That sound rings down the years--I hear it yet--

All earthly life's a winding funeral--

And though I never wept,

But into the dark coach stept,

Dreaming by night to answer the blood's sweet call,

She who stood there, high-breasted, with small, wise lips,

And gave me wine to drink and bread to eat,

Has not more steadfast feet,

But fades from my arms as fade from mariners' eyes

The sea's most beauteous ships.

And others no doubt will appear who are now no more thought of than

were Mr. Nichols or Mr. Graves or Mr. Turner in 1912.

At least this movement--we do not use the word in the sense of

"organised movement" or "school"--has had the luck of early recognition

and careful fostering. There are faults to be found with this as with

the three earlier volumes of the series, but, in a world which has

produced no faultless anthology, we ought not to expect the first to be

a collection of contemporary verse. No one will be able to look through

the book without objections rising to his lips. Every reader will want

this or that poet omitted, this or that included. There are few readers

of anthologies who do not find, on mature consideration, that they

could have done the work better themselves, and this would be just if,

in fact, anthologists worked only for themselves. But to E. M. we must

assign the credit of having carried through an exceedingly difficult

task with as few mistakes as could be thought possible. He has the

extra distinction of having foreseen seven years ago the beginning of a

"liveliness" which has justified him by enduring until at this moment

it shows no signs of recession. He would be no doubt the last person to

claim the invention, or even the discovery, of the "Georgian" movement.

But he might reasonably claim, and, if he does not, the honour must be

thrust upon him, to have provided it with a means of growing naturally

and without undue extravagance.

NEW POEMS. By IOLO ANEURIN WILLIAMS. Methuen. 3_s._ 6_d._ net.

Mr. Williams' first book of poems, published four years ago, was a

quite little book, noticeable for some polished little songs with a

Caroline or Queen Anne air. His tastes have remained the same; his

capacity for writing has developed; he paints miniatures, and his

ingenuity expends itself on the elaboration and variation of the

frames. The frontier between success and non-success is narrow in

this kind of work; a slight flaw ruins all, and Mr. Williams does

not always escape collapse. But _Alice_ and _Song_ are of a neatness

and completeness which would do credit to the best of the Queen Anne

practitioners. _The Country Songs_ is a fragment of what may become

a really excellent celebration of our folk-songs, and _Rocks_ and

_Astronomy_, though still with something of the song in them, let

delicate plummets into deeper waters. The image of the rock, doomed to

decay, yet

The lizard's immortal friend,

And deathless to the flower,

is happy _Astronomy_ we quote in full:

Jupiter may be that or this

Of stars that shine in heaven,

Neptune a mere hypothesis,

And Saturn one of seven.

They will not make the dark less bright,

For names I do not know;

Nameless the stars across the night

In nameless beauty go.

Over my head their vault is bent--

A mirror and a screen--

An ever fresh prefigurement

Of glory past the seen.

It is an unambitious and uneven but very pleasant little book.

THE WAR POEMS OF SIEGFRIED SASSOON. Heinemann. 3_s._ 6_d._ net.

This volume contains fifty-two poems selected from Mr. Sassoon's

previous volumes, and twelve new ones. The former are far too well

known to need description at this date; but we think that even in

these, and still more in the new poems, there is ground for the

conjecture that those who think of Mr. Sassoon primarily as a savage

realist and satirist are likely in the future to be surprised. It was

a genuine and profound sensibility, tenderness, and a cheated passion

for beauty that produced his war poetry; not an innate predilection for

violence, vituperation, or caricature. Now the storm has gone over he

seems to be becoming more and more a poet of nature. The transition is

perhaps symbolised in the most beautiful of the new poems here printed.

It is called _Everyone Sang_, and concludes the book, so full of blood

and corpses, rats, evil smells, and all the turmoil and _débris_ of war:

Everyone suddenly burst out singing;

And I was filled with such delight

As prisoned birds must find in freedom

Winging wildly across the white

Orchards and dark green fields; on; on; and out of sight.

Everyone's voice was suddenly lifted,

And beauty came like the setting sun.

