However destructive this drilling may seem to be, it does

not seriously affect the vitality of the trees; the pits

are but 4 to 5 mm. deep, penetrating only those outer

layers of the bark which after a time scale off. We should

judge that all evidence of this woodpecker’s work is thus

removed through natural process within about three years.

The heartwood of the tree therefore seems not to be damaged

at all by the woodpecker’s work; it _is_ damaged, however,

by the work of the true sapsucker. Our inference from

these facts is that the willow woodpecker feeds on the

inner layers of bark, which the bird exposes through the

perforations described above. We watched a bird at work;

moreover, bits of inner bark-fibers were found adhering to

the bristles around the bill of a bird shot.

Evidently this observation and report started the same old controversy

that arose in connection with the eastern bird, which has been referred

to under that subspecies. Charles W. Michael intimated, in course of

conversation with Dr. Grinnell, that they were mistaken in ascribing

these drillings to willow woodpeckers rather than to red-breasted

sapsuckers. This led to the publication, by Dr. Grinnell (1928a), of

the evidence produced by Mr. Michael and himself, to which the reader

is referred. In spite of some evidence, and more supposed evidence,

to the contrary, it now seems to be generally conceded that the downy

woodpeckers seldom, if ever, drill these holes for themselves, but that

they often feed from holes drilled by sapsuckers. The small amount of

drilling done by the downy woodpeckers seems to do the trees no great

harm.

_Behavior._--Grinnell and Storer (1924) write:

The quietness of the willow woodpecker, as compared with

most other species in its family, is noteworthy. We heard

no single call note from it, and only at long intervals

did we hear the indescribable short trill characteristic

of this bird. Individuals are much restricted in range,

foraging along a relatively short line of cottonwoods or

willows day after day. Once a bird is located, it can

usually be found in the same place regularly. When foraging

it moves about with very little commotion, and even when

drilling for insects works so quietly that only a keen

auditor can detect its presence. No matter what the season

of the year, a pair of these birds is to be found usually

within hearing of each other. The bird’s close adherence

to deciduous trees makes it more conspicuous and easier to

observe in late fall and winter than in the summertime when

the trees are fully leaved out; but even in winter, our

experience with the willow woodpecker led us to consider

it about the most elusive of all the diurnal birds of the

Yosemite region.

We had always supposed that the rapid series of notes

uttered by this species were given only by the adult male

and hence constituted a sort of song. But on June 24, 1920,

in Yosemite Valley a juvenile male was found, with his head

out of a nest hole eight feet above the ground in a dead

branch of a live willow, giving every few moments this very

series of notes. The large _crown_ patch of red on this

bird established its age and sex clearly. There was every

indication that the notes were being given as a food call.

M. P. Skinner contributes the following note:

One seen in Sequoia National Park in August was drilling

at the bases of willow shoots near a river. It perched

lengthwise of the stems. It managed to keep well hidden,

but worked industriously and did not change its position

much during the short time that I could see it. Later,

I caught a glimpse occasionally of the woodpecker’s red

head, although the bird kept hidden most of the time. This

reminded me that I had often wondered why red usually

marked a woodpecker’s head. Certainly it makes a wonderful

recognition mark. In that way it might well be that red on

the constantly moving head of the woodpecker would be of

value to the race.

DRYOBATES BOREALIS (Vieillot)

RED-COCKADED WOODPECKER

PLATES 9, 10

HABITS

CONTRIBUTED BY EUGENE EDMOND MURPHEY

Introduced to ornithology by Wilson under the name of _Picus querulus_,

the red-cockaded woodpecker is locally common throughout the open

pine country of the South Atlantic and Gulf States and extends its

range into the pine country of Oklahoma and Missouri. Its preference

is very definitely for the open woods, shunning the dense thickets

of second-growth pine and the deep recesses of the cypress swamps

even when the latter are only a few hundred yards away from its

chosen environment. These open pine woods, which abound both in the

Austro-Riparian and Carolinian Zones of the South Atlantic and Gulf

States, represent not a normal growth of pine forest but an original

pine forest modified by the pernicious custom of annually burning the

woods under the impression that in that way next year’s pasturage will

be improved.

