So they are; but those ways hold more than the visible shades. The

warehouses of that meandering chasm which is Wapping High Street are

like weathered and unequal cliffs. It is hard to believe sunlight ever

falls there. It could not get down. It is not easy to believe the river

is near. It seldom shows. You think at times you hear the distant call

of a ship. But what would that be? Something in the mind. It happened

long ago. You, too, are a ghost left by the vanished past. There is a

man above at a high loophole, the topmost cave of a warehouse which

you can see has been exposed to commerce and the elements for ages; he

pulls in a bale pendulous from the cable of a derrick. Below him one

of the horses of a van tosses its nosebag. There is no other movement.

A carman leans against an iron post, and cuts bread and cheese with a

clasp knife. It was curious to hear that steamer call, but we know what

it was. It was from a ship that went down, we have lately heard, in the

war, and her spectre reminds us, from a voyage which is over, of men

who have gone. But the call comes again just where the Stairs, like a

shining wedge of day, holds the black warehouses asunder, and shows the

light of the river and a release to the outer world. And there, moving

swiftly across the brightness, goes a steamer outward bound.

That was what we wanted to know. She confirms it, and her signal,

to whomever it was made, carries farther than she would guess. It

is understood. The past for some of us now is our only populous and

habitable world, invisible to others, but alive with whispers for us.

Yet the sea still moves daily along the old foreshore, and ships still

go and come, and do not, like us, run aground on what now is not there.

OF PROSE

A FRAGMENT[30]

[30] Translated from the Dutch by Alexander Teixeira de

Mattos.

By LODEWIJK VAN DEIJSSEL

I love the prose that comes towards me like a man, with sparkling eyes,

with a loud voice, breathing hard and with great gestures of the hands.

I want to hear the writer laugh and cry in it, to hear him whisper and

shout, to feel him sigh and pant. I want his language to loom up before

me like a tangible and resounding organism; I want him, when I read him

in my room, to reveal to me, from the characters that shimmer before my

eyes, a spirit that enters into me and seems to ascend within me from

out of his pages.

I love the prose that comes rolling up from the infinity of the

artist's soul, like a sea of sound, flowing calmly with its wide

waves, drawing nearer, nearer, ever nearer, smooth and broad, suddenly

illumined by intense gleams of light.

I love the prose that clashes towards me, rushes up to me, thunders

down upon me in a raging torrent of passion.

I love the prose that is motionless and awful as mountain ridges.

I love the prose that plays and rejoices like a waving forest filled

with birds in summer.

I love the prose which I see standing there before me, with its

sentences, like a city of marble.

I love the prose that descends upon me like a golden shower of words.

I love the sentences that march like troops of broad-backed men,

walking abreast, shoulder to shoulder, following one on the other

in ever-widening ranks, up hill, down dale, with the tramp of their

footsteps and the heavy movement of their strides. I love sentences

that sound like voices underground, but come rising, rising, louder and

in greater numbers, and pass and rise and ring and echo in the heavens.

I love words that arrive suddenly, as though from very far, shooting

forth in golden brilliancy from a rift in the blue sky, or toppling

high in the air, like dark rocks discharged from a straining volcano.

I love words that bang down upon me like falling rafters, or words that

hiss past me like bullets.

I love words which I see standing there unexpectedly, like poppies or

blue cornflowers in a field.

I love words that suddenly waft a perfume to me from the course of

the style, like incense from a church-door or scent from a woman's

handkerchief in the street.

I love words that in a moment rise softly, like a child's murmuring

voice, from under the droning style.

I love words that just gurgle, like little stifled sobs.

I love the prose that blazes its joy and its rapture like stars above

me, that lights glowing suns of love, that carries me over the thin

ice of its disdain, through the rough black nights of its hatred,

that clangs down upon me the green, copper voice of its irony and its

laughter.

If you would please me, then stretch over my head a rainbow of language

in which I shall see red anger raging, blue gladness rejoicing and

yellow mockery laughing.

Take me up and carry me where you will: I crave for nothing more than

to be powerless against the power of your Word.

