CHAPTER II.

AT SEA.—INCIDENTS.—SEA SOCIABILITY.—A YARN.—SEA

LIFE.—CHARACTERS.—ENGLISH RADICALS.—SKEPTICS.—EDUCATION.—FRENCH

INFIDELITY.—PHRENOLOGY.—THEOLOGY.

_At Sea, May 28._

[Sidenote: _THE VOYAGE._]

We are reckoned to-day to be about one hundred and fifty miles to

the westward of Cape Clear; ship close-hauled, heading north, with a

very dim prospect of the termination of our voyage. It has been thus

far rather dull and uneventful. We three have never been obliged to

own ourselves actually sea-sick, but at any time during the first

week we could hardly have declared that we felt perfectly well, and

our appetites seemed influenced at every meal as if by a gloomy

apprehension of what an hour might bring forth. Most of the other

passengers have been very miserable indeed. I notice they recover

more rapidly in the steerage than in the cabin. This I suppose to be

owing to their situation in the middle of the ship, where there is the

least motion, to their simple diet, and probably to their having less

temptation to eat freely, and greater necessity to “make an effort,”

and move about in fresh air.

We have met one school of small whales. There might have been fifty

of them, tumbling ponderously over the waves, in sight at once.

Occasionally one would rise lazily up so near, that, as he caught sight

of us, we could seem to see an expression of surprise and alarm in his

stolid, black face, and then he would hastily throw himself under

again, with an energetic slap of his flukes.

One dark, foggy night, while we were “on the Banks,” we witnessed a

rather remarkable exhibition of marine pyrotechny. The whole water, as

far as we could see, was lustrous white, while nearer the eye it was

full of spangles, and every disturbance, as that caused by the movement

of the ship, or the ripples from the wind, or the surging of the sea,

was marked by fire flashes. Very singular spots, from the size of one’s

hand to minute sparks, frequently floated by, looking like stars in

the milky-way. We noticed also several schools, numbering hundreds,

of what seemed little fishes (perhaps an inch long), that darted here

and there, comet-like, with great velocity. I tried, without success,

to catch some of these. It was evident that, _besides the ordinary_

phosphorescent animalcula, there were various and distinct varieties of

animated nature around us, such as are not often to be observed.

Some kind of sea-bird we have seen, I think, every day, and when at the

greatest distance from land. Where is their home? is an oft-repeated

question, and, What do they eat? They are mysteries, these feathered

Bedouins. To-day, land and long-legged shore birds are coming on board

of us. They fly tremulously about the ship, sometimes going off out of

sight and back again, then lighting for a few moments on a spar or line

of rigging. Some have fallen asleep so; or suffered themselves, though

panting with apprehension, to be taken. One of these is a swallow, and

another a wheatear. Some kind of a lark, but not recognisable by the

English on board, was taken several days since. It had probably been

lost from the Western Islands.

[Sidenote: _A “BOARDING” ANECDOTE._]

We have seen but very few vessels; but the meeting with one of them

was quite an event in sea life. She was coming from the eastward,

wind north, and running free, when we first saw her, but soon after

took in her studding-sails and hauled up so as to come near us. When

abeam, and about three miles distant, she showed German colours, laid

aback her mainsail and lowered a quarter-boat, which we immediately

squared away to meet, and ran up our bunting, every body on deck, and

great excitement. With a glass we could see her decks loaded with

emigrants; and as her masts and sails appeared entirely uninjured, it

could only be conjectured that she was distressed for provisions or

water. The carpenter was sent to sound the water tanks, and the mate

to make an estimate of what stores might be safely spared, while we

hastened to our rooms to scribble notes to send home. We finished them

soon enough to see a neat boat, rowed by four men, come alongside, and

a gentlemanly young officer mount nimbly up the side-ladder. He was

received on deck by our second mate, and conducted aft by him to the

cabin companion, where the captain, having put on his best dress-coat

and new Broadway stove-pipe hat, stood, like a small king, dignifiedly

waiting. After the ceremony of presentation, the captain inquired,

“Well, sir, what can I have the pleasure of doing for you?” The young

man replied that he came from the ship so and so, Captain ——, who sent

his compliments, and desired “_Vaat is te news?_” This cool motive

for stopping two ships in mid-ocean, with a fresh and favourable wind

blowing for each, took the captain plainly aback; but he directly

recovered, and taking him into the cabin, gave him a glass of wine and

a few minutes’ conversation with a most creditable politeness; a chunk

of ice and a piece of fresh meat were passed into the boat, and the

steerage passengers threw some tobacco to the men in her. The young

officer took our letters, with some cigars and newspapers, and went

over the side again, without probably having perceived that we were any

less gregarious beings than himself. The curbed energy and suppressed

vexation of our officers, however, showed itself before he was well

seated in his boat, by the violent language of command, and the

rapidity with which the yards were sharpened and the ship again brought

to her course.

