If this is integrated between the limits of 0 and h, we have

/ l / h \

t = [pi] / --- . ( 1 + --- + ... ),

\/ g \ 8l /

where t is the time of swing from B to A. The terms after the second

may be neglected. The first term, [pi] sqrt(l/g), is the time of swing

in a cycloid. The second part represents the addition necessary if the

swing is circular and not cycloidal, and therefore expresses the

"circular error." Now h = BC^2/l = 2[pi]^2[theta]^2l / 360^2, where

[theta] is half the angle of swing expressed in degrees; hence h/(8l)

= [theta]^2/52520, and the formula becomes

/ l / [theta]^2 \

t = [pi] / --- ( 1 + -------- ).

\/ g \ 52520 /

Hence the ratio of the time of swing of an ordinary pendulum of any

length, with a semiarc of swing = [theta] degrees is to the time of

swing of a corresponding cycloidal pendulum as 1 + [theta]^2/52520 : 1.

Also the difference of time of swing caused by a small increase

[theta]' in the semiarc of swing = 2[theta][theta]' / 52520 second per

second, or 3.3[theta][theta]' seconds per day. Hence in the case of a

seconds pendulum whose semiarc of swing is 2 deg. an increase of .1 deg. in

this semiarc of 2 deg. would cause the clock to lose 3.3 X 2 X 0.1 = .66

second a day.

Huygens proposed to apply his discovery to clocks, and since the

evolute of a cycloid is an equal cycloid, he suggested the use of a

flexible pendulum swinging between cycloidal cheeks. But this was only

an example of theory pushed too far, because the friction on the

cycloidal cheeks involves more error than they correct, and other

disturbances of a higher degree of importance are left uncorrected. In

fact the application of pendulums to clocks, though governed in the

abstract by theory, has to be modified by experiment.

Neglecting the circular error, if L be the length of a pendulum and g

the acceleration of gravity at the place where the pendulum is, then

T, the time of a single vibration = [pi] sqrt(L/g). From this formula

it follows that the times of vibration of pendulums are directly

proportional to the square root of their lengths, and inversely

proportional to the square root of the acceleration of gravity at the

place where the pendulum is swinging. The value of g for London is

32.2 ft. per second per second, whence it results that the length of a

pendulum for London to beat seconds of mean solar time = 39.14 in.

nearly, the length of an astronomical pendulum to beat seconds of

sidereal time being 38.87 in.

This length is calculated on the supposition that the arc of swing is

cycloidal and that the whole mass of the pendulum is concentrated at a

point whose distance, called the radius of oscillation, from the point

of suspension of the pendulum is 39.14 in. From this it might be

imagined that if a sphere, say of iron, were suspended from a light

rod, so that its centre were 39.14 in. below its point of support, it

would vibrate once per second. This, however, is not the case. For as

the pendulum swings, the ball also tends to turn in space to and fro

round a horizontal axis perpendicular to the direction of its motion.

Hence the force stored up in the pendulum is expended, not only in

making it swing, but also in causing the ball to oscillate to and fro

through a small angle about a horizontal axis. We have therefore to

consider not merely the vibrations of the rod, but the oscillations of

the bob. The moment of the momentum of the system round the point of

suspension, called its moment of inertia, is composed of the sum of

the mass of each particle multiplied into the square of its distance

from the axis of rotation. Hence the moment of inertia of the body I

= [Sigma](ma^2). If k be defined by the relation [Sigma](ma^2) =

[Sigma](m) X k^2, then k is called the radius of gyration. If k be the

radius of gyration of a bob round a horizontal axis through its centre

of gravity, h the distance of its centre of gravity below its point of

suspension, and k' the radius of gyration of the bob round the centre

of suspension, then k'^2 = h^2 + k^2. If l be the length of a simple

pendulum that oscillates in the same time, then lh = k'^2 = h^2 + k^2.

Now k can be calculated if we know the form of the bob, and l is the

length of the simple pendulum = 39.14 in.; hence h, the distance of

the centre of gravity of the bob below the point of suspension, can be

found.

In an ordinary pendulum, with a thin rod and a bob, this distance h is

not very different from the theoretical length, l = 39.14 in., of a

simple theoretical pendulum in which the rod has no weight and the bob

is only a single heavy point. For the effect of the weight of the rod

is to throw the centre of oscillation a little above the centre of

gravity of the bob, while the effect of the size of the bob is to

throw the centre of oscillation a little down. In ordinary practice it

is usual to make the pendulum so that the centre of gravity is about

39 in. below the upper free end of the suspension spring and leave the

exact length to be determined by trial.

[Illustration: FIG. 7.--Section of Westminster Clock Pendulum.]

Regulation.

Since T = [pi]sqrt(L/g), we have, by differentiating, dL/L = 2dT/T,

that is, any small percentage of increase in L will correspond to

double the percentage of increase in T. Therefore with a seconds

pendulum, in order to make a second's difference in a day, equivalent

to 1/86,400 of the pendulum's rate of vibration, since there are

86,400 seconds in 24 hours, we must have a difference of length

amounting to 2/86,400 = 1/43,200 of the length of the rod. This is

39.138/43,200 = .000906 in. Hence if under the pendulum bob be put a

nut working a screw of 32 threads to the inch and having its head

divided into 30 parts, a turn of this nut through one division will

alter the length of the pendulum by .0009 in. and change the rate of

the clock by about a second a day. To accelerate the clock the nut has

always to be turned to the right, or as you would drive in a corkscrew

and vice versa. But in astronomical and in large turret clocks, it is

desirable to avoid stopping or in any way disturbing the pendulum; and

for the finer adjustments other methods of regulation are adopted. The

best is that of fixing a collar, as shown in fig. 7 at C, about midway

down the rod, capable of having very small weights laid upon it, this

being the place where the addition of any small weight produces the

greatest effect, and where, it may be added, any moving of that weight

up or down on the rod produces the least effect. If M is the weight of

the pendulum and l its length (down to the centre of oscillation), and

m a small weight added at the distance n below the centre of

suspension or above the c.o. (since they are reciprocal), t the time

of vibration, and -dt the acceleration due to adding m; then

-dt m / n n^2 \

--- = --- ( --- - ---- ):

t 2M \ l l^2 /

from which it is evident that if n = l/2, then = dt/t = m/8M. But as

there are 86400 seconds in a day, -dT, the daily acceleration, = 86400

dt, or 10800 m/M, or if m is the 10800th of the weight of the pendulum

it will accelerate the clock a second a day, or 10 grains will do that

on a pendulum of 15 lb weight (7000 gr. being = 1 lb.), or an ounce on

a pendulum of 6 cwt. In like manner if n = l/3 from either top or

bottom, m must = M/7200 to accelerate the clock a second a day. The

higher up the collar the less is the risk of disturbing the pendulum

in putting on or taking off the regulating weights, but the bigger the

weight required to produce the effect. The weights should be made in a

series, and marked 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, according to the number of seconds a

day by which they will accelerate; and the pendulum adjusted at first

to lose a little, perhaps a second a day, when there are no weights on

the collar, so that it may always have some weight on, which can be

diminished or increased from time to time with certainty, as the rate

may vary.

