Revival of Wood-engraving by Thomas Bewick--The _Observer_ started,
1791--The _Times_ an Illustrated Paper--Illustrations of News in the
_Observer_--St. Helena and Napoleon Bonaparte--Abraham Thornton and
the 'Assize of Battle'--Mr. William Clement and Illustrated
Journalism--The Cato Street Conspiracy--Trial of Queen Caroline--The
House of Commons in 1821--Coronation of George IV.--Royal Visits to
Ireland and Scotland--Murder of Mr. Weare--Illustrations of the Murder
in the _Morning Chronicle_, the _Observer_, and the
_Englishman_--_Bell's Life in London_--Prize-Fight at Warwick--Liston
as 'Paul Pry'--'Gallery of Comicalities,' &c.--_Pierce Egan's Life in
London_--Death of the Duke of York--Death of Mr. Canning--Opening of
Hammersmith Bridge, 1827--Mr. Gurney's Steam Coach--The Thames
Tunnel--The Murder in the Red Barn--The Siamese Twins--Death of George
IV.--Opening of New London Bridge, 1831--Coronation of William IV. and
Queen Adelaide--Fieschi's Infernal Machine--Funeral of William
IV.--Queen Victoria's First Visit to the City--Coronation and Marriage
of the Queen--Christening of the Prince of Wales--_The Weekly
Chronicle_--The Greenacre Murder--Mr. Cocking and his Parachute--The
Courtney Riots at Canterbury--Burning of the Tower of London,
1841--_The Sunday Times_--Burning of the Houses of Parliament,
1834--_The Champion_--_The Weekly Herald_--_The Magnet_--Removing the
Body of Napoleon I.--_The Penny Magazine_--Charles Knight--Humorous
Journalism of the Victorian Era.
There appears to have been little or nothing done in the way of
illustrated journalism during the remaining years of the eighteenth
century. It was during this period that Thomas Bewick revived the almost
extinct art of wood-engraving, and about the time he brought out the
first of his illustrated natural history books a weekly newspaper was
started in London which afterwards became the pioneer of modern
illustrated journalism. This was the _Observer_, the first number of
which came out on Sunday, Dec. 4th, 1791. It is the oldest of our
existing weekly newspapers, and is one of the rare instances of a
Sunday paper becoming established.[1] Many years had to elapse before
wood-engraving began to be used as a means of popular illustration; but
when some of Bewick's numerous pupils began to diffuse the fruits of
their master's teaching the _Observer_ was the first newspaper that
availed itself of the restored art. Before this, however, there were
symptoms of the reawakening of a dormant idea. In looking back to the
early years of the present century it is curious and interesting to
notice that the _Times_ was occasionally an illustrated paper. The
battle of Trafalgar and the death of Nelson stirred the national heart
to such a degree that the _Times_ of that day was induced to introduce
into its pages engravings of Nelson's coffin and funeral car, when the
hero's remains were carried to St. Paul's. In the number for Jan. 10th,
1806, there is an account of the State funeral, which is illustrated
with the above-named woodcuts. They are very rudely executed, and
plainly show that the influence of Bewick's labours had not yet
penetrated into the region of journalism. Annexed is a copy of what the
_Times_ of 1806 presented to the public in response to the intense
interest felt by the whole of the British nation about Nelson's death
and funeral. It is a noteworthy example of renewed effort in the
direction of illustrated news at a time when insufficient means of
production clogged the spirit of enterprise. Like the _Swedish
Intelligencer_ of 1632, the _Times_ did not hesitate to point out its
shortcomings in the following notice at the foot of the engraving:--'The
only difference in the appearance of the Funeral Car from the engraving
is, that, contrary to what was at first intended, neither the pall nor
coronet appeared on the coffin. The first was thrown in the stern of the
Car, in order to give the public a complete view of the coffin; and
the coronet was carried in a mourning-coach. We had not time to make the
alteration.'
[Illustration: NELSON'S FUNERAL CAR. FROM THE 'TIMES,' JAN. 10, 1806.]
To the above engraving the following description was appended:--'The
Car, modelled at the ends in imitation of the hull of the Victory. Its
head towards the horses, was ornamented with a figure of Fame. The stern
carved and painted in the naval style, with the word "Victory" in yellow
raised letters on the lanthorn over the poop. The coffin placed on the
quarterdeck with its head towards the stern, with the English Jack
pendent over the poop lowered half-staff. There was an awning over the
whole, consisting of an elegant canopy supported by four pillars, in the
form of palm-trees, as we have already mentioned, and partly covered
with black velvet. The corners and sides were decorated with black
ostrich feathers, and festooned with black velvet, richly fringed,
immediately above which, in the front, was inscribed in gold the word
"Nile" at one end; on one side the following motto, "Hoste devicto,
requievit;" behind was the word "Trafalgar;" and on the other side the
motto "Palmam qui meruit ferat," as in the engraving. The carriage was
drawn by six led horses, in elegant furniture.'
In 1817 the _Times_ also illustrated the projects of Robert Owen, who
laboured long and ardently to promote the doctrines of Socialism. In the
number for Aug. 9th, 1817, there is a large woodcut called Robert Owen's
agricultural and manufacturing villages of Unity and Mutual Cooperation.
In those days a page of the _Times_ was not so valuable as it is now, or
probably the enthusiastic Socialist would not have found it so easy to
enlist that journal in helping to propagate his doctrines. In 1834 Owen
made in London another attempt to put in practice the principles he had
so long advocated. He died in 1858, aged ninety.
I have mentioned that the _Observer_ was the first newspaper that
availed itself of the revived art of wood-engraving; but it had
previously essayed the then difficult task of illustrating the news of
the day by the more costly means of engraving on copper. The island of
St. Helena having been selected as the place of residence of Napoleon
Bonaparte, the _Observer_ of Oct. 29th, 1815, published a large
copperplate view of the island, with a descriptive account. The plate is
printed on the same page with the letterpress, so that there must have
been two printings to produce this specimen of illustrated news. Three
years later the _Observer_ produced another copperplate example of news
illustration, also printed on the letterpress page. This was a portrait
of Abraham Thornton, whose remarkable case attracted much public
attention. He was tried for the murder of a young woman, Mary Ashford,
with whom he was known to be acquainted, and in whose company he was
seen shortly before her death. He was, however, acquitted, the jury
probably believing it to be a case of suicide. The brother of the girl
then appealed, and Thornton claimed his right to defend himself by wager
of battle. This claim was allowed, after long arguments before the
judges. It was found, much to the surprise of the general public, that
by the law of England a man in an appeal of murder might demand the
combat, thereby to make proof of his guilt or innocence. In the present
case the girl's brother refused the challenge, and Thornton escaped.
This was the last appeal to the 'Assize of Battle' in this country; and
the attention of the Legislature being drawn to the obsolete statute, it
was repealed by 59 Geo. III., 1819. It was during the progress of the
arguments in this case, and while the public interest was very great,
that the _Observer_ published the portrait of the accused.
After this the _Observer_ became remarkable for its illustrations of
news. Mr. William Clement, the proprietor, was a man who early saw the
attractiveness of illustrated journalism. I am not aware when he first
became associated with the _Observer_; but under his management frequent
illustrations of news were given in that paper. In 1820 _Bell's Life in
London_ was started, and very soon Mr. Clement became the proprietor of
that paper also. In 1821 he purchased the _Morning Chronicle_, which,
however, turned out a bad speculation. Having invested a very large sum
of money in the latter paper, Mr. Clement spared no effort to make it
profitable, and the _Observer_ was neglected. It suffered in
consequence, and fell in circulation. Frequently the illustrations of
news that were printed in the _Observer_ were published the day
previously in the _Chronicle_. They were also occasionally printed in
_Bell's Life_ and the _Englishman_, a fourth paper belonging to Mr.
Clement. All four papers were carried on together; but it is the
_Observer_ that stands out as the prominent representative of
illustrated journalism at this period. Other journals came into
existence which took up the idea of illustrating the news of the day;
among them the _Sunday Times_, started by Daniel Whittle Harvey in 1822,
when he was member for Colchester. Another paper which for a time
rivalled, if it did not excel, the _Observer_ in the frequency of its
news illustrations was the _Weekly Chronicle_. It flourished a few years
before the birth of the _Illustrated London News_, but has long been
extinct. Mr. Clement sold the _Morning Chronicle_ in 1834, and soon
restored the _Observer_ to its old position. The _Morning Chronicle_
started in 1769 and expired in 1864. The _Englishman_ has long been
defunct, but I am not acquainted with the date of its disappearance.
There was a paper called the _Englishman_ in 1714, and the name was
again revived by the late Dr. Kenealy.
The _Observer_ and _Bell's Life_ were both published at the same office
for many years, but their companionship was terminated in 1877, when
they left the office in the Strand where they had so long lived amicably
together, the great sporting journal migrating to Catherine Street, and
the _Observer_ seeking a new home in the Strand further west.
One or two other newspapers occasionally published engravings during the
few years immediately preceding the _Illustrated London News_, and of
them I will speak in the proper place. The most prominent, however,
were the _Observer_, _Bell's Life in London_, and the _Weekly
Chronicle_, and to these three I propose first to direct attention as
being the main supporters of the pictorial spirit until it culminated in
the _Illustrated London News_. It was during the ten years preceding
1842 that the founder of that journal noticed the growing inclination of
the people for illustrated news, and it was chiefly in the pages of the
_Observer_ and the _Weekly Chronicle_ that he thought he saw the growth
of a hitherto uncultivated germ.
In 1820 all England was startled by the discovery of a mysterious plot
of some political desperadoes who planned the assassination of the
Ministers of the Crown and the overthrow of the Government. This came to
be known as the Cato Street Conspiracy, the place of meeting of the
conspirators being in Cato Street, Marylebone. The extravagance of the
Prince Regent, the high price of bread, and the heavy taxation, had
brought about a feeling of discontent among the lower orders which,
unhappily, was greatly increased by the Spa Fields riots, and the
collision between the soldiers and the people in Lancashire, at what was
called the massacre of Peterloo. Thistlewood, the leader of the
conspirators, had already been tried for treasonable practices, but
acquitted. He had also been in trouble for his connexion with the Spa
Fields riots. The sanguinary plan of the conspirators was to murder the
Cabinet Ministers while they were all assembled at dinner at Lord
Harrowby's house in Grosvenor Square. They were to seize certain pieces
of cannon, take the Bank of England, destroy the telegraph to Woolwich,
set fire to different parts of London, and then establish a provisional
government at the Mansion House, sending emissaries to the outports to
prevent the escape of obnoxious persons. They reckoned on large numbers
of the discontented joining them as soon as they had destroyed the
tyrants and oppressors of the people, as they termed the Ministers. They
had provided pikes, pistols, sabres, knives, blunderbusses, and
hand-grenades; and one of the gang, a butcher, had furnished himself
with a heavy butcher's knife, to cut off the heads of 'Castlereagh and
the rest as he came at them.' Adams, one of their number, turned
informer, and the conspirators were surprised by the police at their
meeting-place in Cato Street. After a conflict in which one of the
police-officers was killed, several of the gang were secured, and others
were taken soon afterwards. Thistlewood, the leader, escaped in the
first rush, but was captured next day.
