Caius Julius Caesar

So long as the world lasts men will discuss, without settling, the

question, What constitutes greatness? Some people will give one answer,

some another. There are those who hold that no man ought properly to be

called great who is not also good. Thus a French historian said that

Napoleon was as great as a man could be without virtue. Even here,

however, there is room for difference and discussion. What is meant by

virtue? Is the good man he who does good, who makes people better and

happier, or the man who is good in himself, who tries always to put the

welfare of others before his own, whether he succeeds or not? If the

first be true, poets, painters, and sculptors must rank highest in the

order of goodness as of greatness. If the second, most of the really

good are forgotten, since they tried and failed. Is success the test? It

is the only test that history accepts. The men who appear to us as great

in the story of the past are those who made some mark, whether for good

or evil, on their time. The others are forgotten. What we know of most

of the men, great or small, of the past, is not what they were, but what

they did. We know what they did. We can only guess why they did it.

Often, too, it happens that good men--men kindly, affectionate, and

unselfish--do harm to others without knowing it: bad men do good.

[Illustration: JULIUS CAESAR

The Brit. Mus. gem]

All these puzzling questions, and many more, are set to us by the

character of Caius Julius Caesar. He puzzled the men who lived in his

own time, and has gone on puzzling historians ever since. Brutus, who

loved him, finally killed him because he thought he was doing more harm

than good. Marcus Antonius, who also loved him, thought him, to the end,

the noblest man that ever lived. One great historian regards him as one

of the few really wise and far-seeing statesmen in the world's story;

a man who with extraordinary genius saw what the world needed and with

extraordinary will carried it out. Another sees him as no more than a

clever, selfish, and ambitious time-server: a man without fixed ideas or

principles, whose sole object was power. Both admit his genius: but

where one sees it directed steadily to great ends, the other sees

nothing fixed in his character but the determination to succeed.

Caesar's speeches (and he was a great speaker) are lost. We have two

volumes of his writings: his account of the conquest and settlement of

Gaul, and his account of the Civil War. These two volumes of

_Commentaries_ are so admirably written, in so pure and firm and lucid a

style, with such mastery of narrative and of order, that their author

would stand high among Roman writers had he been distinguished in no

other way. Only a remarkable man could have written an account of his

own doings in just this style. For there is no word of comment: the

whole thing is, as Caesar himself says, bare, simple, and plain, with

every kind of ornament cast aside. The language is simple, exact,

concise. Every word tells. There is never a word too much. The dryness

with which amazing feats of generalship, of endurance, of courage, are

set down only makes them, in the end, more impressive. No mere talker,

no one shifted this way and that by chance and by the opinion of others,

could have written these books. They are the record of one who could

both see and act.

In so far as we can judge a man from his face, the busts tell the same

story. They show us Caesar in middle age, when firmly set to serious

purposes, the idle impulses of youth left behind. The power to think,

the power to act--these are the characteristics of the familiar bust.

Yet Caesar, if we can believe the stories of him, retained to beyond

middle life a rare personal charm, and always had much of the quick,

passionate responsiveness of the artist. There was room in his mind for

all sorts of things beside the business of making men do what he wanted.

Whether the almost tragic nobility of the sculptured face, which is in

this respect like that of Napoleon, means that Caesar was led on by

something higher than personal ambition, the desire to engrave his own

will upon the stuff of life, it is impossible to say. He made history;

he was, in that sense, a man of destiny, but did he know what he was

doing? did he care for a good beyond his own?

[Illustration: JULIUS CAESAR

The Brit. Mus. bust]

The first incident we know of Caesar is highly characteristic. Pompeius

at the time of the proscriptions had put away his wife at Sulla's

behest. Caesar, a little younger, like him a rising young soldier, was

descended from one of the most illustrious of patrician families. But

his uncle had married Marius's sister. Not only was he the nephew of

Marius; he was allied to the beaten party in the Revolution by his

marriage to Cornelia the daughter of Cinna. Sulla commanded him to

divorce her. Caesar refused. He loved his wife dearly. Neither then

(he was hardly out of his teens) nor at any other time was he ready to

take orders from other men. Therefore his property and the dowry of his

young wife were confiscated. His own life was in danger and he had to

leave Rome. But his will did not bend. Sulla realized something of the

stuff of which, youthful and unknown as he was, Caesar was made. 'In

that young man', he said, 'there are many Mariuses.'