Compensation.

The length of pendulum rods is also affected by temperature and also,

if they are made of wood, by damp. Hence, to ensure good time-keeping

qualities in a clock, it is necessary (1) to make the rods of

materials that are as little affected by such influences as possible,

and (2) to provide means of compensation by which the effective length

of the rod is kept constant in spite of expansion or contraction in

the material of which it is composed. Fairly good pendulums for

ordinary use may be made out of very well dried wood, soaked in a thin

solution of shellac in spirits of wine, or in melted paraffin wax; but

wood shrinks in so uncertain a manner that such pendulums are not

admissible for clocks of high exactitude. Steel is an excellent

material for pendulum rods, for the metal is strong, is not stretched

by the weight of the bob, and does not suffer great changes in

molecular structure in the course of time. But a steel rod expands on

the average lineally by .0000064 of its length for each degree F. by

which its temperature rises; hence an expansion of .00009 in. on a

pendulum rod of 39.14 in., that is .000023 of its length, will be

caused by an increase of temperature of about 4 deg. F., and that is

sufficient to make the clock lose a second a day. Since the summer and

winter temperatures of a room may differ by as much as 50 deg. F., the

going of a clock may thus be affected by an error of 12 seconds a day.

With a pendulum rod of brass, which has a coefficient of expansion of

.00001, a clock might gain one-third of a minute daily in winter as

compared with its rate in summer. The coefficients of linear expansion

per degree F. of some other materials used in making pendulums are as

follows: white deal, .0000024; flint glass, .0000048; iron, .000007;

lead, .000016; zinc, .000016; and mercury, .000033. The solid or

cubical expansions of these bodies are three times the above

quantities respectively.

The first method of compensating a pendulum was invented in 1722 by

George Graham, who proposed to use a bob of mercury, taking advantage

of the high coefficient of expansion of that metal. As now employed,

the mercurial pendulum consists of a rod of steel terminating in a

stirrup of the same metal on which rests a glass vessel full of

mercury, having its centre of gravity about 39 in. below the point of

suspension of the pendulum. For each Fahrenheit degree of temperature

the centre of gravity of the bob is lowered by the expansion of the

rod about 1/4000 of an inch. The glass vessel and the mercury in it

have therefore to be so contrived, that their centre of gravity will

rise 1/4000 in. per degree F. The glass having a small coefficient of

expansion, the lateral expansion of the mercury will be checked by it,

and this will help to raise the column. For the linear coefficient of

expansion of glass is .0000048 per degree F., whence the sectional

area of a glass vessel increases by .0000096 per degree F., and

therefore the coefficient of vertical expansion of a column of mercury

whose volumetric expansion coefficient is .0001 per degree F. is

(.0001 - .0000096) = .0000904. Let x be the height of the vessel

necessary to compensate a steel rod upon the bottom of which it rests.

Then, the coefficient of expansion of steel being .0000066 per degree

F., we have

x

--- (.0000904 - .0000066) = .0000066 X 39.14, whence x = 6-1/4 in.

2

It must, however, be remembered that the glass jar has some weight and

that it does not rise by anything like the amount of the mercury. This

tends to keep the centre of gravity down. So that the height of

mercury of 6-1/4 in. will not be sufficient to effect the compensation,

and about 6-3/4 to 7 in. will be required. Some authors specify 7 in.;

this is when the diameter of the jar is small. A certain amount of

negative compensation must also be deducted to allow for the changes

of temperature in the air, as will presently be seen; this amounts in

the case of mercury to about 1/5 in.

In consequence of the complication of all these calculations it is

usual to allow about 6-3/4 to 7 in. of mercury in the glass vessel and to

adjust the exact amount of mercury by trial.

Another very good form of mercurial pendulum was proposed by E. J.

Dent; it consists of a cast-iron jar into the top of which the steel

pendulum rod is screwed, having its end plunged into the mercury

contained in the jar. By this means the mercury, jar and rod rapidly

acquire the same temperature. This pendulum is less likely to break

than the form just described. The depth of mercury required in an iron

jar is stated by Lord Grimthorpe to be 8-1/2 to 9 in. The reason why it

is greater than it is when a glass jar is employed is that iron has a

larger coefficient of expansion than glass, and that it is also

heavier. In all cases, however, of mercury pendulums experiment seems

to be the only ultimate test of the quantity of mercury required, for

the results are so complicated by the behaviour of the oil and the

barometric errors that at its best the regulation of a clock can only

be ultimately a matter of scientifically guided compromise. A small

amount of compensation of a purely experimental character is also

allowed to compensate the changes which temperature effects on the

suspension spring. This is sometimes made as much as 1/6 of the length

correction.

As an alternative to the mercurial pendulum other systems have been

employed. The "gridiron" pendulum consists of a group of alternate

rods of steel and brass, so arranged that the expansion of the brass

acts upwards and counteracts that of the steel downwards. It was

invented in 1726 by John Harrison. Assuming that 9 rods are used--5 of

steel and 4 of brass--their lengths may be as follows from pin to

pin:--Centre steel rod 31.5 in.; 2 steel rods next the centre 24.5

in.; 2 steel rods farthest from centre 29.5 in.; from the lower end of

outside steel rods to centre of bob 3 in.; total 89.5 in. Of the 4

brass rods the 2 outside ones are 26.87 in.; and the two inside ones

22.25 in.; total 49.12 in. Thus the expansion of 88-1/2 in. of steel is

counteracted by the expansion of 49 1/8 in. of brass. Everything

depends, however, on the expansion coefficient of the steel and brass

employed, the requirement in every case being that of total lengths of

the brass and iron should be in proportion to the linear coefficients

of expansion of those metals. The above figures are for a very soft

brass and steel. Thos. Reid, with more ordinary steel and brass,

prescribed a ratio of 112 to 71, Lord Grimthorpe a ratio of 100 to 61.

It is absolutely necessary to put the actual rods to be used for

making the pendulum in a hot water bath, and measure their expansions

with a microscope.