This occurrence brought to the mind of our “second dickey” that

night, a boarding affair of his own, which he told us of in the

drollest manner possible. I wish you could hear his drawl, and see his

immoveably sober face, but twinkling eye, that made it all seem natural

and just like him, as he spun us the yarn.

He was once, he said, round in the Pacific, in a Sag-Harbour whaler,

“rayther smart, we accounted her,” when they tried to speak an English

frigate, and did not get quite near enough. So, as they had nothing

else to do, they “up’t and chased her,” and kept after her without ever

getting any nearer for nearly three days. Finally, the wind hauled

round ahead and began to blow a little fresh, and they overhauled her

very rapidly, so that along about sunset they found themselves coming

well to windward of her, as they ran upon opposite tacks. They then

hove-to, and he was sent in a boat to board her, and she promptly

came-to also, and waited for him.

Dressed in a dungaree jumper, yellow oil-skin hat, and canvass

trowsers, he climbed on board the frigate and was immediately addressed

by the officer of the deck.

“Now then, sir, what is it?”

“Are you the cap’en of this here frigate, sir?”

“What’s your business?”

“Why, our cap’en sent his compliments to yourn, sir, and—if you are

a going home—he wished you’d report the bark Lucreetshy Ann, of

Sag-Harbour, Cap’en J. Coffin Starbuck, thirty-seven days from Wahoo

(Oahu), seven hundred and fifty barrels of sperm, and two hundred and

fifty of whale; guess we shall go in to Tuckeywarner (Talcahuano).”

“Is that all, sir?”

“Well, no; the old man did say, if you was a mind to, he’d like to have

me see if I could make a trade with yer for some tobacky. We hadn’t had

none now a going on two week, and he’s a most sick. How is’t—yer mind

to?”

“Is that all your business, sir?”

“Well—yes; I guess ’tis about all.”

“I think you had better get into your boat, sir.”

He thought so too, when he saw the main-yard immediately after begin to

swing round. As the officer stepped below, he went over the side. When

he called out to have the painter let go though, he was told to wait

a bit, and directly a small parcel of tobacco was handed down and the

same officer, looking over the rail, asked,

“Did you say the _Lucretia Ann_?”

“Ay, ay, sir; Lucreetshy Ann, of Sag-Harbour.”

“Mr. Starboard, I believe.”

“‘_Buck_,’ sir, ‘_buck_.’ How about this ’backey?”

The lieutenant, raising his head, his cap, striking the main-sheet as

it was being hauled down, was knocked off and fell into the water, when

one of the whalers immediately lanced it and held it up dripping.

“Hallo, mister; I say, what shall we do with this cap? Did you mean ter

throw it in.”

The officer once more looked over the side, with half a dozen grinning

middies, and imperturbably dignified, replied,

“You will do me the favor to present it to Captain Buck, and say to

him, if you please, that when he wishes to communicate with one of Her

Majesty’s ships again, it will be proper for him to do so in person.”

“Oh, certainly—oh, yes; good night to yer. Here, let’s have that cap.

Give way, now, boys,” so saying he clapped it on the top of his old

souwester, and as the frigate forged ahead, the boat dropped astern,

and was pulled back to the Lucretia Ann.

[Sidenote: _A GALE._]

We have had only three days of any thing like bad weather, and those

we enjoyed, I think, quite as much as any. The storm was preceded by

some twenty-four hours of a clear, fresh northwester, driving us along

on our course with foaming, sparkling, and most exhilarating speed.

It gives a fine sensation to be so borne along, like that of riding a

great, powerful, and spirited horse, or of dashing yourself through

the crashing surf, and in your own body breasting away the billows as

they sweep down upon you. Gradually it grew more and more ahead, and

blew harder and harder. When we came on deck early in the morning, the

horizon seemed within a stone’s throw, and there was a grand sight

of dark-marbled swelling waves, rushing on tumultuously, crowding

away and trampling under each other, as if panic-struck by the grey,

lowering, misty clouds that were sweeping down with an appearance of

intense mysterious purpose over them. The expression was of vehement

energy blindly directed. The ship, lying-to under trifling storm-sail,

seemed to have composed herself for a trial, and, neither advancing nor

shrinking back, rose and fell with more than habitual ease and dignity.

