THE FUTURE:
MACHINES THAT THINK, AND WHAT THEY MIGHT DO FOR MEN
The pen is mightier than the sword, it is often said. And if this is
true, then the pen with a motor may be mightier than the sword with a
motor.
In the Middle Ages, there were few kinds of weapons, and it was easy
for a man to protect himself against most of them by wearing armor.
As gunpowder came into use, a man could no longer carry the weight of
armor that would protect him, and so armor was given up. But in 1917,
armor, equipped with a motor and carrying the man and his weapons, came
back into service—as the tank.
In much the same way, in the Middle Ages, there were few books, and it
was easy for a man to handle nearly all the information that was in
books. As the printing press came into use, man’s brain could no longer
handle all recorded information, and the effort to do so was given
up. But in 1944, a brain to handle information, equipped with a motor
and supporting the man and his reasoning, came into existence—as the
sequence-controlled calculator.
In previous chapters we have examined some of the giant mechanical
brains that have been finished; we have also considered the design
of such machines. Now in this chapter we shall discuss the future
significance of machines that think, of motorized information. We shall
discuss what we can foresee if we look with imagination into the future.
There are two questions we need to ask: What types of machines that
think can we foresee? What types of problems to be solved by these
machines can we foresee?
FUTURE TYPES OF MACHINES THAT THINK
The machines that already exist show that some processes of thinking
can already be performed very quickly:
Calculating: adding, subtracting,...
Reasoning: comparing, selecting,...
Referring: looking up information in lists,...
We can expect other processes of thinking to come up to high speed
through the further development of thinking machines.
Automatic Address Book
Nowadays when we wish to send out announcements of an event, like going
to South America for a year, we may copy the addresses of our friends
onto the envelopes by hand. In the future, we can see our address book
as a spool of magnetic tape. When we wish to send out announcements,
we put a stack of blank envelopes into the machine that will read the
magnetic tape, and we press a button. Out will come the envelopes
addressed.
If we wish to select only those friends of ours whose last names we put
down on a list, we can write the list on another magnetic tape, place
it also in the machine, and set a few switches. Then the machine will
read the names on the list, find their addresses in the address-book
tape, and prepare only the envelopes we want. If a friend’s address
changes, we can notify the machine. It will find his old address, erase
it, and enter the new address.
Automatic Library
We can foresee the development of machinery that will make it possible
to consult information in a library automatically. Suppose that you
go into the library of the future and wish to look up ways for making
biscuits. You will be able to dial into the catalogue machine “making
biscuits.” There will be a flutter of movie film in the machine. Soon
it will stop, and, in front of you on the screen, will be projected
the part of the catalogue which shows the names of three or four books
containing recipes for biscuits. If you are satisfied, you will press
a button; a copy of what you saw will be made for you and come out of
the machine.
After further development, all the pages of all books will be available
by machine. Then, when you press the right button, you will be able to
get from the machine a copy of the exact recipe for biscuits that you
choose.
We are not yet at the end of foreseeable development. There will be
a third stage. You will then have in your home an automatic cooking
machine operated by program tapes. You will stock it with various
supplies, and it will put together and cook whatever dishes you desire.
Then, what you will need from the library will be a program or routine
on magnetic tape to control your automatic cook. And the library,
instead of producing a pictorial copy of the recipe for you to read and
apply, will produce a routine on magnetic tape for controlling your
cooking machine so that you will actually get excellent biscuits!
Of course, you may have other kinds of automatic producing machinery in
your home or office. The furnishing of routines to control automatic
machinery will become a business of importance.
Automatic Translator
Another machine that we can foresee would be used for translating from
one language to any other. We can call it an _automatic translator_.
Suppose that you want to say “How much?” in Swedish. You dial into the
machine “How much?” and press the button “Swedish,” and the machine
will promptly write out “Hur mycket?” for you. It also will pronounce
it, if you wish, for there would be little difficulty in recording on
magnetic tape the pronunciation of the word as spoken by a good speaker
of the language. The machine could be set to repeat the pronunciation
several times so that the student could really learn the sound. He
could learn it better, probably, by hearing it and trying to say it
than he could by using any set of written symbols.
Automatic Typist
We now come to a possible machine that uses a new principle. This
principle is that of being able to _recognize_ signs. This machine
would perceive writing on a piece of paper and recognize that all the
_a_’s that appear on the paper are cases of _a_, and that all the _b_’s
that appear on it are instances of _b_, and so forth. The machine could
then control an electric typewriter and copy the marks that it sees.