John Smeaton, taking advantage of a far greater expansion coefficient

of zinc as compared with brass, proposed to use a steel rod with a

collar at the bottom, on which rested a hard drawn zinc rod. From this

rod hung a steel tube to which the bob was attached. The total length

of the steel rod and of the steel tube down to the centre of the bob

was made to the total length of the zinc tube, in the ratio of 5 to 2

(being the ratio of the expansions of zinc and steel); for a 39.14 in.

pendulum we should therefore want a zinc tube equal in length to 2/3

(39.14) = 26-1/4 in. In practice the zinc tube is made about 27 in. long,

and then gradually cut down by trial. In fact the weight of a heavy

pendulum squeezes the zinc, and it is impossible by mere theory to

determine what will be its behaviour. The zinc tube must be of rolled

zinc, hard drawn through a die, and must not be cast. Ventilating

holes must be made in suitable places in the steel tube and the collar

on which it rests, to ensure that changes of temperature are rapidly

communicated throughout the system.

A pendulum with a rod of dry varnished deal is tolerably compensated

by a bob of lead or of zinc 10-1/2 to 13 in. in height, resting on a nut

at the bottom of the rod.

Invar.

The old methods of pendulum compensation for heat may now be

considered as superseded by the invention of "invar," a combination of

nickel and steel, due to Charles E. Guillaume, of the International

Office of Weights and Measures at Sevres near Paris. This alloy has a

linear coefficient of expansion on the average of .000001 per degree

centigrade, that is to say, only about 1/11 that of ordinary steel.

Hence it can be easily compensated by means of brass, lead or any

other suitable metal. Brass is usually employed. In the invar pendulum

introduced into Great Britain by Mr Agar Baugh a departure is made

from the previous practice of merely calculating the length of the

compensator, fastening it to the lower part of the pendulum, and

attaching it to the centre of the bob. In the case of these pendulums,

accurate computations are made of the moments of inertia of every

separate individual part. Thus, for instance, since an addition of

volume due to the effect of heat to the upper part of the bob has a

different effect upon the moment of inertia from that of an equal

quantity added to the lower part of the bob, the bob is suspended not

from its centre, but from a point about 1/10 in. below it, the

distance varying according to the shape of the bob, so that the heat

expansion of the bob may cause its centre of gravity to rise and

compensate the effect of its increased moment of inertia. Again the

suspension spring is measured for isochronism, and an alloy of steel

prepared for it which does not alter its elasticity with change of

temperature. Moreover, since rods of invar steel subjected to strain

do not acquire their final coefficients of expansion and elasticity

for some time, the invar is artificially "aged" by exposure to strain

and heat.

These considerations serve as a guide in arranging for the

compensation of the expansion of the rod and bob due to change of

temperature. But they are not the only ones required; we have also to

deal with changes due to the density of the air in which the pendulum

is moving. A body suspended in a fluid loses in weight by an amount

equal to the weight of the fluid displaced, whence it follows that a

pendulum suspended in air has not the weight which ought truly to

correspond to its mass. M remains constant while M_g_ is less than in

a vacuum. If the density of the air remained constant, this loss of

weight, being constant, could be allowed for and would make no

difference to the time-keeping. The period of swing would only be a

little increased over what it would be _in vacuo_. But the weight of a

given volume of air varies both with the barometric pressure and also

with temperature. If the bob be of type metal it weighs less in air

than in a vacuum by about .000103 part, and for each 1 deg. F. rise in

temperature (the barometer remaining constant and therefore the

pressure remaining the same), the variation of density causes the bob

to gain .00000024 of its weight. This, of course, makes the pendulum

go quicker. Since the time of vibration varies as the inverse square

root of _g_, it follows that a small increment of weight, the mass

remaining constant, produces a diminution of one half that increment

in time of swing. Hence, then, a rise of temperature of 1 deg. F. will

produce a diminution in the time of swing of .00000012th part or .0104

second in a day. But in making this calculation it has been assumed

that the mass moved remains unaltered by the temperature. This is not

so. A pendulum when swinging sets in motion a volume of air dependent

on the size of the bob, but in a 10 lb bob nearly equal to its own

volume. Hence while the rise of 1 deg. of temperature increases the weight

by .00000012th part, it also decreases the mass by about the same

proportion, and therefore the increase of period due to a rise of

temperature of 1 deg. F. will, instead of being .0104 second a day, be

about .02 second. This must be compensated negatively by lengthening

the pendulum by about .02/1000 in. for each degree of rise of

temperature, which will require a piece of brass about 2 in. long. It

follows, therefore, that with an invar rod having a linear expansion

coefficient of .0000002 per degree F., which requires a piece of brass

about .8 in. long to compensate it, the compensation which is to

regulate both the expansion of the rod and also that of the air must

be .8 in. - 2 in., or -1.2 in.; so that the bob must be hung downwards

from a piece of brass nearly 1-1/5 in. in length. If the coefficient

of expansion of the invar were .00000053 per degree F., then the two

corrections, one for the expansion of the rod and the other for the

expansion of the air, would just neutralize one another, and the

pendulum rod would require no compensator at all. There are a number

of other refinements which might be added, but which are too long for

insertion here. By taking in all the sources of error of higher

orders, it has been possible to calculate a pendulum so accurately

that, when the clock is loaded with the weight sufficient to give the

pendulum the arc of swing for which it is designed, a rate of error

has been produced of only half a minute in a year. These refinements,

however, are only required for clocks of precision; for ordinary

clocks an invar pendulum with a lead bob and brass compensator is

quite sufficient.

Invar pendulum rods are often made of steel with coefficients of

expansion of about .0000012 linear per 1 deg. C.; such a bob as this would

require about 6.7 cm. of brass to compensate it, and, deducting 5 cm.

of brass for the air compensation, this leaves about 1.7 cm. of

positive compensation for the pendulum. But as has been said, the

exact deduction depends on the shape and size of the bob, and the

metal of which it is made. The diameters of the rods are 8 mm. for a

15 lb bob, 5 mm. for a 4 lb bob, and 12 to 15 mm. for a 60 lb bob. The

bob is either a single cylinder or two cylinders with the rod between

them. Lenticular and spherical bobs are not used. The great object is

to allow the air ready access to all parts of the rod and compensator,

so that they are all heated or cooled simultaneously. The bobs are

usually made of a compound of lead, antimony, and tin, which forms a

hard metal, free from bubbles and with a specific gravity of about 10.

The usual weight of the bobs of the best pendulums for an ordinary

astronomical clock is about 15 lb. A greater weight than this is found

liable to make the support of the pendulum rock and to put an undue

strain on the parts, without any corresponding advantage. The rods

used are all artificially aged, and have their heat expansion

measured. No adjusting screw at the bottom is provided, the regulation

being done by the addition of weights half way up the rod. An

adjusting screw at the bottom has the disadvantage that it is

impossible to know on which of the threads the rod is really resting;

hence extra compensation may be introduced when not required. It is

considered better that the supports of the bob should be rigid and

invariable.

