CHAPTER I

Produced by Nathan Strom, Frank van Drogen, David King, and the

Online Distributed Proofreading Team

THE RELIGIONS OF JAPAN

FROM THE DAWN OF HISTORY

TO THE ERA OF MEIJI

BY

WILLIAM ELLIOT GRIFFIS, D.D.

FORMERLY OF THE IMPERIAL UNIVERSITY OF TOKIO; AUTHOR OF "THE MIKADO'S

EMPIRE" AND "COREA, THE HERMIT NATION;" LATE LECTURER ON THE MORSE

FOUNDATION IN UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN NEW YORK

"I came not to destroy, but to fulfil."--THE SON OF MAN

NEW YORK

CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS

1895

COPYRIGHT, 1895, BY

CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS

TROW DIRECTORY

PRINTING AND BOOKBINDING COMPANY

NEW YORK

IN GLAD RECOGNITION OF THEIR SERVICES TO THE WORLD

AND

IN GRATEFUL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF MY OWN GREAT DEBT TO BOTH

I DEDICATE THIS BOOK

SO UNWORTHY OF ITS GREAT SUBJECT

TO

THOSE TWO NOBLE BANDS OF SEEKERS AFTER TRUTH

THE FACULTY OF UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY

OF WHOM

CHARLES A. BRIGGS AND GEORGE L. PRENTISS

ARE THE HONORED SURVIVORS

AND TO

THAT TRIO OF ENGLISH STUDENTS

ERNEST M. SATOW, WILLIAM G. ASTON AND BASIL H. CHAMBERLAIN

WHO LAID THE FOUNDATIONS OF CRITICAL SCHOLARSHIP IN JAPAN

"IN UNCONSCIOUS BROTHERHOOD, BINDING THE SELF-SAME SHEAF"

PREFACE

This book makes no pretence of furnishing a mirror of contemporary

Japanese religion. Since 1868, Japan has been breaking the chains of her

intellectual bondage to China and India, and the end is not yet. My

purpose has been, not to take a snap-shot photograph, but to paint a

picture of the past. Seen in a lightning-flash, even a tempest-shaken

tree appears motionless. A study of the same organism from acorn to

seed-bearing oak, reveals not a phase but a life. It is something like

this--"_to_ the era of Meiji" (A.D. 1868-1894+) which I have essayed.

Hence I am perfectly willing to accept, in advance, the verdict of smart

inventors who are all ready to patent a brand-new religion for Japan,

that my presentation is "antiquated."

The subject has always been fascinating, despite its inherent

difficulties and the author's personal limitations. When in 1807, the

polite lads from Satsuma and Kiōto came to New Brunswick, N.J., they

found at least one eager questioner, a sophomore, who, while valuing

books, enjoyed at first hand contemporaneous human testimony.

When in 1869, to Rutgers College, came an application through Rev. Dr.

Guido F. Verbeck, of Tōkiō, from Fukui for a young man to organize

schools upon the American principle in the province of Echizen

(ultra-Buddhistic, yet already so liberally leavened by the ethical

teachings of Yokoi Héishiro), the Faculty made choice of the author.

Accepting the honor and privilege of being one of the "beginners of a

better time," I caught sight of peerless Fuji and set foot on Japanese

soil December 29, 1870. Amid a cannonade of new sensations and fresh

surprises, my first walk was taken in company with the American

missionary (once a marine in Perry's squadron, who later invented the

jin-riki-sha), to see a hill-temple and to study the wayside shrines

around Yokohama. Seven weeks' stay in the city of Yedo--then rising out

of the débris of feudalism to become the Imperial capital, Tōkiō,

enabled me to see some things now so utterly vanished, that by some

persons their previous existence is questioned. One of the most

interesting characters I met personally was Fukuzawa, the reformer, and

now "the intellectual father of half of the young men of ... Japan." On

the day of the battle of Uyéno, July 11, 1868, this far-seeing patriot

and inquiring spirit deliberately decided to keep out of the strife, and

with four companions of like mind, began the study of Wayland's Moral

Science. Thus were laid the foundations of his great school, now a

university.

