CLERICUS (D).

_Oaths of Pregnant Women_ (Vol. v., p. 393.).--Women of the humbler classes

in the British Islands appear to have an objection, when pregnant, to take

an oath. I have not observed any attempt to explain or account for this

prejudice. The same objection exists among the Burmese. Indeed, pregnant

women there are, by long-observed custom, absolved from taking an oath, and

affirm to their depositions, "remembering their pregnant condition." The

reason of this is as follows. The system of Budhism, as it prevails in the

Indo-Chinese countries, consists essentially in the negation of a Divine

Providence. The oath of Budhists is an imprecation of evil on the swearer,

{504} addressed to the innate rewarding powers of nature, animate and

inanimate, if the truth be not spoken. This evil may be instantaneous, as

sudden death from a fit, or from a flash of lightning; the first food taken

may choke the false swearer; or on his way home, a tiger by land, or an

alligator by water, may seize and devour him. I have known an instance of

this occur, which was spoken of by hundreds as a testimony to the truth of

the system. Now it is supposed by Budhists that even an unconscious

departure from truth may rouse jealous nature to award punishment. In the

case of pregnant women this would involve the unborn offspring in the

calamity. Hence women in that condition do not take an oath in Burmah.

Notes and Queries, Number 212, November 19, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 82 / 147 题