As a result, the younger trees and seedlings are killed off. Only the

hardier and more resistant survivors remain, so that there is little or

no underbrush and the general appearance of these woods is more that

of an open glade or park than of typical pine forest. William Brewster

(1882) comments on the character of these forests as follows: “The pine

lands of the South have an open park-like character that is a continual

surprise to one accustomed only to New England forests. The trees

rarely stand in close proximity to one another, and they are often so

widely scattered that the general effect is that of an opening rather

than a forest.” These pines are chiefly _Pinus palustris_ Miller,

_Pinus ellioti_ Engelmann, and _Pinus taeda_ Linnaeus.

From many sections of the South where it was formerly common, the

red-cockaded woodpecker has disappeared by reason of the ruthless

destruction of pine forests by the lumbermen. When the large timber is

cut out, the birds leave the locality and apparently do not return.

However, there is still a considerable amount of pine forest suitable

for its nesting that is held in private hands and not about to be

destroyed. In fact, such timber holdings are largely on the increase,

particularly in the “low country” of South Carolina and Georgia and

in certain zones around Thomasville, Ga., and Aiken, S. C., where vast

tracts are being conserved by private ownership as game refuges and

shooting preserves.

There is also a very considerable amount of intelligent reforestation

being carried out, which in time will also furnish adequate and

suitable breeding grounds. This species is so highly specialized at

least in the South Atlantic States in its habits and its choice of

environment that the destruction of the pine forests would probably put

its existence in serious jeopardy.

_Nesting._--Audubon (1842) stated that “the nest is not unfrequently

bored in a decayed stump about thirty feet high.” G. W. Morse (1927)

found the bird nesting in a willow tree in a pasture in Oklahoma. M.

G. Vaiden (MS.) reports from Collins, Miss., the taking of a nest

from a pine tree, the top of which was dead and the nest hole about 8

feet from the top. Arthur T. Wayne (1906), who has probably had more

intimate experience with this bird than any other observer, states:

I have seen perhaps a thousand holes in which this

woodpecker had bred or was breeding, and _every one_ was

excavated in a _living_ pine tree, ranging from eighteen

to one hundred feet above the ground. This bird never lays

its eggs until the pine gum pours freely from beneath and

around the hole, and in order to accelerate the flow the

birds puncture the bark to the “skin” of the tree thereby

causing the gum to exude freely. This species, unlike the

Pileated Woodpecker, returns to the same hole year after

year until it can no longer make the gum exude. But like

the Pileated Woodpecker, it is much attached to the tree

in which it has first made its nest, and as long as it can

find a suitable spot it will continue to excavate new holes

until the tree is _killed_ by this process of boring. I

have frequently counted as many as four holes in one tree,

and in two instances I have seen as many as eight. These

birds seem to know by instinct that the center of the tree

is rotten, or what lumber men call “black-heart,” and they

never make a mistake when selecting a tree! The hole is

bored through the solid wood, generally a little upward,

and to the center of the tree (which is always rotten).