Having been previously accustomed only to the fidgety movements of a

smaller class of vessels, I was greatly surprised and impressed by

her deliberate movements; the quietness and simplicity with which she

answered the threats of the turbulent elements.

* * * * *

“If only that northwester had continued”—every body is saying—“we might

have been in Liverpool by this.” It’s not unfashionable yet at sea to

talk about the weather. I am to write about what is most interesting

us! Well, the wind and weather. Bad time when it comes to that? Well,

now,—here I am, sitting on a trunk, bracing myself between two berths,

with my portfolio on my knees—imagine the motion of the vessel, the

flickering, inconstant half-light that comes through a narrow piece of

inch-thick glass, which the people on deck are constantly crossing,

exclamations from them, dash of waves and creaking of timber, and

various noises both distracting and _lullabying_, and if you can’t

understand the difficulty of thinking connectedly, you may begin to

that of writing.

John’s eyes have been bad, and we have read aloud with him a good deal;

but I tell you it is hard work even to read on board ship. We have had

some good talks, have listened to a good deal of music, and to a bad

deal, and had a few staggering hops with the ladies on the quarter

deck. We contrived a set of chess-men, cutting them out of card-board,

fitting them with cork pedestals, and a pin-point to attach them to

the board so they would not slip off or blow away. Charley has had

some capital games, and I believe found his match with Dr. M., one of

the cabin passengers returning home from the East Indies by way of

California, who promises to introduce him at a London chess club.

[Sidenote: _THE VOYAGE._]

I told you in my letter by the pilot-boat, how we had been humbugged

about the second cabin. While this has reduced the cost of our passage

to a very small sum, we have had almost every comfort that we should

have asked. Our room is considerably more spacious, having been

intended for a family apartment, and has the advantage of much less

motion than those of the first cabin. For a ship’s accommodations it

has, too, a quite luxurious degree of ventilation and light. There is a

large port in it that we can open at pleasure, having only been obliged

to close it during two nights of the gale. Our stores have held out

well, and the cook has served us excellently, giving us, particularly,

nice fresh rolls, soups, omelettes, and puddings. We have hardly tasted

our cured meat, and with this and our hard bread we are now helping out

some of our more unfortunate neighbors. Split peas and portable soup

(_bouillon_), with fresh and dried fruit, have been valuable stores;

even our friends in the cabin have been gladly indebted to us for the

latter. Don’t forget when you come to sea to have plenty of fruit.

As the captain desired us to use the quarter-deck privileges, we have

associated as we pleased with the first-cabin passengers, and found

several valuable acquaintances among them. (Friend, rather, I should

call one now.)

Our room-mate, a young Irish surgeon, is a very good fellow, apparently

of high professional attainments, and possessed of a power of so

concentrating his attention on a book or whatever he is engaged with,

as not to be easily disturbed, and a general politeness in yielding to

the tastes of the majority that we are greatly beholden to. He is a

devoted admirer of Smith O’Brien, and thinks the Irish rising of ’48

would have been successful, if he (O’B.) had not been too strictly

honest and honorable a man to lead a popular revolt. Of what he saw

and knew at that time, he has given us some interesting particulars,

which lead me to think that the revolutionary purpose, insurrection,

or at least the insurrectionary purpose, and preparation was much more

general, respectable, and formidable, than I have hitherto supposed.

[Sidenote: _EMIGRANT PASSENGERS._]

Of his last winter’s passage, in an emigrant ship, across the Atlantic,

he gives us a most thrilling account.

He had been appointed surgeon of a vessel about to sail from a

small port in Ireland. She was nearly ready for sea, the passengers

collecting and stores taken on board, when some discovery was made that

involved the necessity of withdrawing her. Another ship was procured

from Liverpool, and the stores, passengers, doctor, and all, hastily

transferred to her in the night, as soon as she arrived. They got to

sea, and he found there was hardly a particle of any thing in the

medicine chest. He begged the captain to put back, but the captain was

a stubborn, reckless, devil-may-care fellow, and only laughed at him.