Strike me with your Word, torture me with your Word and then let your

Word fall down upon me like a rain of kisses....

HENRY JAMES

By EDMUND GOSSE, C.B.

I

Voluminous as had been the writings of Henry James[31] since 1875,

it was not until he approached the end of his career that he began

to throw any light on the practical events and social adventures

of his own life. He had occasionally shown that he could turn from

the psychology of imaginary characters to the record of real lives

without losing any part of his delicate penetration or his charm of

portraiture. He had, in particular, written the _Life of Hawthorne_

in 1879, between _Daisy Miller_ and _An International Episode_; and

again in 1903, at the height of his latest period, he had produced

a specimen of that period in his elusive and parenthetical but very

beautiful so-called _Life of W. W. Story_. But these biographies threw

no more light upon his own adventures than did his successive volumes

of critical and topographical essays, in which the reader may seek long

before he detects the sparkle of a crumb of personal fact. Henry James,

at the age of seventy, had not begun to reveal himself behind the mask

which spoke in the tones of a world of imaginary characters.

[31] Messrs. Macmillan are about to publish Mr. Lubbock's

edition of James's Letters.

So saying, I do not forget that in the general edition of his

collected, or rather selected, novels and tales, published from

1908 onwards, Henry James prefixed to each volume an introduction

which assumed to be wholly biographical. He yielded, he said, "to

the pleasure of placing on record the circumstances" in which each

successive tale was written. I well recollect the terms in which he

spoke of these prefaces before he began to write them. They were to be

full and confidential, they were to throw to the winds all restraints

of conventional reticence, they were to take us, with eyes unbandaged,

into the inmost sanctum of his soul. They appeared at last, in small

print, and they were extremely extensive, but truth obliges me to

say that I found them highly disappointing. Constitutionally fitted

to take pleasure in the accent of almost everything that Henry James

ever wrote, I have to confess that these prefaces constantly baffle my

eagerness. Not for a moment would I deny that they throw interesting

light on the technical craft of a self-respecting novelist, but they

are dry, remote, and impersonal to a strange degree. It is as though

the author felt a burning desire to confide in the reader, whom he

positively button-holes in the endeavour, but that the experience

itself evades him, fails to find expression, and falls still-born,

while other matters, less personal and less important, press in and

take their place against the author's wish. Henry James proposed, in

each instance, to disclose "the contributive value of the accessory

facts in a given artistic case." This is, indeed, what we require

in the history or the autobiography of an artist, whether painter

or musician or man of letters. But this includes the production of

anecdotes, of salient facts, of direct historical statements, which

Henry James seemed in 1908 to be completely incapacitated from giving,

so that really, in the introductions to some of these novels in the

Collected Edition, it is difficult to know what the beloved novelist

is endeavouring to divulge. He becomes almost chimæra bombinating in a

vacuum.

Had we lost him soon after the appearance of the latest of these

prefaces--that prefixed to _The Golden Bowl_, in which the effort to

reveal something which is not revealed amounts almost to an agony--it

would have been impossible to reconstruct the life of Henry James

by the closest examination of his published writings. Ingenious

commentators would have pieced together conjectures from such tales

as _The Altar of the Dead_ and _The Lesson of the Master_, and have

insisted, more or less plausibly, on their accordance with what the

author _must_ have thought or done, endured or attempted. But, after

all, these would have been "conjectures," not more definitely based

than what bold spirits use when they construct lives of Shakespeare,

or, for that matter, of Homer. Fortunately, in 1913, the desire to

place some particulars of the career of his marvellous brother William

in the setting of his "immediate native and domestic air," led Henry

James to contemplate, with minuteness, the fading memories of his own

childhood. Starting with a biographical study of William James, he

found it impossible to treat the family development at all adequately

without extending the survey to his own growth as well, and thus,

at the age of seventy, Henry became for the first time, and almost

unconsciously, an autobiographer.