Journeying through the interior, I saw many interesting phenomena of

popular religions which are no longer visible. At Fukui in Echizen, one

of the strongholds of Buddhism, I lived nearly a year, engaged in

educational work, having many opportunities of learning both the

scholastic and the popular forms of Shintō and of Buddhism. I was

surrounded by monasteries, temples, shrines, and a landscape richly

embroidered with myth and legend. During my four years' residence and

travel in the Empire, I perceived that in all things the people of Japan

were _too_ religious.

In seeking light upon the meaning of what I saw before me and in

penetrating to the reasons behind the phenomena, I fear I often made

myself troublesome to both priests and lay folk. While at work in

Tōkiō, though under obligation to teach only physical science, I

voluntarily gave instruction in ethics to classes in the University. I

richly enjoyed this work, which, by questioning and discussion, gave me

much insight into the minds of young men whose homes were in every

province of the Empire. In my own house I felt free to teach to all

comers the religion of Jesus, his revelation of the fatherhood of God

and the ethics based on his life and words. While, therefore, in

studying the subject, I have great indebtedness to acknowledge to

foreigners, I feel that first of all I must thank the natives who taught

me so much both by precept and practice. Among the influences that have

helped to shape my own creed and inspire my own life, have been the

beautiful lives and noble characters of Japanese officers, students and

common people who were around and before me. Though freely confessing

obligation to books, writings, and artistic and scholastic influences, I

hasten first to thank the people of Japan, whether servants, superior

officers, neighbors or friends. He who seeks to learn what religion is

from books only, will learn but half.

Gladly thanking those, who, directly or indirectly, have helped me with

light from the written or printed page, I must first of all gratefully

express my especial obligations to those native scholars who have read

to me, read for me, or read with me their native literature.

The first foreign students of Japanese religions were the Dutch, and the

German physicians who lived with them, at Déshima. Kaempfer makes

frequent references, with test and picture, in his Beschryving van

Japan. Von Siebold, who was an indefatigable collector rather than a

critical student, in Vol. V. of his invaluable _Archiv_ (Pantheon von

Nippon), devoted over forty pages to the religions of Japan. Dr. J.J.

Hoffman translated into Dutch, with notes and explanations, the

Butsu-zō-dzu-i, which, besides its 163 figures of Buddhist holy men,

gives a bibliography of the works mentioned by the native author. In

visiting the Japanese museum on the Rapenburg, Leyden, one of the

oldest, best and most intelligently arranged in Europe, I have been

interested with the great work done by the Dutchmen, during two

centuries, in leavening the old lump for that transformation which in

our day as New Japan, surprises the world. It requires the shock of

battle to awaken the western nations to that appreciation of the racial

and other differences between the Japanese and Chinese, which the

student has already learned.

The first praises, however, are to be awarded to the English scholars,

Messrs. Satow, Aston, Chamberlain, and others, whose profound researches

in Japanese history, language and literature have cleared the path for

others to tread in. I have tried to acknowledge my debt to them in both

text and appendix.

To several American missionaries, who despite their trying labors have

had the time and the taste to study critically the religions of Japan, I

owe thanks and appreciation. With rare acuteness and learning, Rev. Dr.

George Wm. Knox has opened on its philosophical, and Rev. Dr. J.H.

DeForest on its practical side, the subject of Japanese Confucianism. By

his lexicographical work, Dr. J.C. Hepburn has made debtors to him both

the native and the alien. To our knowledge of Buddhism in Japan, Dr.

J.C. Berry and Rev. J.L. Atkinson have made noteworthy contributions. I

have been content to quote as authorities and illustrations, the names

of those who have thus wrought on the soil, rather than of those, who,

even though world-famous, have been but slightly familiar with the

ethnic and the imported faith of Japan. The profound misunderstandings

of Buddhism, which some very eminent men of Europe have shown in their

writings, form one of the literary curiosities of the world.

