The best argument of all, however, amongst those making for a

connection with the indigenous culture is derived from the study of

a remarkable bird-cult which it is a chief triumph of the expedition

to have rescued from oblivion. Not only can it be thus shown to the

point of demonstration that the rock-carvings occurring in a deserted

village of stone houses on the south-western headland of the island

represent the annual "bird-man" who got the first egg of a sacred

bird, and so became himself highly sacred; but it can also be made a

probable corollary that the statues of the image-mountain are memorials

of bird-men, since it was close by that the bird-man must abide in

strict seclusion for the five months in which his sacredness was at

its height. Indeed, many are the clues which are afforded by a close

examination of this curious custom. Thus it seems certain that the

present cult which centres round the Sooty Tern is derived from the

worship of the Frigate Bird as practised in far-off Melanesia. The

Frigate Bird, too, seems to have suggested various symbols belonging to

the script. The inference is that there is a Melanesian stratum in the

population; though, as a Polynesian immigration must also be assumed

in order to account for the language, responsibility for the culture

as a whole must somehow be divided between the two parties. All these

difficult questions, we fear, cannot be thrashed out within the limits

of a brief review. Yet perhaps enough has been said to induce every

student of the wider history of man not to miss a golden opportunity of

learning that anthropology and romance are sisters.

SCIENCE

SOME WONDERS OF MATTER. By the RIGHT REVEREND J. E. MERCER. Society

for Promoting Christian Knowledge. 5_s._ net.

CHEMISTRY AND ITS MYSTERIES. By CHARLES R. GIBSON. Seely, Service &

Co. 5_s._ net.

THE REALITIES OF MODERN SCIENCE. By JOHN MILLS. The Macmillan

Company. 10_s._ 6_d._ net.

England has a high tradition in books on popular science. Men like

Faraday and Tyndall did not consider it beneath them to write for

children and laymen, and their books on the elementary facts of science

are models of their kind. Strangely enough--or naturally enough--the

best expositors of the elements of a science are, in general, those

who have themselves contributed to the advances of that science, while

those who are professedly popularisers present the subject not only

less correctly and logically but also less simply and pleasantly. The

books before us confirm this opinion.

Mr. Gibson is a practised hand at writing books for children, the

volume before us being the sixth of a series. He has the merit that

he attempts to bring before the reader the experimental basis of the

science of chemistry and some of its historical aspects, and does

not make a series of dogmatic statements without reference to the

researches on which they rest, as does Bishop Mercer. He describes many

experiments, and gives diagrams to illustrate them. The book covers a

wide field of interesting and, for the most part, elementary chemical

phenomena. The chief fault which we have to find is with the style in

which it is written. We find the imaginary questions put to the writer

by boys and girls distinguished as big, little, facially peculiar, and

so on, irritating, and we very much doubt if his patronising manner

will find favour with most boys, who, we believe, prefer to be treated

as friends who happen not to know. We do not pretend to Mr. Gibson's

knowledge of children, but base our criticism on the fact that Faraday

and most of his successors at the Royal Institution have managed to

interest and instruct their juvenile audiences without this painfully

evident condescension.

Bishop Mercer's method of striving to excite the wonder of his young

readers is based upon a liberal use of notes of exclamation (seldom

less than three on a page, and sometimes three together, for extra

effect) and of the words "wonder" and "wonderful," together with the

constant citation of very large numbers, which fill him with awe--"A

million is bad enough with its six cyphers. But eighteen of them--that

is awful--it is a million million million!" The machinery of nature,

as revealed by modern science, does not impress him as do these rows

of cyphers. If there were any serious attempt to show how they have

been arrived at we should think more highly of the educational value of

the book. As it is, the information is often incorrect on quite simple

matters--water does _not_ occupy "exactly" (or approximately) "the same

space as before" after sugar has been added to it; hydrogen is not

often regarded, in these days when it has been solidified, as a metal.

Often the book is most misleading, as in the description of how the

author saw a man's ribs by X-rays when the "machine" was put the other

side of the man in question. No mention is made of any phosphorescent

screen, and the inexperienced reader is led to infer by the analogy

given that he actually saw through the man. The style is vague and

slipshod in the extreme, a typical sentence being, "The elasticity of

the atoms is so perfect that they always bang about just the same."

