28. Trinity Street, Bristol.

Whether or not the work deemed by L. E. X. to be the first exhibited by

Turner may have been in water-colours, or be still in existence, I leave to

other replicants, availing myself of the occasion to ask him or you,

whether in 1787 two works of W. Turner, at Mr. G. Turner's, Walthamstow,

"No. 471. Dover Castle," "No. 601. Wanstead House," were not, in fact, his

first tilt in that arena of which he was the champion at the hour of his

{90} death? Whether in the two following years he appeared at all in the

ring; and, if not, why not? although in the succeeding 1790 he again threw

down the glaive in the "No. 644. The Archbishop's Palace, Lambeth," being

then set down as "_T._ W. Turner;" reappearing in 1791 as "W. Turner, of

Maiden Lane, Covent Garden," with "No. 494. King John's Palace, Eltham;"

"No. 560. Sweakley, near Uxbridge." In the horizon of art (strange to say,

and yet to be explained!) this luminary glows no more till 1808, when he

had "on the line" (?) several views of Fonthill, as well as the "Tenth

Plague of Egypt," purchased of course by the proprietor of that princely

mansion, as it is found mentioned in Warner's _Walks near Bath_ to be that

same year adorning the walls of one of the saloons.

Notes and Queries, Number 169, January 22, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 76 / 146 题