Barometrical error.

The effect of changes in the pressure of the air as shown by a

barometer is too important to be omitted in the design of a good

clock. But we do not propose to give more than a mere indication of

the principles which govern compensation for this effect, since the

full discussion of the problem would be too protracted. We have seen

that the action of the air in affecting the time of oscillation of a

pendulum depends chiefly on the fact that its buoyancy makes the

pendulum lighter, so that while the mass of the bob which has to be

moved remains the same or nearly the same, the acceleration of gravity

on it has less effect. A volume of air at ordinary temperature and

pressure has, as has been said, .000103 the weight of an equal volume

of type metal, whence it follows that the acceleration of gravity on a

type metal bob in air is .999897 of the acceleration of gravity on the

bob _in vacuo_. If, therefore, we diminish the value of g in the

formula T = [pi]sqrt(L/g) by .000103, we shall have the difference of

time of vibration of a type metal bob in air, as compared with its

time _in vacuo_, and this, by virtue of the principle used when

discussing the increase of time of oscillation due to increased

pendulum lengths, is 1/2(.000103) second in one second, or about 4-1/2

seconds in a day of 86,400 seconds. It follows that a barometric

pressure of 30 in. causes a loss of 4-1/2 seconds in the day, equivalent

to .15 second per day for each inch of difference of the barometer.

But, as has already been explained, the effect of the mass of the air

transported with the pendulum must also be taken into account and

therefore the above figures must be doubled or nearly doubled. A

difference of 30 in. of barometric pressure would thus make a

difference of 9 seconds per day in the rate of the pendulum, and the

clock would lose about 1/3 of a second a day for each inch of rise of

the barometer, the result being of the same magnitude as would be

produced by a fall of temperature of 15 deg. F. in the air. Either of

these effects would require a shortening of the pendulum of 1/3000 in.

This estimate is not far from the truth, for observations taken at

various European observatories on various clocks, and collected by

Jakob Hilfiker, give a mean of .15 second of retardation per day per

centimetre of barometric pressure, or .37 second per day for each inch

rise of the barometer.

In order to counteract variations in going which must thus obviously

be produced by variations of barometrical pressure, attempts have been

made purposely to disturb the isochronism of the pendulum, by making

the arcs of vibration abnormally large. Again, the bob has been fitted

with a piece of iron, which is subjected to the attraction of a piece

of magnetized steel floating on the mercury in the open end of a

barometer tube, so that when the barometer falls the attraction is

increased and the pendulum retarded. Again, mercury barometers have

been attached to pendulums. A simple method is to fix an aneroid

barometer with about seven compartments on the pendulum about 5 to 6

in. below the suspension spring, and to attach to the top of it a

suitable weight which is lowered as the barometric pressure increases.

One of the best methods of neutralizing the effects of variations of

barometric pressure is to enclose the whole clock in an air-tight

case, which may either be a large glass cylinder or a square case with

a stout plate-glass front. This renders it independent of outside

variations, whether of temperature or pressure, and keeps the density

of the air inside the case uniform. If the case could be completely,

or almost completely, exhausted of air, and kept so exhausted, of

course the pendulum would experience the minimum of resistance and

would have to be lengthened a little. But in practice it is impossible

to secure the maintenance of a good vacuum without sealing up the case

in such a way as to render repairs very difficult, and this plan is

therefore rarely resorted to. What is usually done is to put the clock

in a metal case covered with a thick sheet of plate glass bedded in

india-rubber strips, and held down by an iron flanged lid or frame

firmly fixed by means of small bolts. An air-pump is attached to the

case, a turn-off tap being inserted, and by a few strokes the pressure

of the air inside the case can be lowered to (say) 29 in., or a little

below the usual barometric height at the place where the clock is. The

difference of pressure being small, the tendency of air from outside

to leak in is also small, and if the workmanship is good the inside

pressure will remain unaltered for many days. In any case the

difference produced by leakage will be small, and will not greatly

affect the going of the clock. With care, and a daily or weekly touch

of the pump, the pressure inside can be kept practically constant, and

hence the atmospheric error will be eliminated. The cover has also

incidentally the effect of keeping damp and fumes from the clock and

thus preserving it from rust, especially if a vessel with quicklime or

some hygroscopic material be put in the case.

Cases have considerable effect on the air, which moves with a pendulum

and is flung off from it at each vibration; the going rate of a

chronometer can be altered by removing the case. It is therefore

desirable that cases enclosing pendulums should be roomy. Many people

prefer to omit the air-tight case, and to keep a record of barometric,

thermometric and hygrometric changes, applying corrections based on

these to the times shown by the clock.

Suspension of pendulums.

It was formerly usual to suspend pendulums by means of a single spring

about 1/2 in. wide riveted with chops of metal. The upper chop had a pin

driven through it, which rested in grooves so as to allow the pendulum

to hang vertically. The best modern pendulums are now made with two

parallel springs put a little less than an inch apart. The edges of

the chops where the springs enter are slightly rounded so as to avoid

too sharp bending of the springs. Suspension of pendulums on knife

edges was tried by B. L. Vulliamy and others, but did not prove a

success.

It was once thought that lenticular pendulum bobs resisted the air

less than those of other shapes, but it was forgotten that their large

surface offered more "skin friction." They are now no longer used, nor

are spheres on account of difficulty of construction. A cylinder is

the best form of bob; it is sometimes rounded at the top and bottom.

_Escapements._--The term escapement is applied to any arrangement by

which, as the wheels rotate, periodic impulses are given to the

pendulum, while at the same time the motion of the wheels is arrested

until the vibration of the pendulum has been completed. It thus serves

as a mechanism for both counting and impelling. Since the vibrations of

a pendulum through small arcs are performed in times independent of the

length of the arc, it follows that if a pendulum hanging at rest receive

an impulse it will swing out and in again, and the time of its excursion

outwards and of its return will remain the same whatever (within limits)

be the arc of the swing, and whatever be the impulse given to it. If the

impulse is big, it starts with a high velocity, but makes a larger

excursion outwards, and the distance it has to travel counteracts its

increase of speed, so that its time remains the same. Hence a pendulum,

if free to swing outwards and in again, without impediment, will adapt

the length of its swing to the impulse it has received, and any

interference with it, as by the locking or unlocking of the escapement,

will be far less deleterious to its isochronism when such interference

occurs at the middle of its path rather than at the ends. It follows

that the best escapement will be one which gives an impulse to the

pendulum for a short period at the lowest point of its path, and then

leaves it quite free to move as it chooses until the time comes for the

next impulse.

