III.

Meyerbeer, a man of handsome private fortune, like Mendelssohn, made

large sums by his operas, and was probably the wealthiest of the great

composers. He lived a life of luxurious ease, and yet laboured with

intense zeal a certain number of hours each day. A friend one day

begged him to take more rest, and he answered smilingly, "If I should

leave work, I should rob myself of my greatest pleasure; for I am so

accustomed to work that it has become a necessity." Probably few

composers have been more splendidly rewarded by contemporary fame and

wealth, or been more idolised by their admirers. No less may it be

said that few have been the object of more severe criticism. His youth

was spent amid the severest classic influences of German music, and

the spirit of romanticism and nationality, which blossomed into such

beautiful and characteristic works as those composed by his friend and

fellow-pupil Weber, also found in his heart an eloquent echo. But

Meyerbeer resolutely disenthralled himself from what he appeared to

have regarded as trammels, and followed out an ambition to be a

cosmopolitan composer. In pursuit of this purpose he divested himself

of that fine flavour of individuality and devotion to art for its own

sake which marks the highest labours of genius. He can not be exempted

from the criticism that he regarded success and the immediate plaudits

of the public as the only satisfactory rewards of his art. He had but

little of the lofty content which shines out through the vexed and

clouded lives of such souls as Beethoven and Gluck in music, of Bacon

and Milton in literature, who looked forward to immortality of fame as

the best vindication of their work. A marked characteristic of the man

was a secret dissatisfaction with all that he accomplished, making him

restless and unhappy, and extremely sensitive to criticism. With this

was united a tendency at times to oscillate to the other extreme of

vain-gloriousness. An example of this was a reply to Rossini one night

at the opera when they were listening to "Robert le Diable." The "Swan

of Pesaro" was a warm admirer of Meyerbeer, though the latter was a

formidable rival, and his works had largely replaced those of the

other in popular repute. Sitting together in the same box, Rossini, in

his delight at one portion of the opera, cried out in his impulsive

Italian way, "If you can write anything to surpass this, I will

undertake to dance upon my head." "Well, then," said Meyerbeer, "you

had better soon commence practising, for I have just commenced the

fourth act of 'Les Huguenots.'" Well might he make this boast, for

into the fourth act of his musical setting of the terrible St.

Bartholomew tragedy he put the finest inspirations of his life.

Singular to say, though he himself represented the very opposite pole

of art spirit and method, Mozart was to him the greatest of his

predecessors. Perhaps it was this very fact, however, which was at the

root of his sentiment of admiration for the composer of "Don Giovanni"

and "Le Nozze di Figaro." A story is told to the effect that Meyerbeer

was once dining with some friends, when a discussion arose respecting

Mozart's position in the musical hierarchy. Suddenly one of the guests

suggested that "certain beauties of Mozart's music had become stale

with age. I defy you," he continued, "to listen to 'Don Giovanni'

after the fourth act of the 'Huguenots.'" "So much the worse, then,

for the fourth act of the 'Huguenots,'" said Meyerbeer, furious at the

clumsy compliment paid to his own work at the expense of his idol.

Critics wedded to the strict German school of music never forgave

Meyerbeer for his dereliction from the spirit and influences of his

nation, and the prominence which he gave to melodramatic effects and

spectacular show in his operas. Not without some show of reason, they

cite this fact as proof of poverty of musical invention. Mendelssohn,

who was habitually generous in his judgment, wrote to the poet

Immermann from Paris of "Robert le Diable"--"The subject is of the

romantic order; _i.e._, the devil appears in it (which suffices the

Parisians for romance and imagination). Nevertheless, it is very bad,

and, were it not for two brilliant seduction scenes, there would not

even be effect.... The opera does not please me; it is devoid of

sentiment and feeling.... People admire the music, but where there is

no warmth and truth, I cannot even form a standard of criticism."

Schlüter, the historian of music, speaks even more bitterly of

Meyerbeer's irreverence and theatric sensationalism--"'Les Huguenots'

and the far weaker production 'Le Prophète' are, we think, all the

more reprehensible (nowadays especially, when too much stress is laid

on the subject of a work, and consequently on the libretto of an

opera), because the Jew has in these pieces ruthlessly dragged before

the footlights two of the darkest pictures in the annals of

Catholicism, nor has he scrupled to bring high mass and chorale on the

boards."