At the time, and for long after, however, no sign of this was perceived

by most people. At an age when Pompeius, the darling of fortune, had

celebrated a triumph and was, despite his youth, a leading man in Rome,

looked up to by every one, rather feared by the Senate, wealthy,

prosperous, and important, Caesar was poor and quite unknown, attached

by his relationship to Marius and Cinna to a defeated faction and a

broken and discredited party. Yet Sulla was right. Caesar had a genius,

a patience, and a power of will such as Marius never possessed. Of his

military talents no one, not even Caesar himself, had any suspicion till

long after. His rise was slow and difficult. Until his alliance with

Crassus he was perpetually hampered by poverty and debts, both in fact

and in the opinion of Rome.

When he escaped from Rome (81) Caesar went abroad first to the Greek

islands, where he served his first campaign, and afterward to Bithynia;

he also raised an expeditionary force against the Rhodian pirates. After

Sulla's death he returned to Rome. His eloquence soon won him a position

in the Popular party. No one, however, regarded him as a serious rival

to Pompeius, who was at this time regarded as inclining more or less to

the Popular side. The enormous debts which were to be such a burden to

Caesar were mainly contracted while Pompeius was in the East. He carried

through magnificent building schemes, and gave superb games to the

people--such being the road to popularity. Wider plans were forming in

his mind, however: plans on the lines of Gracchus.

The great difficulty in Caesar's way, over and above his own debts, was

the character of the Popular party. It stood, to the majority of

Conservatives and men of wealth and standing, for nothing but disorder

and insecurity, with revolution in the background. These Conservatives

did not see that they were helping to bring about all the things they

dreaded by their opposition to change and their effort to keep all power

in the hands of their own order, and their fear, distrust, and jealousy

of any man of real ability. They drove young able men into the Popular

party; and the Popular party to them was always the party of Marius and

Cinna. There were in fact too many men in it of low character and

reckless ways of life; men like Catiline and his friend Cethegus, like

Clodius and Milo. The more clearly Caesar was marked out as the leader

of this party the more did the Conservatives dread and hate him. Not

without reason did he often think his very life was in danger. It was

always possible that riots might break out. If they did the Popular

party would be held responsible, and he would suffer for them all. His

debts increased this danger. They made him at once reckless and

powerless.

Yet Caesar's popularity in Rome was real. At the time when his

difficulties were thickest upon him he stood for election, against some

of the most honoured and important senators, as Pontifex Maximus, the

chief of the State religion. He was under forty; it was a post generally

held by an old man; his religious views were known to be extremely

'advanced'. Moreover, many people whispered that he had been privy to

Catiline's conspiracy, since Catiline was a member of his party. One of

the other candidates offered to pay his debts if he would retire. To

retire was not Caesar's way; he regarded the proposal as an insult. As

he left home on the day of election he told his mother, to whom he was

devoted, that he would return Pontifex or an exile. He was elected.

The same immovable courage was shown by Caesar at the time of the

Catilinarian conspiracy. The whole machinery of the trial of the

conspirators was contrary to the law; the Senate was not a proper Court

which could condemn men to death. Caesar knew that he was suspected by

many of being involved in the conspiracy and that many would be only too

delighted if they could see him in the dock for any reason. Yet he was

the one man who dared to point out the illegality and injustice of what

was being done and to vote against the death sentence. Caesar's life was

threatened at the time; but afterwards when the excitement died down and

people could consider the affair more calmly they saw that he had been

right; that he had kept his sense of justice when panic had made the

other senators lose theirs altogether.

Caesar was soon after this made governor of Spain (61-60). But his

creditors were so pressing that he would have actually been unable to

start had he not come to an understanding with Crassus. Crassus settled

the most urgent of his debts and he set out. Two stories are told of him

at this time which show a good deal of his mind. In crossing the Alps he

came upon a town so small that one of his friends remarked to him that

in a place so tiny there could be none of the struggle for place and

power such as there were in Rome, nothing worth having or being. Caesar,

however, said, 'I assure you I had rather be the first man here than the

second man in Rome.' When in Spain he spent his leisure in reading.

Among other books he studied the Life of Alexander the Great. The

followers of Pompeius who had just come back from the East were freely

comparing him to Alexander. Caesar was so much moved by what he read

that he sat thoughtful for a long time and at last, to the surprise of

his companions, burst into tears. They could not understand the reason

till he said, 'Do you not think I have sufficient cause for concern,

when Alexander at my age ruled over so many conquered countries and I

have not one glorious achievement to boast?'