But a pendulum is not quite truly isochronous, and has its time slightly

affected by an increase of its arc; it is therefore desirable that the

impulses given to it shall always be equal. If the escapement forms the

termination of a clock-train impelled by a weight, the driving force of

the escapement is apt to vary according to the friction of the wheels,

while every change in temperature causes a difference in the thickness

of the oil. It is therefore desirable, if possible, to secure uniformity

of impulse--say, by causing the train of wheels to lift up a certain

specified weight, and let it drop on the pendulum at regular intervals,

or by some equivalent method.

The two requirements above stated have given rise respectively to what

are known as detached escapements, and remontoires, which will be

described presently. In the first place, however, it is desirable to

describe the principal forms of escapement in ordinary use.

Balance escapement.

The balance escapement, which has been already mentioned, was in use

before the days of pendulums. It was to a balance escapement that

Huygens applied the pendulum, by removing the weight from one arm and

increasing the length of the other arm.

[Illustration: FIG. 8.--Anchor or Recoil Escapement.]

Anchor escapement.

Very shortly afterwards R. Hooke invented the anchor or recoil

escapement. This is represented in fig. 8, where a tooth of the

escape-wheel is just escaping from the right pallet, and another tooth

at the same time falls upon the left-hand pallet at some distance from

its point. As the pendulum moves on in the same direction, the tooth

slides farther up the pallet, thus producing a recoil, as in the

crown-wheel escapement. The acting faces of the pallets should be

convex. For when they are flat, and of course still more when they are

concave, the points of the teeth always wear a hole in the pallets at

the extremity of their usual swing, and the motion is obviously easier

and therefore better when the pallets are made convex; in fact, they

then approach more nearly to the "dead" escapement, which will be

described presently. The effect of some escapements is not only to

counteract the circular error, or the natural increase of the time of

a pendulum as the arc increases, but to over-balance it by an error of

the contrary kind. The recoil escapement does so; for it is almost

invariably found that whatever may be the shape of these pallets, the

clock loses as the arc of the pendulum falls off, and vice versa. It

is unfortunately impossible so to arrange the pallets that the

circular error may be thus exactly neutralized, because the escapement

error depends, in a manner reducible to no law, upon variations in

friction of the pallets themselves and of the clock train, which

produce different effects; and the result is that it is impossible to

obtain very accurate time-keeping from any clock of this construction.

The point in which the anchor escapement was superior to all that had

gone before, was that it would work well with a small arc of swing of

the pendulum. The balance escapement, even when adapted to a pendulum,

necessitated a swing of some 20 deg., and hence the circular error, that

is to say, the deviation of the path from a true cycloid, was

considerable. But with an anchor escapement the pendulum swing need be

only 3 deg. or 4 deg. On the other hand, it violates the conditions above

laid down for a perfect escapement, inasmuch as the pendulum is never

free, but at the end of its swing is still operated on by the

escapement, which it causes to recoil.

[Illustration: FIG. 9.--Dead Escapement.]

Dead escapements.

To get rid of this defect the dead escapement, or, as the French call

it, _l'echappement a repos_, was invented by G. Graham. It is

represented in fig. 9. It will be observed that the teeth of the

scape-wheel have their points set the opposite way to those of the

recoil escapement. The tooth B is here represented in the act of

dropping on to the right-hand pallet as the tooth A escapes from the

left pallet. But instead of the pallet having a continuous face as in

the recoil escapement, it is divided into two, of which BE on the

right pallet, and FA on the left, are called the impulse faces, and

BD, FG, the dead faces. The dead faces are portions of circles (not

necessarily of the same circle), having the axis of the pallets C for

their centre; and the consequence evidently is, that as the pendulum

goes on, carrying the pallet still nearer to the wheel than the

position in which a tooth falls on to the corner A or B of the impulse

and the dead faces, the tooth still rests on the dead faces without

any recoil, until the pendulum returns and lets the tooth slide down

the impulse face, giving the impulse to the pendulum as it goes. In

order to diminish the friction and the necessity for using oil as far

as possible, the best clocks are made with jewels (sapphires are the

best for the purpose) let into the pallets.

The pallets are generally made to embrace about one-third of the

circumference of the wheel, and it is not at all desirable that they

should embrace more; for the longer they are, the longer is the run of

the teeth upon them, and the greater the friction. In some clocks the

seconds hand moves very slowly and rests a very short time; this shows

that the impulse is long in proportion to the arc of swing. In others

the contrary is the case. A not uncommon proportion is that out of a

total arc of swing of 3 deg., 2 deg., or about one degree on each side

of the vertical, are occupied in receiving the impulse. In other

words, the points F and A should subtend an angle of 2 deg. at the

centre C. It is not to be forgotten that the scape-wheel tooth does

not overtake the face of the pallet immediately, on account of the

moment of inertia of the wheel. The wheels of astronomical clocks, and

indeed of all English house clocks, are generally made too heavy,

especially the scape-wheel, which, by increasing the moment of

inertia, causes a part of the work to be lost in giving blows, instead

of being all used up in gentle pushes.

[Illustration: FIG. 10.--Pin-Wheel Escapement.]

A very useful form of the dead escapement, which is adopted in many of

the best turret clocks, is called the "pin-wheel escapement." Fig. 10

will sufficiently explain its action and construction. Its advantages

are--that it does not require so much accuracy as the other; if a pin

gets broken it is easily replaced, whereas in the other the wheel is

ruined if the point of a tooth is injured; a wheel of given size will

work with more pins than teeth, and therefore a train of less velocity

will do, and that sometimes amounts to a saving of one wheel in the

train, and a good deal of friction; and the blow on both pallets being

downwards, instead of one up and the other down, the action is more

steady; all which things are of more consequence in the heavy and

rough work of a turret clock than in an astronomical one. It has been

found expedient to make the dead faces not quite dead, but with a very

slight recoil, which rather tends to check the variations of arc, and

also the general disposition to lose time if the arc is increased;

when so made the escapement is generally called "half-dead."

In the dead escapement, during each excursion of the pendulum the

repose surface of the pallets rubs against the points of the teeth of

the scape-wheel. Thus the pendulum is subject to a constant

retardation by friction. Curiously enough, this friction, which at

first sight might appear a defect, is an advantage, and to a large

extent accounts for the excellence of the escapement. For if the

driving force of the clock is increased so that the impulse on the

pallets is greater, the velocity of the pendulum is increased. But

this very increase of the driving force causes a greater pressure of

the teeth of the scape-wheel on the rest-faces of the pallets, and

hence counteracts the increased drive of the pendulum by an increased

frictional retardation. If the clock weight be enormously increased,

the frictional retardation becomes increased relatively in a greater

proportion than the drive, so that as the weight of the clock is

increased the pendulum's time of vibration is first diminished, until

at last a neutral point is reached and finally the increased loading

of the clock weight begins to make the time of vibration increase

again. It is the neutral point which it is desirable to arrange for,

and only trial and experience can so fit the shape and size of the

pallets, scape-wheel and clock weight to one another, as to secure

that a moderate variation of the driving power neither accelerates nor

retards the motion of the pendulum, while at the same time such an arc

of vibration is secured as shall be least subject to barometric error,

and not have too great a circular error. The celebrated clockmaker B.

