The trouble is that too many trusts start wrong. A lot of these

fellows take a strong, sound business idea--the economy of cost in

manufacture and selling--and hitch it to a load of the rottenest

business principle in the bunch--the inflation of the value of your

plant and stock--, and then wonder why people hold their noses when

their outfit drives down Wall Street. Of course, when you stop a

little leakage between the staves and dip out the sugar by the bucket

from the top, your net gain is going to be a deficit for somebody. So

if these fellows try to do business as they should do it, by clean and

sound methods and at fair and square prices, they can't earn money

enough to satisfy their stockholders, and they get sore; and if they

try to do business in the only way that's left, by clubbing

competition to death, and gouging the public, then the whole country

gets sore. It seems to me that a good many of these trusts are at a

stage where the old individual character of the businesses from which

they came is dead, and a new corporate character hasn't had time to

form and strengthen. Naturally, when a youngster hangs fire over

developing a conscience, he's got to have one licked into him.

Personally, I want to see fewer businesses put into trusts on the

canned-soup theory--add hot water and serve--before I go into one;

and I want to know that the new concern is going to put a little of

itself into every case that leaves the plant, just as I have always

put in a little of myself. Of course, I don't believe that this stage

of the trusts can last, because, in the end, a business that is

founded on doubtful values and that makes money by doubtful methods

will go to smash or be smashed, and the bigger the business the bigger

the smash. The real trust-busters are going to be the crooked trusts,

but so long as they can keep out of jail they will make it hard for

the sound and straight ones to prove their virtue. Yet once the trust

idea strikes bed-rock, and a trust is built up of sound properties

on a safe valuation; once the most capable man has had time to rise

to the head, and a new breed, trained to the new idea, to grow up

under him; and once dishonest competition--not hard competition--is

made a penitentiary offense, and the road to the penitentiary

macadamized so that it won't be impassable to the fellows who ride in

automobiles--then there'll be no more trust-busting talk, because a

trust will be the most efficient, the most economical, and the most

profitable way of doing business; and there's no use bucking that idea

or no sense in being so foolish as to want to. It would be like

grabbing a comet by the tail and trying to put a twist in it. And

there's nothing about it for a young fellow to be afraid of, because

a good man isn't lost in a big business--he simply has bigger

opportunities and more of them. The larger the interests at stake, the

less people are inclined to jeopardize them by putting them in the

hands of any one but the best man in sight.

I'm not afraid of any trust that's likely to come along for a while,

because Graham & Co. ain't any spring chicken. I'm not too old to

change, but I don't expect to have to just yet, and so long as the

trust and labor situation remains as it is I don't believe that you

and I and the kid can do much better than to follow my old rule:

_Mind your own business; own your own business; and run your own

business_.

Your affectionate father,

JOHN GRAHAM.

THE END.

End of Project Gutenberg's Old Gorgon Graham, by George Horace Lorimer

Old Gorgon Graham More Letters from a Self-Made Merchant to His Son · 第 10 / 10 段