Scipio Aemilianus

The young man left to carry on the great name of Scipio was the son of

Aemilius Paulus and nephew by marriage of Africanus, whose son adopted

him into the Cornelian family.

Scipio Aemilianus, to give him the name by which he was always known

after this adoption, saw, even more clearly than Africanus had done,

both that Rome was changing and what was good and what was bad in the

change. He shared in both good and bad. No one saw more clearly than he

the baseness of the destruction of Carthage and the cruelty of the sack

of Numantia; yet it was he who, as general, had to carry them out. He

saw the dangers of the growing contrast between the increasing wealth of

the few rich, as treasures poured from all parts of the world into their

coffers, and the wretchedness of the poor in Rome; he saw the cruelty,

indifference to human life, and love of pleasure that filled men's minds

after a series of successful wars; he saw the old simplicity of life and

high devotion to country disappearing and a new selfishness and personal

ambition growing up.

Scipio was a man of action; an excellent soldier and general. Even old

Cato, who hated the Scipios, had to admire Aemilianus. Speaking of him

he quoted a famous line of Homer: 'He is a real man: the rest are

shadows.' In a very profound sense this was true. The mind of Scipio

Aemilianus saw below the surface of things to the reality. He could act,

but like all really first-rate men of action--Napoleon, Hannibal,

Caesar--he was a thinker. Round his table there gathered the most

interesting men in Rome. They talked of all the questions that have

puzzled and perplexed men's minds since men began to think at all.

Closest of his friends was Polybius, the great Greek historian who wrote

the history of the wars with Carthage. He lived in his house and

accompanied him in his wars in Spain and Africa. Polybius stood by

Scipio's side as he watched Carthage burning to the ground (146). Orders

had come from Rome that the city was to be utterly destroyed;

a ploughshare was to be drawn across the site and a solemn curse laid on

any one who should ever rebuild there. 'It is a wonderful sight,' said

Aemilianus as they watched walls toppling and buildings collapsing in

the flames which rose up, a huge cloud of ruddy smoke darkening and

thickening the noonday sky of Africa, 'but I shudder to think that some

one may some day give the same order--for Rome.'

The following sketch of his character by Polybius shows some of his

distinguishing traits:

_Scipio Aemilianus as a Sportsman_

After the war was decided, Paulus, in the belief that hunting was

the best training and recreation that a young man could have, put

the king's huntsmen at the orders of Scipio, and gave him full

authority over everything connected with the chase. Scipio readily

accepted the charge and, regarding it almost as a royal office,

continued to occupy himself with it as long as the army remained

in Macedonia after the battle. His youth and natural disposition

qualified him for this pursuit, like a high-bred hound, and his

devotion to hunting became permanent, being continued when he came

to Rome and found Polybius as enthusiastic as himself.

Consequently, all the time that other young men spent in the

law-courts and with morning calls, waiting about in the Forum and

trying thus to make a favourable impression on the people, was

passed by Scipio in hunting; and as he was constantly performing

brilliant and notable exploits, he distinguished himself more than

all the rest. For they could not win credit except by injuring

others; such are the conditions of legal action; but Scipio,

without doing any harm to any one, gained a popular reputation for

courage, matching words with deeds. Therefore he soon excelled his

contemporaries more than any Roman of whom we have record, though

he followed a path to fame which, in view of Roman character and

prejudice, was the very opposite of that chosen by his rivals.

Polybius, xxxvi. 15. 5-12.

From Carthage came another friend of Scipio's--the poet Terence. Born in

that city about the time of Hannibal's death, the lad had come to Rome

as a slave. His rare parts attracted the notice of his owner, who

finally set him free. Terence was introduced to Scipio by another friend

of his. This was Caecilius, the playwriter. His plays are unfortunately

all lost, so that we have no means of judging what they were like. One

day when Caecilius was at supper he was told that the managers of the

games had sent a young man to read him a play which he had submitted to

them, and of which they thought well. Caecilius called him in and bade

him sit down on a stool on the other side of the table from that at

which he and his friends were reclining on sofas, and begin to read to

him. The young man had only read a few lines when the elder poet stopped

him. The work was so good, he said, that he ought to sit at the author's

feet, not he at his; he called Terence up to the table. Afterwards

Caecilius took the young man to see Scipio Aemilianus; and he soon

became one of the intimate circle which Scipio had gathered round him.

Scipio and Caecilius helped him with advice, and they all worked

together at Scipio's favourite task of improving and purifying the Latin

language. A line in one of Terence's plays expresses the point of view

which Scipio Aemilianus and his friends tried to take. 'I am human:

nothing human is alien to me.' These plays are among the earliest works

of pure literature in Latin, and they show in every line the influence

of Greece. The Greek spirit was one of questioning; and its influence on

Roman thought was profound.

[Illustration: TRAGIC AND COMIC MASKS]

Scipio Aemilianus questioned but looked on. He saw much in the present

state of Rome to disturb and displease him; he dreaded what might come

in the future, as the few grew richer and the many poorer; but he did

not take any action. His was the mind of the philosopher; like his

friends Polybius and Terence he wanted to understand. He did not believe

that things could be changed. What was to happen would happen; to

perturb and perplex oneself was useless and might be dangerous. The

people who got excited and believed that great improvements could be

brought about easily seemed to him stupid and dangerous. It was easy to

breed disorder; to spoil the things that had made Rome great; very hard

to make alterations. The men who really served the Republic were not the

politicians clamouring in the market-place, orating in the Assembly, or

the idle dirty mobs who listened to them and were ready to shout for

this to-day and the other thing to-morrow. Them Scipio scorned. The real

workers and builders he thought were the silent soldiers fighting and

working in all the dreariness and discomfort of camps in foreign

countries. In Scipio there was a good deal of the temper of that Lucius

Junius Brutus who in the earliest days of the Republic had condemned his

own sons to death for treason to the State. He judged his own friends

and relations more, not less, severely than other people. Thus when

Tiberius Gracchus, the kinsman and brother-in-law of Scipio (his own

wife was Sempronia, the sister of Gracchus) brought in his Land Bill and

came, over it, into conflict with the Senate, Scipio was against him.

When disorders and rioting in the streets of Rome grew out of the

struggle over the Land Bill and Tiberius was murdered, Scipio made a

speech in the Senate in which he said that Tiberius had deserved his

death. He quoted a line of Homer: 'So perish all who do the like again.'

When the people shouted him down in their anger he turned on them with

cold contempt--fear of any kind was not in Scipio--and said, 'Be silent,

ye to whom Italy is only a step-mother.' Speeches like that did not make

him popular. Scipio was so much respected that men always listened when

he spoke. There was something lofty and splendid about him and no

soldier of his day could compare with him. But he stood aloof. Outside

his own circle of close friends he was little known and less understood.

His death was sudden and mysterious. One day after speaking in the

Senate he returned home apparently well and in his ordinary calm frame

of mind. Nothing had occurred to disturb him. He did not seem to be

disturbed about anything. Next morning he was found dead in his bed.

What had happened was never known. It was whispered about that he had

been murdered.

V

Ancient Rome: The Lives of Great Men · 第 22 / 40 题