The place where the seizure was made is described as a hayloft over a
deserted stable with a step-ladder leading from the stable to the loft
above, with two apertures in the floor of the loft, opening on the racks
in the stable below; opening from the loft were two small inner rooms.
On the evening of the 23rd of February, 1820, the conspirators were
assembled in this stable, where they were arming themselves for the
bloody work they had planned, when the police, aided by a party of the
Coldstream Guards under Lieut. Fitzclarence, broke in upon them.
Police-officers Ruthven, Ellice, and Smithers, were the first to mount
the ladder, and enter the loft.
'There were about five-and-twenty men in the room, eating bread and
cheese, and drinking porter, or selecting arms from a long carpenter's
bench which stood close by the wall. Just at that juncture, Thistlewood,
hearing a noise, and some one calling, "Hallo! Show a light!" took a
candle, and looked down the stairs to see who was coming, and, on seeing
that there was a surprise, he put the candle back on the bench, seized a
sword, and with three or four others retreated stealthily to the further
of the inner rooms--the one that had a window looking out into Cato
Street. At that moment one of the men seized below called out to warn
his comrades, "Look out there above!"
'At the same time, two of the constables, at first almost unnoticed,
appeared at the top of the ladder, and presenting their pistols, said,
"Hallo, is anybody in the room? Here's a pretty nest of you!"
'Then another of the patrol cried, "We are officers; seize their arms."
'And a third, "Gentlemen, we have got a warrant to apprehend you all,
and as such we hope you will go peaceably."
'Just then Smithers, distrusting further parley, and believing, in his
staunch way, in promptitude, before the conspirators could discover the
scantiness of the assailing numbers, or could muster courage to use
their arms, cried, "Let me come forward," and pushed towards the door of
the inner room, where Thistlewood stood thrusting with a very long
sword. The leader of the conspirators instantly rushed forward, and
struck Smithers through his right side. The constable threw up his
hands, his head fell back, he staggered against Ruthven, cried, "O my
God, I am done!" and fell dead near the opening of the stairs. Ellice
held up his staff at Thistlewood, and threatened to fire with the pistol
in his right hand, unless he instantly surrendered. The lights were
immediately dashed out, and a voice cried in the darkness, "Kill the
---- at once! Throw them down-stairs! Kill them!"
'Then there were twenty or thirty pistol-shots fired, and a tremendous
headlong rush was made at the stairs, driving the Bow Street men
backwards; the conspirators leaping down into the manger through the
holes in the floor, or by the window, others firing at the officers on
the stairs, or up through the manger, all making for the archway in John
Street.'[2]
It would appear the conspirators were closely watched for some time
before they were arrested. Indeed, it was suspected that Government
emissaries were employed to foment the conspiracy in order that a
terrible example might be made for the benefit of the disaffected.
However this may have been, the plot excited the most intense interest
among all classes. Thistlewood and the other prisoners were tried at the
Old Bailey, April 17th, 1820, and found guilty of high treason. Six
were transported for life, the other five, including Thistlewood, were
hung on May 1st, and their heads severed from their bodies--the
quartering, the usual doom of traitors, having been graciously forgiven.
[Illustration: A. Door to the cart-house. B. Door by which the officers
entered. C. Stable window. D. Loft-door.
STABLE WHERE THE CATO STREET CONSPIRATORS MET. FROM THE 'OBSERVER,'
MARCH 5TH, 1820.]
The _Observer_ for March 5th, 1820, published some illustrations of the
Cato Street Conspiracy. One is an exterior view of the stable in Cato
Street where the conspirators met, which is copied on the opposite page.
[Illustration: SECTION OF GRENADE PREPARED BY THE CATO STREET
CONSPIRATORS.
FROM THE 'OBSERVER,' MARCH 5TH, 1820.
A. Cylindrical tin Box containing gunpowder.
B. Pitched tow.
C. Bullets, old nails, Spikes, &c.
D. Tin Tube a Fuze filled with damp powder.]
There was also an interior view of the hayloft, together with sections
of some of the grenades, daggers, &c., large quantities of which were
found in the loft.
These cuts, which are roughly done, were reprinted in the _Observer_ for
March 12th, and two new ones were added, 'Interior view of the Hayloft
at the moment when Smithers received his Death Wound,' and a view of the
interior of the stable. They are all interesting as examples of
illustrated news at a time when the means of producing such things were
extremely limited.
[Illustration: DAGGER PREPARED BY THE CATO STREET CONSPIRATORS. FROM THE
'OBSERVER,' MARCH 5TH, 1820.
A. Dagger made out of a bayonet to use singly or on top of a pike
handle.
B. Dagger with hole in the middle to receive dagger A. when screwed on,
to be used right and left.
C. Section of the transverse dagger B.]
Mr. Clement, the proprietor of the _Observer_, gave a remarkable proof
of his enterprising spirit when the Cato Street conspirators were tried.
At that time newspapers were prohibited under a penalty of 500_l._ from
publishing reports of cases in the courts of law before they were
concluded. Mr. Clement, seeing the universal interest excited by the
trial, determined to publish a report without waiting for the verdict.
He accordingly sent reporters to the court, and published the whole in
the _Observer_ before the verdict was given. This was a contempt of
court for which he expected to have to pay, and, though the penalty was
duly inflicted, it was never exacted. The _eclat_ attending this
proceeding was of immense value to the _Observer_, and the sale of that
number was so great that the proprietor could easily have paid the
penalty of 500_l._, and he would still have been a gainer.[3]
The Prince of Wales (afterwards George IV.), whose unhappy marriage with
Caroline of Brunswick produced so much scandal and excitement in this
country, had long been separated from his wife, who was residing abroad
at the time her husband became King. Her Majesty announced her intention
of returning to England; and though the King's Ministers endeavoured to
dissuade her from her purpose, she persisted in her resolution, and on
June 6th, 1820, she landed at Dover. Her journey through London was one
long triumph, thousands of people escorting her to her temporary
residence, and giving her the warmest possible welcome, for they looked
upon her as an ill-used and persecuted woman. The question of omitting
her name from the Liturgy had been debated in Parliament, and afterwards
a 'Bill of Pains and Penalties' was brought in, which was in effect
placing the Queen upon her trial. Contemporary newspapers show what
intense excitement filled the public mind upon this subject, and how the
nation ranged itself on the side of the King or Queen--by far the
greater number being for the latter. Nothing was talked of but the
'Queen's trial,' and the wrongs and indignities that had been heaped
upon the head of an innocent woman.
On Aug. 16th, the married ladies of the metropolis presented Her Majesty
with an address, and three days after the trial commenced, the defence
being conducted by Mr. Brougham and Mr. Denman. When the Queen attended
the House of Lords large crowds accompanied her through the streets, and
manifested by their cries their sympathy for her cause. The Bill of
Pains and Penalties was carried on a second reading by a majority of
twenty-eight, but it sank on the third reading to a majority of nine,
and was finally abandoned owing to the threatening attitude of the
populace. Great rejoicings ensued, London was illuminated for three
nights, and on Nov. 29th the Queen went in state to St. Paul's. On this
occasion William Hone, who had distinguished himself as one of the
Queen's champions, displayed a transparency at his house on Ludgate
Hill, which was painted by George Cruikshank, and is engraved in Hone's
collected pamphlets.
The _Observer_, having to some extent laid itself out for 'illustrated
news,' the occasion of so much interest and excitement as the Queen's
trial was not likely to pass unnoticed. Accordingly, we find in the
number for Sept. 17th, 1820, a large woodcut, entitled, 'A Faithful
Representation of the Interior of the House of Lords as prepared for the
Trial of Her Most Gracious Majesty Queen Caroline.' This was published
at the time the excitement was at the highest, and no doubt the eager
public properly appreciated the enterprise of the conductors of the
paper.
In 1821 the House of Commons contained many notable politicians and
eminent men who afterwards became leaders and champions among the ranks
of Whig and Tory. Amongst the most prominent were Canning, Brougham,
Peel, and Palmerston. The question of Reform was becoming more and more
pressing, and the House of Commons as then constituted was tottering to
its fall. The conductors of the _Observer_, ever on the look-out for
what would interest their readers, published on Jan. 21st, 1821, two
views of the interior of the House of Commons, one looking towards the
Speaker's Chair, the other looking from it. In one the House is empty,
but in the other most of the leading politicians of the day are
introduced. The figures, however, are on too small a scale to be
likenesses of the persons intended, but the reader is assisted by
references showing the places occupied by the most prominent members of
the House.
The national excitement about Queen Caroline's trial was dying out when
the first gentleman in Europe prepared for his coronation. On this
occasion the _Observer_ gave the lieges appropriate pictures of the
august ceremony. The best draughtsmen and engravers on wood, then very
few in number, were employed to prepare views of Westminster Abbey and
Westminster Hall during the coronation ceremony and the banquet which
followed. The _Observer_ of July 22nd, 1821, contains four engravings,
which, considering the limited artistic means at command, are by no
means discreditable to the management of the paper. On this occasion a
double number was published, the price of which was fourteen pence, and
the publisher evidently thought it was very cheap. He announced that he
would keep the number on sale for ten days after publication, so that no
one might be disappointed in getting a copy. All these engravings of the
coronation of George IV. were done on what was then considered a large
scale, though none of them exceed a half-page of the present illustrated
newspapers, and were finished as regards light and shade, according to
the best ability of the artist.
The coronation number of the _Observer_ produced a great sensation, and
it had a very large sale. Nothing like it had ever been done before, and
the public eagerly paid the double price for the sake of the engravings.
Fourpence was paid for stamp duty on each sheet, amounting on the whole
to 2000_l._ paid to Government for stamp duty, exclusive of paper duty.
The number consisted of two sheets, each of which had a sale of 60,000
copies. This was a very good stroke of business, and Mr. Clement had
fair reason to congratulate himself on his successful enterprise. It
prompted him to further efforts; but, unfortunately, he had not the
wisdom to confine his energies to one channel, and what he gained by one
speculation he lost by another. It was at this time he purchased the
_Morning Chronicle_ for 42,000_l._; but, as I have before stated, this
turned out a disastrous investment, and also injured for a time the
otherwise successful _Observer_.