L. Vulliamy (1780-1854) greatly improved Graham's escapement by

careful experiment, and other makers introduced further improvements

into the shape of the scape-wheel and pallets, so that the best form

of the deadbeat escapement is now fairly well determined and is given

in books upon horology. For small clocks a little slope is given to

the rest-faces so as to diminish the friction retardation. This is

known as the half-dead escapement. The pin-wheel escapement, if

properly constructed, is also "dead," that is to say, the outward

swing of the pendulum is unfettered except by the slight friction of

the teeth against the dead faces of the pallets.

[Illustration: FIG. 11.--Riefler's Escapement.]

In order to diminish the effect of the impact of the scape-wheel on

the pallets, and of the crutch on the pendulum rod, the plan has been

tried of making the crutch into an elastic spring. In theory this of

course would not destroy the isochronism of the pendulum, for it would

only be to apply upon the pendulum a force at right angles to the rod,

and varying as the displacement. Hence any acceleration given by such

a spring would, like the action of gravity, be harmonic, and it is an

analytical principle that harmonic motions superposed on one another

still remain harmonic. Hence, then, the action of a spring superadded

upon the action of gravity on a pendulum still leaves the motion

harmonic. But changes of temperature would affect the spring

considerably. In the case of such a spring the repose faces of

Graham's escapement might be minimized and the escapement checked each

side by a stop, so as to prevent the pallets from rubbing on the

points of the scape-wheel. Graham's escapement can, if well made, be

arranged so as not to vary more than an average of 1/30 of a second

from its mean daily rate, and this is so good a result that many

people doubt whether further effort in the direction of inventing new

escapements will result in any better form. Two adaptations of

Graham's escapement have been made, one by Clemens Riefler of

Nesselwang, and the other by L. Strasser of Glashutte, Saxony, which

give good results in practice. Riefler's scheme is to mount the upper

block, into which the suspension spring is fastened, upon knife edges,

and rock it to and fro by the action of a modified Graham's

escapement, thus giving impulses to the pendulum. Fig. 11 shows the

arrangement. PP are the agates upon which the knife edges CC rest. A

is the anchor, RH the scape-wheels, and S the pallets.

Strasser's clock is arranged on the same idea as that of Riefler, only

that the rocking motion is given, not to the springs that carry the

pendulum, but to a second pair of springs placed outside of them and

parallel to them. The weight of the pendulum is therefore carried by

an upper stationary block, but above that a second block is subjected

to the rocking motion of the anchor. The general design is shown in

fig. 12. The pallets are each formed of two stones, so contrived as to

minimize the banging of the teeth of the scape-wheel. Both Riefler's

and Strasser's clocks aim at haying a virtually free pendulum; in

fact, they are in reality adaptations of the principle of the

spring-clutch to Graham's escapement. The weak point in both is the

tampering with the suspension.

Detached escapement.

The dead escapement is not, however, truly free. In order to make a

free escapement it would be necessary to provide that as soon as the

pendulum approached its centre position, some pin or projecting point

upon it should free the escapement wheel, a tooth of which should thus

be enabled to leap upon the back of the pendulum, give it a short

push, and then be locked until the pendulum had returned and again

swung forward. An arrangement of this kind is shown in fig. 13. Let A

be a block of metal fixed on the lower end of a pendulum rod. On the

block let a small pall B be fastened, free to move round a centre C

and resting against a stop D. Let E be a 4-leaved scape-wheel, the

teeth of which as they come round rest against the bent pall GFL at G.

The pall is prevented from flying too far back by a pin H, and kept up

to position by a very delicate spring K. As soon as the pendulum rod,

moving from left to right, has arrived at the position shown in the

figure, the pall B will engage the arm FL, force it forwards, and by

raising G will liberate the scape-wheel, a tooth of which, M, will

thus close upon the heel N of the block A, and urge it forward. As

soon, however, as N has arrived at G the tooth M will slip off the

block A and rest on the pall G, and the impulse will cease. The

pendulum is now perfectly free or "detached," and can swing on

unimpeded as far as it chooses. On its return from right to left, the

pall B slips over the pall L without disturbing it, and the pendulum

is still free to make an excursion towards the left. On its return

journey from left to right the process is again repeated. Such an

escapement operates once every 2 seconds. One made on a somewhat

similar plan was applied to a clock by Robert-Houdin, about 1830, and

afterwards by Mr Haswell, and another by Sir George Airy. But the

principle was already an old one, as may be seen from fig. 14, which

was the work of an anonymous maker in the 18th century. A

consideration of this escapement will show that it is only the

application of the detached chronometer escapement to a clock.

[Illustration: FIG. 12.--Strasser's Escapement (Strasser & Rohde).]

[Illustration: FIG. 13.--Free Escapement.]

[Illustration: FIG. 14.--Free Escapement (old form).]

Even detached escapements, however, are not perfect. In order that an

escapement should be perfect, the impulse given to the pendulum should

be always exactly the same. It may be asked why, if the time of

oscillation of the pendulum be independent of the amplitude of the arc

of vibration, and hence of the impulse, it is necessary that the

impulse should be uniform. The answer is that the arc of vibration not

being a true cycloid, as it should be if true isochronism is to be

secured, but being the arc of a circle, any change of amplitude of

vibration produces a change of time in the swing given by the formula

(3/2)(a^2 - b^2) = loss in seconds per day, where a and b are the

semi-arcs of vibration estimated in degrees. Thus 10' increase of arc

in a swing of 4 deg., that is to say, .1 in. increase of arc in a total

arc of 2-1/2 in., produces an error of about a second a day. Now cold

weather, by making the oil thick and thus clogging the wheels, will

easily produce such a change of arc; dust will also make a change even

though the clock weight, acted on by gravity, still exerts a uniform

pull. Besides, if the clock has work to do of a varying amount--as

when the hands of a turret clock are acted on by a heavy wind pressure

tending sometimes to retard them, sometimes to drive them on--then it

is clear that the impulses given by the scape-wheel to the pendulum

may be very unequal, and that the arc of vibration of the pendulum may

thus be seriously affected and its isochronism disturbed.

