SECT. I.

I. In ancient times, if we believe Plutarch, music was used only in

temples, and that afterwards it passed to theatres. Formerly, it

served as an ornament to divine worship; afterwards, it was used to

stimulate vice. Heretofore, the melody of sacred hymns only were heard;

afterwards, we began to listen to profane songs. Music originally,

was used as an obsequies to the Deities, it was afterwards applied to

inflame the passions. In old times, it was dedicated to Apollo, but it

seems as if afterwards, Apollo had divided the protection of this art

with Venus; and as if to poison the soul, and paint on the theatres

the charms of vice, the finest colourings of rhetoric, joined to the

harmony of poetic numbers, were not sufficient, they, to render these

charms more attracting, and make the venom more active, confectioned

and compounded rhetoric, poetry, and music together.

II. This diversity of uses to which music was appropriated, induced

a difference in the composition of it: and as it was necessary in

the temple, and in the theatre, to excite distinct affections, they

contrived distinct modes of melody, to correspond, as their echoes,

with the different affections of the soul. The Dorian mode, as grave,

majestic, and devout, was reserved for the temple; and in the theatres,

they adopted different modes, suited to the diversity of the matters.

In the amorous representations, they used the Lydian mode, which was

soft and tender; and when they had a mind to give the movement a

stronger effect and expression, they applied the mixed Lydian, which

was more pathetic and striking than the Lydian by itself. In warlike

representations, they used the Phrygian mode, which is terrible and

furious; and in affairs of mirth and jollity, or favouring of the

Bacchanalian, they adopted the Æolian, which was sprightly and comic.

The Subphrygian mode, was appropriated to calm the transports, raised

by the Phrygian; and thus, to produce other effects, they had other

modes of melody.

III. Whether these modes of the antients, corresponded with the

different tones used by the moderns, is not clearly ascertained. Some

authors affirm they do, others doubt it. I myself, am inclined to

think they do not, because the diversity of our tones, have not that

influence to vary the passions, which was experienced in the different

modes of the antients.

Essays, or discourses, vol. 2 (of 4) · 第 87 / 105 题