SECT. X.

_Lying._

LI. What can be more obnoxious to urbanity than lying? What man of

understanding is there whom it does not offend? Or to whom is it not

disgusting? and how can deceit cease to be injurious? All the utility,

all the delight that can be obtained by conversation, is destroyed by a

lie. If he, with whom I converse, tells me lies, of what service will

the information I receive from him be to me? for if I do not believe

him, all he says will only tend to irritate me; and if I do, to fill me

with errors. If I am not assured he tells me truth, what satisfaction

can I have in attending to him? For his conversation, so far from

affording me entertainment or instruction, will set my mind on the

rack, and cause me to waver, and continue in a painful state of doubt,

and also perplex me, to find out reasons for believing or disbelieving

what he has told me.

LII. Conversation is a species of traffic, in which mankind exchange

informations and ideas with each other; and what better name can we

give to him, than that of a cheat and a deceiver, who in this commerce,

passes false informations and ideas for true ones; and ought we not

also to treat him as a prevaricator, who is unworthy of being admitted

into human society?

LIII. I have always been amazed at, and have always condemned, the

indulgence and toleration that lying people find in the world. I have

already exclaimed against this practice in my Essay on the Impurity

of Lying, and must beg leave to refer the reader thither for a more

full discussion of the point; but it has occurred to me since I wrote

that Essay, that it is probable, this toleration may have arisen

from the great extension of the vice of lying; and that the number

of those who find themselves interested in this indulgence, is much

greater, than that of those who find themselves injured by it; and that

perhaps they tolerate lying in one another, because the toleration is

necessary and useful to both parties. If the sincere part of the world

consists of but few people, they cannot, without being guilty of great

rashness, attempt to wage war against the many; but they at least may

remonstrate, and with temper complain of the disgust they receive,

from the indulgence that is shewn to lying. I ingenuously confess for

myself, that I look upon him as a man of but little sincerity, who

hears a lie with much seeming composure, and without expressing any

signs of his dislike of it; although I must confess at the time I say

this, that a frank manifestation of our dislike of the practice, cannot

so easily be shewn, unless it is to our equals or our inferiors.

LIV. There is a species of lie, that passes in the world for humour

and pleasantry, which I would punish as a crime. Whenever there

happens to be a person in company who is noted for being an exceeding

credulous man, it frequently happens, that some one or other tells a

very incredible story, for the sake of exposing the easy faith of such

a person, and of shewing, how apt he is to swallow absurdities and

improbabilities for truth. This is received as a piece of wit, and all

the by-standers laugh and applaud the ingenuity and invention of him

who told the lie, and they all regale themselves at the expence of the

innocent credulous person. But I consider this as an abuse; for does

the simple and easy credulity of any person give others a right to

insult him? admitting that his excessive credulity proceeds from the

scantiness of his understanding; are we peradventure only obliged to

be civil to, and treat with urbanity, the discreet and the acute? If

God has blessed you with more talents than another man, would it not be

an insolent abuse of them, if you made that person an object of your

scorn, and played upon him, and treated him with the same derision and

contempt that you would treat a monkey? Would this be using him like

your neighbour? Or would it be applying your talents to the end and

purpose, for which God was pleased to endow you with them?

LV. But the truth is, that excessive credulity proceeds more from

goodness of heart, than from want of discretion. I have seen men who

were very simple, and at the same time very penetrating. The same

rectitude of heart, which excites a man of simplicity of manners to

conduct himself without deceit, inclines him to think, that other

people conduct themselves upon the same principle. It often happens,

that a lie is believed by one person because he is an ingenuous man;

and discredited by another, because he is a simpleton. The case is,

that the first, excited by the goodness of his disposition, sets

himself about finding out grounds of probability for what he has

heard, and by his penetration discovers such. The other, who is only

influenced by the dictates of his malice, never seeks after any such

thing; and although he should seek after it, his stupidity would not

permit him to discover it.

LVI. I don’t know whether the story that is commonly told of St. Thomas

Aquinas, which is, that he was made to believe there was an ox that

could fly, be true or not, as likewise what was said about his going

out very anxious to see the spectacle; but this I know, that the rebuke

which was couched in the answer he gave to those who attempted to put

that affront on his credulity, is well worthy of a St. Thomas; I say

worthy of that great repository of excellent virtues, both moral and

intellectual, and worthy also the generosity of heart, and exalted

prudence, of that sublime genius. The answer was as follows: _I could

more easily be made to believe that there was an ox which could fly,

than I could be made to believe, that mankind were capable of giving a

lying relation of such a thing._ What reproof could be more discreet

than this! and what energy and delicacy is there contained in it! I

esteem this sentence more, than I do any of those which the ancient

Grecians have recorded of their wise men. The sublimity of it persuades

me, that it was the legitimate child of St. Thomas’s brain, and of

course I can have no doubt, but the story we have related was true.

Thus we see, the greatest discretion is not incompatible with, but

may be easily reconciled to, and brought to unite with the greatest

simplicity.

Essays, or discourses, vol. 2 (of 4) · 第 51 / 105 题