PROCEEDINGS OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNION MEDICAL SOCIETY.

SIXTIETH QUARTERLY SESSION, HELD AT AKRON, OHIO, TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 2,

1886.

The president, DR. J. E. DOUGHERTY, in the chair.

DR. BAUER, of the Committee on Obituaries, was instructed to prepare a

fitting memorial to be read at the next meeting upon the death of Dr. J.

C. Ferguson of Mogadore.

DR. PIERSON read a history of a clinical case. The clinical committee,

consisting of Drs. Hitchcock, Bauer and Rowe, after examination,

reported the case to be one of chronic pleuritis with adhesions and

effusion, and recommended alterative treatment.

DR. FISHER read a report of a case of puerperal convulsions, in which

venesection had been resorted to with favorable results.

In the discussion which followed, DR. SHIVELY said he did not believe in

blood-letting, but would rely upon _drastic cathartics_ and anæsthetics.

DR. WRIGHT, in a practice of fifty years, had employed blood-letting in

a few cases with good results.

DR. EVERHARD had seen several cases, and favored the use of anæsthetics,

but objected to the use of morphine on the ground of the supposed uræmic

pathology of puerperal convulsions.

DR. HOWARD thought Dr. Fisher’s treatment of the case good, and believed

emphatically in blood-letting, and also in the use of arterial

sedatives, such as verat., vir., etc.

DR. T. C. MILLER believed in thorough narcosis, giving morphine

hypodermically until the effects were noticeable on the respiration.

Anæsthetics are good, but can not be given continuously. The physician

giving the anæsthetic, when the convulsions cease will not crowd the

anæsthetic, and almost before he is aware of it the convulsions will

return. We have much to learn about the pathology of puerperal

convulsions. The speaker does not believe it to be uræmic. All of his

cases in which he gave narcotics thoroughly from the first recovered;

cases in which he used blood-letting died.

DR. VANCE believed that the treatment advised by Dr. Miller would result

disastrously in many cases, and spoke at some length, showing that the

latest authorities believed the true pathology of the trouble to be

uræmic.

DR. PIXLEY asked, after hearing so many opinions from so many

distinguished speakers: “What is Dr. Pixley going to do to-night if he

meets a case of puerperal convulsions? One speaker swears, if you bleed,

your patient will die; another swears, if you don’t bleed, your patient

will die; a third says, you must give opium; another says, you must not;

another says, you must give anæsthetics; another veratrum, another

cathartics.” Now, after all of this light upon the subject, he would do

as he always has done—apply cold to the head, warmth to the extremities,

maybe give a little opium, possibly bleed a little, equalize the

circulation, and deliver as soon as possible. Some of his patients will

live and some will die.

DR. HOWARD submitted to the society, for signatures, a petition to the

State Legislature in the interests of what is known as the “Sharpe

bill,” for the creation of a State Board of Health and a State Board of

Medical Examiners.

Adjourned to 1:30 P. M.

The Cleveland Medical Gazette, Vol. 1, No. 5, March 1886 · 第 20 / 24 题