LXXXVI. AN EVENING ADVENTURE. (315)

Not long since, a gentleman was traveling in one of the counties of

Virginia, and about the close of the day stopped at a public house to

obtain refreshment and spend the night. He had been there but a short

time, before an old man alighted from his gig, with the apparent intention

of becoming his fellow guest at the same house.

As the old man drove up, he observed that both the shafts of his gig were

broken, and that they were held together by withes, formed from the bark

of a hickory sapling. Our traveler observed further that he was plainly

clad, that his knee buckles were loosened, and that something like

negligence pervaded his dress. Conceiving him to be one of the honest

yeomanry of our land, the courtesies of strangers passed between them, and

they entered the tavern. It was about the same time, that an addition of

three or four young gentlemen was made to their number; most, if not all

of them, of the legal profession.

As soon as they became conveniently accommodated, the conversation was

turned, by one of the latter, upon the eloquent harangue which had that

day been displayed at the bar. It was replied by the other that he had

witnessed, the same day, a degree of eloquence no doubt equal, but it was

from the pulpit. Something like a sarcastic rejoinder was made as to the

eloquence of the pulpit, and a warm and able altercation ensued, in which

the merits of the Christian religion became the subject of discussion.

From six o'clock until eleven, the young champions wielded the sword of

argument, adducing with ingenuity and ability everything that could be

said pro and con.

During this protracted period, the old gentleman listened with the

meekness and modesty of a child, as if he were adding new information to

the stores of his own mind; or perhaps he was observing, with a

philosophic eye, the faculties of the youthful mind, and how new energies

are evolved by repeated action; or perhaps, with patriotic emotion, he was

reflecting upon the future destinies of his country, and on the rising

generation, upon whom those future destinies must devolve; or, most

probably, with a sentiment of moral and religious feeling, he was

collecting an argument which no art would be "able to elude, and no force

to resist." Our traveler remained a spectator, and took no part in what

was said.

At last one of the young men, remarking that it was impossible to combat

with long and established prejudices, wheeled around, and with some

familiarity exclaimed, "Well, my old gentleman, what think you of these

things?" "If," said the traveler, "a streak of vivid lightning had at that

moment crossed the room, their amazement could not have been greater than

it was from what followed." The most eloquent and unanswerable appeal that

he had ever heard or read, was made for nearly an hour by the old

gentleman. So perfect was his recollection, that every argument urged

against the Christian religion was met in the order in which it was

advanced. Hume's sophistry on the subject of miracles, was, if possible,

more perfectly answered than it had already been done by Campbell. And in

the whole lecture there was so much simplicity and energy, pathos and

sublimity, that not another word was uttered.

"An attempt to describe it," said the traveler, "would be an attempt to

paint the sunbeams." It was now a matter of curiosity and inquiry who the

old gentleman was. The traveler concluded that it was the preacher from

whom the pulpit eloquence was heard; but no, it was John Marshall, the

Chief Justice of the United States.

NOTES.--David Hume (b. 1711, d. 1776) was a celebrated Scotch historian

and essayist. His most important work is "The History of England." He was

a skeptic in matters of religion, and was a peculiarly subtle writer.

George Campbell (b. 1719, d. 1796) was a distinguished Scotch minister. He

wrote "A Dissertation on Miracles," ably answering Hume's "Essay on

Miracles."

John Marshall (b. 1755, d. 1835) was Chief Justice of the United States

from 1801 until his death. He was an eminent jurist, and wrote a "Life of

Washington," which made him famous as an author.

McGuffey's Sixth Eclectic Reader · 第 317 / 374 题