R. C. WARDE.

Kidderminster.

_Rome and the Number Six._--It has been remarked lately in "N. & Q." that

in English history, the reign of the second sovereign of the same name has

been infelicitous. I cannot turn to the {491} note I read, and I forget

whether it noticed the remarks in Aubrey's _Miscellanies_ (London, 8vo.,

1696), that "all the _second_ kings since the Conquest have been

unfortunate." It may be worth the while to add (what is remarked by Mr.

Matthews in his _Diary of an Invalid_), that the number _six_ has been

considered at Rome as ominous of misfortune. Tarquinius Sextus was the very

worst of the Tarquins, and his brutal conduct led to a revolution in the

government; under Urban the Sixth, the great schism of the West broke out;

Alexander the Sixth outdid all that his predecessors amongst the Tarquins

or the Popes had ventured to do before him; and the presentiment seemed to

receive confirmation in the misfortunes of the reign of his successor Pius

VI., to whose election was applied the line:

"Semper sub sextis perdita Roma fuit."

Notes and Queries, Number 212, November 19, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 21 / 147 题