The overwhelming majority of observers who have studied the

red-cockaded woodpecker in its normal habitat concur in the opinion

that the site of selection for the nest hole is in a living pine that,

however, has begun to rot at the core, and this condition of the

heart of the tree the birds seem to be able to discern with unfailing

accuracy. All the nests I have seen and studied were in living pines,

and other ornithologists have made similar observations. T. Gilbert

Pearson (1909) says: “So far as I have observed, always excavated

in the trunk of a living pine tree. The site chosen varies from

twenty-five to fifty feet from the earth.” H. L. Harllee (MS.), of

Florence, S. C, writes: “It nests in the same hole each year in close

proximity to several pairs, usually from two to four.” The observations

of Gilbert R. Rossignol (MS.), writing from Savannah, Ga., agree with

the foregoing. He states: “Before the lumberman invaded our great pine

forests, the red-cockaded was fairly common, for I have found 10 or 12

pairs nesting in a 50-acre tract, provided, of course, that the pine

trees were not too close to one another. These little woodpeckers did

not like dark heavily timbered forests. The bird drills a hole in a

living pine ranging from 25 to 80 or more feet high, and it is almost

impossible to get the eggs without full equipment. It takes a brace

and bit to bore holes a little above where you think the bottom of the

nest is located, and then sometimes you strike below it, or again right

into it on an incomplete set or no eggs at all. The eggs I have found

were always more or less sticky with pine gum. This bird will nest in

the same hole for several years and use the same tree probably during

its entire life, but if the tree dies, or the gum does not flow freely,

the birds will desert their old home.” Henry Nehrling (1882), writing

from Texas, states that “it usually excavates its nesting sites in

deciduous trees,” and E. A. McIlhenny (Bendire, 1895) that “in southern

Louisiana it generally nests in willow and china trees.” The nesting

hole is bored usually slightly upward for several inches then straight

through into the softer unsound heart of the tree and downward for 8

inches to a foot or more. The nest cavity is gourd-shaped, and the

eggs are laid upon fine chips and debris in the bottom of the cavity.

The most striking thing about the nesting site, however, is due to the

bird’s custom of drilling numerous small holes through the bark of the

tree until the resin exudes freely. This glazed patch of gum around

the nesting hole is unmistakable and when once seen becomes an easy

landmark for the location of the nests, inasmuch as it may be discerned

through the open woods for a distance of several hundred yards. During

the period of incubation, the birds are a sorry spectacle, the abdomen

being largely denuded of feathers, as is customary with many birds,

and the breast feathers from the clavicle to the end of the sternum

begaumed and matted together with resin, and, in fact, they remain

permanently unfit to be taken as specimens until the next molting has

been completed.

The nidification is earlier along the coast and southward than in

the interior and toward the northern limits of its range, beginning

sometimes as early as February, but the major nesting season may be

said to be the last week in April and the first week in May.

S. A. Grimes tells us that old nests of this species are used by

red-bellied and red-headed woodpeckers, white-breasted nuthatches,

bluebirds, crested flycatchers, and flying squirrels.

_Eggs._--The eggs vary from three to five in number, the latter being

unusual; they are elliptically ovate in shape, pure glossy white,

and semitranslucent when fresh. Not infrequently they are stained or

smeared with resin from the breast feathers of the incubating bird. As

a rule only one brood is raised in a season unless the first set has

been taken, and both parents participate in incubation. There is some

evidence tending to show that the eggs and even the unfledged young

are sometimes thrown out of the nest by the birds when it has been

disturbed.

The measurements of 50 eggs average 24.04 by 17.86 millimeters; the

eggs showing the four extremes measure =26.42= by 18.54, 26.4 by

=19.8=, =21.38= by 17.46, and 23.77 by =16.66= millimeters.

_Plumages._--The young in their first plumage bear the general color

pattern of the adults with this important exception--the young male has

a dull crimson oval central crown patch. However, while the pattern is

identical with that of adult birds, the black is replaced by a dark

sepia merging at times into an aniline black, and the bluish gloss

evident on the crowns of the mature birds is lacking. Similarly, the

feathers of the cheek patch in both sexes lack the fine silky gloss and

texture that are later attained. The underparts show uniformly a buffy

or ochraceous wash everywhere, and the barring of the tail is more

pronounced. During this phase, the plumage is much softer and looser

than it subsequently becomes.

With the first molt, the red crown patch is lost.

It is the belief of the writer, without sufficient specimens properly

to verify it, that the cockades of the full adult male plumage are not

attained until at least the third molt. Without careful dissection

and sex determination of the immature birds, a fact notoriously

difficult to the average ornithologist, the young of both sexes, after

the crown patch is lost and the cockades have not appeared, would be

indistinguishable.

_Food._--The food, like that of most woodpeckers, consists primarily of

larvae of various wood-boring insects, although beetles and grubs of

other kinds as well as ants, grasshoppers, crickets, and caterpillars

are frequently taken. An interesting habit of the red-cockaded

woodpecker is that of going into the cornfields throughout the South

at the time when the corn is at the roasting-ear stage and when many

of the ears are infested with a worm that damages the grain to a very

considerable extent. This habit is reported by Billy Ward (1930), of

Timmonsville, S. C., and by Edward Dingle (1926), of Mount Pleasant, S.

C., who says, “The Red-cockaded Woodpecker (_Phrenopicus borealis_) is

very commonly found in cornfields during the time the corn is in the

ear; in fact, the bird spends a large part of its time at this season

in extracting the worms that bore into the ears of corn. I have often,

at short distance, watched them engaged in this valuable work.” They

also feed on pine mast, the small wild grape, pokeberries, and other

small wild fruit. I have never seen them in orchards or in fig trees,

where the red-headed woodpecker is frequently found feeding.