We will not criticise the Bishop's theology, or his philosophy, which

insists that "what you really see is not the matter of the tree, but

the ether-quiverings which that matter throws off." We will, however,

take it upon ourselves to suggest that, if he should decide to write

another book on elementary science, he should model himself rather upon

Faraday's "Lectures Upon the Physical Forces" than upon an American

temperance lecture.

Mr. Mills' book on _The Realities of Modern Science_ is in a different

class from the two already noticed, and is intended for adult readers.

It gives a sketch of modern conceptions of the composition of matter,

the electron theory, and the recent experimental work on the magnitude

of molecules and electrons. The early chapters of the book are devoted

to a very brief but excellent treatment of certain aspects of the

history of physical science. A great merit of the book is that it

devotes particular attention to the recent important advances in

molecular physics, which are neither yet included in the text-books nor

easily available in popular form. We may mention especially the work of

Millikan on the electronic charge, that of the Braggs and Moseley on

X-ray spectra, and the photographs taken by C. T. R. Wilson (whose name

is not, however, mentioned) of the paths of α {a} and β {b} particles

and of X-rays. The style is simple and sober, and the author, who hails

from the research laboratories of the Western Electric Company, wisely

leaves the results which he describes to produce their own impression.

The book is, of course, written for more advanced readers than the

others here noticed, but, all the same, an intelligent schoolboy with a

smattering of scientific knowledge would, in all probability, prefer it

to the books written expressly for his benefit. The adult reader is not

likely to find a better presentation of the more striking aspects of

modern physics.

BOOK-PRODUCTION NOTES

By J. H. MASON

Last month, in laying down the chief matters to be considered in

producing a satisfactory book, I began with type. And as if the subject

were in the air, as it were in solution, I find it precipitated in the

form of an important article in the pages of the _Saturday Review_. An

illustrated article, too, with specimens of the chief types referred

to. This is all to the good; if this example is followed by other

literary journals we shall soon form a right opinion in the lay public

on what is a good type. The appearance of our books will be improved,

the offensive advertisement--I am speaking typographically--will lose

its vulgarity, and public lettering in posters, shop names, and street

signs will reflect the improvement.

* * * * *

It is interesting to note that my view on the importance of the work

of the private presses is also confirmed by the article referred to,

and that their work is beginning to influence the typefounders, however

tardily.

* * * * *

It is quite frequently said that it costs no more to print from good

type than from bad. We might go further in the case of certain bad

types and say that their use sends up the cost of printing. For when

"modern" type of the extreme form is used, as De Vinne pointed out,

their hair-lines are soon battered by any inequality in the paper and

print imperfectly, or involve a loss of time in changing the damaged

letters. The attempt to emulate the hair-line of the engraver of plate

lettering is altogether misplaced in relief or letterpress printing.

* * * * *

The Victorian greyness of page led some printers and publishers to

resort to the use of heavier type to give their pages a richer black.

But almost all the heavier types at their disposal had been designed

for display lines in advertisements, and went too far in the thickening

of the line. Even Morris's "Golden" type, excellent as it is in his

use of it, is too heavy to be adopted as the staple type-face of our

printing.

* * * * *

Not till quite recently have type-faces of the right weight for

bookwork been designed and placed on the general market. The work of

the American Goudy, the type cut by Mr. Prince (who cut the punches

for the Kelmscott, the Doves, and other celebrated founts) for Messrs.

Shanks and christened "Dolphin," and some of the modern versions of

Venetian founts are pretty satisfactory and generally available.

* * * * *

With the exception of the Monotype Company, who designed an excellent

modified "old style" type for the "Imprint," the composing machines

that produce our newspapers, journals, and a large proportion of our

books have repeated the stock designs originally made for movable

or hand-set type. It is very desirable that they should not limit

themselves to these, and the instance mentioned above is a most

encouraging one to follow up.

* * * * *

The _Studio_ has just issued a special number dealing with modern

woodcuts and lithographs--British and French. This is the first

attempt to collect representative work of modern artists who practise

wood-cutting. The revival of the woodcut in book illustration demands

special discussion. This will form the subject of next month's Notes à

propos of the _Studio_ Woodcut Number.

