LITERATURE.

Cut off from access to the scholars, libraries, lectures, galleries of

art, museums of science, antiquities, and historic scenes of Europe,

Margaret bent her powers to use such opportunities of culture as she

could command in her solitary country-home. Journals and letters thus

bear witness to her zeal:--

'I am having one of my "intense" times, devouring book after

book. I never stop a minute, except to talk with mother,

having laid all little duties on the shelf for a few days.

Among other things, I have twice read through the life of Sir

J. Mackintosh; and it has suggested so much to me, that I

am very sorry I did not talk it over with you. It is quite

gratifying, after my late chagrin, to find Sir James, with

all his metaphysical turn, and ardent desire to penetrate it,

puzzling so over the German philosophy, and particularly what

I was myself troubled about, at Cambridge,--Jacobi's letters

to Fichte.

'Few things have ever been written more discriminating or more

beautiful than his strictures upon the Hindoo character, his

portrait of Fox, and his second letter to Robert Hall, after

his recovery from derangement. Do you remember what he says of

the want of brilliancy in Priestley's moral sentiments? Those

remarks, though slight, seem to me to show the quality of his

mind more decidedly than anything in the book. That so much

learning, benevolence, and almost unparalleled fairness of

mind, should be in a great measure lost to the world, for want

of earnestness of purpose, might impel us to attach to the

latter attribute as much importance as does the wise uncle in

Wilhelm Meister.'

* * * * *

'As to what you say of Shelley, it is true that the unhappy

influences of early education prevented his ever attaining

clear views of God, life, and the soul. At thirty, he was

still a seeker,--an experimentalist. But then his should not

be compared with such a mind as ----'s, which, having no such

exuberant fancy to tame, nor various faculties to develop,

naturally comes to maturity sooner. Had Shelley lived twenty

years longer, I have no doubt he would have become a fervent

Christian, and thus have attained that mental harmony which

was necessary to him. It is true, too, as you say, that we

always feel a melancholy imperfection in what he writes. But I

love to think of those other spheres in which so pure and rich

a being shall be perfected; and I cannot allow his faults

of opinion and sentiment to mar my enjoyment of the vast

capabilities, and exquisite perception of beauty, displayed

everywhere in his poems.'

* * * * *

'_March 17, 1836_.--I think Herschel will be very valuable to

me, from the slight glance I have taken of it, and I thank Mr.

F.; but do not let him expect anything of me because I have

ventured on a book so profound as the Novum Organum. I have

been examining myself with severity, intellectually as well as

morally, and am shocked to find how vague and superficial is

all my knowledge. I am no longer surprised that I should

have appeared harsh and arrogant in my strictures to one who,

having a better-disciplined mind, is more sensible of the

difficulties in the way of really knowing and doing anything,

and who, having more Wisdom, has more Reverence too. All that

passed at your house will prove very useful to me; and I trust

that I am approximating somewhat to that genuine humility

which is so indispensable to true regeneration. But do not

speak of this to--, for I am not yet sure of the state of my

mind.'

* * * * *

'1836.--I have, for the time, laid aside _De Stael_ and

_Bacon_, for _Martineau_ and _Southey_. I find, with delight,

that the former has written on the very subjects I wished most

to talk out with her, and probably I shall receive more from

her in this way than by personal intercourse,--for I think

more of her character when with her, and am stimulated through

my affections. As to Southey, I am steeped to the lips in

enjoyment. I am glad I did not know this poet earlier; for I

am now just ready to receive his truly exalting influences in

some degree. I think, in reading, I shall place him next to

Wordsworth. I have finished Herschel, and really believe I

am a little wiser. I have read, too, Heyne's letters

twice, Sartor Resartus once, some of Goethe's late diaries,

Coleridge's Literary Remains, and drank a great deal from

Wordsworth. By the way, do you know his "Happy Warrior"? I

find my insight of this sublime poet perpetually deepening.'