The first stage of this machine would be one in which only printed
characters of a high degree of likeness could be recognized. In later
stages, handwriting, even rather illegible handwriting, might be
recognizable by the machine. We can call it an _automatic typist_.
The elements of the automatic typist would be the following:
1. _Phototubes_ (electronic tubes sensitive to
the brightness of light), which could sense the
difference between black and white (these already
exist).
2. A memory of the shapes of 52 letters, 10 digits,
and punctuation marks. Fine distinctions would be
required of this memory in some cases—like the
difference between the numeral 5 and the capital
letter S.
3. A control that would cause the machine to
_tune_ itself, so that a good matching between
the marks it observed and the shapes it remembered
would be reached.
4. A _triggering control_ so that, when the
machine had reached good enough matching between
its observations and its memory, the machine would
proceed to identify the marks, read them, and
transfer them.
5. An electric typewriter, which would respond to
the transferred instructions. (This also already
exists.)
This machine is perhaps not so farfetched as it might seem. During
World War II, gun-aiming equipment using the new technique _radar_
reached a high stage of development. Many shots that disabled and sank
enemy ships were fired in total darkness by radar-controlled guns.
On the glowing screen in the control room, there were two spots, one
that marked the target and one that reported the point at which the
gun was aimed. These two spots could be brought almost automatically
into agreement. In the same way, a report from a phototube telling
the shape of an observed mark and a report from the memory of the
machine telling the shape of a similar mark could be compared by the
machine for likeness and, if judged enough alike, could be approved as
identical.
Even the phrase “enough alike” can be applied by a machine. During
World War II, tremendous advances were made in machinery for
deciphering enemy messages. Machines observed various features and
patterns in enemy messages, swiftly counted the frequency of these
features, and carried out statistical tests. Then the machines selected
those few cases in which the patterns showed meaning instead of
randomness.
A machine like the automatic typist, if made flexible enough, would
be, of course, extremely useful. A great load of dull office work is
now being thrown on clerks whose task is to translate from writing and
typing into languages that machines can read, such as punch cards.
At the present time, if punch-card machines are widely used in a big
company, the company must employ large numbers of girls whose sole
duty is to read papers and punch up cards. A still bigger chore is the
work of typists in all kinds of businesses whose main duty is to read
handwriting, etc., and then copy the words on a typewriter.
[Illustration: Each square in the grill is watched by a phototube.
FIG. 1. Scheme for distinguishing _A_ and _H_ by 15
phototubes.]
Research has already begun on various features of the automatic typist
because of its obvious labor-saving value. For example, many patents
have been issued on schemes for dividing the area occupied by a letter
or a digit into an array of spots, with a battery of phototubes
each watching a spot. The reports from the phototubes together will
distinguish the letter or digit. For example, if we consider _A_ and
_H_ placed in a grill of fifteen spots, 5 long by 3 wide (see Fig.
1), then the phototubes can distinguish between _A_ and _H_ by sensing
black or white in the spot in the middle of the top row. When we
consider how easily and swiftly a human being does this, we can once
more marvel at the recognizing machine we all carry around with us in
our heads.
Automatic Stenographer
Another development that we can foresee is one that we can call the
_automatic stenographer_. This is a machine that will listen to sounds
and write them down in properly spelled English words. The elements of
this machine can be outlined:
1. Microphones, which can sense spoken sounds (these
already exist).
2. A memory storing the 40 (more or less) phonetic
units or sounds that make up English, such as the
23 consonant sounds,
_p_ _b_ _l_ _ng_
_f_ _v_ _m_ _th_
_t_ _d_ _n_ _r_
_s_ _z_ _h_ _y_
_k_ _g_ _w_
_ch_ _j_
_sh_ _zh_ (heard in “pleasure”)
and the 17 vowel sounds,
LONG SHORT OTHER
_A_ (“ate”) _a_ (“cat”) _ar_ (“are”)
_E_ (“eat”) _e_ (“end”) _aw_ (“awe”)
_I_ (“isle”) _i_ (“in”) _er_ (“err”)
_O_ (“owe”) _o_ (“on”) _ow_ (“owl”)
_U_ (“cute”) _u_ (“up”) _oi_ (“oil”)
_OO_ (“roof”) _oo_ (“book”)
3. A collection of the rules of spelling in English,
containing many statements like
The sound _b_ is always spelled _b_
The sound _sh_ may be spelled _sh_ (ship), _s_ (sugar),
_ti_ (station), _ci_ (physician), _ce_ (ocean) or
_tu_ (picture) and other statements based on context,
word lists, derivation, etc. These are the statements
by means of which a good English speller knows how to
spell even words that he hears for the first time.