Remontoire.

To abolish errors arising from the changes in the force driving the

escapement, what is known as the "remontoire" system was adopted. It

first came into use for watches, which was perhaps natural, seeing

that the driving force of a watch is not a uniform weight like that of

a clock, but depends on springs, which are far less trustworthy. The

idea of a remontoire is to disconnect the escapement from the clock

train, and to give the escapement a driving power of its own, acting

as directly as possible on the pallets without the intervention of a

clock-train containing many wheels. The escapement is thus as it were

made into a separate clock, which of course needs repeated winding,

and this winding is effected by the clock-train. From this it results

that variations in the force transmitted by the clock-train merely

affect the speed at which the "rewinding" of the escapement is

effected, but do not affect the force exerted by the driving power of

the escapement.

Train remontoires.

There are several modes of carrying out this plan. The first of them

is simply to provide the scape-wheel with a weight or spring of its

own, which spring is wound up by the clock-train as often as it runs

down. Contrivances of this kind are called train remontoires. In

arranging such a remontoire it is obvious that the clock-train must be

provided with a stop to prevent it from overwinding the scape-wheel

weight or spring, and further, that there must be on the scape-wheel

some sort of stud or other contrivance to release the clock-train as

soon as the scape-wheel weight or spring has run down and needs

rewinding. We believe the first maker of a large clock with a train

remontoire was Thomas Reid of Edinburgh, who described his apparatus

in his book on _Horology_ (1819). The scape-wheel was driven by a

small weight hung by a Huygens's endless chain, of which one of the

pulleys was fixed to the arbor, and the other rode upon the arbor,

with the pinion attached to it, and the pinion was driven and the

weight wound up by the wheel below (which we will call the third

wheel), as follows. Assuming the scape-wheel to turn in a minute, its

arbor has a notch cut half through it on opposite sides in two places

near to each other; on the arbor of the wheel, which turns in ten

minutes, suppose, there is another wheel with 20 spikes sticking out

of its rim, but alternately in two different planes, so that one set

of spikes can only pass through one of the notches in the scape-wheel

arbor, and the other set only through the other. Whenever, then, the

scape-wheel completes a half-turn, one spike is let go, and the third

wheel is able to move, and with it the whole clock-train and the

hands, until the next spike of the other set is stopped by the

scape-wheel arbor; at the same time the pinion on that arbor is turned

half round, winding up the remontoire weight, but without taking its

pressure off the scape-wheel. Reid says that, so long as this

apparatus was kept in good order, the clock went better than it did

after it was removed in consequence of its getting out of order from

the constant banging of the spikes against the arbor.

[Illustration: FIG. 15.--Gravity Train Remontoire.]

A clock at the Royal Exchange, London, was made in 1844 on the same

principle, except that, instead of the endless chain, an internal

wheel was used, with the spikes set on it externally, which is one of

the modes by which an occasional secondary motion may be given to a

wheel without disturbing its primary and regular motion. The following

is a more simple arrangement of a gravity train remontoire, much more

frequently used in principle. Let E in fig. 15 be the scape-wheel

turning in a minute, and e its pinion, which is driven by the wheel D

having a pinion d driven by the wheel C, which we may suppose to turn

in an hour. The arbors of the scape-wheel and hour-wheel are distinct,

their pivots meeting in a bush fixed somewhere between the wheels. The

pivots of the wheel D are set in the frame AP, which rides on the

arbors of the hour-wheel and scape-wheel, or on another short arbor

between them. The hour-wheel also drives another wheel G, which again

drives the pinion f on the arbor which carries the two arms fA, fB;

and on the same arbor is set a fly with a ratchet, like a common

striking fly, and the numbers of the teeth are so arranged that the

fly will turn once for each turn of the scape-wheel. The ends of the

remontoire arms fA, fB are capable of alternately passing the notches

cut half through the arbor of the scape-wheel, as those notches

successively come into the proper position at the end of every

half-minute; as soon as that happens the hour-wheel raises the movable

wheel D and its frame through a small angle; but, nevertheless, that

wheel keeps pressing on the scape-wheel as if it were not moving, the

point of contact of the wheel C and the pinion d being the fulcrum or

centre of motion of the lever AdP. It will be observed that the

remontoire arms fA, fB have springs set on them to diminish the blow

on the scape-wheel arbor, as it is desirable not to have the fly so

large as to make the motion of the train, and consequently of the

hands, too slow, to be distinct.

Another kind of remontoire is on the principle of one bevelled wheel

lying between two others at right angles to it. The first of the

bevelled wheels is driven by the train, and the third is fixed to the

arbor of the scape-wheel; and the intermediate bevelled wheel, of any

size, rides on its arbor at right angles to the other two arbors which

are in the same line. The scape-wheel will evidently turn with the

same average velocity as the first bevelled wheel, though the

intermediate one may move up and down at intervals. The transverse

arbor which carries it is let off and lifted a little at half-minute

intervals, as in the remontoire just now described; and it gradually

works down as the scape-wheel turns under its pressure, until it is

freed again and lifted by the clock-train.

[Illustration: FIG. 16.--Spring Remontoire.]

In all these gravity remontoires, however, only the friction of the

heavy parts of the train and the dial-work is got rid of, and the

scape-wheel is still subject to the friction of the remontoire wheels,

which, though much less than the other, is still something

considerable. Accordingly, attempts have frequently been made to drive

the scape-wheel by a spiral spring, like the mainspring of a watch.

One of these was described in the 7th edition of this encyclopaedia;

