It is the most scientific warfare, because the least

sanguinary, and because, like the highest strategy, it is directed

against the communications,--the resources,--not the persons, of the

enemy. It has been the glory of sea-power that its ends are attained by

draining men of their dollars instead of their blood. Eliminate the

attack upon an enemy's sea-borne commerce from the conditions of naval

war,--in which heretofore it has been always a most important

factor,--and the sacrifice of life will be proportionately increased,

for two reasons: First, the whole decision of the contest will rest

upon actual conflict; and, second, failing decisive results in battle,

the war will be prolonged, because by retaining his trade uninjured the

enemy retains all his money power to keep up his armed forces.

The establishment and maintenance of the blockade therefore was, in

the judgment of the present writer, not only the first step in order,

but also the first, by far, in importance, open to the Government of

the United States as things were; prior, that is, to the arrival of

Cervera's division at some known and accessible point. Its importance

lay in its twofold tendency; to exhaust the enemy's army in Cuba, and

to force his navy to come to the relief. No effect more decisive than

these two could be produced by us before the coming of the hostile

navy, or the readiness of our own army to take the field, permitted

the contest to be brought, using the words of our Italian commentator,

"to an immediate issue." Upon the blockade, therefore, the generally

accepted principles of warfare would demand that effort should be

concentrated, until some evident radical change in the conditions

dictated a change of object,--a new objective; upon which, when

accepted, effort should again be concentrated, with a certain amount

of "exclusiveness of purpose."

Blockade, however, implies not merely a sufficient number of cruisers

to prevent the entry or departure of merchant ships. It further

implies, because it requires, a strong supporting force sufficient to

resist being driven off by an attack from within or from without the

port; for it is an accepted tenet of international law that a blockade

raised by force ceases to exist, and cannot be considered

re-established until a new proclamation and reoccupancy of the ground

in force. Hence it follows that, prior to such re-establishment,

merchant vessels trying to enter or to depart cannot be captured in

virtue of the previous proclamation. Consequent upon this requirement,

therefore, the blockades on the north and on the south side, to be

secure against this military accident, should each have been supported

by a division of armored ships capable of meeting Cervera's division

on fairly equal terms; for, considering the sea distance between

Cienfuegos and Havana, one such division could not support both

blockades. It has already been indicated why it was impossible so to

sustain the Cienfuegos blockaders. The reason, in the last analysis,

was our insufficient sea-coast fortification. The Flying Squadron was

kept in Hampton Roads to calm the fears of the seaboard, and to check

any enterprise there of Cervera, if intended or attempted. The other

division of the armored fleet, however, was placed before Havana,

where its presence not only strengthened adequately the blockading

force proper, but assured also the safety of our naval base at Key

West, both objects being attainable by the same squadron, on account

of their nearness to each other.

It should likewise be noticed that the same principle of concentration

of effort upon the single purpose--the blockade--forbade, _a priori_,

any attempts at bombardment by which our armored ships should be

brought within range of disablement by heavy guns on shore. If the

blockade was our object, rightly or wrongly, and if a blockade, to be

secure against serious disturbance, required all the armored ships at

our disposal,--as it did,--it follows logically and rigorously that to

risk those ships by attacking forts is false to principle, unless

special reasons can be adduced sufficiently strong to bring such

action within the scope of the principle properly applied. It is here

necessary clearly to distinguish. Sound principles in warfare are as

useful and as necessary as in morals; when established, the

presumption in any case is all on their side, and there is no one of

them better established than concentration. But as in morals, so in

war, the application of principle, the certainty of right, is not

always clear. Could it always be, war would be an exact science; which

it is not, but an art, in which true artists are as few as in painting

or sculpture. It may be that a bombardment of the fortifications of

Havana, or of some other place, might have been expedient, for reasons

unknown to the writer; but it is clearly and decisively his opinion

that if it would have entailed even a remote risk of serious injury to

an armored ship, it stood condemned irretrievably (unless it conduced

to getting at the enemy's navy), because it would hazard the

maintenance of the blockade, our chosen object, upon which our efforts

should be concentrated.[2] There is concentration of purpose, as well

as concentration in place, and ex-centric action in either sphere is

contrary to sound military principle.

The question of keeping the armored division under Admiral Sampson in

the immediate neighborhood of Havana, for the purpose of supporting

the blockade by the lighter vessels, was one upon which some diversity

of opinion might be expected to arise. Cervera's destination was

believed--as it turned out, rightly believed--to be the West Indies.

