II. THE LIBERAL REACTION

With the rise of the new liberalism in the American colonies no name is

more conspicuous than that of _Jonathan Mayhew_ (1721-66), whose

eloquence was of a more modern type than most of his day. He is credited

with having deeply moved many who became leaders in turn, whether as

ministers or laymen. After the interruption of normal development

inevitable during the War of Independence, things moved more rapidly.

The French Revolution evoked the warmest sympathy in the United States,

and its effect on religion there was largely to increase a sense of the

worth of man. 'Universalism,' the final restoration of all, became a

conspicuous doctrine with some. The need for practical measures to

uplift the general life here was a theme more to the mind of others. The

distinctly 'Unitarian' trend was from the first associated with this

eager attention to the higher culture. Harvard College, in the very

heart of New England, rapidly developed into a fruitful source of the

newer ideas, which were embodied in the lives of 'statesmen, merchants,

physicians, lawyers, and teachers'; and thus the community, in all its

more vigorous members, became charged with a fresh conception of life

and religion.

In the first decade of the nineteenth century we begin to trace

publications more or less distinctly Unitarian. One of these was the

_Monthly Anthology_, the pioneer among American literary magazines. One

of its two editors was the Rev. William Emerson, father of Ralph Waldo

Emerson. As the divergence of ideas grew more distinct debate began to

be fierce. The new magazine took a bold line, while many liberals were

still hesitating. In 1808 the trouble came to the surface. Harvard was

denounced by the orthodox party, in consequence of the appointment of a

liberal minister, Henry Ware, to a professorship involving pastoral care

of the students. An orthodox rival school was set up at Andover. A few

years later a pamphlet appeared giving letters alleged to have been sent

to England by Boston ministers reporting that a certain number were

Unitarians. The name was unwelcome at the time, especially because it

was associated with the 'humanitarianism' then becoming widely taught in

England. The implicated ministers, being charged with cowardly evasion,

replied with warmth; they were, in fact, mostly Arians, and thus their

views really were different from the English type. Moreover, again in

contrast with the English, they expressed strong dislike of controversy;

all they asked was to be left alone to proclaim the 'Simple

Christianity' in which they believed.

The upshot showed, however, that controversy was not to be avoided, and

during twenty years from 1815 onwards it raged more or less severely. An

epoch in this long and regrettable warfare was marked by a sermon

preached at Baltimore in 1819. The preacher was one of the most famous

men on the Unitarian roll, _William Ellery Channing_ (1780-1842).

Already eminent, he continued to hold a position unique in the religious

life of New England; his saintly character and his noble if simple

eloquence made him a leader in spite of himself. For a long time he had

maintained a mediating position--all through his life he resolutely

disclaimed sectarianism; but in 1819, after years of discussion, it was

obvious that, for good or evil, the old dogma and the new spirit lay far

apart. From that date liberals and conservatives in the old

Congregational system of New England were divided, and 'Unitarian

Christianity,' which was the subject of Channing's discourse, was a

recognized type in the land. In 1825 the American Unitarian Association

was founded. It was but a struggling society at first, not for lack of

sympathy with its principle, but because many Unitarians, like Channing,

so strongly disliked the notion of forming a new sect that they took

little interest in methods of propagandism common to most religious

bodies.

Unitarianism · 第 23 / 33 题