That very night the cholera broke out. He went again to the captain,

he beseeched him, he threatened him; he told him that on his head

must be the consequences; the captain didn’t care a rope yarn for the

consequences, he would do any thing else to oblige the doctor, but go

back he would not. The doctor turned the pigs out of the long-boat, and

made a temporary hospital of it. It was a cold place, but any thing

was better than that horrible steerage. Nevertheless, down into the

steerage the doctor would himself go every morning, nor leave it till

every soul had gone or been carried on deck before him. He searched the

ship for something he could make medicine of. The carpenter’s chalk

was the only thing that turned up. This he calcined and saved, to be

used sparingly. He forced those who were the least sea-sick to become

nurses; convalescents and those with less dangerous illness, he placed

beds for on the galley and the hen-coops, and made the captain give

up his fowls and other delicacies to them. Fortunately fair weather

continued, and with sleepless vigilance, and strength, as it seemed

to him, almost miraculously sustained, he continued to examine and

send on deck for some hours each day, every one of the three hundred

passengers. On the first cholera symptoms appearing, he gave the

patient chalk, and continued administering it in small but frequent

doses until the spasmodic crisis commenced; thence he troubled him only

with hot fomentations. The third day out a man died and was buried. The

captain read the funeral service, and after the body had disappeared

beneath the blue water, the doctor took advantage of the solemn moment

again to appeal to him.

“Captain, there are three hundred souls in this ship—”

“Belay that, doctor; I’ll see every soul of ’em in Davy’s locker, sir,

before I’ll put my ship back for your cursed physic.”

The doctor said no more, but turned away with a heavy heart to do his

duty as best he could.

I cannot describe the horrors of that passage as he would.

Nevertheless, as far as simple numbers can give it, you shall have the

result.

Out of those three hundred souls, before the ship reached New York,

there died one, and he, the doctor declared most soberly, was a very

old man, and half dead with a chronic (something) when he came on

board. So much for burnt chalk and—fresh air!

But seriously, this story, which, as I have repeated it, I believe is

essentially true, though not in itself a painful one, not the less

strikingly shows with what villainous barbarity, by disregard or

evasion of the laws of England, and the neglect or connivance of the

port officers, the emigrant traffic is carried on. Some of the accounts

of the three other medical men on board, who are also returning from

passages in emigrant ships, would disgust a slave-trader. They say that

many of the passengers will never go on deck unless they are driven or

carried, and frequently the number of these is so great, that it is

impossible to force them out of their berths, and they sometimes lie

in them in the most filthy manner possible, without ever stepping out

from the first heave of the sickening sea till the American pilot is

received on board. Then their wives, husbands, children, as the case

may be, who have served them with food during their prostration, get

them up, and, if they can afford it, change their garments, throwing

the old ones, with the bed and its accumulations, overboard. So, as

any one may see, from a dozen ships a day often in New York, they come

ashore with no disease but want of energy, but emaciated, enfeebled,

infected, and covered with vermin. When we observe the listlessness,

even cheerfulness, with which they accept the precarious and dog-like

subsistence which, while in this condition, the already crowded city

affords them, we see the misery and degradation to which they must

have been habituated in their native land. When in a year afterwards

we find that the same poor fellows are plainly _growing_ active,

hopeful, enterprising, prudent, and, if they have been favourably

situated, cleanly, tidy, and actually changing to their very bones as

it seems—tight, elastic, well-knit muscles taking the place of flabby

flesh, as ambition and blessed discontent take the place of stupid

indifference,—we appreciate, as the landlords and the government men of

Ireland never can, what are the causes of that degradation and misery.

Dr. M. gives much happier accounts of the English governmental emigrant

ships to Australia, in which he has made two voyages. Some few of their

arrangements are so entirely commendable, and so obviously demanded

by every consideration of decency, humanity, and virtue, that I can

only wonder that the law does not require all emigrant vessels to

adopt them. Among these, that which is most plainly required, is the

division of the steerage into three compartments: married parties with

their children in the central one, and unmarried men and women having

separate sleeping accommodations in the other two.

[Sidenote: _MIDSHIP PASSENGERS._]

The others of our midship passengers are mostly English artisans, or

manufacturing workmen. There are two or three farmers, a number of

Irish servants, male and female, and several nondescript adventurers;

two Scotchmen only, brothers, both returning from Cuba sugar

plantations where they have been employed as engineers. They tell us

the people there are all for annexation to the United States, but as

they cannot speak Spanish, their information on this point cannot be

very extensive. Besides ourselves, there is but one American-born

person among them. She is a young woman of quite superior mind, fair

and engaging, rather ill in health, going to England in hopes to

improve it, and to visit some family friends there. The young men are

all hoping the ship will be wrecked, so they can have the pleasure of

saving her—or dying in the attempt. One goes into the main-chains and

sits there for several hours, all alone, every fine day, for no other

reason that we can conceive, but to drop himself easily into the water

after her, in case she should fall overboard. There are three or four

other women, and as many babies, and little boys and girls. They do not

cry very often, but are generally in high spirits, always in the way,

frolicking or eating, much fondled and scolded, and very dirty.