His precise point of arrival was a matter of inference only, as in

fact was his general purpose. A natural surmise was that he would go

first to Puerto Rico, for reasons previously indicated. But if coal

enough remained to him, it was very possible that he might push on at

once to his ultimate objective, if that were a Cuban port, thus

avoiding the betrayal of his presence at all until within striking

distance of his objective. That he could get to the United States

coast without first entering a coaling port, whence he would be

reported, was antecedently most improbable; and, indeed, it was fair

to suppose that, if bound to Havana, coal exigencies would compel him

to take a pretty short route, and to pass within scouting range of the

Windward Passage, between Cuba and Haïti. Whatever the particular

course of reasoning, it was decided that a squadron under Admiral

Sampson's command should proceed to the Windward Passage for the

purpose of observation, with a view to going further eastward if it

should appear advisable. Accordingly, on the 4th of May, five days

after Cervera left the Cape de Verde, the Admiral sailed for the

appointed position, taking with him all his armored sea-going

ships--the _Iowa_, the _Indiana_, and the _New York_--and two

monitors, the _Amphitrite_ and the _Terror_. Of course, some smaller

cruisers and a collier accompanied him.

It is almost too obvious for mention that this movement, if undertaken

at all, should be made, as it was, with all the force disposable, this

being too small to be safely divided. The monitors promptly, though

passively, proceeded to enforce another ancient maritime

teaching,--the necessity for homogeneousness, especially of speed and

manoeuvring qualities, in vessels intending to act together. Of

inferior speed at the best, they had, owing to their small coal

endurance, and to minimize the delay in the progress of the whole

body, consequent upon their stopping frequently to coal, to be towed

each by an armored ship,--an expedient which, although the best that

could be adopted, entailed endless trouble and frequent stoppages

through the breaking of the tow-lines.

[Illustration: The Caribbean Sea (map)]

Shortly before midnight of May 7th, the squadron was twenty miles

north of Cape Haïtien, about six hundred sea miles east of Havana. It

was there learned, by telegrams received from the Department, that no

information had yet been obtained as to the movements of the Spanish

division, but that two swift steamers, lately of the American

Transatlantic line, had been sent to scout to the eastward of

Martinique and Guadaloupe. The instructions to these vessels were to

cruise along a north and south line, eighty miles from the islands

named. They met at the middle once a day, communicated, and then went

back in opposite directions to the extremities of the beat. In case

the enemy were discovered, word of course would be sent from the

nearest cable port to Washington, and to the Admiral, if accessible.

The two vessels were directed to continue on this service up to a

certain time, which was carefully calculated to meet the extreme

possibilities of slowness on the part of the Spanish division, if

coming that way; afterwards they were to go to a given place, and

report. It may be added that they remained their full time, and yet

missed by a hair's breadth sighting the enemy. The captain of one of

them, the _Harvard_, afterwards told the writer that he believed

another stretch to the south would have rewarded him with success. The

case was one in which blame could be imputed to nobody; unless it were

to the Spaniards, in disappointing our very modest expectations

concerning their speed as a squadron, which is a very different thing

from the speed of a single ship.

Among the telegrams received at this time by the Admiral from the

Department were reports of rumors that colliers for the Spanish

division had been seen near Guadaloupe; also that Spanish vessels

were coaling and loading ammunition at St. Thomas. Neither of these

was well founded, nor was it likely that the enemy's division would

pause for such purpose at a neutral island, distant, as St. Thomas is,

less than one hundred miles from their own harbors in Puerto Rico.

Immediately after the receipt of these telegrams, the Admiral summoned

all his captains between 12 and 4 A.M., May 9th, to a consultation

regarding the situation. He then decided to go on to San Juan, the

chief seaport of Puerto Rico, upon the chance of finding the Spanish

squadron there. The coaling of the monitors, which had begun when the

squadron stopped the previous afternoon, was resumed next morning. At

11.15, May 9th, a telegram from the Department reported a story,

"published in the newspapers," that the Spanish division had been seen

on the night of the 7th, near Martinique. The Department's telegram

betrayed also some anxiety about Key West and the Havana blockade;

but, while urging a speedy return, the details of the Admiral's

movements were left to his own discretion. The squadron then stood

east, and on the early morning of the 12th arrived off San Juan. An

attack upon the forts followed at once, lasting from 5.30 to 7.45

A.M.; but, as it was evident that the Spanish division was not there,

the Admiral decided not to continue the attack, although satisfied

that he could force a surrender. His reasons for desisting are given

in his official report as follows:--

"The fact that we should be held several days in completing

arrangements for holding the place; that part [of the

squadron] would have to be left to await the arrival of

troops to garrison it; that the movements of the Spanish

squadron, our main objective, were still unknown; that the

Flying Squadron was still north and not in a position to

render any aid; that Havana, Cervera's natural objective, was

thus open to entry by such a force as his, while we were a

thousand miles distant,--made our immediate movement toward

Havana imperative."

