REVIEW OF NEW BOOKS.

_Reminiscences of Samuel Taylor Coleridge and Robert Southey. By

Joseph Cottle. New York: Wiley & Putnam. 1 vol. 12mo._

This is quite an important contribution to the literary history of the

nineteenth century. To be sure, it is confined to a small space, and a

few individuals, but it is full of original and important matter as far

as it goes. Cottle, the author, was a bookseller at Bristol, was the

early friend of Coleridge, Southey, and Wordsworth, and carried his

friendship so far as to publish their first unsalable books. Throughout

the lives of Coleridge and Southey, he appears to have been their

associate or correspondent. He now publishes the letters of both, and

his recollections of their character, conduct, and conversation. No

lover of Coleridge can read the book without deep pain. It presents him

as given over to sloth and self-indulgence, as careless of his word, as

indifferent to the happiness and comfort of his wife and children, as a

deceitful and unsafe friend, as a kind of sublime charlatan and

vagabond. The revelations regarding his use of opium are astounding.

About the year 1814 he consumed a pint of laudanum a day. He spent

upwards of _£_2 10_s._ a week for opium, at the very time his family

were suffering, and he himself was living on the charity of a friend. He

borrowed money freely of his friends, ostensibly for the necessaries of

life, but really to obtain the means of gratifying his debasing habit.

He lost all control over himself. The champion of free will was himself

the prey of a passion which swayed his volitions. The philosopher who

was to reconcile philosophy with Christianity, was daily in the habit of

violating both. The poet who celebrated in such exquisite verse the

affections, abandoned his own family. Since Rousseau, there has not been

his like among men of letters. In a letter to Josiah Wade, in 1814, a

letter which he desires to have published after his death, he

acknowledges all that his worst enemies could impute to him. “In the one

crime of OPIUM,” he says, “what crime have I not made myself guilty of?

Ingratitude to my Maker! and to my benefactors—injustice! and

_unnatural cruelty to my poor children_! self-contempt for my repeated

promise—breach, nay, too often, actual falsehood!” In the same letter

he remarks—“Conceive a poor, miserable wretch, who, for many years, has

been attempting to beat off pain by a constant recurrence to the vice

that produces it. Conceive a spirit in hell, employed in tracing out for

others the road to that heaven, from which his crimes exclude him! In

short, conceive whatever is most wretched, helpless, and hopeless, and

you will form as tolerable a notion of my state, as it is possible for a

good man to have.” The apology for Coleridge’s use of opium has been

found in his own assertion, that he acquired the habit originally in an

attempt to quiet physical pain. Southey denies this, and, indeed,

imputes duplicity to Coleridge in all the apologies he makes for his

vices of self-indulgence.

Southey, it seems, from the first, never placed any dependence upon

Coleridge. Writing to Cottle, in 1836, he says—“I know that Coleridge,

at different times of his life, never let pass an opportunity of

speaking ill of me. Both Wordsworth and myself have often lamented the

exposure of duplicity which must result from the publication of his

letters, and by what he has delivered by word of mouth to the worshipers

by whom he was always surrounded. . . . I continued all possible offices

of kindness to his children long after I regarded his own conduct with

that _utter disapprobation_ which alone it can call forth from all who

had any sense of duty and moral obligation.” When Coleridge placed

himself under the care of his friend, Morgan, to be cured of his opium

insanity, and while he was writing letters to the friends who lent him

money, that he had reduced his allowance to twenty drops of laudanum a

day, he was secretly taking his enormous doses, obtained by deceiving

his benefactor, and by playing the meanest tricks upon his hired

attendant. Coleridge’s whole life appears to have been that of a

vagabond. He subsisted on the charity of friends whom he continually

deceived or outraged. At least so he appears in the representations of

Southey and Cottle, and partly in his own confessions. Many of Cottle’s

remarks are sufficiently good for nothing; and he occasionally cants and

whines distressingly, but we see no reason to doubt his statements of

fact. We hope that if any thing can be said in his favor, his relations

will promptly do it. In the present book the author is sunk to the level

of the Savages and Dermodys of literary history.