Wagner, the last of the great German composers, cannot find words too

scathing and bitter to mark his condemnation of Meyerbeer. Perhaps

his extreme aversion finds its psychological reason in the

circumstance that his own early efforts were in the sphere of

Meyerbeer and Halévy, and from his present point of view he looks

back with disgust on what he regards as the sins of his youth. The

fairest of the German estimates of the composer, who not only cast

aside the national spirit and methods, but offended his countrymen by

devoting himself to the French stage, is that of Vischer, an eminent

writer on æsthetics--"Notwithstanding the composer's remarkable

talent for musical drama, his operas contain sometimes too much,

sometimes too little--too much in the subject-matter, external

adornment, and effective 'situations'--too little in the absence of

poetry, ideality, and sentiment (which are essential to a work of

art), as well as in the unnatural and constrained combinations of the

plot."

But despite the fact that Meyerbeer's operas contain such strange

scenes as phantom nuns dancing, girls bathing, sunrise, skating,

gunpowder explosions, a king playing the flute, and the prima donna

leading a goat, dramatic music owes to him new accents of genuine

pathos and an addition to its resources of rendering passionate

emotions. Though much that is merely showy and meretricious there come

frequent bursts of genuine musical power and energy, which give him a

high and unmistakable rank, though he has had less permanent influence

in moulding and directing the development of musical art than any

other composer who has had so large a place in the annals of his time.

The last twelve years of Meyerbeer's life were spent, with the

exception of brief residences in Germany and Italy, in Paris, the city

of his adoption, where all who were distinguished in art and letters

paid their court to him. When he was seized with his fatal illness he

was hard at work on "L'Africaine," for which Scribe had also furnished

the libretto. His heart was set on its completion, and his daily

prayer was that his life might be spared to finish it. But it was not

to be. He died May 2, 1864. The same morning Rossini called to inquire

after the health of the sick man, equally his friend and rival. When

he heard the sad news he sank into a fit of profound despondency and

grief, from which he did not soon recover. All Paris mourned with him,

and even Germany forgot its critical dislike to join in regret at the

loss of one who, with all his defects, was so great an artist and so

good a man.

Meyerbeer seems to have been greatly afraid of being buried alive. In

his pocket-book after his death was found a paper giving directions

that small bells should be attached to his hands and feet, and that

his body should be carefully watched for four days, after which it

should be sent to Berlin to be interred by the side of his mother, to

whom he had been most tenderly attached.

The composer was the intimate friend of most of the celebrities of his

time in art and literature. Victor Hugo, Lamartine, George Sand,

Balzac, Alfred de Musset, Delacroix, Jules Janin, and Théophile

Gautier were his familiar intimates; and the reunions between these

and other gifted men, who then made Paris so intellectually brilliant,

are charmingly described by Liszt and Moscheles. Meyerbeer's

correspondence, which was extensive, deserves publication, as it

displays marked literary faculty, and is full of bright sympathetic

thought, vigorous criticism, and playful fancy. The following letter

to Jules Janin, written from Berlin a few years before his death,

gives some pleasant insight into his character:--

"Your last letter was addressed to me at Königsberg; but I

was in Berlin working--working away like a young man,

despite my seventy years, which somehow certain people, with

a peculiar generosity, try to put upon me. As I am not at

Königsberg, where I am to arrange for the Court concert for

the eighteenth of this month, I have now leisure to answer

your letter, and will immediately confess to you how greatly

I was disappointed that you were so little interested in

Rameau; and yet Rameau was always the bright star of your

French opera, as well as your master in the music. He

remained to you after Lulli, and it was he who prepared the

way for the Chevalier Gluck: therefore his family have a

right to expect assistance from the Parisians, who on

several occasions have cared for the descendants of Racine

and the grandchildren of the great Corneille. If I had been

in Paris, I certainly would have given two hundred francs

for a seat; and I take this opportunity to beg you to hand

that sum to the poor family, who cannot fail to be unhappy

in their disappointment. At the same time I send you a power

of attorney for M. Guyot, by which I renounce all claims to

the parts of my operas which may be represented at the

benefit for the celebrated and unfortunate Rameau family.

Why will you not come to Königsberg at the festival? Why, in

other words, are you not in Berlin? What splendid music we

have in preparation! As to myself, it is not only a source

of pleasure to me, but I feel it a duty, in the position I

hold, to compose a grand march, to be performed at

Königsberg while the royal procession passes from the castle

into the church, where the ceremony of crowning is to take

place. I will even compose a hymn, to be executed on the day

that our king and master returns to his good Berlin.

Besides, I have promised to write an overture for the great

concert of the four nations, which the directors of the

London exhibition intend to give at the opening of the same,

next spring, in the Crystal Palace. All this keeps me back:

it has robbed me of my autumn, and will also take a good

part of next spring; but with the help of God, dear friend,

I hope we shall see each other again next year, free from

all cares, in the charming little town of Spa, listening to

the babbling of its waters and the rustling of its old grey

oaks.

"Truly your friend,

"Meyerbeer."

Great Musical Composers: German, French, and Italian · 第 143 / 173 题