4. A triggering control so that, when the machine
reaches good enough matching between its
observations of sounds, its memory of sounds, and
its knowledge of spelling rules, the machine will
identify groups of sounds as words, determine their
spelling, and report the letters determined.
5. An electric typewriter, which would type the
reported letters.
With this type of machine, you would dictate your letters into a
machine (now existing) that would record your voice. Then the record
would be placed on the automatic stenographer, and out would come your
letters written and spaced as they should be.
Automatic Recognizer
We can foresee a recognizing machine with very general powers. Suppose
that we call it an _automatic recognizer_ (see Fig. 2). It will have
the following elements:
1. _Input._ This element will consist of a set
of observing instruments, capable of perceiving
sights, sounds, etc. There will be ways of
positioning or _tuning_ these instruments.
2. _Memory._ This element will store knowledge.
It may store the patterns of observations that we
are interested in; or it may store general rules on
how to find patterns of observations that we will
be interested in. It will contain knowledge about
acceptable groups of patterns, about actions to be
performed in response to patterns, etc.
3. _Program 1._ The element “Program 1” performs
a set of standard instructions. Under these
instructions, the machine:
Compares group after group of observations with the
information in the memory.
Compares these groups with patterns furnished, or seeks
to organize the observations into patterns.
Counts cases and tests frequencies.
Finds out how much matching with patterns there is.
Tunes the observing instruments in ways to increase
matching.
[Illustration: FIG. 2. Scheme of an automatic recognizer.]
4. _Program 2._ The element “Program 2” performs
another set of standard instructions. Under these
instructions, the machine, if it is tuned well,
matches sets of observations one after another with
the patterns and so reads them.
5. _Triggering Control._ This element shifts the
control of the machine from Program 1 to Program
2. It does this when the machine reaches “good
matching.” We shall set the meaning of this into
the machine in much the same way as we set “warm”
into a thermostat.
6. _Output._ This element performs any action
that we want, depending on recognized patterns read
and any other knowledge or instructions stored in
the memory.
The automatic recognizer will be capable of extraordinary tasks. With
microphones and a large memory, this type of machine would be able to
hear a foreign language spoken and translate it into spoken or written
English. With phototubes and with an expanded filtering and decoding
capacity as in deciphering machines, the automatic recognizer should be
able to read a dead language, even those (such as Minoan or Etruscan)
that have so far resisted efforts to read it. The machine would derive
rules for the translation of the language and translate any sample.
An automatic recognizer could perhaps be equipped with many sensitive,
tiny observing instruments that could be placed around or in the brain
and nervous systems of animals. Then the machine might enable us to
find out what activity in the nervous system corresponds with what
activity in the animal.
TYPES OF PROBLEMS THAT MACHINES WILL SOLVE IN THE FUTURE
We turn now to the second question regarding the future of machines
that think: What types of problems can we foresee as solved by these
machines?
Problems of Control
Probably the foremost problem which machines that think can solve is
automatic control over all sorts of other machines. This involves
controlling a machine that is running so that it will do the right
thing at the right time in response to information. For example,
suppose that you are mowing a lawn with a mowing machine. You watch
the preceding strip so as to stay next to it. You watch the ends of
the strips, where you turn around. If a stick is caught in the cutting
blade, you stop and take it out. Now it is entirely possible to put
devices on the mowing machine so that all these things will be taken
care of automatically. In fact, in the case of plowing a large field,
a tractor-plow can be equipped with a device that guides it next to
the preceding furrow. Thus, once the first furrow around the edge has
been made, riderless tractors will plow a whole field and stop in the
middle.
For another example, take a gas furnace for heating steam to keep a
house warm. Such a furnace has automatic controls, which respond to the
following information whenever reported:
House too warm.
House not warm enough.
Too much steam pressure.
Not enough water in boiler.
Gas flame not lit.
Daytime.
Nighttime.
In fact, your own meaning of “warm” can be put into the control system:
you set the dial on your thermostat at the temperature that “warm” is
to be for you.
In the future many kinds of automatic control will be common. We shall
have automatic pilots for flying and landing airplanes. We shall
have automatic missiles for destructive purposes, such as bombing
and killing, and for constructive purposes, such as delivering mail
and fast freight. An article in the magazine _Fortune_ for November
1946 described the automatic factory (see Supplement 3). This is a
factory in which there would be automatic arms for holding stuff being
manufactured, and automatic feed lines for supplying material just
where it is needed. All this factory would be controlled by machines
that handle information automatically and produce actions that respond
to information.