A LETTER FROM FRANCE

THE FRENCH POETRY OF TO-DAY

_Paris, December, 1919_

French poetry has not been renewed since the Symbolist Movement by any

new and powerfully original poet. Besides, the Symbolist Movement is

not finished, and it is in its spirit, in its influence, in its metric,

that our poetry still lives to-day. The majority of the best French

poets have passed the age of forty and come from Symbolist circles.

The influence of the four Symbolist masters, of after 1870, Rimbaud,

Laforgue, Mallarmé, and Verlaine, is still visible. A sleeper, like

Wells's character, who fell asleep in 1898 and woke up twenty years

afterwards, would find poetry much as he left it and with the same

essential names.

He would see only that a reign has ended and that another head wears

the crown on the coinage; but this by itself is not in the ordinary way

a capital event. In his time the name of the prince of the poets was

Mallarmé. To-day his name is Paul Fort; and it is very obvious that

there is hardly any resemblance between the two. But our sleeper would

very well remember having known Paul Fort at the Thursdays in the rue

de Rome and in the _Mercure_, and having once read five or six volumes

of _Ballades_, among them what was perhaps the poet's masterpiece, the

astonishing _Roman de Louis XI_. The prince has nothing absolutely

novel to show except his crown.

The sleeper would then ask news of the prince who reigned in his time,

and would learn that in the year when he closed his eyes for twenty

years Mallarmé closed them for ever.

One of the numerous surprises of the war was the sudden return of the

purest and most authentic of the disciples of Mallarmé, M. Paul Valéry,

to the poetry which he had abandoned for twenty years. M. Valéry then

produced that admirable pendant to Mallarmé's _Hérodiade_ which is

called _La Jeune Parque_, and he published in reviews a few poems that

connoisseurs cut out and keep jealously as once they did the sonnets of

Hérédia. The volume, which will doubtless appear in a short time, will

be published by the _Nouvelle Revue Française_, and will be a jewel

of the same kind as the poems of Mallarmé, and will make the second

peak of a double snow-covered Parnassus. Another disciple of Mallarmé,

M. Jean Royère, has published a collection of poems, _Par la lumière

peints_, that the master of Valvins would have loved. One finds in them

a curious contrast between a somewhat cold and Parnassian form and a

beautiful mobility of images which change without ceasing one into the

other.

The sleeper, happy to see that the spirit of Mallarmé is still alive,

would ask news of the two poets who were in 1898 the leaders of the

Symbolist school, M. Henri de Régnier and M. Viélé Griffin. "They

still make an honourable figure," we should answer, "but the twenty

years during which you have been asleep have not added much to what is

essential to their work. In 1898 they had already written all their

most beautiful verses, those that your generation knew by heart, which

made indeed two original visions of the world."

"I remember, also," the sleeper would continue, "two other poets who

were frequently named together and who, if they did not resemble one

another in their inspirations, resembled one another in their life

apart and their solitary work. One of them lived in a little town of

the Pyrenees, and painted there with a naive fervour like that of

Francis of Assisi, and also with the irony of a shrewd observer, the

things and the faces of his quiet life, the animals and the people

of his small countryside. This was Francis Jammes. The other had

made at the age of eighteen or twenty two tragic masks shining with

genius, _Tête d'or_ and _La Ville_. Then he went as consul to China and

elsewhere. We received sometimes from him strange things, printed at

Fou-Tcheou by a widow named Rosario. This was Paul Claudel. Are they

still of this world?" "Of this poetical world and of another world

still: these are to-day our two great Catholic poets. These in the last

twenty years have, all the same, produced new works that you could not

have looked for in 1898. But they also belong to the generation that

you knew, and all of Claudel was already potentially in _Tête d'or_, as

all of Jammes was potentially in the trilogy of the _Poète_."

"Am I myself," the sleeper will ask, "an image of this poetry?

Has it, like me, been asleep for twenty years or repeating itself

indefinitely?" "Not altogether, but it has added nothing essential,

except this little in Claudel and Jammes, to what was germinating

or flourishing in the garden of 1898." "I understand. You must have

been for twenty years one of these happy people who have no history.