In his government of Spain Caesar showed firmness, energy, and wisdom.

He carried out successful expeditions to distant parts of the peninsula

and brought the whole country into such good order that he enriched it

as well as the Roman State, himself, and his own soldiers. And all the

time that he was in Spain his mind was at work. From a distance he saw

the meaning of events in Rome with clearness and formed his own plans.

As soon as he returned he set to work to bring about that understanding

between himself, Crassus, and Pompeius that was known afterwards (at the

time it was a private bond) as the First Triumvirate (60). To bring this

about was by no means easy. Pompeius was jealous and apt to ride the

high horse. Crassus, though attached to Caesar, hated Pompeius. But

Caesar persuaded them both. The world might see how things stood when he

walked between them to the place of election for the consulship.

During his consulship (59) Caesar, despite the feeble opposition of his

colleague, carried through a big programme of reforms. In addition he

got a decree passed making him governor and military commander of Gaul

for five years. In Transalpine Gaul very dangerous movements were said

to be going on among the tribes. The Senate was not sorry to think of

getting Caesar out of the way and into a dangerous place: he himself

desired to win a glory equal to that of Pompeius and the command of an

army devoted to himself. In Gaul he meant to find both. And he did.

Plutarch, who wrote the lives of many distinguished Romans, was no lover

of Caesar. Pompeius is his hero. Yet Plutarch says that Caesar's

campaigns in Gaul (58-51) show him 'not in the least inferior to the

greatest and most admired commanders the world ever produced'. 'In

Gaul', he says, 'we begin a new life, as it were, and have to follow him

in quite another track.' In the nine years he spent there Caesar showed

astonishing genius as a soldier and won the utter devotion of his men.

But what he did in the field is surpassed by the statesmanship shown in

his settlement of the country and plan for its government.

In Gaul Caesar's great ideas found scope; but they were not born in

Gaul. If Caesar at work in Gaul appears to be a different man from

Caesar playing at politics in Rome, the reason is not that he suddenly

changed but that the picture of him in Rome is based on the accounts

given by his enemies, by men who feared and disliked without

understanding him. They have drawn a picture of a wild, extravagant, and

dissipated young man. Caesar was that, but behind it there was a mind

more powerful, a personality more strong, than in any of his

contemporaries: that mind and personality which old Sulla had perceived.

When in Rome Caesar worked incessantly even while he pretended to idle.

He was one of the busiest men in the city, though some of his busy-ness

was of a foolish kind. In Gaul his immense energies were turned to

constructive work. His health, which had been fragile--he suffered from

epilepsy or what was called 'the falling sickness' and from violent

headaches--and never became extraordinarily robust, was strengthened by

the hardships of a military life, by long marches, exposure, and spartan

food. And his energy, always extraordinary, seemed to grow by what it

fed on. He never rested. When on horseback on the march he kept

secretaries by him to write, at his dictation, letters, orders,

memoranda, draft laws, and his own history. He reduced his hours of

sleep to the fewest and at all times shared, like Hannibal, every

hardship of his men. They adored him, not only because of this and

because he never forgot that they were men like himself, but because of

something magnetic in his personality, that charm which is the hardest

thing in the world to describe or define. Caesar made his men believe in

him: trust him when he asked them to do things that appeared impossible:

face the most terrific odds and the severest trials in perfect belief in

him. They believed, as he did, in his star. But their devotion was not

only due to his genius. It was given to him, as a man, because of his

charm.

For nine years Caesar was in Gaul. For nine years Rome saw nothing of

him, though he spent winters at Ravenna and Lucca, and all the time

never lost touch with what was going on in the capital, or hold over men

there. He had left one or two faithful friends, among them Marcus

Antonius and Curio, to look after his interests. But his whole mind and

energy were devoted to his work in Gaul. It was a great work. Caesar not

only fought battles and conquered territories, as Pompeius and Lucullus

had done in the East. He did what they had never even tried to do: he

romanized the country. Understanding, with rare quickness and sympathy,

the nature of the people with whom he had to deal, he did not try to

alter their deep-rooted habits. But he started the work, completed under

the Empire, of spreading Roman law and order, coins and ways of trading,

in a word Roman civilization, over Central Europe. Caesar's mark

remained upon it all. There were disturbances in various parts of the

country after he left it. What the Romans called Gaul was a vast region

inhabited by numerous tribes who hated and warred against one another,

and had not learnt how to live in peace side by side. When Caesar took

up his command, the wild hordes of the north were ready to swoop down

upon Rome as they had done in the time of Brennus and again later when

Marius defeated them at Vercellae and the Raudine Fields. As the result

of Caesar's work they were held back for more than four hundred years.