If Coleridge, in this book, is deprived of almost every thing but his

genius, and is even represented as having that a good deal dashed with

charlatanry, Southey appears in his most amiable light. The austerity

and spiritual pride of the man are not so prominent as the finer

qualities of his heart. His letters are admirable. The earlier ones are

especially spirited and graphic. He sketches the external appearance of

his acquaintances to the life. “I saw,” he says, “Dr. Gregory to-day; a

very brown-looking man, of most pinquescent and full-moon cheeks. There

is much tallow in him.” Of Dr. Hunter he draws a very animated portrait.

“He has a very red, drinking face, little, good-humored eyes, with the

skin drawn up under them, like cunning and short-sightedness united. I

saw Dr. Hunter again yesterday. I neither like him, nor his wife, nor

his son, nor his daughter, nor any thing that is his.” Gilbert Wakefield

is despatched in a few words. “He has a most critic-like voice, as if he

had snarled himself hoarse. You see I like the women better than the

men. Indeed, they are better animals in general, perhaps because more is

left to nature in their education. Nature is very good, but God knows

there is very little of it left.” The whole of Southey’s youthful

letters are marked by sense, enthusiasm and humor. The collection

extends almost to his death. In 1826, while he was editing an edition of

John Bunyan, he writes to Cottle, noticing a rumor that the Pilgrim’s

Progress was a mere translation from the Dutch. “The charge of

plagiarism,” he says, “is utterly false. _When you and I meet in the

next world, we will go and see John Bunyan_, and tell him how I have

tinkered the fellow, for tinker him I will, who has endeavored to pick a

hole in his reputation.” This is a most perfect specimen of Southey’s

peculiar humor. In another letter Cottle tells him that Mackintosh has

said his style was founded on Horace Walpole’s. Southey replies, “my

style is founded on nobody’s. _I say what I have to say as plainly as I

can, without thinking of the style, and this is the whole secret. . ._

In fact, I write, as you may always have remarked, such as I always

converse, without effort, and without aiming at display.” This

confession from the most fascinating of prose writers, conveys an

important truth with authority.

We have said that this book derives all its value from the letters or

recollections of the author’s eminent friends. As such it will be

extensively read. Cottle’s portion is done badly, especially in the

arrangement of the matter. No person curious in literary history will

fail to obtain the book, in spite of the compiler’s deficiencies.

* * * * *

_The Public Men of the Revolution, Including Events from the

Peace of 1783 to the Peace of 1815. In a Series of Letters. By

the late Hon. Wm. Sullivan, LL. D. Edited by his Son, John T. S.

Sullivan. Philadelphia: Carey & Hart. 1 vol. 8vo._

This book was originally published thirteen years ago. The present is a

new edition, with additional notes and references, and a short biography

of the late author. The work relates to the political history of the

United States, and especially to the questions at issue between the

Federalists and Democrats. The author was a Federalist, and the book

throughout is devoted to the vindication of the character and conduct of

the leading members of his party, and the policy they advocated. The

style of the composition is without bitterness, and lacks even the

energy we might expect in a political discussion. It is calm, clear,

somewhat diffuse, apologetic in its tone, and strikes hard hits in the

blandest possible manner. The leading men and measures of the country,

from 1783 to 1815, a period when party spirit raged and foamed almost to

madness, are taken up in their natural order, and discussed with

considerable candor. One peculiarity in the volume will impress every

reader. The writer appeared to have felt that he was coming before the

bar of public opinion as the advocate of persons under its ban. Instead

of assuming a high tone, and dealing sturdy blows to the right and

left,—instead of grappling firmly with a question, and exhibiting it at

once in all its bearing—he adopts a sly, insinuating, apologizing,

round about manner, which deprives his style of vitality, and conveys

the impression of a timid thinker. We do not believe that Mr. Sullivan

would have adopted this style unless he had supposed that in the popular

mind Federalism was identified with projects to dissolve the union, and

sell the country to old England. In this we think he altogether

under-estimated the intelligence of the people. Many of the men whose

character he defends so timidly, need no defender at all; men who, if

their merits are to be presented, deserve a hearty and eloquent

recognition, unconnected with answers to dead and stale calumnies.