He had completed two large volumes of _Memories_, and was deep in a

third, when death took him from us. _A Small Boy and Others_ deals

with such extreme discursiveness as is suitable in a collection of

the fleeting impressions of infancy, from his birth in 1843 to his

all but fatal attack of typhus fever at Boulogne-sur-Mer in (perhaps)

1857. I say "perhaps" because the wanton evasion of any sort of help

in the way of dates is characteristic of the narrative, as it would

be of childish memories. The next instalment was _Notes of a Son and

Brother_, which opens in 1860, a doubtful period of three years being

leaped over lightly, and closes--as I guess from an allusion to George

Eliot's _Spanish Gypsy_--in 1868. The third instalment, dictated in

the autumn of 1914 and laid aside unfinished, is the posthumous _The

Middle Years_, faultlessly edited by the piety of Mr. Percy Lubbock in

1917. Here the tale is taken up in 1869, and is occupied, without much

attempt at chronological order, with memories of two years in London.

As Henry James did not revise, or perhaps even re-read, these pages,

we are free to form our conclusion as to whether he would or would not

have vouchsafed to put their disjected parts into some more anatomical

order.

Probably he would not have done so. The tendency of his genius had

never been, and at the end was less than ever, in the direction of

concinnity. He repudiated arrangement, he wilfully neglected the

precise adjustment of parts. The three autobiographical volumes will

always be documents precious in the eyes of his admirers. They are

full of beauty and nobility, they exhibit with delicacy, and sometimes

even with splendour, the qualities of his character. But it would be

absurd to speak of them as easy to read, or as fulfilling what is

demanded from an ordinary biographer. They have the tone of Veronese,

but nothing of his definition. A broad canvas is spread before us,

containing many figures in social conjuncture. But the plot, the single

"story" which is being told, is drowned in misty radiance. Out of this

_chiaroscuro_ there leap suddenly to our vision a sumptuous head and

throat, a handful of roses, the glitter of a satin sleeve, but it is

only when we shut our eyes and think over what we have looked at that

any coherent plan is revealed to us, or that we detect any species of

composition. It is a case which calls for editorial help, and I hope

that when the three fragments of autobiography are reprinted as a

single composition, no prudery of hesitation to touch the sacred ark

will prevent the editor from prefixing a skeleton chronicle of actual

dates and facts. It will take nothing from the dignity of the luminous

reveries in their original shape.

Such a skeleton will tell us that Henry James was born at 2 Washington

Place, New York, on April 15th, 1843, and that he was the second

child of his parents, the elder by one year being William, who grew

up to be the most eminent philosopher whom America has produced.

Their father, Henry James the elder, was himself a philosopher, whose

ideas, which the younger Henry frankly admitted to be beyond his

grasp, were expounded by William James in 1884, in a preface to their

father's posthumous papers. Henry was only one year old when the family

paid a long visit to Paris, but his earliest recollections were of

Albany, whence the Jameses migrated to New York until 1855. They then

transferred their home to Europe for three years, during which time the

child Henry imbibed what he afterwards called "the European virus." In

1855 he was sent to Geneva for purposes of education, which were soon

abandoned, and the whole family began an aimless wandering through

London, Paris, Boulogne-sur-Mer, Newport, Geneva, and America again,

nothing but the Civil War sufficing to root this fugitive household in

one abiding home.

Henry James's health forced him to be a spectator of the war, in which

his younger brothers fought. He went to Harvard in 1862 to study

law, but was now beginning to feel a more and more irresistible call

to take up letters as a profession, and the Harvard Law School left

little or no direct impression upon him. He formed a close and valuable

friendship with Mr. Howells, seven years his senior, and the pages

of the _Atlantic Monthly_, of which Mr. Howells was then assistant

editor, were open to him from 1865. He lived for the next four years

in very poor health, and with no great encouragement from himself or

others, always excepting Mr. Howells, at Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Early in 1869 he ventured to return to Europe, where he spent fifteen

months in elegant but fruitful vagabondage. There was much literary

work done, most of which he carefully suppressed in later life. The

reader will, however, discover, tucked away in the thirteenth volume

of the Collected Edition, a single waif from this rejected epoch, the

tale called _A Passionate Pilgrim_, written on his return to America

in 1870. This visit to Europe absolutely determined his situation; his

arrival in New York stimulated and tortured his nostalgia for the old

world, and in May, 1872, he flew back here once more to the European

enchantment.