And since Caesar was a statesman as well as a soldier his work was never

wholly undone: the stamp of his genius and of Rome was set once and for

all on North-western Europe.

As a soldier Caesar ranks among the greatest in the world. When he first

went to Gaul his army was small--but four legions in all. The rest of

his army he created, enlisting and training it on the spot. With his

small forces he had to meet not Orientals, driven into battle by fear,

but sturdy and fiercely warlike men with whom fighting was a natural

passion. Among the Gaulish chieftains too there were leaders of great

military gifts--Ariovistus, the chief of the Teutons, and Vercingetorix

of the Arverni.

Some idea of the means by which Caesar stirred and inspired his men, and

checked the danger of insubordination in his own ranks, which rose at

times when they were called upon to fight forces far greater in numbers,

is given by a passage in his own story. It begins with a speech he made

to his men.

[Illustration: SUBMISSION OF TRIBES

from a relief of the Empire]

_How Caesar dealt with threats of insubordination provoked by fear

of meeting the Germans_

'If any of you are alarmed by the defeat and flight of the Gauls,

you will find on inquiry that they were tired out by the length of

the war, and that Ariovistus, who for many months had been

encamped behind the shelter of the swamps and made it impossible

to engage him, suddenly fell on them when they were scattered

without any thought of fighting, and conquered them rather by

stratagem than by valour. Such a policy might well succeed against

untrained barbarians, but even Ariovistus does not expect that

Roman armies can be ensnared by it. Again, if any disguise their

fears by a pretended anxiety about supplies or by imaginary

difficulties in the route, they are acting presumptuously; for, as

it seems, either they are hopeless about the commander's

performance of his duty or they are dictating to him what that

duty is. These matters are for my decision; corn is being supplied

by the Sequani, Leuci and Lingones, and the crops are already

ripe. As for the difficulties of the route, you will soon have an

opportunity of judging them. When I am told that the soldiers will

disobey me and refuse to march, I am not at all troubled, for I

know that, if an army has been disobedient, either its commander

has been defeated through incompetence or some overt act has

convicted him of extortion; but the whole course of my life bears

witness to my integrity, and my success is proved by my campaign

against the Helvetii. Accordingly I shall do at once what I had

intended to do later and shall march to-night at the fourth watch,

so that I may know without delay whether your fears are stronger

than the claims of honour and duty. If no one else follows me,

I shall start with the tenth legion, whose devotion is beyond

question, and I intend to make it my bodyguard.' Caesar had shown

special favour to this legion and had an absolute trust in its

valour.

This speech made an extraordinary impression upon all and inspired

very great enthusiasm and eagerness to advance. The tenth legion

set the example, thanking Caesar through its tribunes for his

generous confidence, and declaring that it was ready in every way

to fight. Then the rest of the legions commissioned their tribunes

and chief centurions to apologize to Caesar; they had never

hesitated or feared, and had never thought that they should meddle

with their commander in the control of operations. Caesar accepted

their apology and started at the fourth watch, as he had warned

them.

Caesar, _De Bello Gallico_, i. 40. 8-41. 4.

[Illustration: A ROMAN LEGIONARY HELMET

found in Britain]

There was a moment when it looked as though all Caesar's work was to be

swept away. He spent part of the year 54 in Britain. While he was away

plans for a great rising were conceived. Soon after he returned all Gaul

rose in a blaze. The first rising was put down. In 52 another and more

serious movement took place with Vercingetorix at its head. The danger

was greater than ever. It was the more serious that Caesar knew that in

Rome his enemies were working against him. So great was it indeed that

Caesar's officers were in despair and begged him to retreat to some safe

spot until reinforcements could be sent. But to wait for reinforcements

would make things worse instead of better. The rebellion would gather

force. It was by no means certain that Pompeius, now hand in glove with

the Conservatives, would send him more troops. Pompeius would be glad to

see his rival fail. Caesar was not going to give him that pleasure. And

retreat in face of danger was never Caesar's way. Always he went to meet

it. So now. He delivered a blow at the very heart of the enemy's

position. Caesar's capture of Alesia, the stronghold of Vercingetorix,

and his defeat of the second great Gallic army that closed him in while

he was blockading the town are among the great feats in the history of

war. The odds were heavy against him. His army was in a position from

which no luck, only the most brilliant generalship, could save it.