The most notable character in our part of the ship, is one Dr. T.,

another returning emigrant physician. He appears to have been well

educated, and is of a wealthy Irish family. His diploma is signed by

Sir Astley Cooper, whose autograph we have thus seen. Though a young

man, he is all broken down in spirit and body from hard drinking.

He makes himself a buffoon for the amusement of the passengers, and

some of the young men of the first cabin are so foolish as to reward

him sometimes with liquor, which makes him downright crazy. Even the

pale-faced student, who kept his neighbours awake with his midnight

prayers while he was sea-sick, has participated in this cruel fun. Dr.

T. has been _smutten_, as the second mate says, by a young lady of the

first cabin, who does not altogether discourage his gallant attentions.

He keeps up the habits of a gentleman in the reduction of his

circumstances, eating his dinner at four o’clock, (being thus enabled

to cook it while the first-cabin people are below eating theirs, which

is served at half-past three). He declares it was only to oblige the

owners that he took a berth in the second cabin, and he certainly

should not have done so, if he had suspected the _promiscuous_

character of the company he should be associated with there. The

forenoon he spends in combing his hair and whiskers, cleaning his

threadbare coat, smoothing his crushed hat, and polishing his shoes.

Now, indeed, since he has become conscious of the tender passion, and

can feed on love, he has traded off a part of his stock of bread for a

pair of boots, which enables him to dispense with stockings and straps,

much to his relief in dances and fencing bouts. Towards noon he comes

on deck with his coat buttoned to the neck; he wears a stock and no

collar; his hat is set on rakishly; he has a yellow kid glove for his

right hand, the thumb only is missing—his thumb, therefore, is stuck

under the breast of his coat allowing the rest to be advantageously

displayed; his other hand is carried habitually in the mode of Mr.

Pickwick, under the skirt of his coat. He has in his mouth the stump of

a cigar that he found last night upon the deck, and has saved for the

occasion. After walking until it is smoked out with the gentlemen—to

whom he manages to give the impression that he has just finished his

breakfast—he approaches, with a really elegant air to the ladies, and,

gracefully bowing, inquires after their health. Then, after gazing

upwards at the sun a moment, he takes the attitude, “Napoleon at St.

Helena,” his left hand hidden under his right arm, and, in a deep,

tremulous voice, says, “Ourre nooble barruck still cleaves the breeny

ailiment, and bears us on with velucitay ’twarrd th’ expectant shoorres

of Albeeon’s eel. Ah! what a grrand expanse it is of weeld-washing

waterrers! Deleeghtful waytherr, ’pon my worrud.” He is a good

fencer, boxer, card player, and trickster; a safe waltzer, even in a

rolling ship, and, when half-seas over, dances a jig, hornpipe, or

French _pas seul_, and turns a _pirouette_ on the top of the capstan;

plays a cracked clarionet, and can get something out of every sort

of musical instrument; he spouts theatrically, gives imitations of

living actors, sings every thing, _improvises_, and on Sunday chants

from the prayer-book, so that even then the religiously inclined may

_conscientiously_ enjoy his entertainment. A most rare treasure for a

long passage. Some of our passengers declare they would have died of

dulness if it had not been for him!

[Sidenote: _CHARACTERS.—A POET._]