In this volume Mr. Jefferson is treated, not as he will be treated by

the historian, but in the spirit of an opposing partisan. No fair and

full representation of the man is given, no clear insight is shown of

the fitness of the man for the times. Mr. Sullivan does not go very deep

into the philosophy of Democracy, nor appreciate its nature. It could

not be expected. With all his intelligence and virtue he lived in the

times of which he writes, took sides with one of the parties, and judged

Democracy by the light of Federalism, not by its own light. No man can

fairly analyze what he hates or despises. With this abatement, Mr.

Sullivan is eminently candid and judicial in his estimate of the leading

Democrats. It would be impossible to point out a single passage of

intentional misrepresentation in his book. But of unconscious

misrepresentation there is necessarily much, and a person who desired to

obtain a perfectly accurate view of political men and measures, could

not get it by reading these letters. It must be conceded that it is

disgraced by none of that falsehood, bigotry, and blackguardism, which

characterize almost every former work on the subject, and which appears

now to survive the controversaries from which they originally sprung.

Mr. Sullivan was one of those perfectly honest politicians who would not

stoop to an untruth, and who possessed the virtue of moderation. He

writes like a man who believes every thing he says—a rare endowment in

a political author.

Perhaps the most valuable portion of this book is its anecdotes of

numerous men whose private character is but little known to this

generation, and of numerous events of which history has taken little

note. To the future historian of our country the work, on this account,

will be very valuable.

* * * * *

_Budget of Letters, or Things which I Saw Abroad. Boston: Wm. D.

Ticknor & Co. 1 vol. 12mo._

Under this somewhat quaint title we have quite an original book of

travels. It consists of a collection of private letters, written by an

intelligent lady of Providence to her friends at home, and printed

exactly as they first came from her pen. They are accordingly honest

transcripts of real impressions of objects thrown off in a clear,

careless style, and strongly infused with individual peculiarities. Even

her “O dears!” and “goodness me’s!” and “I verily believe!” are

retained. Such a book has, of course, a great deal of raciness. Those

objects and scenes which professional tourists linger most lovingly

over, and in the celebration of which they indulge in so much

premeditated rapture, our authoress fearlessly describes according to

her own perceptions. Many of her opinions are, doubtless, crude, and

much of her criticism of little worth. In logic she is fond of giving

the lady’s reason. There are many things on which she passes judgment,

of which she knows little or nothing. Some objects she saw with her eye

and not with her mind. But, taking the book as it is, in all its

freshness and individual truth, and we can hardly bring to mind a late

publication of a similar nature, which excels it in interest, or one

more likely to be pleasing to the tourist. There are a hundred little

incidents, scenes, and annoyances, which most travelers forget as soon

as experienced, which are made quite interesting in this book, and

constitute its original feature. We hope this will not be the last work

of the authoress.

* * * * *

_Chambers’ Miscellany of Useful and Entertaining Knowledge.

Boston: Gould, Kendall & Lincoln._

This is a fac-simile of the Edinburgh edition. It is composed of a

series of articles on a wide variety of subjects, including history,

biography, sketches of travel, science, poetry, &c., &c. It is published

in weekly numbers. No publishers in Europe equal the Messrs. Chambers in

tact to discern the popular taste, and enterprise to meet it. The

present work has had a large circulation abroad, and is well calculated

to be popular here. Each number is complete in itself.