France has lived peaceful days. And this united and undisturbed life

has proved favourable to the continuity of the poetic routine?" "Not

at all, O Epimenides. You went to sleep precisely when France was

beginning the Dreyfus affair, which was a famous earthquake, and you

wake at the moment when we are emerging from a world-wide war which has

killed a dozen million men on our planet, and which has given to Europe

the appearance you can see here, on the wall, on this map." "And all

this has not yet produced any new poets? And, in 1919, when my eyes

open again to the light, you send me back where I was in 1898, you give

me again all my old poets and none but them, and the great news is that

Mallarmé's workshop is open again, that the attention of the poetical

world is hung on the new _Hérodiade_, which M. Valéry is exhibiting

there! That is a stupefying thing which is enough to wake up a sleeper,

which might even wake up a dead man!"

"Well, my dear sir, poetry has its own logic. The war has, we know,

been favourable for those who trade in iron; learn also that it has

been an age of gold for those who trade in diamonds. It has pleased us

to hold in our hands the diamonds of former times. But be reassured.

The war has sometimes brought into the poetic light a kind of iron

which is not without beauty. We have had true war poets. The _Hymns_

of Joachim Gasquet make a superb book. He is certainly not attached to

the Symbolist Movement. Gasquet is a southerner, a classic, a man with

sonorous lungs, with an unquenchable abundance of oratory. The book of

this poet from Aix seems as though it were written by a Mirabeau of the

trenches."

"But in 1898 I knew Gasquet pretty well, I read his verses. They

resembled most closely those of Emmanuel Signoret, and they were very

beautiful. Can you only quote to me these ghosts of my own time? Are

there, then, no young men?"

"Here are the poems of Henri Ghéon, delicate in their harmony, pure in

their emotion, _Foi en la France_."

"I remember Ghéon very well."

"The devil! I forgot that he also was of the group of 1898. All the

same, here are some that will be new to you. Here is _Europe_, by Jules

Romains, in which we find again the powerful and vigorous poet of the

_Vie Unanime_.

"Here is a charming little book which Louis de Gonzague-Frick wrote

in pencil on his military postcards: it is called _Sous le Bélier de

Mars_. In that book we find again the succulence and verve of Laurent

Tailhade. And you will find them again, in a different form, in Fernand

Fleuret's _Falourdin_. It is a pity that Georges Duhamel has written

nothing during the war except some admirable books of prose; but that

will not prevent me reminding you of his earlier, beautiful poems in

_Compagnons_. You would also like Charles Vildrac's _Livre d'Amour_.

You should certainly also read the poems, sometimes rather awkward

but very original and robust, that Jules Supervieille wrote in South

America. And as dessert I will keep for you that exquisite confection

_L'Appartement des Jeunes Filles_, by Roger Allard. Together these make

a charming bouquet, but I grant you it is a small one."

Here I end this dialogue, designed to show French poetry stationary in

the positions of twenty years ago. We may end by saying that in thus

remaining alive and healthy, in thriving for a longer period than the

Parnassian movement, French symbolism has made a place for itself which

will deserve the respect of posterity. The poetic form which will take

its place is not yet in sight. But that form will surely appear when

the generation of our sleeper has gone down, to the last man, into

slumber irrevocable.

ALBERT THIBAUDET

LEARNED SOCIETIES, ETC.

THE SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES

The Near East has been opened up by the war, and reports are coming in.

The Augustinian Priory of the Holy Sepulchre, a complex of buildings,

including the Calvary, St. Helen's Chapel, and the Prison of Christ,

has been described by Mr. A. W. Clapham, who, being on military duty

in Jerusalem, recently surveyed the ruins, and succeeded in making

an almost complete plan of the Latin monastery, founded in 1114.