There is another Irishman (from the North), who has written a poem as

long as Paradise Lost, the manuscript of which he keeps under lock

and key, in a small trunk, at the head of his bed, and, as they say,

fastened to a life-preserver. It is never out of his head, however,

and he manages to find something to quote from it appropriate to

every occasion. You might suppose he would be made use of as a butt,

but somehow he is not, and is only regarded as a bore. I incline to

think him a true poet, for he is a strange fellow, often blundering,

stupidly as it seems, upon “good hits,” and, however inconsistently,

always speaking with the confidence of true inspiration. We have a

godless set around us, and he is very impatient of their card-playing

and profanity—particularly if the weather is at all bad—declaring

that he is not superstitious, but that he thinks, if a man is ever

to stand by his faith, it should be when he is in the midst of the

awful ocean, and in an unlucky ship. “Nay,” he asserts again, “he is

_not_ superstitious, and no one must accuse him of it, but if he

were not principled against it, he would lay a large wager that this

ship never does arrive at her destined port.” His poem runs somewhat

upon socialism, whether approvingly or condemnatory I have not yet

been able quite to understand. I rather think he has a scheme of

his own for remodelling society. He uses a good deal of religious

phraseology; he is liberal on doctrinal points, does not enlist under

any particular church banner, and says himself, that he can bear “any

sort of religion (or irreligion) in a man, so he is not a papist.”

Towards all persons of the Roman church he entertains the most orthodox

contempt and undisguised hatred, as becomes, in his opinion, an Irish

_Protestant-born_ man.

There is a good-natured fellow who has been a flat-boatman on the

Mississippi, and more lately a squatter somewhere in the wilds of

the West. His _painter_ and cat-fish stories, with all his reckless

airs and cant river phrases, have much entertained us; of course

he has no baggage, but a “heap of plunder.” He has a rough, rowdy,

blustering, half-barbarous way with him, and you would judge from his

talk sometimes, that he was a perfectly lawless, heartless savage;

yet again there is often evident in his behaviour to individuals a

singularly delicate sense of propriety and fitness, and there is not a

man in the ship with whom I would sooner trust the safety of a woman or

child in a time of peril. The great fault of the man is his terrific

and uncontrollable indignation at any thing which seems to him mean or

unjust, and his judgment or insight of narrow-mindedness is not always

reliable.

[Sidenote: _CHARACTERS._]

He has formed a strong friendship, or crony-ship, for an Englishman

on board, who is a man of about the same native intelligence, but

a strange contrast to him in manner, appearance, and opinions,

being short, thick-set, slow of speech, and husky voiced. He is a

stone-cutter by trade, and returns to England because, as he says,

there is no demand for so _fine work_ as he is able to do, in America,

and he will be better paid in London. These two men are always

together, and always quarrelling. Indeed, the Englishman has, with his

slowness and obstinate deafness to reason on any matter that he has

once stated his views of, an endless battery of logic and banterings

to reply to, for he is the only defender of an aristocratic form of

government amongst us, every other man, Irish, Scotch, or English,

being a thorough-going, violent, radical democrat. Most of them,

indeed, claim the name of red republican, and carry their ideas of

“liberty” far beyond any native American I have known. What is more

remarkable and painful, nearly all of them, except the Irish, are

professedly Deists or Atheists, or something of the sort, for all

their ideas are evidently most crude and confused upon the subject,

and amount to nothing but pity, hatred, or contempt for all religious

people, as either fools or hypocrites, impostors or imposed upon.

There is only one of them that seems to have ever thought upon the

matter at all carefully, or to be able to argue upon it, and he is so

self-satisfied (precisely what he says, by the way, of every one that

argues against him), that he never stops arguing. Of him I will speak

again.

A remark of one of the farmers, an Englishman, and a very sensible

fellow, upon these sentiments so generally held among our company,

seemed to me true and well expressed. I think my observation of the

lower class of Englishmen in the United States generally confirms it.

“I have often noticed of my countrymen,” said he, “that when they cease

to honour the king, they no longer fear God.” That is, as I understand

it, when they are led to change the political theory in which they

have been instructed, they must lose confidence in a religious creed

which they owe about equally to the circumstances of their birth,

neither having been adopted from a rational process in their own minds.

Seeing the childish absurdity of many forms which they have been

trained to consider necessary, natural, and ordered of God, they lose

confidence in all their previous ideas that have resulted from a merely

receptive education, and religion and royalty are classed together as

old-fashioned notions, nursery bugbears, and romances. It is partly the

result of the abominable masquerade of words which is still constantly

played off in England on all public occasions, clothing government

with antiquated false forms of sacredness. The simple majesty and

holy authority that depends on the exercise of justice, love, and

good judgment, so far from being made more imposing by this mummery,

is lost sight of; while all the folly, indiscretion, and injustice of

the administration of the law by fallible and unsanctified agents, is

inevitably associated in the minds of the ignorant with all that is

holy and true.