Soon after his coronation George IV. visited Ireland, and while on his
way received the melancholy intelligence of the death of his consort,
the unfortunate Queen Caroline, which, however, did not prevent His
Majesty from continuing his journey. The _Observer_ of Sept. 2nd, 1821,
published 'A correct View of his Majesty King George the Fourth landing
from the _Lightening_ Steam Packet, Capt. Skinner, on the Pier of the
Harbour of Howth, on Sunday, the Twelvth of August, 1821.' In describing
this event the _Observer_ spoke of it as the opening of a new era for
Ireland, and of the highest importance both in an historical and
political point of view.
In the following year the King went to Scotland; but, though the
_Observer_ published long and elaborate descriptions of His Majesty's
visit, the occasion was not deemed worthy of illustration. The
opportunity, however, must have been far richer than the visit to
Ireland in affording subjects for sketches. It would have been curious
to see what a contemporary 'special artist' would have made of Sir
Walter Scott; and posterity would have been glad to have had handed down
to it the 'varra effigies' of George IV. and Alderman Curtis in the
kilt!
In 1823 the city of Cadiz, in Spain, was invested by the French, who
took possession of the place on Oct. 3rd in that year. The _Observer_,
in its issue of Oct. 5th, printed a plan and view of Cadiz, the plan
first appearing in the _Morning Chronicle_ of the day before. The view
of Cadiz is well engraved, in the manner of that day, by W. Hughes. The
plan is also well done, and very complete.
Towards the end of 1823 a murder, unparalleled in the history of crime,
excited immense public interest, and the _Observer_ at once took up the
case, and described and illustrated it with a particularity and
minuteness of detail that must have satisfied the most ardent
sensationalist. The incidents of this remarkable crime have been long
forgotten; but I will give an outline of the story in connexion with the
engravings published on the occasion by the _Observer_.
Mr. William Weare was an attorney in Lyon's Inn, who added to his legal
practice the business of a bill-discounter, and enlivened the dulness of
both pursuits by indulging occasionally in the excitement of gambling.
He counted amongst his friends one Mr. John Thurtell, a notorious
betting-man; and it was to keep an appointment with this friend that he
left his chambers in Lyon's Inn on Friday, Oct. 24th, 1823. The two
friends had agreed to go on a short shooting excursion to a lonely
cottage on the St. Albans road, about fourteen miles from London.
Thurtell was respectably connected, but had an evil reputation, he and
his brother being then in hiding to avoid a charge of arson. Two other
men were concerned in the murder, Hunt, a public singer, of doubtful
character, and Probert, a spirit merchant, a fraudulent bankrupt, who
lived at the cottage to which Thurtell and his friend were going. In the
gambling transactions between Thurtell and Weare the former conceived
himself to have been cheated of 300_l._, and in revenge he determined to
murder Weare, and by robbing him recoup himself as far as possible for
his losses. The crime was coolly premeditated, and Hunt appears to have
been an accessory before the fact, having arranged to meet Thurtell on
the road, and to assist in despatching the victim. For this purpose the
shooting excursion to Probert's cottage was planned, but, owing to a
mistake of Hunt's, he did not join Thurtell as agreed, and the latter
committed the murder alone.
Thurtell and Weare were seen driving in a gig towards Edgeware about
five o'clock in the evening on Oct. 24th, and they afterwards called at
the 'White Hart,' Edgeware, for refreshment. After they were gone
Probert and Hunt, also driving in a gig, called at the same inn, where
they had some brandy and water, and afterwards drove away.
Gill's Hill Cottage, the place where Probert lived, was about two miles
from Elstree, and was approached by a narrow road called Gill's Hill
Lane. Some country people passing in the neighbourhood of this lane
about eight o'clock in the evening heard a shot fired and deep groans as
if some one was injured. They also heard voices and the wheels of a cart
or gig moving. Near nine o'clock Thurtell arrived at the cottage
_alone_, and giving the horse and gig to the servant, went out to meet
Probert and Hunt, with whom he soon afterwards returned.
Hunt being a stranger, was formally introduced to Mrs. Probert and a
Miss Noyes who was staying at the house. The whole party supped
together, and spent the evening in jollity. Hunt sang several songs, and
Thurtell produced a gold hunting-watch which afterwards proved to be
Weare's, and, taking off the chain, offered it to Probert for his wife,
but he declining it, Thurtell put it round the lady's neck himself. It
was after midnight before the ladies retired, and the sleeping
accommodation being limited it was arranged that Thurtell should sleep
on some chairs and Hunt was to occupy the sofa. A drawing of the sofa
forms one of the illustrations in the _Observer_, and proves how
thoroughly every circumstance of the horrid tale was followed up and
exhibited to the public. All this time the body of the murdered Weare
was lying behind a hedge in the lane.
Mrs. Probert's suspicions had been aroused by several strange
circumstances. A vague and horrid alarm took possession of her, and when
she retired to bed she stole to the head of the stairs and listened to
the talk that was going on below in the parlour. She heard her husband
and his two visitors apparently dividing money, burning papers, and
making mysterious plans to conceal something dreadful that had been
done. Then the parlour door was opened, and the frightened woman stole
back to her room. She heard two of the men go to the stable and bring
out the horse. Afterwards, hearing a noise in the garden, she looked out
of the window, and it being a moonlight night, she saw a man dragging
something large and heavy along the garden walk towards the fishpond.
Then followed a hollow sound as if something had been thrown into the
pond.
That night, when Probert went to bed, he found his wife sitting up and
crying. She questioned him about the mysterious sounds she had heard,
but he told her that he and his companions had only been out trying to
net some game. In the morning she renewed her inquiries, but he only
replied, 'Don't torment me; you make my life miserable.' He seemed in
low spirits, and went moping round the garden and about the pond. Going
into the kitchen Mrs. Probert observed the gig cushion drying at the
kitchen fire, although there had been no rain the night before, and the
cook was surprised to see in the stable a wet, ripped-up sack hanging on
a nail.
[Illustration: THE COUCH ON WHICH HUNT SLEPT AT GILL'S HILL COTTAGE.
FROM THE 'OBSERVER,' NOV. 10, 1823.]
Early on Saturday morning two labouring men were busy in Gill's Hill
Lane repairing the road, when two gentlemen passed them on foot. At the
bend of the lane they stooped down and appeared to be looking for
something among the dead leaves and brambles. Coming back they had some
conversation with the road-menders, and afterwards passed on up the lane
towards the cottage. A short time afterwards one of the labourers found
at the spot where the gentlemen had been looking an open penknife
covered with blood, and a little further on a pistol with hair sticking
to it, and also bloody. These articles the man gave to his master the
same morning when he came round to inspect their work. About noon they
saw the two gentlemen from Probert's drive away in a gig. They both
looked hard at the spot where the knife and pistol had been found, but
said nothing.
Mr. Nicholls, the road surveyor, to whom the knife and pistol had been
handed by the man who found them, went to the magistrates at Watford and
told how and where the articles had been found. The magistrates at once
sent information to Bow Street, and two of their number immediately went
to Gill's Hill Lane, where they discovered spots and gouts of blood on
the bank and under the leaves, and there was a gap in the hedge where a
body seemed to have been dragged through. The field was also much
trampled. They at once came to the conclusion that a murder had been
committed, and took instant measures to trace the guilty parties. The
police seized Probert and Thomas Thurtell at Gill's Hill, and searched
the house and premises. John Thurtell was apprehended at the 'Coach and
Horses,' in Conduit Street. Marks of blood were found on different
articles of clothing belonging to him. At Hunt's lodgings various
articles belonging to Weare had been found. Weare being missing it was
suspected he had met with foul play at the hands of these men. A
billiard-table keeper in Spring Gardens proved that Mr. Weare had called
upon him about three o'clock on Friday, October 24th, and told him he
was then on his way to join Thurtell in the Edgeware Road, as they were
going down to Hertfordshire for a few days' shooting. Thurtell, on being
questioned, admitted he knew Mr. Weare, but said he had not seen him for
eight days.
It appeared by the disclosures afterwards made by Thurtell's two
confederates that Thurtell had shot Weare while they were riding in the
gig down Gill's Hill Lane, leading to the cottage where Probert lived.
Weare jumped out of the gig, crying he would pay Thurtell all he owed
him if he would only spare his life. Thurtell jumped out of the gig and
ran after him. He got Weare down and cut his throat with a penknife, and
then struck him on the head with a pistol. He then dragged the body
through the hedge and left it there. The same night Thurtell and Hunt
went out from Probert's cottage to bring the body away, but they found
it too heavy. Probert and Thurtell then went and brought the body on the
horse, and put it in the fishpond with stones in the sack to keep it
down. They afterwards removed the body from the fishpond and sunk it in
a deep pond by the side of the Elstree road.
The cold-blooded indifference of the perpetrators of this atrocious
crime was most extraordinary. The murder was committed on Friday night,
and on Saturday Thurtell and Hunt returned to London and dined with
Thomas Thurtell and Mr. Noyes, Probert's brother-in-law, at the 'Coach
and Horses,' in Conduit Street. They were very jovial, and next day
(Sunday) the whole party met again at Proberts' house in Gill's Hill
Lane, when the afternoon was spent in playing at cards. On Sunday night
Thurtell and Hunt went to dig a grave to bury the body, but the dogs
were barking, and they were afraid some one was about. On Monday, while
Hunt engaged Mrs. Probert in conversation, Thurtell and Probert got the
body out of the fishpond, and cut off the clothes. Then they all three
carried it to the garden-gate and put it into the gig. A grave half dug
was found in Probert's garden, but the soil was hard, and it is supposed
that Thurtell and Hunt were afraid of the noise pickaxes would make.
Hunt, to save his own neck from the halter, confessed that he knew where
the body was, and went with four men in a hackney coach to a bridge on
the Elstree Road, near which was a deep pond by the side of the road. In
this pond the body of Weare was found tied in a sack, with stones to
keep it down.
[Illustration: POND IN WHICH THE BODY OF MR. WEARE WAS FOUND. FROM THE
'OBSERVER,' NOV. 10, 1823.]
Thurtell, Probert, and Hunt were tried at Hertford on January 6, 1824.
Probert was admitted King's evidence, and so escaped for that time, but
he was afterwards hung at the Old Bailey for horse-stealing. Thurtell
and Hunt were condemned to death, but only Thurtell was hung, Hunt being
reprieved on the morning of execution, and transported for life. In
those days prize-fighting was in much favour, and a great fight was
coming off between Spring and Langham, two noted pugilists. To show the
ruffianly and impenitent character of Thurtell, it is related that he
said, a few hours before his execution, 'It is perhaps wrong in my
situation; but I own I should like to read Pierce Egan's account of the
great fight yesterday.'
