CXXX. CHARACTER OF WASHINGTON. (440)

Jared Sparks, 1789-1866, was born at Willington, Connecticut, and

graduated at Harvard in 1815. He was tutor in the University for two

years, and in 1819 was ordained pastor of the Unitarian Church in

Baltimore. In 1823 he returned to Boston, purchased the "North American

Review," and was its sole editor for seven years. From 1839 to 1849 he was

Professor in Harvard, and for the next three years was President of the

University. Mr. Sparks has written extensively on American history and

biography, including the lives of Washington and Franklin. He collected

the materials for his biographies with great care, and wrought them up

with much skill.

###

The person of Washington was commanding, graceful, and fitly proportioned;

his stature six feet, his chest broad and full, his limbs long and

somewhat slender, but well-shaped and muscular. His features were regular

and symmetrical, his eyes of a light blue color, and his whole

countenance, in its quiet state, was grave, placid, and benignant. When

alone, or not engaged in conversation, he appeared sedate and thoughtful;

but when his attention was excited, his eye kindled quickly, and his face

beamed with animation and intelligence.

He was not fluent in speech, but what he said was apposite, and listened

to with the more interest as being known to come from the heart. He seldom

attempted sallies of wit or humor, but no man received more pleasure from

an exhibition of them by others; and, although contented in seclusion, he

sought his chief happiness in society, and participated with delight in

all its rational and innocent amusements. Without austerity on the one

hand, or an appearance of condescending familiarity on the other, he was

affable, courteous, and cheerful; but it has often been remarked that

there was a dignity in his person and manner not easy to be defined, which

impressed everyone that saw him for the first time with an instinctive

deference and awe. This may have arisen, in part, from a conviction of his

superiority, as well as from the effect produced by his external form and

deportment.

The character of his mind was unfolded in the public and private acts of

his life; and the proofs of his greatness are seen almost as much in the

one as the other. The same qualities which raised him to the ascendency he

possessed over the will of a nation, as the commander of armies and chief

magistrate, caused him to be loved and respected as an individual. Wisdom,

judgment, prudence, and firmness were his predominant traits. No man ever

saw more clearly the relative importance of things and actions, or

divested himself more entirely of the bias of personal interest,

partiality, and prejudice, in discriminating between the true and the

false, the right and the wrong, in all questions and subjects that were

presented to him. He deliberated slowly, but decided surely; and when his

decision was once formed he seldom reversed it, and never relaxed from the

execution of a measure till it was completed. Courage, physical and moral,

was a part of his nature; and, whether in battle, or in the midst of

popular excitement, he was fearless of danger, and regardless of

consequences to himself.

His ambition was of that noble kind which aims to excel in whatever it

undertakes, and to acquire a power over the hearts of men by promoting

their happiness and winning their affections. Sensitive to the approbation

of others, and solicitous to deserve it, he made no concessions to gain

their applause, either by flattering their vanity or yielding to their

caprices. Cautious without timidity, bold without rashness, cool in

counsel, deliberate but firm in action, clear in foresight, patient under

reverses, steady, persevering, and self-possessed, he met and conquered

every obstacle that obstructed his path to honor, renown and success. More

confident in the uprightness of his intention than in his resources, he

sought knowledge and advice from other men. He chose his counselors with

unerring sagacity; and his quick perception of the soundness of an

opinion, and of the strong points in an argument, enabled him to draw to

his aid the best fruits of their talents, and the light of their collected

wisdom.

His moral qualities were in perfect harmony with those of his intellect.

Duty was the ruling principle of his conduct; and the rare endowments of

his understanding were not more constantly tasked to devise the best

methods of effecting an object, than they were to guard the sanctity of

conscience. No instance can be adduced in which he was actuated by a

sinister motive or endeavored to attain an end by unworthy means. Truth,

integrity, and justice were deeply rooted in his mind; and nothing could

rouse his indignation so soon, or so utterly destroy his confidence, as

the discovery of the want of these virtues in anyone whom he had trusted.

Weaknesses, follies, indiscretions be could forgive; but subterfuge and

dishonesty he never forgot, rarely pardoned.

He was candid and sincere, true to his friends, and faithful to all;

neither practicing dissimulation, descending to artifice, nor holding out

expectations which he did not intend should be realized. His passions were

strong, and sometimes they broke out with vehemence: but he had the power

of checking them in an instant. Perhaps self-control was the most

remarkable trait of his character. It was, in part, the effect of

discipline; yet he seems by nature to have possessed this power in a

degree which has been denied to other men.

A Christian in faith and practice, he was habitually devout. His reverence

for religion is seen in his example, his public communications, and his

private writings. He uniformly ascribed his successes to the beneficent

agency of the Supreme Being. Charitable and humane, he was liberal to the

poor, and kind to those in distress. As a husband, son, and brother, he

was tender and affectionate. Without vanity, ostentation, or pride, he

never spoke of himself or his actions unless required by circumstances

which concerned the public interests.

As he was free from envy, so he had the good fortune to escape the envy of

others by standing on an elevation which none could hope to attain. If he

had one passion more strong than another it was love of his country. The

purity and ardor of his patriotism were commensurate with the greatness of

its object. Love of country in him was invested with the sacred obligation

of a duty; and from the faithful discharge of this duty he never swerved

for a moment, either in thought or deed, through the whole period of his

eventful career.

Such are some of the traits in the character of Washington, which have

acquired for him the love and veneration of mankind. If they are not

marked with the brilliancy, extravagance, and eccentricity, which, in

other men, have excited the astonishment of the world, so neither are they

tarnished by the follies, nor disgraced by the crimes of those men. It is

the happy combination of rare talents and qualities, the harmonious union

of the intellectual and moral powers, rather than the dazzling splendor of

any one trait, which constitute the grandeur of his character. If the

title of great man ought to be reserved for him who can not be charged

with an indiscretion or a vice; who spent his life in establishing the

independence, the glory, and durable prosperity of his country; who

succeeded in all that he undertook; and whose successes were never won at

the expense of honor, justice, integrity, or by the sacrifice of a single

principle,--this title will not be denied to Washington.

How sweetly on the ear such echoes sound!

While the mere victors may appall or stun

The servile and the vain, such names will be

A watchword till the future shall be free.

--Byron.

McGuffey's Sixth Eclectic Reader · 第 366 / 374 题