* * * * *

'Mr. ---- says the Wanderjahre is "_wise._" It must be

presumed so; and yet one is not satisfied. I was perfectly so

with my manner of interpreting the Lehrjahre; but this sequel

keeps jerking my clue, and threatens to break it. I do not

know our Goethe yet. I have changed my opinion about his

religious views many times. Sometimes I am tempted to think

that it is only his wonderful knowledge of human nature which

has excited in me such reverence for his philosophy, and that

no worthy fabric has been elevated on this broad foundation.

Yet often, when suspecting that I have found a huge gap, the

next turning it appears that it was but an air-hole, and

there is a brick all ready to stop it. On the whole, though

my enthusiasm for the Goetherian philosophy is checked, my

admiration for the genius of Goethe is in nowise lessened, and

I stand in a sceptical attitude, ready to try his philosophy,

and, if needs must, play the Eclectic.'

'Did I write that a kind-hearted neighbor, fearing I might

be _dull_, sent to offer me the use of a _book-caseful_ of

Souvenirs, Gems, and such-like glittering ware? I took a two

or three year old "Token," and chanced on a story, called the

"Gentle Boy," which I remembered to have heard was written by

somebody in Salem. It is marked by so much grace and delicacy

of feeling, that I am very desirous to know the author, whom I

take to be a lady.' * *

'With regard to what you say about the American Monthly, my

answer is, I would gladly sell some part of my mind for lucre,

to get the command of time; but I will not sell my soul: that

is, I am perfectly willing to take the trouble of writing for

money to pay the seamstress; but I am _not_ willing to have

what I write mutilated, or what I ought to say dictated to

suit the public taste. You speak of my writing about Tieck. It

is my earnest wish to interpret the German authors of whom

I am most fond to such Americans as are ready to receive.

Perhaps some might sneer at the notion of my becoming a

teacher; but where I love so much, surely I might inspire

others to love a little; and I think this kind of culture

would be precisely the counterpoise required by the

utilitarian tendencies of our day and place. My very

imperfections may be of value. While enthusiasm is yet fresh,

while I am still a novice, it may be more easy to communicate

with those quite uninitiated, than when I shall have attained

to a higher and calmer state of knowledge. I hope a periodical

may arise, by and by, which may think me worthy to furnish a

series of articles on German literature, giving room enough

and perfect freedom to say what I please. In this case, I

should wish to devote at least eight numbers to Tieck, and

should use the Garden of Poesy, and my other translations.

'I have sometimes thought of translating his Little Red Riding

Hood, for children. If it could be adorned with illustrations,

like those in the "Story without an End," it would make a

beautiful little book; but I do not know that this could be

done in Boston. There is much meaning that children could not

take in; but, as they would never discover this till able

to receive the whole, the book corresponds exactly with my

notions of what a child's book should be.

'I should like to begin the proposed series with a review of

Heyne's letters on German Literature, which afford excellent

opportunity for some preparatory hints. My plans are so

undecided for several coming months, that I cannot yet tell

whether I shall have the time and tranquillity needed to write

out the whole course, though much tempted by the promise of

perfect liberty. I could engage, however, to furnish at

least two articles on Novalis and Körner. I trust you will be

interested in my favorite Körner. Great is my love for both of

them. But I wish to write something which shall not only _be_

free from exaggeration, but which shall _seem_ so, to those

unacquainted with their works.

'I have so much reading to go through with this month, that

I have but few hours for correspondents. I have already

discussed five volumes in German, two in French, three in

English, and not without thought and examination.

'Tell--that I read "Titan" by myself, in the afternoons and

evenings of about three weeks. She need not be afraid to

undertake it. Difficulties of detail may, perhaps, not be

entirely conquered without a master or a good commentary, but

she could enjoy all that is most valuable alone. I should be

very unwilling to read it with a person of narrow or unrefined

mind; for it is a noble work, and fit to raise a reader into

that high serene of thought where pedants cannot enter.'

Memoirs of Margaret Fuller Ossoli, Volume I · 第 70 / 133 题