Some of the incidents of the trial were appalling, others ludicrous. The
production of the weapon with which the murder was committed, stained
and rusted with blood, made every one shudder except the prisoners. The
oft-quoted reason for a man being respectable 'because he kept a horse
and shay' occurred during this trial; and when Probert's cook was asked
whether the supper at Gill's Hill Cottage was postponed, she answered,
'No; it was pork.'[4]
The murder of Mr. Weare was committed on October 24, and discovered a
few days afterwards. On November 10 the _Observer_ published five
illustrations of the murder:--1. Probert's cottage and garden. 2. The
scene of the murder in Gill's Hill Lane. 3. The pond in which the body
of Weare was found. 4. Front view (from the road) of Probert's cottage.
5. The parlour and the couch on which Hunt slept. On December 7 the
_Observer_ published a view of the interior of the Crown Court at
Hertford at the moment the prisoners were brought up to plead; and,
having found that the public had eagerly purchased the illustrations
already issued, the editor announced the publication of two sheets with
additional engravings on the occasion of the trial:--'The Trials of the
prisoners at Hertford having been put off till Tuesday, Jan. 6, the
publication of the intended Supplement of this Journal, containing the
plates illustrative of the facts to be disclosed in the evidence, has
been deferred till Sunday, January 11, on which day Two Sheets instead
of one will be published. Booksellers, Postmasters, &c., are requested
to give their orders through their respective Agents in London, as no
papers whatever are on any occasion forwarded through the Publisher.'
Accordingly, at the appointed time two sheets came out, containing the
cuts already enumerated together with three fresh ones, the latter being
the stable-yard of Probert's cottage with the murderers conveying the
body by the light of a lantern to the stable; a front view of the
cottage, showing the murderers dragging the body to the pond; and a
ground-plan of the country round the scene of the murder. The conductors
of the Journal appear to have had some misgivings as to the good taste
of their proceedings, but were unable to resist the temptation of a
large and profitable sale. The engravings are thus introduced to the
reader:--'The unparalleled interest which has been created in the public
mind by the mysterious circumstances attending the death of Mr. Weare
has induced us, with a view to the gratification of our readers, to use
every exertion in our power, not only to give a faithful and copious
Report of the Trial of the persons charged with this most foul and
atrocious deed, but, with the assistance of competent Artists, to obtain
such Plates as appear to us best calculated to illustrate the detail of
circumstances disclosed in the evidence before the jury. We are aware
that by some these illustrations will be condemned as inconsistent with
good taste; and we are ready to acknowledge that on all occasions their
adoption would be extremely injudicious. In a case, however, where the
feelings and the curiosity of the public have been so much excited, and
where so singular and ardent an avidity has been displayed to obtain
every possible light upon a subject so interesting, we trust that those
who may entertain, perhaps, a well-founded objection to our plan, will,
for a moment, grant us their indulgence, and permit us to meet the
wishes of persons who may not be so fastidious as themselves. The
strongest argument which we can adduce in favour of the continued
pursuit of this plan--is the fact, that of three of the plates which we
now feel it necessary to republish, many thousand impressions have been
already sold, and yet the number, though high, has been insufficient to
supply the continued demand. The necessity imposed on us, however, for
breaking up our formes, forced us to refer the recent applicants to the
present publication, which will be found to contain the most minute and
correct particulars of everything connected with this extraordinary
affair.'
Then follows a long and minute description of all the plates, when it is
stated, 'For the sake of effect the artist has given all the views as
they would appear in daylight; but, with the exception of Plate II.
(finding the body of Weare in the pond), the scenes ought to have been
represented as at night.' Some of the engravings illustrating the murder
of Mr. Weare appeared in the _Morning Chronicle_ the day before their
publication in the _Observer_, and they were also published
simultaneously in the _Englishman_, which appears to have been in
substance another edition of the _Observer_ without the advertisements.
The name of W. Hughes is attached to them as the engraver.
The _Observer_ was loudly condemned for publishing the Weare and
Thurtell illustrations, and it did not for some time bring out any more
engravings; but this was probably owing more to the commercial
depression prevailing at the time than to the strictures that had been
passed upon newspaper morality.
About this time _Bell's Life_ came into Mr. Clement's hands, and
henceforth it shared, with the _Morning Chronicle_ and the _Englishman_,
in the illustrations prepared for the _Observer_. It had, however, a
distinct series of illustrations of its own, which was continued for
several years. But before describing them I must refer to one or two
characteristic engravings which appeared in _Bell's Life_ in its early
days. On November 28, 1824, the first large woodcut was published,
representing a prize-fight on a raised stage, and entitled the 'Tip Top
Milling at Warwick.' According to the account accompanying the
engraving, this prize-fight was a most brutal exhibition, without any
display of what boxers call 'science'--a mere exchange of hard blows,
ending in one of the combatants being carried insensible from the stage.
The coming fight was made known far and wide, so that when the day
arrived vehicles from all parts of the country brought hundreds of
spectators to the scene. The fight took place, openly and without fear
of interruption, on the race-course at Warwick, the grand stand being
crammed with spectators, and a ring of waggons, on which clustered
crowds of eager gazers, surrounded the stage. This is all shown in the
engraving in _Bell's Life_; and the different objects in the background,
such as the church, the keep of Warwick Castle, the cemetery, &c., are
pointed out by figures of reference with the most conscientious care.
There is a very long account of the battle, couched in language only
understood by members of the 'fancy.'
In 1825 the town was being amused by Liston, as 'Paul Pry,' then a
recent creation of the stage. On November 8 in that year _Bell's Life_
published a woodcut representing the comedian in that character, which I
have copied as an early example of the illustrations of the great
sporting journal.
[Illustration: LISTON AS PAUL PRY. FROM 'BELL'S LIFE,' 1825.]
In 1827 _Bell's Life_ commenced a series of caricature sketches by
Cruikshank, Seymour, and Kenny Meadows, entitled a 'Gallery of
Comicalities.' This continued at intervals, along with other sketches
entitled 'Phizogs of the Tradesmen of London' (half-lengths of Butchers,
Cobblers, &c., commencing in 1832); 'Kitchen Stuff, or Cads of the
Aristocracy' (heads of gentlemen's servants); 'Portraits down the Road'
(heads of characters seen on a stage-coach journey, such as the
Landlady, the Commercial Traveller, the Chambermaid, &c.); 'The Sporting
Album' (sketches from life, commencing 1834). These caricature subjects
were continued to the end of the year 1840. The greater number are much
too coarse, cynical, and vulgar for the taste of the present day.
Sometimes a series of sketches extended through several consecutive
weeks, such as 'The Pugilist's Progress' and 'The Drunkard's Progress,'
both by Seymour. 'The Drunkard's Progress,' which appeared in 1829,
consisted of twelve scenes, and embodied the same idea that was many
years afterwards more fully developed by George Cruikshank in his series
of large plates entitled 'The Bottle.' Now and then appeared a sporting
subject by Harvey, such as Coursing, Hunting, Bull-Baiting, &c. In the
number for February 8, 1829, appeared a curious woodcut representing a
view in the Isle of Anglesea, which was said to have excited the
attention and surprise of passing travellers from its presenting an
excellent profile of the Marquis of Anglesea, who was then very
popular. In 1831 portraits of Young Dutch Sam and Ned Neal, the famous
pugilists, were published; and in 1838 the initials of John Leech began
to appear to some of the cuts. Portraits of prize-fighters, race-horses,
representations of racing-cups, &c., were given at intervals until 1851,
when the last illustration, a monument to Tom Cribb, appeared.
[Illustration: THE MAN WOT LOST THE FIGHT.
THE MAN WOT WON THE FIGHT.
FROM 'BELL'S LIFE,' 1831.]
As further examples of the illustrations in _Bell's Life_, I copy two,
which were published in 1831.
About 1825 there was another sporting paper in existence, conducted by
the celebrated author of 'Tom and Jerry.' It was called _Pierce Egan's
Life in London_, and, like _Bell's Life_, had its sporting and other
columns decorated with little woodcut headings, and sometimes published
an engraving of a racing-cup.
At the beginning of 1827 the _Observer_ resumed its illustrations of
news, and on the death of the Duke of York published a long memoir of
his Royal Highness, accompanied by an equestrian portrait of the Duke,
'taken during his last visit to Newmarket.' In the number for January 21
are engravings of the remains of his Royal Highness lying in state in
St. James's Palace, and a view of the interior of the Royal Mausoleum at
Windsor. The above were engraved by Slader, and were published
simultaneously in the _Englishman_ and _Bell's Life_.
The number published on Aug. 13, 1827, contains a large portrait of Mr.
Canning, then just deceased. This portrait has the names of Jackson and
Smith attached to it as the engravers. In the number for Sept. 30 there
is a 'correct view of the Suspension Bridge, Hammersmith, to be opened
to the public on Saturday, Oct. 6, 1827.' This is engraved by Slader,
and appears also in _Bell's Life_ the same week. The following week the
_Observer_ published a large plan showing the alterations proposed in
St. James's Park in connexion with the building of Buckingham Palace;
and on Nov. 18 appeared a plan of the port of Navarino, accompanying an
account of the naval battle at that place. In December was published a
view of 'Mr. Gurney's new Steam-Carriage, as it appeared in the Regent's
Park on Thursday, Dec. 6, 1827,' and later in the same month a
representation of Mr. D. Gordon's new steam-coach. Both these engravings
are curious and interesting, as showing the attempts that were made
fifty years ago to apply steam to the propulsion of carriages on common
roads.
[Illustration: HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUKE OF YORK, TAKEN DURING HIS
LAST VISIT TO NEWMARKET. FROM THE 'OBSERVER,' JAN. 8, 1827.]
Mr. Gurney was a medical man, but gave up his practice and devoted
himself to scientific studies, and particularly to the construction of
locomotive engines for turnpike travelling. He had seen Trevithick's
engine, and when a youth had frequently met Trevithick himself. He had
thus become imbued with a conviction of the practicability of making a
steam-carriage that would travel on common roads. Other inventors
succeeded in doing the same thing, but Mr. Gurney attained the greatest
amount of success. With his steam-carriage he made a journey from London
to Bath on July 28, 1829, performing the return journey at fourteen
miles an hour, or the eighty-four miles in nine hours and twenty
minutes, stoppages for fuel and water included. In 1831 he established a
regular steam conveyance between Gloucester and Cheltenham, a distance
of about nine miles. The steam-carriages commenced plying on Feb. 21,
1831, and continued running four times a-day for four months, with
tolerable regularity and without accident. The project, however,
received such determined opposition from coach proprietors and turnpike
trusts that it was abandoned. The tolls exacted were so heavy that at
one gate they amounted to eight guineas. Mr. Gurney is said to have
expended 36,000_l._ on his enterprise, but without any permanent
beneficial result. His inventive genius, however, contributed to
develope the high speed of the locomotive and the subsequent success of
railways. He died Feb. 28, 1875, aged eighty-two years.