In setting forth these Morse lectures, I have purposely robbed my pages

of all appearance of erudition, by using as few uncouth words as

possible, by breaking up the matter into paragraphs of moderate length,

by liberally introducing subject-headings in italics, and by relegating

all notes to the appendix. Since writing the lectures, and even while

reading the final proofs, I have ransacked my library to find as many

references, notes, illustrations and authorities as possible, for the

benefit of the general student. I have purposely avoided recondite and

inaccessible books and have named those easily obtainable from American

or European publishers, or from Messrs. Kelly & Walsh, of Yokohama,

Japan. In using oriental words I have followed, in the main, the

spelling of the Century Dictionary. The Japanese names are expressed

according to that uniform system of transliteration used by Hepburn,

Satow and other standard writers, wherein consonants have the same

general value as in English (except that initial g is always hard),

while the vowels are pronounced as in Italian. Double vowels must be

pronounced double, as in Méiji (mā-ē-jē); those which are long

are marked, as in ō or ū; i before o or u is short. Most of the

important Japanese, as well as Sanskrit and Chinese, terms used, are

duly expressed and defined in the Century Dictionary.

I wish also to thank especially my friends, Riu Watanabe, Ph.D., of

Cornell University, and William Nelson Noble, Esq., of Ithaca. The

former kindly assisted me with criticisms and suggestions, while to the

latter, who has taken time to read all the proofs, I am grateful for

considerable improvement in the English form of the sentences.

In closing, I trust that whatever charges may be brought against me by

competent critics, lack of sympathy will not be one. I write in sight of

beautiful Lake Cayuga, on the fertile and sloping shores of which in old

time the Iroquois Indian confessed the mysteries of life. Having planted

his corn, he made his pregnant squaw walk round the seed-bed in hope of

receiving from the Source of life increased blessing and sustenance for

body and mind. Between such a truly religious act of the savage, and

that of the Christian sage, Joseph Henry, who uncovered his head while

investigating electro-magnetism to "ask God a question," or that of

Samuel F.B. Morse, who sent as his first telegraphic message "What hath

God wrought," I see no essential difference. All three were acts of

faith and acknowledgment of a power greater than man. Religion is one,

though religions are many. As Principal Fairbairn, my honored

predecessor in the Morse lectureship, says: "What we call superstition

of the savage is not superstition _in him_. Superstition is the

perpetuation of a low form of belief along with a higher knowledge....

Between fetichism and Christian faith there is a great distance, but a

great affinity--the recognition of a supra-sensible life."

"For the earnest expectation of the creation waiteth for the revealing

of the sons of God.... The creation itself shall be delivered from the

bondage of corruption into the liberty of the glory of the children of

God."

W.E.G.

ITHACA, N.Y., October 27, 1894.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER I

PRIMITIVE FAITH: RELIGION BEFORE BOOKS, PAGE 1

Salutatory.--The Morse Lectureship and its provisions.--The Science of

Comparative Religion is Christianity's own child.--The Parliament of

Religions.--The Study of Religion most appropriate in a Theological

Seminary.--Shortening weapons and lengthening boundaries.--The right

missionary spirit that of the Master, who "came not to destroy but to

fulfil."--Characteristics of Japan.--Bird's-eye view of Japanese history

and religion.--Popularly, not three religions but one

religion.--Superstitions which are not organically parts of the

"book-religions."--The boundary line between the Creator and his

creation not visible to the pagan.--Shamanism: Fetichism.--Mythical

monsters, Kirin, Phoenix, Tortoise, Dragon.--Japanese mythical

zoölogy.--The erection of the stone fetich.--Insurance by amulets upon

house and person.--Phallicism.--Tree-worship.--Serpent-worship.--These

unwritten superstitions condition the "book-religions."--Removable by

science and a higher religion.

The Religions of Japan, from the Dawn of History to the Era of Méiji · 第 1 / 17 章