* * * * *

_The Anatomy of Melancholy. What it is, with all the Kinds,

Causes, Symptoms, Propensities, and Several Cures of it. By

Democritus Junior. With Translations of the Classical Extracts

by Democritus Minor._

There is scarce any volume to which the scholar turns with such constant

and ever recurring delight as Burton’s Anatomy of Melancholy. It is a

store-house of rich and rare learning, and abounds, beyond any parallel,

in apt and original quotation; but this is, at last, its least merit,

for the author’s own vein of thought, though quaint, is vigorous and

manly, and is enlivened by arch and graceful digressions, full of

classic wit and sturdy English humor. Dr. Johnson justly characterized

the work as “a valuable book—perhaps overloaded with quotations—but

there is great spirit and great power in what Burton says, when he

writes from his own mind.” The doctor said that it was the only book

that ever took him out of bed two hours sooner than he wished to rise.

The copy before us is published in Philadelphia, by J. W. Moore, 193

Chestnut street, and in New York by Wiley & Putnam, 161 Broadway. The

volume is well printed, in large and distinct type and upon good paper.

We are rejoiced to see so excellent a reprint of our old favorite.

* * * * *

_Memoir of Elizabeth Fry, with Extracts from her Journal and

Letters. Edited by Two of Her Daughters. 1 vol. Philadelphia.

No. 193 Chestnut Street._

The career of this distinguished and untiring philanthropist has excited

deep interest and admiration on both sides the Atlantic; and her memoirs

cannot be read without an increased respect for a character at once so

exalted and meek, so brave and gentle. The account given by Mrs. Fry of

the early religious struggles which resulted in the devotion of her life

to God and her fellow creatures, will be found full of thrilling

interest to those who have themselves known the night of doubt, and the

joy that cometh with the morning of assured reconciliation with Heaven.

The details of her prison labors are also rich in instruction. We

commend the work to the attention of those who believe, with us, that

there is no study more noble than the life of the just.

* * * * *

_Ireland’s Welcome to the Stranger, or an Excursion through

Ireland in 1844 and 1845, for the Purpose of Personally

Investigating the Condition of the Poor. By A. Nicholson._

The authoress of this volume, a lady of Irish descent, seems to have

been so deeply impressed with the sufferings of the unfortunate children

of the Emerald Isle, that she determined to visit and minister to them

in person. She appears to have effected this purpose with very

inadequate means, often afoot, and under privations which most of the

sterner sex would have shrunk from. Her opportunities for learning the

true condition of the lower classes were ample, and seem to have been

improved with intelligence and judgment. Her descriptions are life-like

and animated; and the book is to those for whom the subject has interest

a pleasant and instructive one.

* * * * *

_The Celebrated Treatise of Joach. Fortius Ringelbergius de

Ratione Studii: Translated from the Edition of Van Erpe. By G.

P. Earp. With Preface and Appendix, by W. H. Odenheimer, A. M.,

Rector of St. Peter’s, Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Carey &

Hart._

This treatise is a most valuable one, and the translation strikes us as

deserving praise. The Rev. Mr. Odenheimer has greatly added to the

excellence of the book by his preface and appendix.

* * * * *

_Essay on the Fairy Queen. By J. S. Hart, Professor of the

Philadelphia High School._

Every reader knows that Spenser’s “Fairy Queen,” although marked by

striking and exquisite passages, is not calculated to be a popular work,

in consequence of the faults of the narrative. Professor Hart has, in

the essay before us, with the mind of a poet and the skill of an artist,

removed the objection alluded to, and presented the narrative in an

attractive style, introducing into his remarks many of the most

beautiful passages. The obvious result of his labors will be to bring

the remarkable and brilliant parts of this poem familiarly before the

public, and make many persons acquainted with Spenser who would never

have undertaken the task of laboring, like miners, through a mass of

rubbish to arrive at the pure ore. The publishers are Wiley & Putnam, of

New York, and they have issued it to the world in a manner worthy of the

excellence of the work itself.