[Illustration: MR. GURNEY'S NEW STEAM-CARRIAGE AS IT APPEARED IN THE
REGENT'S PARK ON THURSDAY, DEC. 6, 1827. FROM THE 'OBSERVER,' DEC. 9,
1827.]
Mr. Gordon took out a patent for a steam-coach in 1822, and constructed
two different machines. One had its wheels surrounded by cogs, or
projecting teeth. This engine was to be placed within a large rolling
drum, about nine feet in diameter and five feet wide, the inside of
which should be fitted with circular rack-rails fitting the wheels of
the steam-engine. Thus the motion of the engine would cause the drum to
roll forward, on the same principle that a squirrel causes a cylindrical
cage to revolve; and the rolling of the drum was to move a carriage
connected with it. The other machine had two long propellers or legs,
intended to obviate the supposed tendency of wheels to slip when
ascending a slope.
The Thames Tunnel, which was begun in 1825 by Mr. Brunel, was on more
than one occasion threatened with destruction by irruptions of water. On
Jan. 12, 1828, six workmen perished by a sudden rush of water into the
workings, and on the 20th the _Observer_ published an engraving
representing the catastrophe. On the 9th of June appeared 'A correct
view of Ascot Heath Race Course, taken by an eminent artist on Thursday
last.' This 'eminent artist' was William Harvey, and the cut bears the
names of Jackson and Smith as the engravers. A sheet containing a
selection of comic sketches from _Bell's Life_ was issued with the
_Observer_ of July 20, 1828, accompanied by a statement that the
sketches (twenty-seven in number) cost one hundred and forty-two pounds,
drawing and engraving. This sounds very trivial when contrasted with the
large sums now paid by illustrated newspapers.
In 1827 another exciting murder was committed, and the _Observer_,
undeterred by former censures, published a portrait of the criminal and
a view of the scene of his crime, but did not on this occasion deal with
the case in the elaborate way in which the murder of Mr. Weare was
treated. The story of the Red Barn is well known to provincial playgoers
in the Eastern Counties, where it still sometimes figures in theatrical
programmes on Saturday nights. William Corder was a farmer's son
residing not far from Ipswich. He had for some time carried on an
intrigue with a country girl named Maria Marten, whom he at last enticed
into a barn not far from her father's cottage, and there murdered her,
and buried her body under the floor of the barn. After this he continued
to visit her father's cottage, and by various falsehoods accounted for
the girl's continued absence. Months went by, and Corder wrote several
letters to the girl's parents, in which he told plausible stories about
her being at the seaside with relatives of his own. The girl's mother,
however, had had her suspicions aroused by several circumstances, and at
length she dreamed three times that her daughter had been murdered and
her body hid under the floor in the Red Barn. The woman's mind was so
worked upon by the recurrence of this dream that she induced her husband
to search under the floor of the barn, and there, sure enough, the
murdered body of the girl was found. In the meantime Corder had
advertised for a wife in the _Morning Herald_ in the following
terms:--'A private gentleman, aged twenty-four, entirely independent,
whose disposition is not to be exceeded, has lately lost chief of his
family by the hand of Providence, which has occasioned discord among the
remainder, under circumstances the most disagreeable to relate. To any
female of respectability, who would study for domestic comfort, and is
willing to confide her future happiness to one in every way qualified to
render the marriage state desirable, as the advertiser is in affluence.
Many happy marriages have taken place through means similar to this now
resorted to. It is hoped no one will answer this through impertinent
curiosity; but should this meet the eye of any agreeable lady, who feels
desirous of meeting with a sociable, tender, kind, and sympathising
companion, they will find this advertisement worthy of notice. Honour
and secrecy may be relied on. As some little security against idle
application, it is requisite that letters may be addressed, post-paid,
A. Z., care of Mr. Foster, stationer, 68 Leadenhall Street, with real
name and address, which will meet with most respectful attention.'
[Illustration: WILLIAM CORDER. FROM THE 'OBSERVER,' AUG. 10, 1823.]
Through this advertisement Corder became acquainted with a lady who kept
the Grove House Academy at Ealing, near London. They were married, and
he went to reside with his wife at Grove House, where he was arrested
one morning in the spring of 1828. Various circumstances pointed to him
as the murderer of Maria Marten, and he was tried for the crime at Bury
St. Edmunds on Aug. 6, 1828. The crowd was so great that the counsel and
officers of the court had to fight their way to their places. Corder
appeared at the bar dressed in a new suit of black, and with his hair
combed over his forehead. He wore a pair of blue French spectacles,
through which he eyed the witnesses smilingly. Being called on for his
defence, he read a statement which amounted to charging Maria Marten
with having committed suicide. He said that in consequence of a quarrel
they had in the Red Barn she shot herself with one of two pistols which
he had with him:--'The instant the mischief happened, I thought to have
made it public; but this would have added to the suspicion, and I then
resolved to conceal her death. I then buried her in the best way I
could. I tried to conceal the fact as well as I could, giving sometimes
one reason for her absence, and sometimes another.' He was found guilty
and sentenced to death, and the night before his execution he made the
following confession:--'I acknowledge being guilty of the death of poor
Maria Marten, by shooting her with a pistol. The particulars are as
follows: When we left her father's house, we began quarrelling about the
burial of the child, she apprehending that the place wherein it was
deposited would be found out. The quarrel continued for about three
quarters of an hour upon this and about other subjects. A scuffle
ensued, and during the scuffle, and at the time I think that she had
hold of me, I took the pistol from the side pocket of my
shooting-coat.... I have been guilty of great idleness, and at times led
a dissolute life, but I hope through the mercy of God to be
forgiven.--W. CORDER.'
This murder excited great and marked interest, not only in Suffolk, but
through the whole country. On Aug. 10, 1828, the day before the
execution, the _Observer_ published a portrait of Corder and a view of
the Red Barn, which are here copied. The excitement showed itself in the
streets, where puppet shows represented the scene of the crime, and
Methodist preachers held forth in the fields near the barn to thousands
of attentive listeners. The Red Barn itself was nearly pulled to pieces
by curiosity seekers.
[Illustration: THE RED BARN. FROM THE 'OBSERVER,' AUG. 10, 1828.]
On the Monday of the execution all the workmen in Bury struck work in
order to see the murderer hanged, and persons came from long distances
for the same purpose. One man was pestered by every one he met on his
return by inquiries whether Corder had really been hung that morning.
This was repeated so often that he became quite weary of the constantly
recurring question, 'Is Corder executed?' In the evening, in order to
get rid of the gloomy feelings created by what he had witnessed, he went
to the theatre, where he arrived somewhat late. The play ('Macbeth') had
advanced to the fourth scene of the first act as he seated himself in
the pit. The newcomer, who was better acquainted with the details of the
murder in the Red Barn than with the plays of Shakespeare, was not a
little astonished when King Duncan entered, and, fixing his eye upon
him, repeated what he thought was the same question that had been so
often addressed to him that day, 'Is execution done on Cawdor?'
[Illustration: THE SIAMESE TWINS. FROM THE 'OBSERVER,' NOVEMBER 22,
1829.]
The _Observer_ continued its illustration of events as they occurred,
sharing the engravings with _Bell's Life_ and the _Englishman_. St.
Katharine's Docks were opened on Oct. 25th, 1828, and on the following
day the _Observer_ published a bird's eye view of the docks, showing the
ceremonies attending the opening. In January, 1829, appeared two views
of Buckingham Palace, then building for George IV.; and in August a cut
of the 'Post-Office Accelerator,' a carriage for conveying London
postmen to their several districts. A portrait of Rowton, the winner of
the Great St. Leger for 1829, was given in September. This year the
lovers of wonderful shows were attracted to an exhibition in London of
two Siamese youths who were united together by a short cartilaginous
band at the pit of the stomach, but with no other connexion existing
between them. They were perfectly straight and well made, and walked
with a gait like other people; being perfect in all their parts, and
having all their functions distinct. Their names were Chang and Eng; and
they were first discovered on the banks of the Siam river, fishing, by
Mr. Hunter, an American, by whom they were taken to New York, where they
were exhibited, and were afterwards brought to England. They were
supposed to be about eighteen years old when they were exhibited in
London in 1829. The _Observer_ of November 22, 1829, published a long
account of the Siamese Twins, with a woodcut representing them as they
were exhibited to the public.
After having been exhibited for several years in London and the
provinces, the Siamese twins went to America, where they settled on a
farm, and married sisters. In the year 1869 they returned to London, and
were as elderly men again exhibited; but they soon went back to America,
where in a few years they died, both together. A similar exhibition was
made in London about 1868 of twin girls, named Millie-Christine, or the
'Two-headed Nightingale,' and it was probably the appearance of these
two 'black birds' that suggested the idea of the Siamese twins appearing
again in public.
In June, 1830, George the Fourth died, and the _Observer_ published
several engravings connected with the event. On June 24th appeared a
portrait of 'His Majesty George the Fourth as he last appeared in his
Pony Phaeton in Windsor Park;' and on July 18 three illustrations of the
lying-in-state and the funeral were published.
'The King is dead! Long live the King!' So said the citizens of London
when they invited William IV. and Queen Adelaide to a banquet at
Guildhall on the following November 9; and on the 1st, eight days before
the entertainment came off, the _Observer_ duly supplied the public with
'A correct view of the grand civic entertainment,' as it was to be. On
Aug. 1, 1831, new London Bridge was opened by the King and Queen, and
two engravings illustrative of the event were published in the
_Observer_, the _Morning Chronicle_, _Bell's Life_, and the
_Englishman_. One of them is interesting, as it shows the relative
positions of the old and the new bridge. The view was taken from the
tower of St. Saviour's Church, Southwark, looking towards Fish Street
Hill.
[Illustration: HIS MAJESTY GEORGE IV., AS HE LAST APPEARED IN HIS PONY
PHAETON IN WINDSOR PARK. FROM THE 'OBSERVER,' JUNE 29, 1830.]
The _Observer_ of Sept. 11, 1831, contained four illustrations of the
coronation of King William IV. and Queen Adelaide, together with long
and elaborate descriptions. There was another paper in existence at this
time called the _United Kingdom_, which also illustrated the coronation.