Here, practically, the biographical information respecting Henry

James which has hitherto been given to the world ceases, for the

fragment of _The Middle Years_, so far as can be gathered, contains

few recollections which can be dated later than his thirtieth year.

It was said of Marivaux that he cultivated no faculty but that _de ne

vivre que pour voir et pour entendre_. In a similar spirit Henry James

took up his dwelling in fashionable London lodgings in March, 1869.

He had come from America with the settled design of making a profound

study of English manners, and there were two aspects of the subject

which stood out for him above all others. One of these was the rural

beauty of ancient country places, the other was the magnitude--"the

inconceivable immensity," as he put it--of London. He told his sister,

"The place sits on you, broods on you, stamps on you with the feet

of its myriad bipeds and quadrupeds." From his lodgings in Half Moon

Street, quiet enough in themselves, he had the turmoil of the West End

at his elbow, Piccadilly, Park Lane, St. James's Street, all within

the range of a five minutes' stroll. He plunged into the vortex with

incredible gusto, "knocking about in a quiet way and deeply enjoying my

little adventures." This was his first mature experience of London, of

which he remained until the end of his life perhaps the most infatuated

student, the most "passionate pilgrim" that America has ever sent us.

But his health was still poor, and for his constitution's sake he

went in the summer of 1869 to Great Malvern. He went alone, and it is

to be remarked of him that, social as he was, and inclined to a deep

indulgence in the company of his friends, his habit of life was always

in the main a solitary one. He had no constant associates, and he did

not shrink from long periods of isolation, which he spent in reading

and writing, but also in a concentrated contemplation of the passing

scene, whatever it might be. It was alone that he now made a tour of

the principal English cathedral and university towns, expatiating to

himself on the perfection of the weather--"the dozen exquisite days of

the English year, days stamped with a purity unknown in climates where

fine weather is cheap." It was alone that he made acquaintance with

Oxford, of which city he became at once the impassioned lover which he

continued to be to the end, raving from Boston in 1870 of the supreme

gratifications of Oxford as "the most dignified and most educated" of

the cradles of our race. It was alone that during these enchanting

weeks he made himself acquainted with the unimagined loveliness of

English hamlets buried in immemorial leafage and whispered to by

meandering rivulets in the warm recesses of antiquity. These, too,

found in Henry James a worshipper more ardent, it may almost be

averred, than any other who had crossed the Atlantic to their shrine.

Having formed this basis for the main predilection of his English

studies, Henry James passed over to the Continent, and conducted a

similar pilgrimage of entranced obsession through Switzerland and

Italy. His wanderings, "rapturous and solitary," were, as in England,

hampered by no social engagement; "I see no people to speak of," he

wrote, "or for that matter to speak to." He returned to America in

April, 1870, at the close of a year which proved critical in his

career, and which laid its stamp on the whole of his future work. He

had been kindly received in artistic and literary circles in London;

he had conversed with Ruskin, with William Morris, with Aubrey de

Vere, but it is plain that while he observed the peculiarities of

these eminent men with the closest avidity, he made no impression

whatever upon them. The time for Henry James to "make an impression"

on others was not come yet; he was simply the well-bred, rather shy,

young American invalid, with excellent introductions, who crossed the

path of English activities, almost without casting a shadow. He had

published no book; he had no distinct calling; he was a deprecating

and punctilious young stranger from somewhere in Massachusetts,

immature-looking for all his seven-and-twenty years.