As far as is known, this species does not visit cultivated fields,

except as above referred to, or orchards and is not destructive to

fruit and deserves to be regarded as wholly beneficial. This statement

takes into account the fact that a number of observers say that they

will continue to bore into certain pines that they have selected for a

nesting site until the tree is killed. The fact is, however, that the

tree is diseased and unsound before the woodpecker begins to utilize it

and is already worthless for lumber, so that this species seems worthy

of complete protection.

_Behavior._--The bird is strikingly gregarious as compared with other

woodpeckers and is ordinarily to be found in small groups of six,

eight, or even ten individuals, which seem to keep in continuous touch

with one another, calling back and forth, sounding their drum roll on

resonant timber and apparently not satisfied unless assured of the near

presence of the group.

This behavior is no doubt due to the fact that the family remains

together until early in winter, although family groups are probably

joined by other individuals until the number above referred to is

attained. Numerous observers speak of the frequent association of the

red-cockaded woodpecker with other birds. This to the mind of the

writer, however, is purely accidental and is due to the fact that

there are certain species of birds that inhabit the open pineries and

have common feeding ground and habitat. It is true that one often sees

bluebirds, tufted titmice, white-breasted and brown-headed nuthatches,

and red-cockaded woodpeckers in the same woodland and that when

sitting quietly and concealed all the species mentioned pass in review

before the observer, but probably it is not a true gregariousness that

embraces all these various species; rather the restlessness that so

frequently seems to possess the avian population of a given tract of

woods communicates itself from one to the other and the entire avifauna

of a limited patch of woodland begins to move in a certain direction

perhaps because of some alarm which has been communicated from one

member of the group to the others.

These woodpeckers are exceedingly active, galloping from one tree to

another and rapidly ascending it in quest of food or apparently often

merely to secure a better observation point somewhere near the top of

the tree. Their usual custom is to ascend the tree in spirals, although

they have frequently been observed to continue a straight course up

the trunk particularly when feeding. The bird may be described as wary

rather than shy and is most adept at the familiar woodpecker trick

of keeping the trunk of the tree between an approaching observer and

itself.

As a rule they do not feed close to the ground, nor have I ever

observed one on the ground even after the burning of a woodland, at

which time the flicker and the red-bellied woodpecker may both be

observed on the ground searching for grubs and insects killed by

the blaze. Dr. Irving Phinizy (MS.) states that he has on several

occasions observed the red-cockaded woodpecker descend a tree in a

series of backward hops. This the writer has never observed. Arthur H.

Howell (1932) states that the ivorybill inches backward down a tree,

a somewhat different procedure. Frequently also they are observed,

particularly when feeding near the top of a pine and out toward the end

of a limb, to descend the hanging limb nuthatch fashion. Much of their

feeding is done in the highest branches of the trees, and they seem

to have a predilection for remaining there, spending a considerable

portion of their time in the very crown of the tree, where they are

very difficult to see.

They are exceedingly quarrelsome, particularly during the breeding

season, yet their quarrels do not seem to be so serious or so prolonged

as those of the red-headed woodpecker; and not infrequently, after the

lapse of a very little time, birds that have been scolding one another

most extensively again alight on the same pine tree and go about their

respective businesses in perfect amity.

C. J. Maynard (1896) states, concerning its habits, as follows:

Wilson called the Cockaded Woodpeckers, _Picus querulus_,

and this seems, at first glance, to be a most appropriate

name, for, of all the family, these are not only the most

noisy, but their notes are given in a decidedly fretful

tone as if the birds were constantly in an irritable state

of mind. It must have been upon the impulse of the moment,

however, that the Pioneer Ornithologist gave them the

name of Querulus Woodpeckers, for a close study of their

habits gives a very different impression of them. They

are, in fact, a most jovial class of birds, being almost

constantly engaged in sporting about the tops of tall pines

or chasing one another from tree to tree, uttering their

peevish sounding notes very frequently when in the best

humor. The noise is more noticeable because they congregate

in flocks, and it is quite rare to find even a pair without

other companions. They are also fond of the company of

other members of the family and will even associate with

the Jays, Blue Birds, or Warblers. This gregarious instinct

does not forsake them during the breeding season, for

they build in detached communities. The nests are almost

always in living pines, often thirty or forty feet from the

ground; thus, as the trunks of these trees are covered with

a smooth bark, it is quite difficult to climb them and,

when the nests are reached it is not easy to cut the hard

wood, especially as the straight trunks afford no foot-hold.