Caesar not only saved it: he absolutely crushed the foe. Vercingetorix

surrendered. The rebellion collapsed. By the end of the next year Gaul

was under Caesar's feet again. It was possible for him to turn his eyes

and mind to Rome (50).

[Illustration: THE HEIGHTS OF ALESIA

The stronghold of Vercingetorix]

He did not want to quarrel with Pompeius. He had indeed from the first

done everything in his power to prevent such a quarrel. But he saw that

the old order of things in Rome was crumbling into ruin. If Pompeius and

he could not rule together, one of them must rule alone. In the years of

his absence Pompeius had moved more and more to the Conservative point

of view. His jealousy of Caesar had grown. The long struggle came to a

head when Caesar's time in Gaul drew to an end.

[Illustration: MARCUS ANTONIUS from a coin]

Caesar from his winter quarters at Ravenna declared that he was ready to

disband his army and return to Rome as a private citizen as soon as

Pompeius demobilized his troops. Pompeius actually had a larger force of

men under arms than Caesar, including two legions which Caesar had

borrowed and sent back to him. In the Senate Curio proposed that both

generals should lay down their commands. This was agreed to. Pompeius

refused. A few months later the question came up again. Curio, who had

been to Ravenna, where Caesar was, read a letter from him. In this he

said he would disarm, if Pompeius did the same. The Senate declared the

letter was dangerous, and the man who wrote it dangerous. A friend of

Pompeius then proposed that by a certain day Caesar, if not disarmed,

should be regarded as a traitor. When Marcus Antonius and Cassius,

another tribune, vetoed this, they were expelled from the Senate and

threatened with swords by Pompeius's adherents. Caesar could no longer

have any doubt as to what awaited him in Rome. He explained how things

stood to his soldiers: they cried to him to march on (49).

By Sulla's law the Rubicon was the military boundary of Italy. No one

might cross it under arms. Caesar paused for a moment on the bank; then

suddenly crying, 'The die is cast', he crossed the river at the head of

his men and marching with great speed entered Ariminum.

The poet Lucan, writing long afterwards, tried to penetrate the secrets

of his mind, and guess what passed in it at this moment.

_The Approach to the Rubicon: a Poet's Phantasy_

Caesar had already hurried across the frozen Alps, pondering in

his heart vast schemes of war to come; but when he reached the

narrow waters of the Rubicon, the vision of his distracted country

rose awful to his gaze, with saddened features clear seen through

the gloom and white locks flowing from beneath her crown of

towers. All dishevelled and bare-armed she stood before him,

uttering words broken by sighs: 'Whither do ye press on? Whither

do ye bear these my standards? If ye come as loyal citizens, thus

far and no further.' Then Caesar shuddered in every limb, his hair

stiffened, and faintness of heart, checking his steps, stayed him

at the very brink. Soon he cried: 'Oh Lord of thunder, that from

the Tarpeian rock dost survey all our city, and gods that followed

the race of Iulus from Troy, and mysteries of Quirinus lost to our

sight, and Jupiter enthroned over Latium on Alba's mount, and

hearth of Vesta's fire, and thou, Rome, worshipped as divine, be

gracious to my cause. I bear against thee no frenzied arms. Lo!

here am I, Caesar, conqueror by sea and land, still everywhere thy

soldier if none forbid. On him, on him shall rest the guilt who

makes me thy enemy!' Then without delay be gave the signal for

advance and quickly led his men through the swollen stream.

Lucan, _Pharsalia_, i. 183-203.

There was no resistance. It was not Caesar's intention to use any

violence. In Rome, however, when the news came that he was moving south,

people fell into a panic. Pompeius lost his head. Although the forces at

his command were greater than Caesar's, he left the city, leaving

everything, including the State Treasury, behind him. Most of the

senators and people of consequence did the same.

Within sixty days from his crossing the Rubicon Caesar entered Rome and

made himself master of it and of all Northern Italy without bloodshed.

People who had trembled and believed that a reign of terror and

proscriptions of the kind carried out by Marius and Sulla would follow,

breathed again. Caesar showed no bitterness. There were no executions.