My heart was shaken with tears and horror

Drifted away.... O but every one

Was a bird; and the song was wordless; the singing will never be

done.

The book contains much that, however sincere, can only be described

as journalism _in excelsis_, but it is all inextricably mixed with

genuine poetry, and the collection as a whole, we suspect, will have

a permanent interest and value. Better than from a hundred histories

posterity will get from these poems a picture of how men felt and

looked in that world of

Sad, smoking, flat horizons, reeking woods,

And foundered trench-lines volleying doom for doom.

Their merits are never more clearly displayed than when they are

compared to the poems of the imitators who have sprung up like

mushrooms since Mr. Sassoon began publishing. These have taken his

brutal words, his more obvious attitudes, and the senile and complacent

objects of his satire; but in the copies the life is lacking.

ARGONAUT AND JUGGERNAUT. By OSBERT SITWELL. Chatto & Windus 5_s._ net.

At first sight this book looks like a revolutionary manifesto. Its

title is vehement and original, and its paper "jacket" is decorated

with the photograph of a negro head surmounted with a towering and

tapering wickerwork structure. It has no bearing on the contents, and

we can only assume that the author put it there because he liked it

or to arrest attention. Attention having been arrested, expectation

is disappointed. It is true that Mr. Sitwell often writes in _vers

libres_, and that he opens with a challenge and hearty proclamation in

the key of

Let us prune the tree of language

Of its dead fruit.

Let us melt up the clichés

Into molten metal;

Fashion weapons that will scald and flay

Let us curb this eternal humour

And become witty.

Let us dig up the dragon's teeth

From this fertile soil;

Swiftly,

Before they fructify.

And that, at a later stage, he observes that

The world itself

Dances

To make us dance

In cosmic frenzy.

But his frenzies have a very calculated air; he has not got rid of

those clichés, and that wit does not emerge. He cannot really play

the revolutionary with gusto, so, as Queen Victoria said, "We are not

amused": and when he lapses into more ordinary forms and more connected

statements he is revealed as an ordinary immature writer of verses. He

has some gift of observation which he will waste unless he treats it

more conscientiously, but observation will not make a poet.

CARMINA RAPTA. By GRIFFYTH FAIRFAX. Elkin Mathews. 3_s._ 6_d._ and

2_s._ 6_d._ net.

Mr. Fairfax's volume consists of "Verse translations from the French,

Spanish, Italian, German, Greek, Latin, with a few Arabic, Japanese,

and Armenian renderings from French prose versions." Mezzofanti and the

monk Calepino, in another sphere, must be alarmed for their linguistic

laurels. Some of Mr. Fairfax's translations are neat; but we hope those

from the Armenian--our Armenian wants rubbing up--are nearer the spirit

of the originals than are some of those from European languages. He

is at his neatest in some brief poems from the Spanish. His versions

of Hérédia and Baudelaire are especially lifeless; and he inflicts an

additional injury upon the latter by attributing the famous _Don Juan

in Hell_ to Hérédia.

THE CLOWN OF PARADISE. By DORMER CRESTON. Heath Cranton. 3_s._ net.

We notice this volume merely in order to record a neologism which we

commend to the notice of the editors of the _Oxford Dictionary_. It is

found in this passage:

My tearful soul did slip into those silver pools,

And, bathing in that stillness,

Was oned with God.

In the Court of Sir Henry Duke, we may continue, people are twoed.

NOVELS

COUSIN PHILIP. By MRS. HUMPHRY WARD. Collins. 6_s._ net.

SAINT'S PROGRESS. By JOHN GALSWORTHY. Heinemann. 7_s._ 6_d._ net.

IF ALL THESE YOUNG MEN. By ROMER WILSON. Methuen. 7_s._ net.

MADELEINE. By HOPE MIRRLEES. Collins. 6_s._ net.

LEGEND. By CLEMENCE DANE. Heinemann. 6_s._ net.

THE MASK. By JOHN COURNOS. Methuen. 6_s._ net.