In flight, the cockaded woodpeckers resemble the downy

but when they alight they strike the object upon which

they wish to rest very hard. Like the preceding species,

they are also exceedingly agile, moving spirally up the

tall tree trunks with great celerity. Although they will

occasionally alight near the ground, yet they spend the

greater part of their time in the tops of the lofty pines;

in fact, they pass a large portion of their lives there,

for they are seldom, if ever, found elsewhere than in the

piney woods and they inhabit this kind of woodland even to

the extreme southern portion of the main-land of Florida.

The bird is resident throughout its normal range, although David V.

Hembree, of Roswell, Ga., in the very foothills of the Appalachian

Range, a lifelong student and collector of birds, writes me, “This

bird does not breed in this locality. I have never seen a nest. A few

are found here, nearly always males in April or May, and I have always

thought them to be migrants or strays from their regular range.”

In common with the other small black and white woodpeckers, this

species carries the vernacular name of sapsucker and in the main is

not differentiated from the others, although one astute lumberman once

said to me: “Speaking of sapsuckers, there _is_ a piney-woods sapsucker

which is different from the others, leastways he acts different.”

_Voice._--The voice is variously described by different observers--

“harsh and discordant,” “almost exactly resembling the calls of the

Brownheaded Nuthatch,” “resembling the yank-yank of a White-breasted

Nuthatch,” “they have sharp calls more like loud sparrow alarms than

woodpecker notes,” “resembling the querulous cries of young birds.”

The bird is noisy, and its call notes and scolding notes are to the ear

of the writer quite radically different, the scolding note being more

prolonged, somewhat rolling in character and lower in pitch. There is

a definite nasal character to a note that to that extent does resemble

the notes of the nuthatch. The note is quite characteristic and when

once learned is distinguishable with ease from that of the other small

woodpeckers. It resembles more the high note of some small woodwind

instrument than anything else, having a definite clarinetlike quality.

Descriptions of bird notes are notoriously variable because of

the variability of the human ear, and many attempts at phonetic

reproduction of the bird notes are unsuccessful, and when, as is so

often done, the attempt is directed to reproduction in syllables, the

result is usually a futile and meaningless onomatopoeia.

DISTRIBUTION

_Range._--Southeastern United States; nonmigratory.

The range of the red-cockaded woodpecker extends =north= to

northeastern Oklahoma (Copan); southern Missouri (Shannon County);

Tennessee (Beersheba and Allardt); and North Carolina (Red Springs and

Beaufort). =East= on the Atlantic coast from North Carolina (Beaufort)

to southern Florida (Long Pine Key). =South= on the Gulf coast from the

Florida Keys (Long Pine Key) to southeastern Texas (Houston). =West= to

Texas (Houston); northwestern Louisiana (Mansfield); probably western

Arkansas (Mena); and eastern Oklahoma (Tulsa and Copan).

_Casual records._--It seems probable that this species may breed or

upon occasion has bred in the vicinity of Raleigh, N. C., as it was

noted there several times in April from 1890 to 1898. It also has

been reported as seen at Piney Creek, N. C., on July 6, 1932, and on

September 12, 1933.

A specimen in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia was

collected near that city in 1861; one in the collection of the Ohio

State University was taken near Columbus, Ohio, on March 15, 1872.

According to Stone (1909) the collection of George N. Lawrence

contained a specimen taken near Hoboken, N. J.

_Egg dates._--Florida: 30 records, April 3 to May 28; 15 records,

April 29 to May 20, indicating the height of the season.

South Carolina: 14 records, April 27 to May 28.

DRYOBATES SCALARIS SYMPLECTUS Oberholser

TEXAS WOODPECKER

HABITS

Life histories of North American woodpeckers · 第 9 / 43 段