The only idea now, these our shipmates entertain of Christianity,

seemed to be the particular humbug by which the bishops and clergy

make the people think that they must support them in purple and fine

linen, just as royalty is the humbug on which the queen is borne, and

government the humbug by which the aristocracy are carried on their

shoulders, all, of course, in combination. And nothing would convince

them of the sincerity of the clergy short of their martyrdom—even that,

I fear, should the time come for them to act as judges, they would

rather attribute to pride, or, at best, to an exceptional deluded mind.

With these ideas, nothing but thorough contempt for him, or fear of

punishment, would prevent them from putting a bishop to the test of the

stake, if he should fall into their hands.

[Sidenote: _DEMOCRACY.—SKEPTICISM._]

While this explanation, if it is correct, should not hinder the

promulgation of sound republican views, it strongly opposes the fear

that many have, of providing for the lower classes an education that

shall make them capable of free independent thinking. It is long ago

too late in any country in the world, to prevent the masses from

learning that little that is dangerous. Yet, even in England, it is

argued by churchmen that education, unless managed by the church, is

the foe of their religion! Surely, there must be consciousness of evil

in this fear of the light. True religion is not a machinery for fitting

men with beliefs and morals. The free man in Christ cannot be the

subject of ignorance. It is as much slavish and disloyal to God to be

blindly led by a priest, as to be wheedled by a politician; and more

than it is to be ruled over and crushed by a tyrant. Let _us_ remember,

too, that slaves to party or to creed are not confined to monarchies,

but that all churches and governments whose authority is not dependent

on the untrammelled and honest judgment of free intelligent minds, are

alike ungodly and degrading.

If this view of the connection of liberal politics with religious

skepticism is correct, it follows that we may look with less of horror

and more of hope upon the infidelity which has so scandalized the

national character of France. We may conceive it as the unnatural

and convulsive action of a mind which the last thrust of tyranny

has suddenly aroused from a long, false dream. Sitting in judgment

over the wickedness of tyrants and the licentiousness of courts, it

would be strange, unnatural, almost unreasonable, that a people whose

religious teachers had been dependent on those tyrants,—had been the

most active sycophants of those courts,—teachers, who had taught them

that the power there seated was sacred, should hold in reverence for

a moment longer, any of the dogmas of a religion so debased. The

authority, the stability of the throne, which they have ground to

powder and thrown to the free winds, was a part of the very idea of the

being and government of the God in whom they had been instructed to

believe. Would they not be fools still to worship _such_ an idol of the

imagination? And what then? The natural and fearful reaction here also,

from torpidity and stupid delusion, which a _little_ knowledge must

provoke. And which is best—a dead, superstitious morality, or a live,

working-onward infidelity—a slow poison, swallowed in a sugar-coated

bolus, or an active, painful, purging black-draught? Let us yet hope

(for years are but hours with a nation), that repudiation of lying

forms and ignoble use of the name of God, and His Holy Word is but a

symptom which precedes a return of healthy fidelity to the truth of God.

* * * * *

To return to the man that I mentioned as being more thoughtful and fond

of argument than the others, and who for that reason I have reserved to

speak of more particularly, as affording a more tangible illustration

of English popular skepticism and agrarianism of the day.

[Sidenote: _A DEIST._]

He was born near Sheffield, had been a good while in the United

States, and now returned to England, thinking that some particular

art, in smelting, I believe, that he had acquired, would be more

valued there. He had certainly been a serious and constant thinker,

but his information was limited, superficial, and inaccurate, and

he was better at quibbling and picking inconsistencies, than at

sustained and thorough reasoning. He was a man that would have a strong

influence with a certain kind of honest people, not able to think

far originally; and as his activity would infuse itself into them,

and he was generally in earnest after something, his influence might

possibly in the end be more good than bad. No one could sleep easily,

at all events, while he was near them (as, literally, some of us had

uncomfortable experience). He had been brought up to the best of the

cunning of his parents and friends, a strict ——ist; and nothing can be

more characteristic of the blundering progress likely to be made by a

man cramped with an “education,” after the cowardly fashion to which

the stiff-necked people of England so generally condemn their children,

than his account of his coming to Deism.