The property of those who had fled with Pompeius was untouched. Even to

Labienus, the one officer of his own who deserted him and joined the

other side, Caesar was generous. He sent his goods after him.

Caesar summoned those members of the Senate who had remained in Rome and

addressed them in a mild and gracious speech. He had no desire for war:

he urged them to send deputies to Pompeius. But no one would do this.

Pompeius meantime was embarking for Greece. Caesar did not follow him.

He was master in Rome: but Rome was utterly dependent for all its

supplies, the means by which it lived, on the world outside. Of that

world Pompeius seemed master. Caesar's first task was, therefore, not to

defeat Pompeius but to secure the food supply of the capital. For this

purpose he himself set out for Spain, where there was a strong Pompeian

army, leaving Marcus Antonius in charge in Italy and sending Curio to

Sicily. The Spanish campaign was severe, but after the Battle of Ilerda

the Pompeian armies were shattered. A considerable force surrendered.

Caesar pardoned the men and many of them joined his legions. When he

returned home, capturing Massilia on the way, he heard that Curio had

done excellently in Sicily: Cato had been defeated and fled to Pompeius.

The West was safe. From Spain, Sicily, and Sardinia corn flowed into

Rome. Caesar could sail for Dyrrachium to meet Pompeius. Pompeius

rejected all his proposals for peace. He was in a strong position: his

army far outnumbered Caesar's, and his companions were blindly certain

of victory. They indeed spent their time quarrelling among themselves as

to who should hold the great offices in Rome when they got back there:

who should be Pontifex Maximus for instance, when Caesar had been

killed. They were so sure of victory that when Caesar was compelled to

shift his camp, since his men were dying of starvation, they insisted on

following him and giving battle, though Pompeius saw that this was

playing Caesar's game: whereas to delay would have worn him down. At the

battle of Pharsalia (48) Caesar's much smaller army won a complete

victory, thanks to his superior generalship. The princes of the East

sent in their submission to the conqueror. The senators and men of rank

who survived Pharsalia hastened to make their peace with Caesar, all

except Cato, who had not shaved or cut his hair since Caesar crossed the

Rubicon, and now sailed to Africa to resist to the last.

Pompeius fled to Egypt. Thither Caesar followed him only to learn the

news of his death. When the bloody head of his chief enemy and sometime

friend was handed to him Caesar turned away, tears in his eyes.

Years before Caesar had planned to bring Egypt under the Roman rule: but

this plan had been defeated. Now he found everything in confusion there.

The old king, dying two years earlier, had left his kingdom to his

children, Cleopatra, then sixteen, and a baby boy. By Cleopatra, who

even as a young girl had those extraordinary powers of mind and charm

that have made her famous through the ages, Caesar was fascinated. Her

wit and gaiety, her beauty and changefulness, held him entranced: and

week after week he stayed on in Alexandria, while a dangerous

insurrection was being planned by the ex-vizier of the old king.

Suddenly it broke out. Caesar had but a handful of troops: to save his

fleet from being used against him he had to set fire to it with his own

hands. From the dock the flames spread to the palace and destroyed the

great Alexandrine library, the most wonderful in the world. Caesar

himself only just escaped: he had to swim across the harbour, holding

his papers in one hand.

[Illustration: CLEOPATRA from a coin]

The danger was serious but brief. Reinforcements arrived from Cilicia:

the Egyptian rebels were defeated: the ex-vizier put to death: Cleopatra

and her brother made rulers over Egypt under the protection of Rome.

Caesar in the spring crossed to Asia Minor, where he came, saw, and

conquered, as he himself said. In September he was in Athens: in October

in Rome: in December in Africa. There, at the battle of Thapsus, he

crushed out the last spark of opposition. Cato, who had fled to Utica,

killed himself, much to Caesar's distress. He admired the sturdy

independence of the old man and would have spared him. His daughter

Portia was married to Marcus Junius Brutus, a Pompeian whom Caesar had

pardoned and loved as a son.

The secret of Caesar's clemency, which astonished his contemporaries,

lay partly in his own nature, partly in his clear purpose to

re-establish life in Rome on a firm and lasting foundation. His mind had

no bitterness. Bitterness arises out of some inner uncertainty; Caesar

had a rare certainty as to what he wanted to do and as to his being able

to do it. He was not afraid of other people or of their judgements. He

had no need to compare himself uneasily with them. He could stand on

what he did, irrespective of what they thought about it. He had come to

build, not to destroy. He had seen the failure of Marius and of Sulla.