and Sir G. Airy invented another on the same principle, of which one

specimen is still going well. One of the best forms of such a

remontoire is shown in fig. 16, in which A, B, D, E, e, f are the same

things as in fig. 15. But e, the scape-wheel pinion, is no longer

fixed to the arbor, nor does it ride on the arbor, as had been the

case in all the previous spring remontoires, thereby producing

probably more friction than was saved in other respects; but it rides

on a stud k, which is set in the clock frame. On the face of the

pinion is a plate, of which the only use is to carry a pin h (and

consequently its shape is immaterial), and in front of the plate is

set a bush b, with a hole through it, of which half is occupied by the

end of the stud k, to which the bush is fixed by a small pin, and the

other half is the pivot-hole for the scape-wheel arbor. On the arbor

is set the remontoire spring s (a moderate-sized musical-box spring is

generally used), of which the outer end is bent into a loop to take

hold of the pin h. In fact, there are two pins at h, one a little

behind the other, to keep the coils of the spring from touching each

other. Now, it is evident that the spring may be wound up half or a

quarter of a turn at the proper intervals without taking the force off

the scape-wheel, and also without affecting it by any friction

whatever. When the scape-wheel turns in a minute, the letting-off

would be done as before described, by a couple of notches in the

scape-wheel arbor, through which the spikes A, B, as in fig. 15, would

pass alternately. During the half-minute that the spring is running

down the impulse on the pendulum constantly diminishes; but this error

is small if the spring be properly shaped, and besides, being

periodic, does not affect the _average_ time-keeping of the clock. It

would be inadmissible in astronomical clocks where each particular

second has always to be true. In clocks with only three wheels in the

train it is best to make the scape-wheel turn in two minutes. In that

case four notches and four remontoire arms are required, and the fly

makes only a quarter of a turn. Lord Grimthorpe made the following

provision for diminishing the friction of the letting-off work. The

fly pinion f has only half the number of teeth of the scape-wheel

pinion, being a lantern pinion of 7 or 8, while the other is a leaved

pinion of 14 or 16, and therefore the same wheel D will properly drive

both, as will be seen hereafter. The scape-wheel arbor ends in a

cylinder about 5/8 in. in diameter, with two notches at right angles

cut in its face, one of them narrow and deep, and the other broad and

shallow, so that a long and thin pin B can pass only through one, and

a broad and short pin A through the other. Consequently, at each

quarter of a turn of the scape-wheel, the remontoire fly, on which the

pins A, B are set on springs, as in fig. 15, can turn half round. It

is set on its arbor f by a square ratchet and click, which enables the

spring to be adjusted to the requisite tension to obtain the proper

vibration of the pendulum. A better construction, afterwards

introduced, is to make the fly separate from the letting-off arms,

whereby the blow on the cylinder is diminished, the fly being allowed

to go on as in the gravity escapement. It should be observed, however,

that even a spring remontoire requires a larger weight than the same

clock without one; but as none of that additional force reaches the

pendulum, that is of no consequence. The variation of force of the

remontoire spring from temperature, as it only affects the pendulum

through the medium of the dead escapement, is far too small to produce

any appreciable effect; and it is found that clocks of this kind, with

a compensated pendulum 8 ft. long, and weighing about 2 cwt., will not

vary above a second a month, if the pallets are kept clean and well

oiled. No turret clock without either a train remontoire or a gravity

escapement will approach that degree of accuracy.

The introduction of this remontoire led to another very important

alteration in the construction of large clocks. Hitherto it had always

been considered necessary, with a view to diminish the friction as far

as possible, to make the wheels of brass or gun-metal, with the teeth

cut in an engine. The French clockmakers had begun to use cast iron

striking parts, and cast iron wheels had been occasionally used in the

going part of inferior clocks for the sake of cheapness; but they had

never been used in any clock making pretensions to accuracy. But in

consequence of the success of a clock shown in the 1851 Exhibition, it

was determined by Sir G. Airy and Lord Grimthorpe (then E. Denison),

who were jointly consulted by the Board of Works about the great

Westminster clock in 1852, to alter the original requisition for

gun-metal wheels there to cast iron. But cast iron wheels must drive

cast iron pinions, for they will wear out steel.

[Illustration: FIG. 17.--Mudge's Gravity Escapement.]

[Illustration: FIG. 18.--Bloxam's Gravity Escapement.]

Gravity escapements.

The next kind of remontoire still leaves the scape-wheel linked up

with the clock-train, but makes it wind up the pallets which are held

raised up till their action is wanted, when they are allowed to drop

gently on the crutch or the pendulum rod. In this case the two arms of

the anchor are usually divided and mounted on separate shafts so as to

act independently. This idea was first started by Thomas Mudge

(1717-1794) and Alexander Cumming (1733-1814). Mudge's escapement is

shown in fig. 17. The tooth A of the scape-wheel is resting against

the stop or detent a at the end of the pallet CA, from the axis or

arbor of which descends the half-fork CP to touch the pendulum. From

the other pallet CB descends the other half-fork CO. The two arbors

are set as near the point of suspension, or top of the pendulum

spring, as possible. The pendulum, as here represented, must be moving

to the right, and just leaving contact with the left pallet and going

to take up the right one; as soon as it has raised that pallet a

little it will evidently unlock the wheel and let it turn, and then

the tooth B will raise the left pallet until it is caught by the stop

b on that pallet, and then it will stay until the pendulum returns and

releases it by raising that pallet still higher. Each pallet therefore

descends with the pendulum to a lower point than that where it is

taken up, and the difference between them is supplied by the lifting

of each pallet by the clock, which does not act on the pendulum at

all; so that the pendulum is independent of all variations of force

and friction in the train. This escapement is said by Lord Grimthorpe,

in his _Rudimentary Treatise on Clocks_, first published in 1850, to

be liable to trip, the pallets being apt to be jerked by the pendulum,

so that the teeth slip past the hook, and the wheel flies round. This,

however, appears entirely a matter of construction. The really weak

point is that while the impulses on the pendulum due to the

gravitational fall of the arms are uniform, the force which has to be

exercised by the pendulum in unlocking them from the scape-wheel

varies with the pressure of the clock-train. Hence we miss the

compensation which is so beautiful a result of Graham's escapement. To

avoid this, J. M. Bloxam, a barrister, proposed about the middle of

the 19th century his legged gravity escapement (fig. 18). By this

arrangement the parts of the scape-wheel which lifted the gravity

arms were brought as near to the axis of the scape-wheel as possible,

while the locking arms were brought as far from the axis as possible

so that the pressure should be light. The pallet arbors were cranked,

to embrace the pendulum-spring, so that their centres of motion might

coincide with that of the pendulum as nearly as possible--perhaps an

unnecessary refinement; at least the three-legged and four-legged

gravity escapements answer very well with the pallet arbors set on

each side of the top of the spring. The size of the wheel determines

the length of the pallets, as they must be at such an angle to each

other that the radii of the wheel when in contact with each stop may

be at right angles to the pallet arm; and therefore, for a wheel of

this size, the depth of locking can only be very small. The pinion in

Bloxam's clock only raises the pallet through 40' at each beat; i.e.

the angle which we call [gamma], viz. the amplitude of the pendulum

when it begins to lift the pallet, is only 20'; and probably, if it

were increased to anything like a/sqrt(2), where a is the semiarc of

swing, the escapement would trip immediately. The two broad pins

marked E, F, are the fork-pins, and A and B are the stops. The clock

which Bloxam had went very well; but it had an extremely fine train,

with pinions of 18; and nobody else appears to have been able to make

one to answer.

[Illustration: FIG. 19.--Four-legged Gravity Escapement.]

[Illustration: FIG. 20.--Double Three-legged Escapement.]

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Clervaux" to "Cockade" Volume 6, Slice 5 · 第 17 / 41 题