It seems probable that a long time must elapse before the novel escapes

altogether from the spell of the war; and the reasons why this should

be so are fairly obvious. It is not only that the novelists, like

all of us, have received in their minds an indelible impress of that

great event. We must recognise that the last five years have made a

gulf between us and preceding time only comparable to a long interval

of history. The manners and habits of 1913 are not connected in an

imperceptibly changing fabric with our own. They are already a matter

of archæological interest, and definitely to place the action of a

novel in that year requires a course of archæological research--say

among old numbers of _Punch_. In 1919 the war is still so vivid a

thread in the web of our minds that we are constantly influenced by

it, constantly referring to it, in our actions, our conversations,

and our thoughts. When we meet a character, whether in a novel or a

drawing-room, it is still our instinct to enquire where he has been,

what he has been doing since August, 1914, and the present moment.

This is natural indeed; but its tendency in the novel is to produce

ephemeral work. The tidal wave may have subsided, but it has left the

mental waters exceedingly muddy.

Mrs. Humphry Ward's novel, _Cousin Philip_, is an excellent example of

the work which this state of affairs elicits from even the most serious

authors. It is a study, careful and detailed, of the sort of young

woman who has emerged from the war. Helena Pitstone, aged nineteen,

arrives at the house of her guardian, Lord Buntingford. She looks like

Romney's Lady Hamilton; but "the beautiful head was set off by a khaki

close cap, carrying a badge, and the khaki uniform, tunic, short skirt,

and leggings, might have been specially designed to show the health

and symmetry of the girl's young form"--all this though she has been

demobilised. She naturally begins her stay with Lord Buntingford by

quarrelling with him over one of her men friends, whom he refuses to

allow her to invite to his house. This gentleman had run away with the

wife of a friend, not for any base motive--"He didn't mean anything

horrid," says Helena--but "for a lark," and to show her husband that

she was not to be bullied. In the end Helena marries a politician, who

says to her, "Are you mine--are you mine at last?--you wild thing!"--a

remark which has been made by other lovers in other novels. In between

these two points lies Mrs. Humphry Ward's study of the girl of the

period, in order to make which, it may be supposed, she wrote this

novel. An idea of its quality and usefulness may be gained from the

following specimen of Helena's conversation:

"The chauffeur here is a fractious idiot. He has done that

Rolls-Royce car of Cousin Philip's balmy, and cut up quite rough when

I spoke to him about it."

"Done it what?" said Mrs. Friend faintly.

"Balmy. Don't you know that expression?" Helena, on the floor, with

her hands under her knees, watched her companion's looks with a grin.

"It's _our_ language now, you know--English--the language of us young

people. The old ones have got to learn it as we speak it."

Mrs. Ward would no doubt be shocked by a writer who delivered his, or

her, views on the French people with an obvious ignorance of the French

language. She would despise the affectation of an author who used

Latin tags incorrectly. But it is only fair to say that her views on

the younger generation are rendered slightly ridiculous by her obvious

ignorance of its idioms. She would perhaps have been better employed

in a detailed picture of the manners of 1913, a period to which she

doubtless looks back as to a lost paradise of decorous behaviour.

Mr. Galsworthy's _Saint's Progress_ suffers less from insufficient

documentation. His heroine Noel, with her short hair, is the daughter

of a clergyman, and follows the course gloomily foretold for so many

young girls during the war-period to the predestined end of bearing

a war-baby. She and her sister Gratian are forced by the pressure of

events to think and act for themselves. Gratian, safely married to a

doctor, delivers herself as follows:

"Dad," said Gratian suddenly, "we can only find out for ourselves,

even if we do singe our wings in doing it. We've been reading James's

_Pragmatism_. George says the only chapter that's important is

missing--the one on ethics, to show that what we do is not wrong till

it's proved wrong by the result. I suppose he was afraid to deliver

that lecture."