It will be noted that the Admiral's conclusions, as here given,

coincided substantially with the feeling of the Department as

expressed in the telegram last mentioned. The squadron started back

immediately to the westward. During the night of this same day,

Thursday, May 12th, towards midnight, reliable information was

received at the Navy Department that Cervera's squadron had arrived

off Martinique,--four armored cruisers and three torpedo destroyers,

one of the latter entering the principal port of the island.

The movements of the Spanish division immediately preceding its

appearance off Martinique can be recovered in the main from the log of

the _Cristobal Colon_, which was found on board that ship by the

United States officers upon taking possession after her surrender on

July 3. Some uncertainty attends the conclusions reached from its

examination, because the record is brief and not always precise in its

statements; but, whatever inaccuracy of detail there may be, the

general result is clear enough.

At noon on May 10th the division was one hundred and thirty miles east

of the longitude of Martinique, and fifteen miles south of its

southernmost point. Being thus within twelve hours' run of the island,

Admiral Cervera evidently, and reasonably, considered that he might

now be in the neighborhood of danger, if the United States Government

had decided to attempt to intercept him with an armored division,

instead of sticking to the dispositions known to him when he

sailed,--the blockade of Cuba and the holding the Flying Squadron in

reserve. In order not to fall in with an enemy unexpectedly,

especially during the night, the speed of the division was reduced to

something less than four knots, and the torpedo destroyer _Terror_ was

sent ahead to reconnoitre and report. The incident of her separating

from her consorts is not noted,--a singular omission, due possibly to

its occurring at night and so escaping observation by the _Colon_; but

it is duly logged that she was sighted "to port" next morning, May

11th, at 9 A.M., and that, until she was recognized, the crew were

sent to their quarters for action. This precaution had also been

observed during the previous night, the men sleeping beside their

guns,--a sufficient evidence of the suspicions entertained by the

Spanish Admiral.

At 10 A.M.--by which hour, or very soon afterwards, the communication

of the _Terror_ with the Admiral recorded by the log must have taken

place--there had been abundance of time since daybreak for a 15-knot

torpedo destroyer, low-lying in the water, to remain unseen within

easy scouting distance of Martinique, and thence to rejoin the

squadron, which would then be forty or fifty miles distant from the

island. She could even, by putting forth all her speed, have

communicated with the shore; possibly without the knowledge of the

American representatives on the spot, if the sympathies of the

inhabitants were with the Spaniards, as has been generally believed.

However that may be, shortly after her junction the division went

ahead again seven knots, the speed logged at noon of May 11th, which,

as steam formed, was increased to ten knots. At 4 P.M. Martinique was

abeam on the starboard hand--north. At sundown the ships went to

general quarters, and the crews were again kept at their guns during

the night. By this time Cervera doubtless had been informed that

Sampson's division had gone east from Cuba, but its destination could

have been only a matter of inference with him, for the attack upon San

Juan did not take place till the following morning. The fact of

keeping his men at quarters also justifies the conclusion that he was

thus uncertain about Sampson, for the stationariness of the Flying

Squadron would be known at Martinique.

After mentioning that the ship's company went to quarters, the log of

the _Colon_ adds: "Stopped from 5.15 to 6 A.M." Whether the 5.15 was

A.M. or P.M., whether, in short, the squadron continued practically

motionless during the night of May 11th-12th, can only be conjectured,

but there can be little doubt that it did so remain. The Spaniards

still observe the old-fashioned sea-day of a century ago, abandoned

long since by the British and ourselves, according to which May 12th

begins at noon of May 11th. A continuous transaction, such as stopping

from evening to morning, would fall, therefore, in the log of the same

day, as it here does; whereas in a United States ship of war, even

were our records as brief and fragmentary as the _Colon's_, the fact

of the stoppage, extending over the logs of two days, would have been

mentioned in each. It is odd, after passing an hour or two in putting

this and that together out of so incomplete a narrative, to find

recorded in full, a few days later, the following notable incident:

"At 2.30 P.M. flagship made signal: 'If you want fresh beef, send

boat.' Answered: 'Many thanks; do not require any.'" Log-books do

state such occurrences, particularly when matters of signal; but then

they are supposed also to give a reasonably full account of each day's

important proceedings.

