PREFACE.

I send this little book out into the world, first, to aid those who,

having decided to adopt a bloodless diet, are still asking how they can

be nourished without flesh; second, in the hope of gaining something

further to protect "the speechless ones" who, having come down through

the centuries under "the dominion of man," have in their eyes the mute,

appealing look of the helpless and oppressed. Their eloquent silence

should not ask our sympathy and aid in vain; they have a right, as our

humble brothers, to our loving care and protection, and to demand

justice and pity at our hands; and, as a part of the One Life, to--

"life, which all can take but none can give;

Life, which all creatures love and strive to keep;

Wonderful, dear, and pleasant unto each,

Even to the meanest; yea, a boon to all

Where pity is, for pity makes the world

Soft to the weak and noble for the strong.

Unto the dumb lips of the flock he lent

Sad, pleading words, showing how man, who prays

For mercy to the gods, is merciless,

Being as god to those; albeit all life

Is linked and kin, and what we slay have given

Meek tribute of their milk and wool, and set

Fast trust upon the hands which murder them."

If the cruelty and injustice to animals are nothing to us, we have still

another argument to offer--the brutalization of the men who slaughter

that we may eat flesh. Mrs. Besant, in "Why I Am a Food Reformer," says:

"Lately I have been in the city of Chicago--one of the greatest

slaughter-houses of the world--where the slaughter-men, who are employed

from early morn till late at night in the killing of thousands of these

hapless creatures, are made a class _practically apart from their

fellow-men_; they are marked out by the police _as the most dangerous

part of the community_; amongst them are committed most crimes of

violence, and the most ready use of the knife is found. One day I was

speaking to an authority on this subject, and I asked him how it was

that he knew so decidedly that most of the murders and the crimes with

the knife were perpetrated by that particular class of men, and his

answer was suggestive, although horrible. He said: 'There is a peculiar

turn of the knife which men learn to use in the slaughter-house, for, as

the living creatures are brought to them by machinery, these men slit

their throats as they pass by. That twist of the wrist is the

characteristic of most crimes with the knife committed amongst our

Chicago population.' That struck me at once as both a horrible and

significant fact. _What right have people to condemn other men to a

trade that makes them so readily take to the knife in anger; which marks

them out as specially brutalized--brutes amongst their fellow-men?_

Being constantly in the sight and the smell of blood, their whole nature

is coarsened; accustomed to kill thousands of creatures, they lose all

sense of reverence for sentient life, they grow indifferent to the

suffering they continually see around them; accustomed to inflict pain,

they grow callous to the sight of pain; accustomed to kill swiftly, and

sometimes not even waiting until the creature is dead before the skin is

stripped from it, their nerves become coarsened, hardened, and

brutalized, and they are less men as men because they are slaughterers

of animals. _And everyone who eats flesh meat has part in that

brutalization; everyone who uses what they provide is guilty of this

degradation of his fellow-men._

"If I may not appeal to you in the name of the animals--if under

mistaken views you regard animals as not sharing _your kind of

life_--then I appeal to you in the name of _human brotherhood_, and

remind you of your duty to your fellow-men, your duty to your nation,

which must be built up partly of the children of those who

slaughter--who physically inherit the very signs of this brutalizing

occupation. I ask you to recognize your duty as men and women who should

_raise_ the Race, not _degrade_ it; who should try to make it _divine_,

not _brutal_; who should try to make it _pure_, not _foul_; and

therefore, in the name of Human Brotherhood, I appeal to you to leave

your own tables free from the stain of blood and your consciences free

from the degradation of your fellow-men."

That flesh-eating is not necessary to the perfect health of man is

attested by many scientists. The following testimonies from some very

prominent physiologists and anatomists may prove interesting:

Sir Charles Bell, F. R. S.: "It is, I think, not going too far to say

that every fact connected with the human organization goes to prove that

man was originally formed a frugivorous animal. This opinion is

principally derived from the formation of his teeth and digestive

organs, as well as from the character of his skin and the general

structure of his limbs."

Sylvester Graham, M. D.: "Comparative anatomy proves that man is

naturally a frugivorous animal, formed to subsist upon fruits, seeds,

and farinaceous vegetables."

Professor Wm. Lawrence, F. R. S.: "The teeth of man have not the

slightest resemblance to those of carnivorous animals; and, whether we

consider the teeth, jaws, or digestive organs, the human structure

closely resembles that of the frugivorous animals."

Dr. Jozef Drzewiecki: "There is no doubt that fruit and vegetable food

purifies the blood, while meat inflames and is the source of many

diseases, which are the punishment for breaking the natural law and

command."

Professor Vogt: "The vegetarian diet is the most beneficial and

agreeable to our organs, as it contains the greatest amount of carbon

hydrates and the best proportion of albumen."

Sir Henry Thompson, M. D., F. R. C. S.: "It is a vulgar error to regard

meat in any form as necessary to life. All that is necessary to the

human body can be supplied by the vegetable kingdom.... The vegetarian

can extract from his food all the principles necessary for the growth

and support of the body, as well as for the production of heat and

force. It must be admitted as a fact beyond all question that some

persons are stronger and more healthy who live on that food. I know how

much of the prevailing meat diet is not merely a wasteful extravagance,

but a source of serious evil to the consumer."

The following special cablegram from London to the New York "Sun," July

3d, 1898, contains a practical illustration of the superiority of a

vegetable diet:

"The vegetarians are making a great ado over the triumph of their theory

in the long-distance test of walking endurance, seventy miles, in

Germany, this week. The twenty-two starters included eight vegetarians.

The distance had to be covered within eighteen hours. The first six to

arrive were vegetarians, the first finishing in 14 1/4 hours, the second

in 14 1/2, the third in 15 1/2, the fourth in 16, the fifth in 16 1/2, and the

sixth in 17 1/2. The last two vegetarians missed their way and walked five

miles more. All reached the goal in splendid condition. Not till one

hour after the last vegetarian did the first meat-eater appear,

completely exhausted. He was the only one. Others dropped off after

thirty-five miles."

There is no question of the great economy of vegetarianism. Dr. Alcott,

in "Arguments for Vegetarianism," says:

"Twenty-two acres of land are needed to sustain one man on fresh meat.

Under wheat that land will feed forty-two people; under oats,

eighty-eight; under potatoes, maize, or rice, one hundred and

seventy-six; under the banana, over six thousand. The crowded nations of

the future must abandon flesh-eating for a diet that will feed more than

tenfold people by the same soil, expense and labor. How rich men will be

when they cease to toll for flesh-meat, alcohol, drugs, sickness, and

war!"

"Suffer the ox to plough, and impute his death to age and Nature's

hand.

Let the sheep continue to yield us sheltering wool, and the goats

the produce of their loaded udders.

Banish from among you nets and snares and painful artifices,

Conspire no longer against the birds, nor scare the meek deer, nor

hide with fraud the crooked hook; ....

But let your mouths be empty of blood, and satisfied with pure and

natural repasts."[1]

[1] Imputed to Pythagoras.

COMPARATIVE TABLES

OF

Vegetable and Animal

FOODS.

The Golden Age Cook Book · 第 5 / 430 题