But, while Mr. Galsworthy is much superior to Mrs. Ward in the accuracy

of his information, he can hardly be said to be superior to her in

the justice and clearness of his presentation. The traits of his

persons are correctly observed and generalised, but they are not shown

through the medium of living individuals. We feel of Noel that many

girls of such a disposition found themselves in such circumstances and

behaved thus; and so far, regarded as a sociological study, the book

is deserving of praise. But what we never feel is that the individual

girl, Noel, ever existed; and by the deficiency it is condemned as a

novel. This book will be a serious disappointment to those who imagined

from _Five Tales_ that Mr. Galsworthy had recovered the original

freshness of his talent and was about to begin a new and a sincerer

period.

But perhaps the desire to depict, and to comment on, phenomena so fresh

and living in the mind as these, which has been fatal to experienced

craftsmen of the order of Mrs. Ward and Mr. Galsworthy, is one which

will ruin any novel in which it is attempted. Miss Romer Wilson has

not the experience of either; but as her first book, _Martin Schuler_,

demonstrated, she has really extraordinary natural gifts. These

gifts are still obvious in her second book, which is nevertheless

disappointing and all but a complete failure. It describes a circle

of non-combatants during the last year of the war, young people, of

whom Mrs. Ward has hardly heard, who sway between cynical disgust with

the world around them and cynical disgust with their own natures. No

man, it has been wisely said, is uninteresting, and these persons,

regarded from a sane and tolerantly humorous point of view, might have

been the theme for a good book. But since the thoughts, or actions,

the manners through which they manifest themselves not being genuine

or spontaneous, are important neither for good nor evil, the method

of treating them seriously results in making them appear thin and

tedious. Affectations, except in the rare event of their producing

serious consequences, are a topic only for satire; and here the loves

of Josephine and Sebastian, of James Blanchard and Susan and Amaryllis,

are expressed purely by affectations, which overlie and conceal

whatever genuine feelings these persons may have possessed. This type

has had in recent years a curious attraction for young novelists, who

have as a result produced many books which are not worthy of attention.

But the author of _Martin Schuler_ must sin deeply before we can refuse

to read any book of hers, however unwillingly we may persevere in it.

And even here her special qualities are altogether beyond mistake. She

can still, even in this dreary and pointless tale of people we should

prefer not to meet, astonish us with vivid and enchanting fragments

of pictorial beauty. A couple of these passages, which are all that

redeems the book from dullness, may be given as specimens:

... At the turn of the night it began to rain, and at daybreak the

whole country was grey with driving rain, which spluttered against

the bedroom window and beat upon the thatch. The noisy sparrows

under the eaves shook themselves angrily and fluttered up and down

in the garden after worms. The tom cat, who had been out all night,

gathered himself up on the doorstep and brooded there with one eye on

the sparrows, waiting for the door to be opened. The draught under

the door made his paws cold, so he blew himself out and crouched

down with his paws folded up underneath him. He was angry and tired,

and his fur was covered with minute drops of water that in places

had penetrated to his skin, but he sat there patiently dosing and

dreaming for two hours until half-past eight, when the bolts were

drawn. At the sound of the bolts being shot back he at once stood

up and mewed, and the door was hardly opened before he ran into the

kitchen, where a stick fire roared in the grate and a frying-pan gave

out an odour of frying fat.

... The people came out of the house door, mysterious in the fading

light like a procession of Boccaccio's women and a clerk of the

Decameron seen through the romantic distance of seven hundred

years. They lit the candles in the dark garden-room and sat down

as if waiting for somebody to begin a story. Overhead the blue sky

gleamed through the gathering darkness, and in the west a rosy glow

spread up behind the delicate aspens and maples and acacias of the

little plantation above the yew garden. Up in the mazy blue sky the

transparent half moon and a few bright planets gleamed beneath the

outermost heavens, where faint white constellations began to appear

as the darkness quickly gathered upon the earth.

We do not quote these descriptive passages as proving Miss Wilson's

aptitude for the novelist's multifarious task. They represent only one

of the many gifts of which she must dispose; and they are themselves in

several details open to criticism. They do moreover represent almost

everything in this book which can be distinguished for commendation.

They suggest, however, that Miss Wilson possesses one of the most

important gifts of the novelists, namely, a sense of the scene; and

it remains for time to show whether she can imagine persons and a

situation worthy of her background.