This was the period of the great Reform agitation, when the newspapers
were absorbed in political excitement; and after this the _Observer_ for
a time ceased to give any illustrations.
On July 28, 1835, a diabolical attempt was made in Paris to shoot
Louis-Philippe, king of the French. The assassin, whose name was
Fieschi, constructed an infernal machine, consisting of twenty-five
barrels, charged with various kinds of missiles, and lighted
simultaneously by a train of gunpowder. The machine was fired from a
window as the King rode along the lines of the National Guard, on the
Boulevard du Temple, accompanied by his three sons and suite. The King
and his sons escaped, but Marshal Mortier was shot dead and many
officers were dangerously wounded. Amongst the spectators upwards of
forty persons were killed or injured. In its number for August 9, 1835,
the _Observer_ gave a sketch of the attempted assassination, a portrait
of the criminal, and a representation of the infernal machine.
The actual infernal machine, with a waxen effigy of Fieschi, formed for
many years a prominent attraction at Madame Tussaud's Exhibition.
The reign of William IV. was a short one, and soon the _Observer_ had to
illustrate his funeral, as it had done that of his predecessor. The
number for July 3, 1837, contained three engravings of the royal
obsequies, and ere long the brief rule of the Sailor King was forgotten
in the dawning glories of the Victorian era. The epoch of railways was
opening. The Greenwich Railway was the first railway out of London, and
the next was the North-Western, or the London and Birmingham as it was
then called. On July 24, 1837, the _Observer_ published a large
woodcut of the 'Grand entrance to the London and Birmingham Railway at
Euston Square.' Mr. Hardwick's massive structure was then in progress,
and formed the entrance to the first of the great London railway
stations--vast buildings, some of which have swallowed up whole streets,
and contributed greatly to alter the appearance of London in their
vicinity.
[Illustration: GERARD, _ALIAS_ FIESCHI, AND THE INFERNAL MACHINE. FROM
THE 'OBSERVER,' AUGUST 9, 1835.]
On July 24, 1837, a balloon ascended from Vauxhall with a parachute
attached, in which was Mr. Cocking, who in descending was killed. The
_Observer_ published illustrations of this event, which excited great
interest at the time. Other papers illustrated Mr. Cocking's death,
which I will recount more at length when I come to treat of the _Weekly
Chronicle_, which contained more illustrations of the event than any
other paper. A large engraving appeared in the _Observer_ for August 20,
1837, representing the Waterloo shield, given by Lord George Bentinck,
and run for at Goodwood Races, 1837.
When Her Majesty Queen Victoria paid her first visit to the City of
London after her accession, the _Observer_ came out with larger
engravings than it had ever before produced. Two large views of the
interior of Guildhall were given, together with a panoramic sketch of
the royal and civic procession, and a portrait of the youthful Queen,
'surrounded by a beautiful Emblematic Design, in which innocence and
strength are happily portrayed by the playfulness of the Doves and the
fearless defiance of the Lion.' Such was the flowery language of the
_Observer_ in those days.
The _Observer_ of July 2, 1838, was a double number, price tenpence, and
contained several illustrations of the coronation of Queen Victoria,
which were also printed in _Bell's Life_. I have copied one of them, not
because it is particularly good, but simply to mark an important
historical event, which ought to have some record in an account of
illustrated journalism.
[Illustration: THE CORONATION OF QUEEN VICTORIA. FROM THE 'OBSERVER,'
JULY 2, 1838.]
On the occasion of Her Majesty's marriage, the _Observer_ published a
wedding number, containing several engravings, which were introduced to
the reader thus:--'Little in the way of explanation is necessary to
render the sketches in the opposite page, with which we have illustrated
our account of the splendid ceremonials of Her Majesty's Nuptials on
Monday last, intelligible. Our readers will no doubt make due allowance
for any imperfections which may be discovered, when they reflect on the
fact that the whole of the labours of the artists and the engravers have
been accomplished in less than a week, and this under circumstances of
difficulty, in obtaining admission to the scenes to be sketched, almost
insurmountable. We should not be doing justice to our engraver were we
not to state that it is to Mr. Orrin Smith we owe the consummation of
our desire to gratify our patrons.'
On October 30, 1841, a fire occurred in the Tower of London, when the
Armoury and 280,000 stand of arms were destroyed. On November 7 the
_Observer_ published three illustrations of this great fire. On November
14 it presented its subscribers with a large emblematic engraving on the
occasion of the birth of the Prince of Wales. In the following January,
when the Prince of Wales was christened, it published a large page
engraving designed by W. B. Scott, and engraved by Smith and Linton,
containing the ceremony of christening in St. George's Chapel, the
banquet in St. George's Hall, illustrations of the history of the
Princes of Wales from the presentation of the first Prince of Wales to
the Welsh, to the religious instruction of Edward VI. by Archbishop
Cranmer, including the battle of Cressy with the feats of the Black
Prince, and the subsequent pageantry attending the introduction of the
King of France as a prisoner into London over London Bridge; following
this is the dismissal of Falstaff and his profligate companions by Henry
V., with views of Windsor, &c. From this time until 1847 the _Observer_
published no more engravings. In the interval the _Illustrated London
News_ commenced its career. On July 12, 1847, the _Observer_ published
the last of its illustrations. This was on the installation of Prince
Albert as Chancellor of the University of Cambridge. The engravings have
the name of W. J. Linton attached to them, and are on a larger scale,
and are better done than anything hitherto appearing in the same paper.
The _Weekly Chronicle_, the first number of which was published
September 18, 1836, started with the idea of illustrating the news of
the day as one of its principal features. The price was threepence, and
with it was incorporated the _Weekly Times_. In the first number the
public were 'requested to be on their guard against the substitution of
any other paper.' This probably had reference to some threatened
rivalship, for exactly a year later appeared _Holt's Weekly Chronicle_,
a paper which also gave illustrations of current events. It published
engravings connected with the rebellion in Canada, and also illustrated
the burning of the Royal Exchange in 1838. It appears to have had only a
brief existence. The first number of the _Weekly Chronicle_ contained an
engraving of 'the new grand Balloon which ascended from Vauxhall Gardens
with nine persons on Friday, September 9th, engraved by W. C. Walker,
from a drawing made by a gentleman who ascended expressly for this
paper.' Number 2 contained a page of comic sketches, apparently by
Seymour, and with the number for October 30, 1836, was presented gratis
an almanack containing a view of the new Houses of Parliament, not quite
as the design was eventually carried out. Very early in its career the
_Weekly Chronicle_ selected the criminal records as favourite subjects
for illustration. Perhaps some memory of the profits realised by the
_Observer_ on the occasion of the Weare murder induced the conductors to
cultivate this class of news. Certainly nothing more repulsive ever
figured in the pages of an illustrated newspaper than some of the
woodcuts published by the _Weekly Chronicle_.
Towards the end of 1836 another attempt was made on the life of the King
of the French, and on January 8, 1837, the _Weekly Chronicle_ published
a portrait of the criminal. A month or two later the public were
enlightened as to the personal appearance of another murderer, one
Pegsworth, who had his portrait taken in Newgate on the morning of his
execution. The annals of crime were varied by the exploits of war, and a
view of the heights of Amelzagame illustrated the career of the Spanish
Legion under the command of General Evans. In the spring of 1837
occurred the Greenacre murder, and the _Weekly Chronicle_ at once went
into the case with an evident determination to do full justice to its
sensational merits. From the first examination of the murderer before
the magistrates to his final exit in the Old Bailey the artists of the
paper were on the alert, pencil in hand. It is a painful fact that the
numbers of the _Weekly Chronicle_ containing the illustrations of the
Greenacre murder had a very large sale. The details of the crime are too
shocking to recapitulate, but I will give a list of the woodcuts
published in connexion with it.
April 2, 1837.--A sketch of Greenacre taken while under examination at
the police-office. Head of the murdered woman as preserved in spirits at
Paddington Workhouse.
April 9.--Greenacre taking notes at his examination before the
magistrates at Marylebone Police Office. Exterior of Greenacre's house
in Carpenter's Buildings, Windmill Lane, Camberwell. View of Pineapple
Gate, Edgware Road, where the body was found. Matthew Hale, lock-keeper,
who found the head. Rear of Greenacre's house. A back room looking into
the garden. Portraits of Mrs. Gale and child taken while under
examination at Marylebone Police Office. Room where the horrible
mutilation was committed. Osierbed in Cold Harbour Lane, where the legs
were found.
April 16.--Trial of Greenacre.
April 23.--Chapel in Newgate, sketched during the preaching of the
condemned sermon to Greenacre.
April 30.--Greenacre in condemned cell.
[Illustration: CHAPEL IN NEWGATE: THE CONDEMNED SERMON. FROM THE 'WEEKLY
CHRONICLE,' APRIL 23, 1837.
1. Sheriffs' Pew.
2. Governor's Pew.
3. Condemned Pew.]
On May 7 the _Weekly Chronicle_ wound up this series of illustrations by
publishing a large cut, which it entitled, 'A scene in the Old Bailey,
immediately before the execution, engraved expressly for the _Weekly
Chronicle_ by a distinguished artist.' According to an announcement in
the paper itself, the sale of the _Weekly Chronicle_ during the
publication of these engravings was 130,000.
[Illustration: THE CONDEMNED CELL, NEWGATE. FROM THE 'WEEKLY CHRONICLE,'
APRIL 30, 1837.]
On May 14, 1837, the _Weekly Chronicle_ published portraits of Sir
Francis Burdett and Mr. Leader, the former of a superhuman length, with
a shocking bad hat. In the following number, as if the public had not
been sufficiently supplied with horrors, there was printed 'a sketch of
Eliza Davis as she lay on the mattress after the murder.' This was known
as the Frederick Street murder, and was remarkable from the
circumstances, and from the fact that the murderer was never
discovered. This paper now commenced 'The Pictorial Gallery,
illustrating every object of interest and curiosity in Art, Science,
Literature, and Amusement. (To be continued weekly.)' In this series
were published a view of the Euston Railway Station, a portrait of
Madame Taglioni, a sketch of a novel mode of propelling balloons,
representations of the Bedouin Arabs, the City of London School, the
Adelaide Gallery, the Hippodrome at Bayswater, proclamation of Queen
Victoria at Temple Bar, portraits of the Queen, the late King, the Earl
of Durham, and the Duchess of Kent. Then followed a view of the Royal
Mausoleum at Windsor, and several illustrations of Mr. Cocking's fatal
descent in a parachute.