Whatever the movements back and forth, or the absence of movement, by

the Spanish ships during the night, at 7.10 A.M. the next day, May

12th, while Sampson's division was still engaged with the forts at San

Juan, they were close to Martinique, "four miles from Diamond Rock," a

detached islet at its southern end. The next entry, the first for the

sea-day of May 13th, is: "At 12.20 P.M. lost sight of Martinique." As

the land there is high enough to be visible forty or fifty miles under

favorable conditions, and as the squadron on its way to Curaçao

averaged 11 knots per hour, it seems reasonable to infer that the

Spanish Admiral, having received news of the attack on San Juan,

though possibly not of the result, had determined upon a hasty

departure and a hurried run to the end of his journey, before he could

be intercepted by Sampson, the original speed of whose ships was

inferior to that of his own, and whom he knew to be hampered by

monitors.

The Spaniards did not take coal at Martinique. This may have been due

to refusal by the French officials to permit it, according to a common

neutral rule which allows a neutral only to give enough to reach the

nearest national port. As the ships still had enough to reach Curaçao,

they had more than enough to go to Puerto Rico. It may very well be,

also, that Cervera, not caring to meet Sampson, whose force, counting

the monitors, was superior to his own, thought best to disappear at

once again from our knowledge. He did indeed prolong his journey to

Santiago, if that were his original destination, by nearly two hundred

miles, through going to Curaçao; not to speak of the delay there in

coaling. But, if the Dutch allowed him to take all that he wanted, he

would in his final start be much nearer Cuba than at Martinique, and

he would be able, as far as fuel went, to reach either Santiago,

Cienfuegos, or Puerto Rico, or even Havana itself,--all which

possibilities would tend to perplex us. It is scarcely probable,

however, that he would have attempted the last-named port. To do so,

not to speak of the greater hazard through the greater distance,

would, in case of his success, not merely have enabled, but invited,

the United States to concentrate its fleet in the very best position

for us, where it would not only have "contained" the enemy, but have

best protected our own base at Key West.

In the absence of certain knowledge, conjectural opinions, such as the

writer has here educed, are not unprofitable; rather the reverse. To

form them, the writer and the reader place themselves perforce nearly

in Cervera's actual position, and pass through their own minds the

grist of unsolved difficulties which confronted him. The result of

such a process is a much more real mental possession than is yielded

by a quiet perusal of any ascertained facts, because it involves an

argumentative consideration of opposing conditions, and not a mere

passive acceptance of statements. The general conclusion of the

present writer, from this consideration of Cervera's position, and of

that of our own Government, is that the course of the Spanish Admiral

was opportunist, solely and simply. Such, in general, and necessarily,

must be that of any "fleet in being," in the strict sense of the

phrase, which involves inferiority of force; whereas the stronger

force, if handled with sagacity and strength, constrains the weaker

in its orbit as the earth governs the moon. Placed in an extremely

false position by the fault, militarily unpardonable, of his

Government, Admiral Cervera doubtless did the best he could. That in

so doing he caused the United States authorities to pass through some

moments of perplexity is certain, but it was the perplexity of

interest rather than of apprehension; and in so far as the latter was

felt at all, it was due to antecedent faults of disposition on our own

part, the causes of which have been in great measure indicated

already. The writer is not an angler, but he understands that there is

an anxious pleasure in the suspense of playing a fish, as in any

important contest involving skill.

To say that there was any remarkable merit in the movements of the

Spanish Admiral is as absurd as to attribute particular cleverness to

a child who, with his hands behind his back, asks the old conundrum,

"Right or left?" "It is all a matter of guess," said Nelson, "and the

world attributes wisdom to him who guesses right;" but all the same,

by unremitting watchfulness, sagacious inference, and diligent

pursuit, he ran the French fleet down. At Martinique, Admiral Cervera

had all the West Indies before him where to choose, and the United

States coast too, conditioned by coal and other needs, foreseen or

unforeseen. We ran him down at Santiago; and had he vanished from

there, we should have caught him somewhere else. The attempt of the

Spanish authorities to create an impression that some marvellous feat

of strategy was in process of execution, to the extreme discomfiture

of the United States navy, was natural enough, considering the straits

they were in, and the consciousness of the capable among them that a

squadron of that force never should have been sent across the sea;

but, though natural, the pretension was absurd, and, though echoed by

all the partisan Press in Europe, it did not for a moment impose as

true upon those who were directing the movements of the United States

ships.

Lessons of the war with Spain and other articles · 第 14 / 30 题