Some further uneventful seasons, mainly spent in America but

diversified by tours in Germany and Italy, bring us to 1875, when

Henry James came over from Cambridge with the definite project, at

last, of staying in Europe "for good." He took rooms in Paris, at 29

Rue de Luxembourg, and he penetrated easily into the very exclusive

literary society which at that time revolved around Flaubert and Edmond

de Goncourt. This year in Paris was another highly critical period in

Henry James's intellectual history. He was still, at the mature age of

thirty-two, almost an amateur in literature, having been content, up to

that time, to produce scarcely anything which his mature taste did not

afterwards repudiate. _The Passionate Pilgrim_ (1870), of which I have

spoken above, is the only waif and stray of the pre-1873 years which he

has permitted to survive. The first edition of this short story is now

not easy of reference, and I have not seen it; the reprint of 1908 is

obviously, and is doubtless vigorously, re-handled. Enough, however,

remains of what must be original to show that, in a rather crude, and

indeed almost hysterical form, the qualities of Henry James's genius

were, in 1869, what they continued to be in 1909. He has conquered,

however, in _A Passionate Pilgrim_, no command yet over his enthusiasm,

his delicate sense of beauty, his apprehension of the exquisite colour

of antiquity.

From the French associates of this time he derived practical help

in his profession, though without their being aware of what they

gave him. He was warmly attracted to Gustave Flaubert, who had just

published _La Tentation de St. Antoine_, a dazzled admiration of

which was the excuse which threw the young American at the feet of

the Rouen giant. This particular admiration dwindled with the passage

of time, but Henry James continued faithful to the author of _Madame

Bovary_. It was Turgenev who introduced him to Flaubert, from whom he

passed to Guy de Maupassant, then an athlete of four-and-twenty, and

still scintillating in that blaze of juvenile virility which always

fascinated Henry James. In the train of Edmond de Goncourt came Zola,

vociferous over his late tribulation of having _L'Assommoir_ stopped in

its serial issue; Alphonse Daudet, whose recent _Jack_ was exercising

over tens of thousands of readers the tyranny of tears; and François

Coppée, the almost exact coeval of Henry James, and now author of a

_Luthier de Cremone_, which had placed him high among French poets.

That the young American, with no apparent claim to attention except

the laborious perfection of his French speech, was welcomed and

ultimately received on terms of intimacy in this the most exclusive of

European intellectual circles is curious. Henry James was accustomed to

deprecate the notion that these Frenchmen took the least interest in

him: "they have never read a line of me, they have never even persuaded

themselves that there was a line of me which anyone could read," he

once said to me. How should they, poor charming creatures, in their

self-sufficing Latin intensity, know what or whether some barbarian had

remotely "written"? But this does not end the marvel, because, read or

not read, there was Henry James among them, affectionately welcomed,

talked to familiarly about "technique," and even about "sales," like

a fellow-craftsman. There must evidently have developed by this time

something modestly "impressive" about him, and I cannot doubt that

these Parisian masters of language more or less dimly divined that he

too was, in some medium not by them to be penetrated, a master.

After this fruitful year in Paris, the first result of which was the

publication in London of his earliest surviving novel, _Roderick

Hudson_, and the completion of _The American_, Henry James left

his "glittering, charming, civilised Paris" and settled in London.

He submitted himself, as he wrote to his brother William in 1878,

"without reserve to that Londonising process of which the effect

is to convince you that, having lived here, you may, if need be,

abjure civilisation and bury yourself in the country, but may not,

in pursuit of civilisation, live in any smaller town." He plunged

deeply into the study of London, externally and socially, and into

the production of literature, in which he was now as steadily active

as he was elegantly proficient. These novels of his earliest period

have neither the profundity nor the originality of those of his middle

and final periods, but they have an exquisite freshness of their own,

and a workmanship the lucidity and logic of which he owed in no small

measure to his conversations with Daudet and Maupassant, and to his, at

that time almost exclusive, reading of the finest French fiction. He

published _The American_ in 1877, _The Europeans_ and _Daisy Miller_

in 1878, and _An International Episode_ in 1879. He might advance in

stature and breadth; he might come to disdain the exiguous beauty of

these comparatively juvenile books, but now at all events were clearly

revealed all the qualities which were to develop later, and to make

Henry James unique among writers of Anglo-Saxon race.

The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920 · 第 83 / 95 段