This prospect fills us with concern as well as with amazement. How
shall we control these automatic machines, these robots, these
Frankensteins? What will there be left for us to do to earn our living?
But more of this in the next chapter.
Problems of Science
Other problems for which we can foresee the use of machines that think
are the understanding, and later the controlling, of nature. One of
these problems is weather forecasting and weather control.
The Weather Brain
We can imagine the following type of machine—a _weather brain_. A
thousand weather observatories all over the country observe the weather
at 8 A.M. The observations are fed automatically through a countrywide
network of communication lines into a central station. Here a giant
machine, containing a great deal of scientific knowledge about the
weather, takes in all the data reported to it. At 8:15 the weather
brain starts to calculate; in half an hour it has finished, having
produced an excellent forecast of the weather for the whole country.
Then it proceeds to transmit its forecast all over the country. By 8:50
every weather station, newspaper, radio station, and airport in the
country has the details. In October 1945, Dr. V. K. Zworykin of the
Princeton Laboratories of the Radio Corporation of America proposed
solving the problem of weather forecasting in this way by a giant brain.
The weather brain will have a second stage of application. From time to
time and here and there, the weather is unstable: it can be triggered
to behave in one way or another. For example, recently, pellets of
_frozen carbon dioxide_—often called Dry Ice—have been dropped from
planes and have caused rain. In fact, a few pounds of Dry Ice have
apparently caused several hundred tons of rain or snow. In similar
ways, we may, for example, turn away a hail storm so that hail will
fall over a barren mountain instead of over a farming valley and
thus protect crops. Or we may dispel conditions that would lead to a
tornado, thus avoiding its damage. Both these examples involve local
weather disturbances. However, even the greatest weather disturbances,
like hurricanes and blizzards, may eventually be directed to some
extent. Thus the weather may become to some degree subject to man’s
control, and the weather brain will be able to tell men where and when
to take action.
Psychological Testing
Another scientific problem to which new machinery for handling
information applies is the problem of understanding human beings and
their behavior. This increased understanding may lead to much wiser
dealing with human behavior.
For example, consider tests of aptitudes. If you take one of these
tests, you may be asked to mark which word out of five suggested ones
is nearest in meaning to a given word. Or your test may be 40 simple
arithmetical problems to be solved in 25 minutes. Or you may be given
a sheet with 20 circles, and be asked to put 3 dots in the first, 7
dots in the second, 4 dots in the third, 11 dots in the fourth, and
so on, irregularly; you may be given a total of 45 seconds to do this
as well as you can. Now, if a vocational counselor gives you one of
these tests, and if you get 84 out of 100 on it, he needs to know just
what he has measured about you. Also, he needs to know whether he can
reasonably forecast that, as a result of your grade of 84, you will
be good at writing articles, or good at supervising the work of other
people, or good at designing in a machine shop. He needs to know the
records of people with scores of about 84 on this test and to have
evidence supporting his forecasts.
If we wish to make the most use of the tests, we need to carry out a
good deal of statistics, mathematics, and logic. For example, it will
turn out that answers to some questions are much more significant
than answers to others, and so we can greatly improve the quality of
the tests by keeping only the more significant questions. Powerful
machinery for handling calculations will be very useful in the field of
aptitude testing.
But, you may ask, what if the person analyzing your answers has to use
interpretations and judgments? If the judgments and interpretations can
be expressed in words, and if the words can be translated into machine
language, then the machine can carry out the analysis. Usually the
difference between a rule and a judgment is simply this: a rule in a
case in which it is hard to express all the factors being considered is
called a judgment.
Psychological Trainer
It is conceivable that machines that think can eventually be applied
in the actual treatment of mental illness and maladjustment. Consider
what a physician does. In treating a psychiatric case, such as a
_neurosis_, a physician uses words almost entirely. He asks questions.
He listens to the patient’s answers. Each answer takes the physician
nearer and nearer to a diagnosis. By and by the physician knows what
most of the difficulty is. Then he must present his knowledge slowly
to the patient, gradually guiding the patient to understanding. It is
a psychological truth that telling a man in ten minutes what is wrong
with him does not cure him. The physician seeks to free the patient
from the tormenting circles of habit and worry in which he has been
trapped. Often the diagnosis is short and the treatment is long; the
reasons for the neurosis may soon be clear to the physician, but they
may take months to become clear to the patient.