It is a relief to recede from the tangled epoch, which has spoilt and

hindered all these writers, into the seventeenth century in France.

Miss Mirrlees has written, not a wholly satisfactory or very agreeable,

but a very strange book, one far removed from the historical romance of

commerce. She has combined what appears to be a close knowledge of her

period, of the time of the Jansenists, the Précieuses, and Mademoiselle

de Scudéry, with a desire to study a curious case of mental pathology.

Madeleine, her heroine, is a provincial girl who removes to Paris

with her family and is consumed by an intense longing to enter that

fantastic circle of elegance and _galanterie_ which revolved round

Mademoiselle de Scudéry and was depicted by her in _Le Grand Cyrus_.

But her awkward shyness forbade that this longing should ever be

satisfied; and when she sought to pacify it by the familiar device of

the "endless story," she exacerbated it into madness. This is a brief

and inadequate account of a most unusual composition, but it will

serve to show how Miss Mirrlees has loaded the historical novel with

a heavier freight than that ornamental craft is accustomed to carry.

But she has not developed either the psychology or the descriptive

detail at the expense of the other. She dissects Madeleine's mind with

almost morbid closeness and makes of it a terrifying spectacle, but at

the same time she has contrived to make her setting in time and place

convincing. Her picture of mind and manners may or may not be strictly

accurate; but it is certainly not conventional, it is original, it

_bites_. There are certain crudities apparent both in the style and in

the construction of the book, as well as in the choice and development

of subject; but it will be very interesting to see the next production

of a mind so unusual.

Miss Clemence Dane's _Legend_ touches Miss Mirrlees' work fleetingly at

one point. It too describes a literary "circle," dominated by women,

of the sort which draws weaker characters into it and causes them to

deteriorate. But it interests not so much as a study of this particular

phenomenon as in that it is an extraordinary attempt, the only one

among these books, to carry on the history of the novel, to give that

form a new task, to enlarge its range and its adaptabilities. It

consists of one long conversation; and the principal character, Madala

Grey, makes no appearance, unless the regrettable introduction of her

ghost towards the end be counted as such. Madala is a woman-novelist

who has contracted what seems to her friends an inexplicable marriage

with a dull country doctor. She is in child-bed; and her circle meets

to await news, hears of her death, and discusses her. Their views,

all mistaken, are reported by the one person present who had never

seen her and who deduces the true and simple explanation--that she

was actually in love with her husband. This is, it may be objected,

merely jumping through a series of hoops; and in a sense the objection

has its justification. For, when the story should reach its climax,

when Madala herself begins to emerge from the mists of misjudgment

and misinterpretation, she is revealed as being only a lay figure.

This does not mean that Miss Dane's singular device in the end misses

its aim. On the contrary she accomplishes what she set out to do with

perfect precision. Nevertheless, the fact remains that she has locked

in a very complicated cabinet, and thence extracted again by very

subtle means, not a living woman but a doll. Hence her book is not the

masterpiece it might have been. But we are almost brought to overlook

this fact by the amazing skill with which she manages her invention;

and her jumping through hoops, whether it be regarded as an unrelated

exhibition of agility or as an experiment in a new method of progress,

deserves all attention even though it leads only to disappointment at

the end. Miss Dane's first novel, _Regiment of Women_, was much praised

not long ago; her second, _First the Blade_, did not receive so much

notice. This reveals in her originality, daring and ingenuity which

could hardly have been predicted from her earlier work; and there is no

doubt that it will be widely discussed, since it is in fact rare for

any really remarkable display of these qualities to miss its reward.

But Miss Dane has yet some distance to advance if she is to do more

than win fame as a conjuror or open up paths for other novelists.

For an artist capable of so distinguished a conception her style is

strangely flat and undistinguished; and the introduction of some very

bad and banal passages from the works of Madala Grey is a curious lapse

of tact.

The London Mercury, Vol. I, Nos. 1-6, November 1919 to April 1920 · 第 25 / 95 段