Mr. Cocking was an enthusiast in aerostation--he was, in fact, balloon
mad, and had spent years in inventing a parachute which he believed to
be perfectly safe, and in which he ascended from Vauxhall Gardens on
July 24, 1837, attached to Mr. Green's Royal Nassau balloon. The
experiment was widely advertised, and when the day and hour arrived the
poor enthusiast faithfully appeared, and ascended in his fatal machine
for more than a mile. He then himself liberated the parachute from the
balloon. For a few seconds he descended steadily; the parachute then
collapsed, broke, turned over, and shot straight down to the earth a
hopeless ruin. Poor Cocking was still in the basket of the parachute
when he reached the earth, but was quite insensible, and in ten minutes
he was dead. The parachute fell at Lee; and it is recorded that not only
was the machine itself carried away piecemeal, but the dead man's purse
was stolen from his pocket, his watch, his snuff-box, his eye-glass were
taken, even the cap was stolen from his head, the shoes were pulled from
his feet, the buttons from his dress. Such statements seem incredible,
and for the credit of human nature one could wish they were false; but
they have been seriously made, and never contradicted.
[Illustration: MR. COCKING IN HIS PARACHUTE AT THE MOMENT OF ASCENSION.
FROM THE 'WEEKLY CHRONICLE,' JULY 30, 1837.]
The _Weekly Chronicle_ published several illustrations of this event.
They represent Mr. Cocking in the car of the parachute at the moment
of ascension; the Nassau balloon as it appeared from the Royal Gardens,
Vauxhall; the parachute in its various stages in its descent; and Mr.
Cocking as he lay for the inspection of the jury in the room at the
Tiger's Head, at Lee. The first of these I have copied.
This rash adventure was wound up by the opening of a subscription list
for the benefit of Cocking's widow, which was headed by the Queen with
50_l._ The Gas Company that had supplied the gas for the disaster gave
30_l._, and the proprietors of Vauxhall gave the gardens for a benefit.
Thus the friends who ought to have restrained the vanity of the
enthusiast and the speculators who led him on to his fate did their best
in the way of atonement; but it was clearly a case where the civil power
ought to have interposed to prevent the fatal catastrophe.
The _Chronicle_ varied its illustrations of events by an occasional
portrait of a public man, such as Mr. T. Wakley, Mr. Roebuck, Lord John
Russell, and Daniel Whittle Harvey. The Queen's first visit to the City,
and her Majesty delivering her speech to her first Parliament, furnished
subjects for large woodcuts. Early in the year 1838 the Royal Exchange
was burnt, and this historical event was made the subject of an
engraving in the number for January 14, 1838.
This year the _Weekly Chronicle_ also published several engravings
illustrative of the rebellion in Canada, including a portrait of
Papineau, the insurgent leader, and views of Quebec and Montreal. The
murder of Eliza Grimwood in the Waterloo Road furnished another
opportunity for sensational sketches, and in the same number that
contained them (June 10, 1838) appeared three illustrations of the
Courtney Riots at Canterbury.
In 1833 an eccentric person, calling himself Sir William Courtney,
appeared at Canterbury and attracted much attention by his half-crazed
appearance and his frequent harangues on the grievances of the poor. He
presented himself as a candidate to represent the city of Canterbury in
Parliament, but this ambition was frustrated by his being tried and
found guilty of perjury, an offence he had committed on behalf of some
smugglers on the Kentish coast. He was sentenced to imprisonment and
transportation; but, being proved insane, the sentence was commuted, and
he was confined in a lunatic asylum. Here he remained four years, and
was then liberated under the belief that he was restored to a rational
state. He was, however, madder than ever, having while in confinement
brooded over his supposed wrongs and the sufferings of the oppressed
poor until he fancied himself a prophet and a deliverer sent from
heaven. With the cunning of madness he counterfeited sanity, and thus
was able to resume what he considered his prophetic mission. He
harangued about the new poor law, promised cheap bread to all who would
follow him, and on May 29, 1838, he gathered together a band of about
twenty men, with whom he marched from one place to another, proclaiming
that he would make May 29 more memorable than it had ever been in
connexion with the restoration of Charles II. This went on for a day or
two, when a farmer, named Curtis, having his field-work stopped by the
leading away of his men, went to a magistrate and obtained a warrant to
apprehend them. In an attempt to execute this warrant a constable was
killed by Courtney, who now broke into a rhapsody of exultation,
declared that a second Gideon was come to slay the ungodly, and that all
should perish who opposed the prophet. With outstretched sword he cried,
'I am the only Saviour of you all. You need not fear, for I will bring
you through all.' The excitement had now become so general, and the
menaces of Courtney and his armed party so alarming, that the
magistrates resolved on the instant capture of this dangerous maniac and
his ignorant followers. They came up with the rioters at a place called
the Osier Bed, where Courtney's men threatened the magistrates and
constables with bludgeons and fire-arms. After firing his pistol at one
of the party who attempted to arrest him, Courtney and his men broke
away to Bossenden Wood, and the magistrates, seeing no other resource,
sent at once for a detachment of the 45th Regiment from Canterbury
Barracks. Courtney had now proclaimed to his followers that he was no
other than Jesus Christ returned to earth, and that they were safer with
him than if they were in their beds; therefore they must resist the
soldiers, and they were sure of victory. In the meantime a hundred men
of the 45th Regiment, headed by Lieutenant Bennett, surrounded Bossenden
Wood. Accompanied by the civil magistrates, they advanced to close round
the rioters, when Courtney fired at the young Lieutenant commanding the
party, and shot him dead. The next minute the prophet himself was slain
by a soldier, who covered him with his musket as he fired at Lieutenant
Bennett. Then ensued a hand-to-hand fight, which resulted in the death
of seven of the rioters and one constable, besides several persons
seriously wounded.
The illustrations of these riots in the _Weekly Chronicle_ of June 10,
1838, consist of the following:--
1. 'Courtney with his troops leaving Bossenden Farm.'
2. 'The death of Lieutenant Bennett. Courtney in the act of exhorting
his men to advance.'
3. 'Interior of the Red Lion stables, with the bodies as they were laid
out after the conflict.'
Courtney, whose real name was John Thom, was undoubtedly mad. He never
could have found followers, except amongst the most degraded and
ignorant; and it is hoped he did better service to his countrymen than
he ever dreamt of by drawing attention to the dreadful evils arising
from the want of education among the rural population. Most of his
followers could neither read nor write, and were so totally unacquainted
with the simplest truths of Christianity that they believed him when he
asserted that he was Gideon, Samson, and Jesus Christ all in one, and
that he had descended from heaven to redress the wrongs of the poor, but
more especially to reduce the price of bread!
[Illustration: THE DREADFUL RIOT AND LOSS OF LIFE AT BOSSENDEN WOOD,
EAST KENT. FROM THE 'WEEKLY CHRONICLE,' JUNE 10, 1838.
1. Courtney.
2. Lieutenant Bennett.
3. Sergeant Langley making a thrust at Courtney with a bayonet, and
was knocked down with a bludgeon.
4. Six Magistrates.
5. Soldier who stepped forward and shot Courtney.
6. Major Armstrong.
7. Detachment of the 45th Regiment loading.
8. Lieutenant Bennett's detachment.
9. The man Wills, who knocked down Sergeant Langley.
10. Courtney's flag.
11. J. N. Knatchbull firing at Courtney.]
The _Weekly Chronicle_ illustrated the coronation of Queen Victoria by a
view of 'The interior of the Abbey at the moment of Her Majesty
assuming the Crown,' and a full-page engraving of the Coronation
Procession. Two pages of engravings were given on the occasion of the
Queen's marriage; and on November 1, 1841, a large 'view of the Tower of
London as it appeared on fire on the morning of Sunday, the 31st ult.,
from a drawing by a distinguished artist.' On January 29, 1842, the same
paper illustrated the christening of the Prince of Wales, with its
attendant ceremonies and festivities; and later in the same year were
published the last of its illustrations, relating to the employment of
women and children in coal-mines.
[Illustration: INTERIOR OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS, LOOKING FROM THE ENTRANCE
TO THE SPOT LATELY OCCUPIED BY THE THRONE. FROM THE 'SUNDAY TIMES,' NOV.
2, 1834.]
The _Observer_, _Bell's Life_, and the _Weekly Chronicle_, which during
more than twenty years had been the chief representatives of pictorial
journalism, gradually abandoned the practice of giving illustrations
after the _Illustrated London News_ was established. Two or three other
newspapers occasionally published engravings, but they were very few,
and appeared at long intervals. The _Sunday Times_ illustrated the trial
of Thurtell for the murder of Mr. Weare, and on Nov. 2, 1834, it
published several engravings of the destruction of the Houses of
Parliament, two of which, representing the ruins, are of sufficient
interest to introduce here.
[Illustration: RUINS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. FROM THE 'SUNDAY TIMES,'
NOV. 2, 1834.]
The _Champion_ of Nov. 13, 1836, has an engraving of the interior of a
cotton-factory; and the _Weekly Herald_ in the same year issued two
engravings illustrating the story of Wat Tyler:--'1. Workshop scene; Wat
Tyler knocking the Tyrant Tax-gatherer's brains out;' the principal
characters equipped in boots, buckles, and belts, in true theatrical
style 2. 'Smithfield scene; the assassin Walworth treacherously
murdering the brave but too-confiding Wat Tyler.' The same paper also
issued this year a view of St. Peter's, Rome. The _Magnet_, a paper
started in 1837, illustrated the proclamation of Queen Victoria, William
IV. lying in state, the Canadian rebellion, burning of the Royal
Exchange, coronation of Queen Victoria, and on Jan. 4, 1841, the removal
of the remains of Napoleon I. from St. Helena. There are two engravings
of this interesting historical event. The first is entitled, 'A correct
view, taken on the spot, of the interior of the tent at St. Helena,
after the disinterment of the body of Napoleon, at the instant of the
removal of the lid from the coffin; the remains of the Emperor appearing
(as one of the spectators remarked) as if he were asleep.' I have copied
the second cut, which represents the embarkation of the body, and is one
of the last examples of pictorial journalism before the birth of the
_Illustrated London News_.
Before concluding this part of my subject it is fitting that I should
include the _Penny Magazine_ amongst the pictorial journals which
immediately preceded the establishment of a regular illustrated
newspaper. The _Penny Magazine_, though not a newspaper, was intended to
supplant the cheap and pernicious contraband newspapers that then
existed in large numbers. It was the most successful experiment that
England had then seen of the art of illustration in combination with the
steam press, and was the best attempt that had been made in a cheap form
to elevate the public taste.