Architectural features, both Western and Byzantine, were noticed, and

the hope expressed that cleaning and repair would soon be undertaken

now that the Holy Places are under British protection. In Babylonia

Mr. H. R. Hall has been excavating for the British Museum at Eridu and

Ur of the Chaldees. Work on the former site was begun by Mr. Campbell

Thompson last year, and buildings of the First Dynasty at Ur have been

discovered, dating about 2400 B.C. Still earlier finds of Sumerian

origin, dating from pre-Semitic times, have come to light at Tell

el-Obeid near Ur, including heads of lions and panthers in copper, on

a bitumen foundation, with inlaid tongues, eyes, and teeth of coloured

stone and shell; and a lion-headed eagle in copper relief, flanked by

stags, the group being 8 feet long and 4 feet high. Nearer home Mr.

Reginald Smith has brought forward evidence to prove that flint daggers

belong to the early Bronze Age in Britain, but to the last phase of

the Stone Age in Scandinavia. The earlier daggers point to connection

between the two areas about 2000 B.C.

THE SOCIETY OF GENEALOGISTS OF LONDON

Since Her Majesty the Queen graciously consented to become a Patron

membership has considerably increased, and now stands at 377. During

the winter papers have been read as follows: By Mr. Watson-Taylor on

"Joan of Arc, Her Relatives and Descendants"; by Mr. Austen-Leigh on

"Editing a School Register," Eton to wit; by Dr. G. C. Peachey on

"Bookplates"; and by Mr. George Sherwood on "Pedigrees and Next-of-Kin

Cases," all of which were well attended, and the papers recommended

for publication. A paper is promised by the Rev. T. C. Dale on "Durham

Records." The last _Report_ of the Royal Commission on Public Records

has been much discussed, and measures suggested for getting its

recommendations put into practice. Recognition has been accorded by

the British Museum authorities, with the result that the genealogical

papers of the late R. W. Twigge, F.S.A., have been added, with the

consent of Mrs. Twigge, to the Society's collection.

The Society's aim is simply to facilitate research: by making records

more accessible, by forming a collection of printed books, documents,

and MSS., and by making a great index on the card-index system to the

less-known records of biographical fact. Application should be made for

the latest Annual Report to the Secretary, at the Society's Rooms, 5

Bloomsbury Square, W.C.1.

THE VASARI SOCIETY

The Committee of the Vasari Society have decided to resume the

publication of their annual Portfolio in 1920 if enough subscribers

are forthcoming. The Society's aim is to reproduce in facsimile fine

drawings by the Old Masters from both public and private collections.

While attempting in the first place to publish less-known drawings

from private collections, it will not forget that the essential aim

is to reproduce masterly drawings rather than secondary pieces of

historical interest, and on that account will draw, as in the past, to

a considerable degree on the better-known works in public collections.

In the first ten years of the Society's work an annual Portfolio

was published with an average of thirty reproductions, covering the

fourteenth to the eighteenth centuries. The new series may be somewhat

broader in scope in admitting the nineteenth century, and allowing "Old

Masters" to include any deceased master of acknowledged excellence in

draughtsmanship. Moreover, it is desired to give ampler representation

to draughtsmen of the British School than has been done in the past.

To continue the annual publication at the same subscription of one

guinea, it has been decided to reduce the size of the Portfolio from 18

by 15 to 16 by 11½ inches, and it is thought that this will be welcomed

by members who have little space for the larger folios. It will not

imply reduction in size of the reproductions, which will continue to

be as far as possible facsimile in size and colour, and every effort

will be made to keep up the standard of quality. Intending subscribers

should communicate with the Hon. Secretary, Mr. A. M. Hind, at the

British Museum, London, W.C.1. Subscriptions for 1920 will not be due

until May 1st, and those who have intimated their willingness to become

members will be informed before that date if the number of subscribers

promised does not justify the committee in issuing the publication.

THE BIBLIOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY

The Annual Report of the Bibliographical Society announces that the

Society's _Transactions_ will henceforth be published in quarterly

parts, and that with a view to lessening the cost it is proposed

to allow copies to be purchased by non-members and to accept

advertisements. It is hoped also that _The Library_, founded by Sir

John MacAlister in 1888 and edited during recent years by Mr. A. W.

Pollard, the Keeper of Printed Books at the British Museum, and the

Honorary Secretary of the Bibliographical Society, may be brought into

the scheme, and that the quarterly numbers may be gradually worked up

into a full bibliographical magazine.

The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920 · 第 45 / 95 段