* * * * *

_The Boy’s Treasury of Sports, Pastimes and Recreations._

A most delightful book for the instruction and amusement of the young,

has just been issued under the above title, by Messrs. Lea & Blanchard

of this city, from the London edition. It is indeed a treasury of

knowledge for juveniles, comprehending chapters on various kinds of

sports of the field, green and play-ground, on archery, angling, the

care and keeping of animals and birds, authentic chemical experiments,

&c., &c. There are nearly four hundred engravings interspersed

throughout the volume, explanatory of the different subjects treated

upon, and well calculated to illustrate the text. On the whole, we

regard the “Treasury” as eminently calculated to be both useful and

popular, and think the publishers entitled to praise for presenting to

our youth so rational a means of amusement and instruction.

* * * * *

_The Legend of Latimer, a Zurich Tale, with other Poems. By

William Nind, M. A. London: F. & J. Rivington._

We have before us a copy of this pretty little volume, prepared in

handsome style by the publishers. The main poem has for its subject the

celebrated Latimer, who, with his co-laborer Ridley, suffered martyrdom

during the reign of “bloody Queen Mary,” and is marked with considerable

merit. Some of the minor pieces are also worthy of praise, of which we

would particularly instance a poem entitled “The Secret of the

Universe.”

* * * * *

_Pictorial Life of La Fayette._

Messrs. Lindsay & Blakiston, of this city, have recently published a

Pictorial Life of Gen. La Fayette, embracing anecdotes illustrative of

his character. The eminent services rendered by this distinguished

Frenchman in our struggle for national independence, and the chivalrous

attributes of his character, render every thing connected with him

interesting in the eyes of the American people. We are, therefore, glad

that the enterprising publishers of the volume before us have caused it

to be prepared, so that our youth may have an opportunity of becoming

acquainted with the merits of the gallant marquis, and learn from his

example, a lesson of devotion to the cause of popular liberty.

* * * * *

_Pictorial Life of Gen. Marion._

Tradition has transmitted, and the pages of history recorded too many

instances of the daring hardihood, patient endurance, and indefatigable

perseverance of this celebrated partisan warrior, not to have rendered

his name familiar as a household word throughout the whole length and

breadth of our land. A volume, just issued from the press of Messrs.

Lindsay & Blakiston, gives an epitomized but highly interesting memoir

of his life and deeds, and describes, in a graphic and spirited manner,

a number of the scenes of strife in which Gen. M. was engaged. The

preface to the volume, after alluding to the inscription on the tomb of

Marion, at Belle Isle, St. Stephen’s Parish, South Carolina, states that

“this volume is presented as an humble echo to the labors of those who

would keep the memory of such men green among the people;” and as the

design is a laudable one, so must we regard the publication now under

notice as admirably calculated to effect the object intended.

* * * * *

[Illustration:

Laure Colin

LE FOLLET

Boulevart S^{t}. Martin, 61.

_Toilettes de Longchamps._

_Chapeaux de M^{me}._ Delaunay, _pl. de la Bourse, 31—Plumes et fleurs de

M^{me}._ Tilman, _r. Ménars, 2;_

_Robes de M^{me}._ Bienvenu, _r. de la Chaussée d’Antin, 41;_

_Mantelet en dentelle de_ Violard, _r. Choiseul 2^{bis}—Corsets de_

Pousse, _r. Montmartre, 101._

Graham’s Magazine.]

* * * * *

Transcriber’s Notes:

Table of Contents has been added for reader convenience. Archaic

spellings and hyphenation have been retained. Obvious typesetting and

punctuation errors have been corrected without note. Other errors have

been corrected as noted below. For illustrations, some caption text may

be missing or incomplete due to condition of the originals available for

preparation of the eBook.

page 217, of butcher’s shops in the ==> of butchers’ shops in the

page 218, appellation of _têtes-carreés_ ==> appellation of

_têtes-carrées_

page 239, and pillared collonade, ==> and pillared colonnade,

page 266, that the Elliot’s would ==> that the Elliots would

page 271, sevez-vous il faut ==> levez-vous il faut

[End of Graham’s Magazine, Vol. XXXI, No. 5, November 1847]

Graham's Magazine, Vol. XXXI, No. 5, November 1847 · 第 56 / 56 题