II.

The French musical drama continued without much change in the hands of

the Lulli school (for the musician had several skilful imitators and

successors) till the appearance of Jean Philippe Rameau, who

inaugurated a new era. This celebrated man was born in Auvergne in

1683, and was during his earlier life the organist of the Clermont

cathedral church. Here he pursued the scientific researches in music

which entitled him in the eyes of his admirers to be called the Newton

of his art. He had reached the age of fifty without recognition as a

dramatic composer, when the production of "Hippolyte et Aricie"

excited a violent feud by creating a strong current of opposition to

the music of Lulli. He produced works in rapid succession, and finally

overcame all obstacles, and won for himself the name of being the

greatest lyric composer which France up to that time had produced. His

last opera, "Les Paladins," was given in 1760, the composer being then

seventy-seven.

The bitterness of the art-feuds of that day, afterwards shown in the

Gluck-Piccini contest, was foreshadowed in that waged by Rameau

against Lulli, and finally against the Italian new-comers, who sought

to take possession of the French stage. The matter became a national

quarrel, and it was considered an insult to France to prefer the music

of an Italian to that of a Frenchman--an insult which was often

settled by the rapier point, when tongue and pen had failed as

arbitrators. The subject was keenly debated by journalists and

pamphleteers, and the press groaned with essays to prove that Rameau

was the first musician in Europe, though his works were utterly

unknown outside of France. Perhaps no more valuable testimony to the

character of these operas can be adduced than that of Baron Grimm:--

"In his operas Rameau has overpowered all his predecessors by dint of

harmony and quantity of notes. Some of his choruses are very fine.

Lulli could only sustain his vocal psalmody by a simple bass; Rameau

accompanied almost all his recitatives with the orchestra. These

accompaniments are generally in bad taste; they drown the voice rather

than support it, and force the singers to scream and howl in a manner

which no ear of any delicacy can tolerate. We come away from an opera

of Rameau's intoxicated with harmony and stupified with the noise of

voice and instruments. His taste is always Gothic, and, whether his

subject is light or forcible, his style is equally heavy. He was not

destitute of ideas, but did not know what use to make of them. In his

recitatives the sound is continually in opposition to the sense,

though they occasionally contain happy declamatory passages.... If he

had formed himself in some of the schools of Italy, and thus acquired

a notion of musical style and habits of musical thought, he never

would have said (as he did) that all poems were alike to him, and that

he could set the _Gazette de France_ to music."

From this it may be gathered that Rameau, though a scientific and

learned musician, lacked imagination, good taste, and dramatic

insight--qualities which in the modern lyric school of France have

been so pre-eminent. It may be admitted, however, that he inspired a

taste for sound musical science, and thus prepared the way for the

great Gluck, who to all and more of Rameau's musical knowledge united

the grand genius which makes him one of the giants of his art.

Though Rameau enjoyed supremacy over the serious opera, a great

excitement was created in Paris by the arrival of an Italian company,

who in 1752 obtained permission to perform Italian burlettas and

intermezzi at the opera-house. The partisans of the French school took

alarm, and the admirers of Lulli and Rameau forgot their bickerings to

join forces against the foreign intruders. The battle-field was

strewed with floods of ink, and the literati pelted each other with

ferocious lampoons.

Among the literature of this controversy, one pamphlet has an

imperishable place, Rousseau's famous "Lettre sur la Musique

Française," in which the great sentimentalist espoused the cause of

Italian music with an eloquence and acrimony rarely surpassed. The

inconsistency of the author was as marked in this as in his private

life. Not only did he at a later period become a great advocate of

Gluck against Piccini, but, in spite of his argument that it was

impossible to compose music to French words, that the language was

quite unfit for it, that the French never had music and never would,

he himself had composed a good deal of music to French words and

produced a French opera, "Le Devin du Village." Diderot was also a

warm partisan of the Italians. Pergolesi's beautiful music having been

murdered by the French orchestra-players at the Grand Opera-House,

Diderot proposed for it the following witty and laconic

inscription:--"Hic Marsyas Apollinem."[M]

Rousseau's opera, "Le Devin du Village," was performed with

considerable success, in spite of the repugnance of the orchestral

performers, of whom Rousseau always spoke in terms of unmeasured

contempt, to do justice to the music. They burned Rousseau in effigy

for his scoffs. "Well," said the author of the _Confessions_, "I don't

wonder that they should hang me now, after having so long put me to

the torture."

The eloquence and abuse of the wits, however, did not long impair the

supremacy of Rameau; for the Italian company returned to their own

land, disheartened by their reception in the French capital. Though

this composer commenced so late in life, he left thirty-six dramatic

works. His greatest work was "Castor et Pollux." Thirty years later

Grimm recognised its merits by admitting, in spite of the great faults

of the composer, "It is the pivot on which the glory of French music

turns." When Louis XIV. offered Rameau a title, he answered, touching

his breast and forehead, "My nobility is here and here." This composer

marked a step forward in French music, for he gave it more boldness

and freedom, and was the first really scientific and well-equipped

exponent of a national school. His choruses were full of energy and

fire, his orchestral effects rich and massive. He died in 1764, and

the mortuary music, composed by himself, was performed by a double

orchestra and chorus from the Grand Opera.

Great Musical Composers: German, French, and Italian · 第 122 / 173 题