Now let us consider the following kind of machine as an aid to the
physician. We might call this kind of machine a _psychological
trainer_, for in many ways it is like the training machines used in
World War II for training a pilot to fly an airplane. The psychological
trainer would have the following properties:
1. The machine is able to show sound movies—produce
pictures and utter words.
2. It is able to put before the patient: situations,
problems, questions, experiences, etc.
3. It is able to take in responses from the patient.
4. It is able to receive a program of instructions
from the physician.
5. Depending on the responses of the patient and on
the program from the physician, the training
machine can select more material to put before the
patient.
6. The training machine produces a record of what it
presented and of how the patient responded, so that
the physician and the patient can study the record
later.
What sort of films would the machine hold? The machine could be loaded
with a number of films which would help in the particular type of
neurosis from which the patient was suffering.
What sort of responses could the patient make? The patient might have
buttons in front of him which he could press to indicate such answers
as:
Yes I don’t know Repeat
No It depends Go ahead
Also, the patient might hold a device—like a lie detector,
perhaps—which would report his state of tenseness, etc., and so report
what he really felt.
Where would the machine’s questions come from? From one or more
physicians very clever in the treatment of mental illness.
Suppose that the patient is inconsistent in his answers? The machine,
discovering the inconsistencies, could return to the subject and ask
related questions in a different way. As soon as several questions
related to the same point are answered consistently, the machine could
exclude groups of questions that no longer apply and could proceed to
other questions that would still apply.
Patients would vary in their ability to go as fast as the machine
could. So from time to time the machine would ask questions to test
the effect of what it had presented; and, depending on the answers,
the machine would go faster or would bring in additional material to
clarify some point.
This machine might have a few advantages over ordinary treatment. For
example, with the machine, treatment does not depend on the physician’s
making the right answer in a split second, as it may in a personal
interview. Also, the patient might be franker with the machine than
with the physician, for it might be arranged that the patient could
review his record, and then decide whether to confess it to his
physician.
Such a machine would enable physicians to treat many more patients
than they now can. In fact, it is estimated that nearly 50 per cent of
persons who consult physicians are suffering only from mental illness.
Such a machine would therefore be a great help.
Problems of Business
Another large group of problems for which we can foresee the use of
machines that think is found in business and economics.
For example, consider production scheduling in a business or a factory.
The machine takes in a description of each order received by the
business and a description of its relative urgency. The machine knows
(that is, has in its memory) how much of each kind of raw material is
needed to fill the order and what equipment and manpower are needed
to produce it. The machine makes a schedule showing what particular
men and what particular equipment are to be set to work to produce the
order. The machine turns out the best possible production schedule,
showing who should do what when, so that all the orders will be filled
in the best sequence. What is the “best” sequence? We can decide what
we think is the best sequence, and we can set the machine for making
that kind of selection, in the same way as we decide what is “warm” and
set the thermostat to produce it!
On a much larger scale, we can use mechanical brains to study economic
relations in a society. Everything produced in a society is made by
consuming some materials, labor, equipment, and skill. The output
produced by one man or factory or industry becomes the input for
other men, factories, industries. In this way all economic units are
linked together by many different kinds and degrees of dependence. The
situation is, of course, complicated: it changes as time goes on and
as people want different things produced. Economists have already set
up simple models of economic societies and have studied them. But with
machines that think, it will be possible to set up and study far more
complicated models—models that are very much like the society we live
in. We can then answer questions of economics by calculation instead of
by arguments and counting noses. We shall be able to solve definitely
such problems as: “How will a rise in the price of steel affect the
farming industry?” “How much money must be paid out as wages and
salaries so that consumer purchasing power will buy back what industry
produces?”
Machines and the Individual
What about the ordinary everyday effects of these machines upon you
and me as an individual? We can see that the new machinery will apply
on a small scale even to us. Small machines using a few electronic
tubes—much like a radio set, for example—and containing spools of
magnetic wire or magnetic tape will doubtless be available to us. We
shall be able to use them to keep addresses and telephone numbers, to
figure out the income tax we should pay, to help us keep accounts and
make ends meet, to remember many things we need to know, and perhaps
even to give us more information. For there are a great many things
that all of us could do much better if we could only apply what the
wisest of us knows.
We can even imagine what new machinery for handling information may
some day become: a small pocket instrument that we carry around with
us, talking to it whenever we need to, and either storing information
in it or receiving information from it. Thus the brain with a motor
will guide and advise the man just as the armor with a motor carries
and protects him.