Sulla had tried to restart Rome on a false basis--the rule of one party

in the State, standing on the bleeding bodies and broken fortunes of the

other. He had failed. His system had crumbled, and in its ruin it had

brought the whole State to the ground. Moreover, Sulla's system had left

no room for growth. Rome's task in the world had grown enormously and

the old machine was quite incapable of fulfilling it. Caesar wanted to

create a new machine that could govern not a city but a world.

[Illustration: A ROMAN COIN

celebrating the murder of Caesar]

Caesar worked with the energy and power of a giant at his colossal task.

Every part of the State was in disorder--the army, the navy, the

treasury, the laws, trade, the whole business of government. He had to

reconstruct the whole, and in the space of little more than a year he

did much towards this. And besides these great tasks there were lesser

ones--the reform of the calendar, of the system of weights and measures,

of the language. Reforms are never popular. The change from bad to good

is slow and gradual. Caesar's followers were not made as rich as they

had hoped. His measures were directed to filling, not private pockets,

but the coffers of the State.

The people loved him. Their lot was vastly improved. But a growing body

began to say that he was behaving as a tyrant and that things were no

better than they had been under the old government. Some of these people

were sincere republicans who were afraid that Caesar was trying to make

himself king. Among them was Marcus Junius Brutus.

Brutus had married Cato's daughter and shared many of Cato's ideas.

Round him there gathered a knot of men, among whom the ablest was Caius

Cassius, who determined to free the city of the tyrant. To the minds of

Brutus and Cassius it seemed that Caesar was destroying the seeds of

greatness in all other men, to make himself supreme. Shakespeare makes

Cassius argue thus:

_The Penalty of Greatness_

_Cassius._ Why, man, he doth bestride the narrow world

Like a Colossus; and we petty men

Walk under his huge legs, and peep about

To find ourselves dishonourable graves.

Men at some time are masters of their fates:

The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,

But in ourselves, that we are underlings.

Brutus and Caesar: what should be in that 'Caesar'?

Why should that name be sounded more than yours?

Write them together, yours is as fair a name;

Sound them, it doth become the mouth as well;

Weigh them, it is as heavy; conjure with 'em,

'Brutus' will start a spirit as soon as 'Caesar'.

Now, in the names of all the gods at once,

Upon what meat doth this our Caesar feed,

That he is grown so great? Age, thou art sham'd!

Rome, thou hast lost the breed of noble bloods!

When went there by an age, since the great flood,

But it was fam'd with more than with one man?

When could they say, till now, that talk'd of Rome,

That her wide walls encompassed but one man?

Now is it Rome indeed, and room enough,

When there is in it but one only man.

O! you and I have heard our fathers say,

There was a Brutus once that would have brook'd

The eternal devil to keep his state in Rome

As easily as a king.

Shakespeare, _Julius Caesar_, I. ii.

Caesar was warned of the conspiracy but took little heed. He had always

taken his life in his hand. He knew that he walked in constant danger.

When a soothsayer warned him to beware the Ides of March he only

laughed; and when the Ides (March 15) came and his wife implored him to

stay indoors, he paid no attention but set out for a meeting of the

Senate as usual to transact his daily business, hearing petitions and

so on.

It was the day chosen by the conspirators. One of them detained Marcus

Antonius, who generally watched over his chief's safety: the others

gathered round Caesar. At a sudden signal, they fell upon him with their

daggers. Caesar was unarmed. At the foot of the statue of Pompeius,

which he had himself caused to be set up in a place of honour, he fell.

Pierced by six and thirty wounds he died. Marcus Brutus raised his

dagger, dyed with Caesar's blood, and holding it aloft declared that he

had freed Rome from a tyrant.

So Caesar fell (44). Years of bitter civil war followed. Then at last

Caesar's nephew and adopted son, Caius Julius Caesar Octavianus, did

that which Brutus had slain Caesar to prevent--changed the Roman

Republic into the Roman Empire. All the Emperors bore the name of

Caesar. Throughout the vast world over which the Roman eagles flew,

Julius Caesar was worshipped almost as a god.

[Illustration: A CINERARY URN]

[Illustration: A ROMAN WATER-CARRIER

with his water-skin on his back]

Ancient Rome: The Lives of Great Men · 第 39 / 40 题