[Illustration: THE REMOVAL AND DELIVERY OF THE REMAINS OF THE EMPEROR
NAPOLEON BY THE GOVERNOR OF ST. HELENA TO THE PRINCE DE JOINVILLE, ON
THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1840. FROM THE 'MAGNET,' JAN. 11, 1841.]
Mr. Charles Knight, who thus, in the _Penny Magazine_, led the way in
combining literature with art in a popular form, was a staunch advocate
of education, and he never ceased in his endeavours to improve the
condition of the masses. He said, 'the poor man must be made a
thinking man--a man capable of intellectual pleasures; he must be
purified in his tastes, and elevated in his understanding; he must be
taught to comprehend the real dignity of all useful employments; he must
learn to look upon the distinctions of society without envy or
servility; he must respect them, for they are open to him as well as to
others; but he must respect himself more. The best enjoyments of our
nature might be common to him and the most favoured by fortune. Let him
be taught how to appreciate them. Diminish the attractions of his
sensual enjoyments by extending the range of his mental pleasures.'[5]
With such convictions, Mr. Knight, in 1827, joined the Society for the
Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, a new educational movement then just
started by the Reform Party. He brought out, under its auspices, a great
number of useful works, most of which were profusely illustrated. In
1832 Mr. Knight resided in the Vale of Health on Hampstead Heath. One of
his neighbours was Mr. M. D. Hill, an active member of the Society for
the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge. It was a time of great political
excitement, and the town was flooded with unstamped weekly publications,
which in some degree came under the character of contraband newspapers,
and were nearly all dangerous in principle and coarse in language. Mr.
Knight and Mr. Hill often walked to town together, and their
conversation naturally turned to a subject in which they both felt a
special interest--the means of improving the condition of the people by
the diffusion of cheap literature, and so counteracting the dangerous
and offensive publications which then abounded. One morning in early
spring their talk was of this kind, when Mr. Hill exclaimed, 'Let us see
what something cheap and good can accomplish! Let us have a Penny
Magazine!' Mr. Knight immediately adopted the suggestion, which was
cordially approved by the Lord Chancellor Brougham; and on March 31,
1832, appeared the first number of 'the _Penny Magazine_ of the Society
for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge.' It was necessary to avoid making
the new periodical anything like a newspaper lest it should become
liable to stamp duty, and at first very little expense was incurred for
illustrations, most of the engravings in the early numbers being
reprinted from other works of the Society. It was not till six months
had elapsed that Mr. Knight ventured into the wide field of
illustration, and made the public familiar with great works of art, such
as the 'Laocoon,' the 'Apollo Belvedere,' the 'Dying Gladiator,' the
'Cartoons,' &c. The best pictures of the old masters were intermingled
with scenes at home and abroad, with places of renown and illustrious
men of all nations and of every age.
The success of the _Penny Magazine_ was a surprise to the publisher and
an astonishment to most persons. At the end of 1832 it had reached a
sale of 200,000 in weekly numbers and monthly parts, and it soon
produced a revolution in popular art throughout the world. Stereotype
casts of its best cuts were supplied for the illustration of
publications of a similar character which appeared in Germany, France,
Holland, Livonia, Bohemia, Italy, Ionian Islands, Sweden, Norway,
Spanish America, and the Brazils. The entire work was also reprinted in
the United States from plates sent from this country.[6]
It continued its prosperous career for nine years, when a new series was
commenced, with considerable improvements in engraving and printing.
Five volumes of the new series were published, but the sale declined,
owing to the commencement of illustrated newspapers, and the _Penny
Magazine_ in its old form came to an end in 1845, three years after the
commencement of the _Illustrated London News_.[7] _Knight's Penny
Magazine_, a smaller miscellany, commencing in January, 1846, kept up
the old name for six months longer, and then it ceased to exist. In
announcing its discontinuance, Mr. Knight thus closes this interesting
chapter of literary history:--'The present series of the _Penny
Magazine_ is closed, after an experience of only six months. The editor
has no reason to complain of the want of public encouragement, for the
sale of this series has exceeded that of its predecessor in 1845. But
the sale, such as it is, is scarcely remunerative; and there are
indications that it may decline rather than increase. This is a hint
which cannot be mistaken. It shall not be said of his humble efforts to
continue, upon an equality with the best of his contemporaries, a
publication which once had a decided pre-eminence, that
"Superfluous lags the veteran on the stage."
He leaves this portion of popular literature to be cultivated by those
whose new energy may be worth more than his old experience. The _Penny
Magazine_ shall begin and end with him. It shall not pass into other
hands.'
Mr. Knight attributed the falling off in the sale of the _Penny
Magazine_ to the extended sale of newspapers and the application of
wood-engravings to their illustration; and in his _Passages of a Working
Life_ he relates how he first heard of the journal that was destined to
succeed the _Penny Magazine_ in the field of popular art:--'In 1842,
having occasion to be in attendance at the Central Criminal Court, my
curiosity was excited by an unusual spectacle--that of an artist, seated
amongst the civic dignitaries on the bench, diligently employed in
sketching two Lascars, on their trial for a capital offence. What was
there so remarkable in the case, in the persons, or even in the costume
of the accused, that they should be made the subject of a picture? The
mystery was soon explained to me. The _Illustrated London News_ had been
announced for publication on the Saturday of the week in which I saw the
wretched foreigners standing at the bar. I knew something about hurrying
on wood-engravers for the _Penny Magazine_, but a newspaper was an
essentially different affair. How, I thought, could artists and
journalists so work concurrently that the news and the appropriate
illustrations should both be fresh? How could such things be managed
with any approach to fidelity of representation unless all the essential
characteristics of a newspaper were sacrificed in the attempt to render
it pictorial? I fancied that this rash experiment would be a failure. It
proved to be such a success as could only be ensured by resolute and
persevering struggles against natural difficulties.'
Charles Knight was born at Windsor in 1791. The son of a bookseller, he
very early became connected with the press. At the age of twenty-one he
conducted the _Windsor and Eton Express_, and a few years later he
became the editor of the _Guardian_, a London weekly paper. He
afterwards started a monthly magazine called the _Etonian_, and amongst
his contributors were Macaulay, Praed, and other clever young men who
had been educated at Eton, some of whom supported him in a later
venture, _Knight's Quarterly Magazine_. In the midst of his varied
duties as author and publisher he never lost sight of the great question
of popular education, and heartily joined in the movement for repealing
the taxes on knowledge. He gave expression to his views in _The
Struggles of a Book against Excessive Taxation_ and _The Case of the
Authors as regards the Paper Duty_. He paid the enormous sum of
16,500_l._ for paper duty on the _Penny Cyclopedia_ alone, and on the
same work he expended 40,000_l._ for literature and engravings. When
this great and useful work was completed Mr. Knight was entertained at a
public dinner presided over by Lord Brougham, when the leading men in
literature and art united to do him honour. The _Penny Cyclopedia_ was
not a commercial success, solely because of the paper duty.
Of the numerous illustrated works published by Mr. Knight, the
_Pictorial Bible_ was the most successful in a pecuniary sense, and he
considered the _Arabian Nights_ the most beautiful as regards
illustrations. He was so ardent a promoter of illustrative art, that he
invented a press for printing in colours, from which issued many
coloured engravings for his various works, such as _Old England_, the
_Farmer's Library_, &c.
Mr. Knight died at Addlestone, Surrey, March 9, 1873, and was buried in
his native town of Windsor. A marble bust of him was placed by public
subscription in the Council Chamber of that town, and two scholarships,
bearing his name, were founded in the school of the Stationers' Company.
It was well said of Charles Knight on the occasion of unveiling his bust
at Windsor, that he set out in life with the desire to make knowledge a
common possession instead of an exclusive privilege. He laboured for the
good of his fellow-men rather than for the rewards of fame or fortune,
and no man was more worthy of honour for his public services and his
private virtues. The last time I saw him was at the grave of an old
friend of his and mine; and as I recall the remembrance of his grey hair
tossed in the wintry wind, I adopt in all seriousness what Douglas
Jerrold said in jest, that two words would suffice for his
epitaph--'good Knight.'
It is curious that the printing-press, which has worked such mighty
changes, should have reproduced in another form the ancient jester who
stood in cap and bells behind his master's chair, and the merry-andrew
who made the rustics laugh upon the village green. The numerous
satirical and humorous publications of the Victorian era represent a
distinct kind of illustrated journalism, through which runs an amusing
commentary on passing events, combined with a vein of satire always
good-humoured and often instructive. At the head of this array of wit
and wisdom stands _Punch_, who, however, was preceded by _Figaro in
London_, conducted by Mr. Gilbert A'Beckett, afterwards one of _Punch's_
strongest supporters. Mr. A'Beckett faithfully acted up to his motto:--
'Satire should, like a polished razor keen,
Wound with a touch that's hardly felt or seen;'
but the constitution of _Figaro_ was not strong, and he died young.
While the _Penny Magazine_ was yet in vigorous life, and the
_Illustrated London News_ was as yet unborn, there used to be a weekly
gathering of authors, actors, and artists, at a tavern in Wych Street,
Strand, where the late Mr. Mark Lemon presided as the genial host. This
company of merry men were mostly on the sunny side of life, and disposed
to look upon the world and the world's cares with a laughing eye. They
were ever ready to go out of their way for the sake of a joke, and a
pun, good or bad, was pleasant to them. In this congenial atmosphere
_Punch_ germinated, and in July, 1841, that shrewd observer and
good-humoured satirist appeared. Mr. _Punch_, like some other great men,
had a hard struggle in his early days; but prosperous times came, and he
now combines in his own person the dignity of age with the vivacity of
youth. _Puck_, _Diogenes_, and numerous other imitators of _Punch_,
attempted to obtain a share of public favour, but most of them died
after a brief existence. The best of these that survive are _Fun_ and
_Judy_, which, with the _Hornet_, _Vanity Fair_, _Figaro_ (a revival of
the name), _Moonshine_, _Funny Folks_, and others, continue their weekly
budgets with a smartness and vigour not unworthy of their great
prototype.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] There was another Sunday paper in existence about this time, the
_Sunday Reformer and Universal Register_. In the number for Dec.
29th, 1793, there is a copperplate portrait of Robert Lowth, D.D.,
Lord Bishop of London, then recently deceased.
[2] 'Old Stories Retold,' in _All the Year Round_.
[3] Grant's _Newspaper Press_.
[4] 'Old Stories Retold,' in _All the Year Round_.
[5] _Passages of a Working Life._
[6] At this time there was another illustrated weekly magazine in
existence--the _Mirror_, which began about 1822. The engravings it
contained were chiefly of a topographical character.
[7] The _Saturday Magazine_ was started in imitation of the _Penny
Magazine_, and, like its prototype, had a considerable popularity for
some years.