While quite young, he said that he saw inconsistencies in the religious

doctrines which had been battered into him, and for years labored

painfully and devoutly to reconcile them; yet each dogma, however

contradicted by another, seemed plainly to rest on Bible language

(always understanding that language as interpreted by his teachers),

constantly looking into every thing else that came in his way, he

obtained from itinerant lecturers some knowledge of phrenology, and

reading a few books upon it, and practising among his fellow-workmen,

he soon acquired not only a good deal of theoretical understanding of

the science, and acuteness in discerning character, but considerable

skill as a manipulator. So, as he moved from place to place, sometimes,

I suspect, giving lectures himself also upon it, he had accumulated

experience that to him incontestably proved the foundation in nature

of the science. He was still a church-going man, and still worshipped

under the shadow of his congenital creed, still trying to reconcile

what seemed its discrepancies, when one day he read in the religious

newspapers of his sect an article on phrenology, in which the reverend

editor, in strong terms, declared its devilish origin and untruth.

His argument, what there was of it, for his strength was mostly spent

in ridicule, denunciation, and everlasting condemnation, was based

on the assumption that phrenology was inconsistent with free will

and moral responsibility, therefore irreconcilable with the Bible.

To listen to phrenologists, then, was to close the eye of faith;

“if you accept phrenology as truth, you deny God. If the Bible is

true, phrenology is false; if phrenology is true, the Bible is a lie.

Phrenology is infidelity.”

“Then,” exclaimed he, “_I_ am an infidel, for I _know_ as well as

the nose on my face, that phrenology _is_ true.” He forthwith began

to study infidel books, soon so scandalized his church, that he was

publicly expelled from it, and thenceforth he had looked upon the Bible

only as a block in the road, over which every man must leap before he

can become free to truth. As the great barrier to the progress of his

race, he set himself diligently to searching out every cranny of error

and crevice of inconsistency from which he could proudly poke the dust,

and expose to reasoners equally shallow with himself; unconscious, poor

fellow, that he was merely picking into blind traditions, uninspired

translations, and hard-squeezed interpretations; rubbish of mortal

church-builders and vain-glorious creed-idolaters, accumulating for

nineteen centuries over the real under-laying adamant of divine truth.

He had even yet, while with us, all the zeal and activity in this

purpose that characterizes the young convert to any faith; talked to

every one that would listen to him, and lugged in his “cause” most

pertinaciously with every company he joined, no matter what might be

the subject of conversation before he entered. There was little use

to argue with him, for he would shift his ground as fast as it was

weakened under him, and by changing the question, never knew that

he failed to sustain himself. He would insist on making the Bible

responsible for every ridiculous notion that foolish or designing men

have ever professed to ground upon it, and constantly insisted on

taking part in those quarrels, it was little matter to him on which

side, which, like the fierce little disputes one often hears in a

family, only show the real bond of love, in the common interest, that

can make matters so trivial seem important. On the grand and simple

purpose of the Bible, from which all Christendom is nursed, he would

always avoid to look or argue.

I had myself always managed to avoid discussion with him, till one

night, as he came to me on deck to repeat the good things with which

he had successively sent to bed the Episcopalian, the Unitarian, the

Calvinist, and the poet, fearing that he presumed from my silence

that I sympathized with his opinions, and would enjoy his triumphs,

I thought it not honest to do so longer; but as I really cared very

little for the views one way or the other against which the shafts

of his wit had been directed, I desired, if possible, to get him

to examine the broad, catholic citadel of which these, at best,

were insignificant outworks, in which alone, too, I had sufficient

confidence to be willing to encounter him. I found it almost

impossible, however, to draw his attention from them. They had been

made to appear to him so much the most important part of Christianity,

that he could hardly for an instant raise his eyes above them, or see

through their obstruction. This difficulty, common enough perhaps

anywhere, is peculiarly characteristic of English working-men, and

is, as I imagine, a direct result of the prevalent views of education

among the religious classes of their country. I have seen immense

evil, as I think, arising from it, and have a strong conviction of its

exceeding folly and danger. I cannot, however, presume upon the general

interest of my readers in the subject, and will not pursue it; but as

illustrating what I mean, and also as showing what seems to me the best

way to meet the difficulties I have referred to, I will endeavour to

give, in the Appendix, for those who care to listen to it, a report of

our conversation.[1] It is, of course, impossible to report minutely

a conversation after a considerable lapse of time. I wish to give

the general ideas brought out, with so much of their connection as

shall show the manner in which they were suggested, and the motive of

presenting them, as this must often greatly affect their force and

character. The reader is requested to bear this remark in mind in other

conversations which will be found in this book. It is the idea given,

and the exhibition of character presented in any way, that I endeavour

to recall and dramatize with all the truth of my memory.

[1] See Appendix A.

Walks and talks of an American farmer in England (Part 1 of 2) · 第 2 / 30 章